Dystopia In Film | Metropolis Vs Utopian Fine art Deco

The 1920s in Germany were a change time, World Battle I had recently finished, and it was exactly the war that exhibited the destructive probable of modern tools. Invented and first utilized by the Germans in 1915, machine guns and poison gas exhibited the deep break up between technology and mankind, it was the first modern battle in which machines decided the results. In this time around ever sold, it was the embracement of technology in other areas of the world, the Art Deco movements was the Utopian new approach to life. After the battle in Germany, North american modernity became a robust agent in the monetary and cultural modernisation. America displayed the New World, since Germany got too little national identity, the idea that mass culture might be a key American weapon, the one that would enslave the entire world by distracting it made sense relating to Isenberg (2009, p. 182-183). Incorporating these two facts, the German loss of dignity during the first World Battle, and modernity rising, it created a certain comfort for the German culture to accept the modern movements, since it represented the ideal of residing in the present which made it easier to forget about the harsh past. Initially America was regarded as a good notion, but by the mid-1920's Germany faced a stability in politics and current economic climate, which questioned American way of living, its technological progress began to be seen as inhuman. Germany was starting to feel threatened by America, using its concentrate on materialism and mechanisation of life, seeing it in an effort to kill the real human side of humankind.

In 1927, the German film director Fritz Lang, created a movie analysing that, our future with machines and its own possible outcome. It had been a film created to show the comfort Germany first took in recognizing modernity however in a means where humanity would lose it all to it. The Art work Deco movement at that time, stood for the modern world and the evolution of individuals through the new inventions of machines. Metropolis, still thought in this Utopian life but created its, showing how individuals and machines could work so long as one important factor is not overlooked, that your modern world seemed to have already done.

In evaluation to the Fine art Deco modern views, Metropolis created its view, which can be seen as its own naЇve Utopian world, but also demonstrated the Dystopia that could occur out of this fast modern movement.

In order to observe how the two go together, one must check out important elements which took place at the moment, the benefits of new technologies which affected virtually all the aspects of life. From structures to fashion, people and their ways were changing, since freedom was now praised upon, everything that used to be taboo or traditional was now in the wild. Taking into consideration that the major elements, which will make up Skill Deco, are present in the film; this is to show how these were used to portray the negative part of this modern vision. Most of us have confidence in a Utopian way of life, in perfection, but the consequences are the majority of the time forgotten, and the film Metropolis was that perspective, showing the consequences of the new systems people were praising and exactly how it would forever change people, life and the globe. Without further ado, let's observe how the film has proven itself to be a masterpiece but most of all how a purely imaginative eye-sight may have foretold our future, from started as a Utopian idea from what may have improved the fundamentals of humankind.

The late teens and early on twenties in Germany was a period of rampant inflation, decadence, personal liberty, violence and insecurity. It had been accompanied by the unfortunate rise of the Nazis through the late twenties and early thirties, which found a severe clampdown on independence of appearance is all strolls of life, especially the arts and politics relating to Organ (2009). The central theme of Metropolis is that of a parting between working school and higher-ups and the necessity for a common understanding of each is offered both abstractly and directly through the image as opposed to the word. This theme of personnel revolting against domination by exploitative management, their soulless machines, and new technologies, also struck a chord with reviewers and everyone, though many critics in America and Britain objected strongly to the anti-Fordism / anti production-line tale. Consequently, Metropolis, using its many themes and sub-texts, including the almost obligatory 'son meets girl, young man looses girl, young man finds young lady' - was a controversial film from day one It garnered both negative and positive comment wherever it was shown, and generated much critical discourse in the press after release corresponding to Organ (2009).

