Ethical standards require businesses and people to make use of moral principles

One difference between a typical decision and an ethical one lies in "the main point where the accepted rules no longer serve, and your choice maker is faced with the responsibility for weighing values and reaching a judgement in a situation which is not quite the same as any he or she faced before". (Ferrell, Fraedrich, 1994) Ethics is not only a glorified intellectual game, of no practical relevance. We become moral individuals by practice; proficient at being truthful by habitually telling the reality; becoming honest by trying always not to be dishonest. You can find nothing abstract about business ethics. It is simply another tool to help the practical business male or female deal with the endlessly recurring moral dilemmas of business life. There is a connection between our perception of the world and the way in which we make decisions in the world. If managers believe that they are simply and should be rational egoists, concerned only with maximising profit, they'll take the decisions accordingly. If, on the other hand, they know about moral theories and social policies that affect their own societies and the wider world, then they will be more likely to make rather different and much more superior judgements, (Vallance, 1995).

The notion of ethics running a business targets the moral or ethical actions of individuals. It is in this sense that lots of people, in discussing business ethics, immediately raise examples of immoral or unethical activity by individuals. Incorporated with this idea, however, is also the criticism of multinational corporations that use child labour or pay pitifully low wages to employees in less Developed Countries. Many people are strongly influenced by their religious beliefs and the ethical norms they have been taught as part of their religion, and apply these norms in their business activities. Aaron Feuerstein is a prime example of someone whose actions after fire destroyed almost all of his Malden Mills factory complex kept his workers on the payroll until he could rebuild. He has mentioned often and publicly that he just did what his Jewish faith told him was the right move to make (Richard T De George).

The study of Business Ethics has evolved through a long time since prior to the 1960s. Business ethics continues to change rapidly because so many organisations recognise the features of improved ethical conduct in business and there can be an increased understanding between business ethics and financial performance. Up until 1960 ethical issues related to business were often discussed theologically. Through churches, synagogues and mosques, individual moral issues related to business ethics were addressed. Religious leaders raised questions about fair wages, labour practises and the morality of capitalism. Courses began on offer in social ethics in some catholic colleges and universities. Through the 1970s business ethics started out to develop as a field of study. Theologians and religious thinkers laid down groundwork suggesting that certain religious principles could be employed to business activities. Because of this professors began to teach and write about corporate social responsibility. By the finish of 1970s a number of ethical issues had emerged and business ethics became the expression. Inside the 1980s business academics and practitioners acknowledged business ethics as a field of study. Business ethics organisations grew and expanded to add thousands of members. Many rules of business started out changing at a phenomenal rate because of less regulation. Corporations had more freedom to make decisions, and the federal government developed new mandatory federal sentencing guidelines to control firms which were involved in misconduct. Business ethics today is still an evolving field of study. Business ethical issues can be approached from the perspective of law, philosophy, theology or social sciences; or they can dealt with in a pragmatic spirit, seeking solution for specific managerial problems. (Ferrell, Fraedrich, Ferrell, 2002. )

Some ethical principles include: Fudicary Duty, Property Principle, Reliability Principle, Transparency Principle and Dignity Principle. Fudicary Duty involves each officer creating a legal fudicary duty to act in the best interests of the stakeholders and other employee within the firm such as, loyalty. Property Principle is dependant on the fact that every employee should respect property as well as the rights of the owners of the house for example, theft. Reliability Principle believes that it's the employee's responsibility to honour the commitments that they have made to the firm for example, breaching a contract. Transparency Principle is based on the belief that every employee should conduct business in a truthful and open manner and assumes they will not make decisions based on an individual agenda. Dignity Principle believes that every employee must respect the dignity of most individuals such as safety and privacy. Fairness Principle predicated on belief that stakeholders who've vested interest in the firm should be treated fairly for example they must be eligible for fair reciprocal. Citizenship Principle believes that every employee should become responsible citizen locally, for example they need to abide and respect the laws of the city. Responsiveness Principle predicated on belief that employees have the responsibility to respond to requests for information about procedures from various stakeholders. Being socially responsible will permit you to definitely get greater profits, be more attentive to consumer demands and attract investment. An example of a socially responsible company is The Body Shop (Harvey, 2010).

Social Responsibility is the obligation a company assumes to possess for society. To be socially responsible is to increase positive effects and minimise unwanted effects on society. The monetary responsibilities of your business are to produce goods and services that meet the needs and wants of society at a cost that can perpetuate the business while also gratify the needs of the investors. (Ferrell & Fraedrich, 1994) The legal responsibilities of businesses are the laws that they need to obey. (Ferrell & Fraedrich, 1994) The civil laws are the rights and duties of individuals and organisations. The criminal laws prohibit specific actions and impose fines and/or imprisonment as punishment for breaking regulations. (Harvey, 2010) At a minimum, companies are anticipated to be in charge of their workers obeying local, state and federal laws. Ethical duties will be the behaviours or activities that are anticipated of the business enterprise by society but aren't codified in law. (Ferrell & Fraedrich, 1994) These are the standards, norms, or expectations that reflect the concern of major stakeholders. (Harvey, 2010) Consider the responsibility issues for many riverboat casinos that serve their patrons as much free drinks as they need. The result is that many of the drunken patrons should drive after leaving their premises and then cause a major accident. For instance, one patron at the Players Casino in Louisiana, had twelve drinks in two hours, experienced his vehicle and then crashed into a van carrying five people, triggering three of these to lose their lives. But the casino operators fulfilled their responsibility to provide alcohol consumption to adults only, they sometimes neglect to address the ethical issues presented by the spirit of law. The ultimate obligation a business assumes towards society is philanthropic responsibilities. These are the behaviours and activities that society desire and business values dictate. Philanthropic responsibilities represent the company's desire to provide back to charity. For instance, Ben & Jerry's donate 7. 5% of pretax profits to charity. (Ferrell, Fraedrich, Ferrell, 2002. )