In order to comprehend the value of the visual work achieved in the film, on must check out different scenes from the movie where this is proven, including the starting shot of series upon line, file upon file, of personnel marching down the hallway into the elevator that takes them into the depths of the city's machines and interior workings. Each employee wears the same even, shuffles their feet in the same manner as if they were a military product, and each slouch and keep their minds down together corresponding to Simon M (2010). Such images as staff being given to a giant monster, masses upon masses of slave labor building the biblical Tower of Babel, and Loss of life itself swinging its scythe signify the possible land of the turbulent society in a stark and shocking way extremely hard through regular images or even the written expression. They provide this story something of an mythic and fantastic property, portraying its subject matter through symbolism rather than realism, exaggeration alternatively than realism corresponding to Simon M (2010). The pleasure garden where Freder (the main character) indulges in the most hedonistic of pleasures, providing a stark distinction with the metallic, grimy world of the employees. This fluid and happy-go-lucky world is immediately interrupted by the access of Maria and the employee children. Here is the direct issue and distinction between staff and elites, high and low, heaven and hell. Down the road in the film Freder witnesses one of the machines at work, each employee mechanically pushing keys and pulling levers in standard, fixed motions. It is as if these employees are themselves machines, as Lang uses the image of standard, unnatural action to represent a lack of humanity, hopefully uplifting repulsion in the audience according to Simon M (2010). Such exaggeration is probably necessary regarding a silent film to make up for the lack of proper dialogue, but it addittionally may enhance the raw symbolism of everything, going to every last length showing the divide between employee and elite. This exaggeration basically defines "Metropolis" in most cases. Combined with the above mentioned portrayals of Freder and Maria, you have the near-comically evil Rotwang, who encouraged almost every mad scientist portrayed in popular culture since then regarding to Simon M (2010). Another important factor is the characteristics of the appearance and behaviour of Rotwang which does not fit the stereotype of today's scientist, and there are indications that he may be in category with the devil. The personality of the scientist Rotwang belongs to one of the very most interesting antagonists of the display screen. The possibility of the ambivalent interpretation of his character, he's a scientist, but also something of a sorcerer allied with satanic pushes, which gives him greater complexity corresponding to Urgoskov (2009).

In 1924, Fritz Lang frequented NEW YORK, where the big-city structures struck him, and the luminous cityscape influenced the aesthetic design and electrifying energy for the film. Formerly an architect, Lang was a guy of unusually hypersensitive aesthetic perceptions. His films of those years show an expressionistic sense for the plastic material and the light, which emphasized architectonic lines and conveyed a feeling of geometric building that not only reaches the units and the depicted milieu but even influenced the placement of the actors in individual shots. Commensurate with the conventions of expressionism, the inhabitants of the subterranean city haven't any personality, and the audience represents a compact mass from which personality assignments only as a stark exception in support of in an absolute rhythm matching to Urgoskov (2009).

The introductory sequences present this cultural organization in an exceedingly attractive light. In an impressive, gigantic city with gleaming skyscrapers, suspension bridges, and bustling avenue, people live in comfort and lots, with every possibility for intellectual and physical development. However, Metropolis is not really a city of flexibility and equality. Below floor, working for the chosen elite, are people of nameless employees who have forget about value within the social order than a cog in a machine or an instrument or production. It really is because of this that the personnel revolt and almost ruin the town; only then will there be a reconciliation and an equalization of protection under the law for the two strata, the elite and the workers. Lang honestly assumed in this idea of reconciliation, and his frame of mind to a certain degree mirrored the German certainty, in which there were growing indications of stabilization and efforts to resolve communal problems. The unequal lines, contrasts of light and dark, half-shadows and silhouettes, which provide to suggest inexplicable and menacing actions, events, and emotions. Lang applied these techniques effectively and successfully to 1 of the types of the illusion genre, what he intended to be utopian work, or in modern words inspired the genre of Research Fiction corresponding to Urgoskov (2009).

What can be factored is the value of structures in the Art Deco movement, where the advanced of technology was released, which made the construction of skyscrapers possible. This new way of building up somewhat than out, provided the illusion that people could reach the sky, offering a high expectation for our future. Within the film Metropolis, the main building is the Babel tower, where the story is told that it was made to reach the celebrities and at the top it would be written "Great is the globe and its Inventor! And great is Man!" however in the sequence of the film where this is discussed, it shows how in order for a building or any composition to be built, one must first think of the theory, which is not necessarily possible. Once the idea is put on paper or into small scale, it needs labour to be produced which is when the hands come in, and it is shown that for the Babel tower to be built, it could take a great deal of man vitality and therefore some blood would need to be shed in order for the man who had considered this building, could view it built. This is Metropolis's view on the built of skyscrapers, since they were utilizing new techniques, which were not already perfected, and what it would try build such things, the price tag on human lives? That it is great for such ideas to ever be thought up, but is it necessary? At the time yes, since it confirmed the greatness of man and what he could achieve.

When a director creates a film, its main purpose it to speak a message through visuals and dialogue, that can be expressed in various ways, such as conversation, cosmetic expressions and written words. Its main concentrate is to make the audience feel just what the director has at heart, therefore when Fritz Lang created this film, these elements could not be neglected or not be taken seriously, if not the film would have not gotten so much attention or gained very much success. In a way if unprofessional work had been done, we'd not even talk about this movie today, but the push for another genre in film and the desire to create a realistic set in place and using the right light, made this film not just a work or artwork but a movie that will continue steadily to impact people in generations to come.


How does indeed one judge another's financial position? by the furniture and interior of their home, it isn't always true, however when exposed to someone else's lifestyle and home, one can easily put a sociable status on the other. In Metropolis, the interiors of both the higher and lower worlds are very distinct. The top shows a higher usage of Art work Deco elements and the lower is very cold and style-less. The Skill Deco elements confirmed the top quality, therefore representing individuals who could manage such extravaganzas. The Utopian concept is very much indeed present, from using such interiors, that have been extremely popular with the American style of the time, exhibiting how the "exploiters" can manage to hide the bad and only show the nice, or in other words the productivity. As observed in any office of Joh Fredersen and in Freder's bedroom, all the best technology was designed for their usage. Through the bed shape to the lighting fixtures, as well as the table, all the geometric elements can be seen. This is done to show how the upper class could actually live, set alongside the lower category, which lived under ground, with very little to count too, since their liveable space was limited to brick surfaces and frequent work, were the luxurious Fine art Deco furniture would serve no purpose to them, since they didn't have enough time to appreciate it.

All these elements were to show, the Utopian life lived by people who ran the city, compared to the Dystopia it created by requesting such a submission from other human beings, it analyses the two points of culture and how people live. Predicated on the concept of capitalism and materialism, where it can only just be come to by the officials rather than the employees, which tends to be a standard theme in virtually any point ever sold. The primary point of using such specific style or interiors and exteriors, was to show the freedom and lack of appreciation from top of the class, since they got everything, they forgot to think about what it had taken to give them this luxury. It is a significant factor in the film, since the entire point is to show, how and just why workers would revolt against their superiors, and making such a large contrast between your standard of living between your two made the impact of the worker's revolt more powerful, since it proved what they were deprived from and how it damaged them. Running a city and taking all the profits can only make unfairness, therefore building a created desire of unneeded what to people who do not pocess them. If the inside design had not been considered because of this movie the different views of both classes could have not been so powerful, and considering that the film depended a whole lot on visual and not words, might be found needed to be accentuated to create its full point, to be clear to the viewers, what people were being targeted and illustrated.

For her all 7 lethal sins

Many biblical referrals can be seen in this film, one of the most crucial component in Metropolis is the robot version of Maria, which carries on her all 7 deadly sins. This image of the woman can be interpreted on many levels, you can be to show how women were acting in the 1920's since it was a time where more open behaviours were accepted, their dresses got shorter, they began to smoke and drink in public areas and freely exposed their sexuality, a means for them to celebrate the modern woman. The introduction of emancipated and sexually liberated women, as well as organised feminist activities in the mid-1920's. The robot Maria, stylised as the "New Woman, " rips the interpersonal textile asunder, inciting the personnel to rebel and seducing them into self-destructive acts. Her abuse, once she actually is uncovered as a realtor provocateur, is to be used up at the stake regarding to Isenberg (2009, p. 181). The most important field is when the robotic doppelgnger of Maria, with her twitchy eye, sexually dances in front of the upper course men, this behavior was designed to distract and change them, done in an exaggerated way, when all the men's sight have emerged, their mouths are open up, they are more violent to the stage where they all set you back the podium on which she dances, she tips them to be a temptress who's out to deceive those who land for the illusion of an imitation. This nexus of technology, visible pleasure, and fantasy also lay down at the key of modern American mass culture, which, regarding to some ethnic critics, experienced seduced Germany into renouncing its traditional canon of high culture according to Isenberg (2009, p. 181). This robotic Maria was designed as metaphors, one being the risk the modern woman would have on men and community with her new erotic manipulating techniques, second she represents America and how it first seduced Germany into mass culture, through the same kind of pleasurable ways. The imaginative beauty which Lang made the automatic robot, with its glittering female body, stylised chest and inhuman cover up instead of a face flawlessly symbolizes this theory, it was made deliberately to be erotic, since it needed to represent the energy of woman's new erotic behaviour and how it might impact communities. She is treated as being a witch when she actually is discovered to be an imposter, which again shows how this new take action is unnatural and dangerous to the advancement of people if practiced a female is really as good as dead and should be burnt alive on her behalf sins of manipulation. The wonder of girl was openly accepted, therefore women seemed to take advantage of this new attention they were getting and getting away with it, displaying how soon women would have the same rights as men, given that they could manipulate them, exhibiting an unbalance to how people use to live and statuses between men and women were already established.

Visual Communication - Typography and movie poster

Art Deco typefaces are composed of geometric forms, an influence from the geometrical formal terms of the Constructivists, but the love for beauty at the time gave it a decorative touch. With this new design of type design, readability sometimes wasn't too clear, because the letters seemed flat and ornamental, where they received additional spacial and visual embellishments. One characteristic change was type heading from thin to large, sometimes the low situations were completely overlooked to embrace the slim, long stroked capital words, but antique and fractured scripts remain the standard despite the era's prevailing preferences. At times they were the mouthpiece of twenties modernism, with its technology, communication, travel and its own dynamism; at other times, of mundane elegance and luxury transposed into a fantastical world of unadulterated glamour that will take precedence over typography matching to Stawinski (2009, p. 131). This became a visual language of spectacular civilizations, which embodied designs of modern technology and ways of life. One specific font of the Fine art Deco motion, is Broadway; created by Morris Fuller Benton in 1925: (show type)

Comparing it to the font used for the Metropolis name, one can see where the Art Deco elements of type are obvious but how they have been altered to set-up the feel for the movie. This clear alteration, created a sort of horror feel, but how? The descenders of the M, T, R, P and S have elongated, the dishes of the O have been equally distributed, the I, L and E have been distorted, an also distorted dot has been added to the I, but all the most crucial factor is that each letter finishes with a spot as can be seen in all the descenders and the arm of the T. These strong perspectives, visible in every the characters, even on the O since it not perfectly round but largely choppy lines created into a group, have with all this name its unique identity, where it is only composed of sides, no soft lines are present, respecting the geometric terminology of the time but heading against elegance.

Taking into consideration that Fritz Lang's 1927 film Metropolis is a silent film, the written term found in intertitles played a sizable role in history comprehension. Intertitles are important in silent films, given that they need to provide the audience information through text, that ought to be both attractive and readable, to plainly share to the audience what's being visually shown. Metropolis would be especially hard to understand with no on-screen narration, because the actor's faces and activities can express only a great deal. The font chosen for the Metropolis intertitles is very artistically stylized, which should go resistant to the futuristic city storyline, in which a more straight-lined font may have been more appropriate. Even though Metropolis inspired the Science Fiction film style, it was not designed to be one, but instead a skill film, therefore it makes sense to use artistic intertitles, as a way to make the movie balanced in the style it was creating. Through the entire film's city the same stylised font it used as well as statistics, which signify the style used throughout Metropolis, which ultimately shows that typography enjoyed a large part in the film's feeling, is was careful positioned and used to be sure all the information needed was clear and stylised appropriately.

All these attributes put together have created an abstract version of typical Fine art Deco font, but on purpose, to be able to capture someone's attention, one must energize that sense, the best way to promote the art form of film was through making a poster for this, what better way to give it an individuality and a feel. When a poster is designed, it comprises information because of its viewers, which is also targeted, to inform them of what's happening, this information is go through the consumption of words, which is where typography will come in. This powerful tool of type design, is the cherry on top of a poster design, since additionally it is made up if imagery to bring about another kind of feel, but type when used appropriately can automatically create the ambience to spell it out the art form all together. Regarding Metropolis, this alteration of type was used simply for that goal, to induce the imagination of its viewers, to show different things then the typical Skill Deco posters created at the time of its production. Since the film's theme was also an alteration of the life span views of the time, if a typical Artwork Deco font had been used, it would havent shown the effect the film all together was trying to attain.

So heading back to 1927, as someone is walking in the streets and recognizes the Metropolis poster advertising the film over a wall, you can envision the attention it must have gotten, since everything else around was produced to support positivity and evolution, here comes something scary and negative, therefore triggering the attention of people to see why it was so different. In order for a poster or any other sort of advertising elements to reach your goals, they need to properly stand for what it is symbolising, which the original font used for the subject of Metropolis does, it was the introduction to the movie before someone went to the theatre to see.

Going to the next visual component, posters are a very powerful advertising tool, given that they can be located literally anywhere, therefore making them reachable to any sight and also to any audience. Typography as said before is one of the most important elements of a poster, since it creates the audience aware of what the poster is approximately, since it will surely cary a title. The other factor is imagery, which is usually the backdrop, and can be used to go along with the title, to make a unified theme and helps the audience reach a bottom line of their own to what the poster may signify. Posters are a skill, since they need to work in a way where they need to be noticed initially, and briefly inform the viewers with all the current important info in a short while. For such a film as Metropolis, which is actually a two hour viewing of moving images, the poster needed to illustrate all that into one image, fundamentally giving away the complete movie within a view.

Typical Artwork Deco posters were colourful, attractive, energetic, revealed a lot of movement, basically they illustrated and embraced the new technology being introduced. They were drawn and stamping with the latest techniques invented, showing people living in this new modernity, such as travel, fashion, drinking and smoking. What used to be taboo, was now in the wild and folks were showing off this new lifestyle full of luxury and progression, which had never been seen before. This perfect lifestyle, mainly only affordable by the bigger school, was praised upon, everyone needed to be part of this new movement, exposing their inner dreams, or making all hell break lose. This new liberty of expression, and new options needed to be reflected, mainly through abstract views, such as people were usually attracted through geometric forms, almost not real, such as this movements was too good to be true, in a way it showed the fear of individuals, since it used fantasy images showing that which was really taking place, things were moving too fast and the population did not genuinely have time to digest all this, therefore exhibiting people though geometric elements, was a easier way to accept it.

The imagery of the Metropolis poster allocated at the time, was duotone, illustrating only complexes in the backdrop and the robot in the foreground, the name of the film at the top and all the information at the bottom. The duotone, was against all the colourful posters at that time, because the movie was displaying the dark part of the Utopian philosophy of Artwork Deco, the robot in the centre represented the most crucial area of the film, but also to show people how they would evolve, however the answer to how lied in enjoying the movie. The information at the bottom, gave the standard film info; who aimed it, the key stars, music composer, creation house and copy writer. The drawing of the robot used a whole lot of curved lines, and revealed an emotionless face, making it obvious that humans were being interpreted as robots.


Let's focus on the quote "The mediator between mind and hands must be the heart" taken from the film Metropolis, from this analysis it could be said that Art Deco is the head and the hands and Metropolis is the heart. The Utopian notion of Art Deco was a way to celebrate the " new world " and its technologies whereas Metropolis was the Dystopian view covered behind this school of thought. It can be seen through all the elements explained, as a alert or possible to what the earth may progress to be, that minus the heart a life cannot function, but without the head and the hands a world cannot evolve. Therefore they both go hand in hand, but never one without the other, that humans may remember their real principles. This is actually the note that the film portrayed, that there is beauty in evolving, but we should remember who we really are and our true power, that if we count too much on machines (technology) then what is left folks? Artwork Deco, was a period when everything was changing, the pleasure of a new life, the embracing of a freedom directed at people by machines doing jobs for them. Both of these art forms, have proven themselves through history and have shaped the world we now live in, but without fine art, how could anyone in the foreseeable future know how a community progressed or resided, this is excatly why it is important to analyse everything of one component and exactly how it fits in to the time period it was produced, to raised understand its subject matter and value.

The naЇve way individuals were living through the 1920's, was in a way beautiful and clean, they had no worries except live and explore their new identities, Metropolis proved the difference between your top quality or quite simply the minds versus the lower category, the hands, and exactly how they would live in two different worlds, one above and one below. This shows, that once a concept is conceived, the inventor can take all the credit, whereas the hands who built it, are never recognised for the hard work and dangers it took to create it. People in the bigger class would be the only one to appreciate the hand's work, since they will be the only ones would could manage it, they might be the only ones who might well have the luxury to stay in such buildings reaching the stars and afford such extravaganzas in their homes. But where do the workers easily fit in, in all with this? This is what Metropolis, was demonstrating, that for such a Utopia to exist fairness should be put between the mind who conceive ideas and the hands who built them, and yes to carry out that, really the only ability is our hearts. When speaking about art, the idea behind it should always be discussed, since it clarifies why it was made and what it was designed to signify, without one, you can't have the other, which is also another strong point about the estimate, since people tend to concentrate on the main facts but forgetting how it became important.

Metropolis also created its own Utopia, where as long as the heart is present and the human side in humankind is never lost, we can are in an harmonious world. The palm shake in the end, also could represent the labour providing in again to capital. Metropolis inaugurated a series of utopias on film that attempted to resolve the down sides of the modern day state of world by projecting them into a tale with a futuristic setting corresponding to Urgoskov (2009).

Also We Can Offer!

Other services that we offer

If you don’t see the necessary subject, paper type, or topic in our list of available services and examples, don’t worry! We have a number of other academic disciplines to suit the needs of anyone who visits this website looking for help.