The notion of social responsibility became prominent during the 1960s in response to changing social values. Many businesses have tried to know what relationships, obligations and duties are appropriate between the business organisation and society. (Ferrell, Fraedrich, Ferrell, 2002. ) Therefore, Social Responsibility may very well be a social contract with society, whereas ethics relates to carefully thought-out rules of moral philosophy that guide individual decision-making. While business ethics relates to the result of moral rules and principles on individual decisions, social responsibility is concerned with the decisions the organisation makes and their influence on society, (Ferrell & Fraedrich, 1994).

Corporate Social Responsibility refers to any voluntary business activity that goes beyond legal compliance, improving economic performance and contributing to sustainable development of the surroundings and the city when a business operates. Corporate Social Responsibility is a conclusion for business and generally a company's CSR activity will fall under one of four priority headings: workplace, environment, community or marketplace. Corporate Social Responsibility gets more and more attention as the natural complement of social activities and business sustainability is gaining recognition. Contemporary developments, values and stakeholder expectations have shifted also to survive companies must develop new activities and processes that reflect the societal, demographic, economic and legislative changes. Better working relationships with stakeholders can derive from the higher management of expectations, (IBEC Policy, 2006).

Business ethics attempts to apply general moral principles to business activities in order to resolve, or at least clarify, the moral issues which typically arise in business. (Vallance, 1995) Moral philosophy refers to the principles or rules that folks use to decide what is right and wrong. For example, a production manager may be guided by a general philosophy of management that emphasises encouraging employees to know whenever you can about the merchandise they may be manufacturing. It comes into play when the manager must make decisions such as whether to notify employees in advance of upcoming layoffs. But the workers might like advance warning, its side effects may have an affect on production quality and quantity. There are numerous moral philosophies and each is complex. (Ferrell, Fraedrich, Ferrell, 2002) Some types include: Teleology, Deontology, The Relativist Perspective, Virtue Ethics and Justice. Teleology is an act considered morally right or acceptable if it produces some desired result i. e. , realisation of self-interest or utility. The two teleological philosophies are Egoism and Utilitarianism. Egoism is the right or acceptable behaviour in conditions of the results for the individual. (Harvey, 2010) In an ethical decision- making situation, an egoist will probably choose the choice that contributes most with their own self interest. Many believe that egoists are inherently unethical, that such people and organisations are short-term oriented and will take benefit of any opportunity or consumer. For example, some telemarketers demonstrate this negative egoistic tendency when they victimize elderly consumers who may be vulnerable because of loneliness or worries of losing financial independence. Many senior citizens fall victim to fraudulent telemarketers each year. In many cases they lose all their savings and in some instances their homes. Utilitarianism can be involved with the consequences in conditions of seeking the best good for the greatest amount of people. Utilitarian decision making uses systematic comparison of the costs and the benefits to all influenced parties. Using a cost benefit analysis, a utilitarian decision maker calculates the utility of the consequences of most possible alternatives and then selects the one that results in the best utility. For example, the Supreme Court has said that employers are accountable for the sexual misconduct of supervisors, even if the employers knew nothing about it. Thus, it has established a strict standard for harassment on the job. (Ferrell, Fraedrich, Ferrell, 2002) Deontology targets the rights of the average person and on the intentions associated with behaviour not on the results. It believes that there are some things we ought to not do whatever the utility. (Harvey, 2010) Unlike utilitarian's, deontologists argue that there are some things that people shouldn't do, even to increase utility. For example, deontologists would contemplate it wrong to kill or harm an innocent person, no matter how much utility might result from doing so, because such an action would infringe on that person's rights as an individual. (Ferrell, Fraedrich, Ferrell, 2002) The Relativist Perspective states that ethical behaviour is defined by connection with the average person and the group. (Harvey, 2010) Relativists use themselves or the people around them as their basis for defining ethical standards. The relativist observes the actions of members of an organization and attempts to determine the group consensus on a given behaviour. A positive consensus signifies that the action is considered right or ethical. Such judgements may well not remain the same forever i. e. , advertising in the accounting profession. Relativism acknowledges that we live in a society where people have a number of views and bases that to justify decisions as right or wrong. The relativist looks to the interacting group and tries to determine probable solutions predicated on the group consensus. When formulating business strategies and plans, a relativist would make an effort to anticipate the conflicts that will arise between the several philosophies held by members of the organisation, its suppliers, customers and the city most importantly. (Ferrell, Fraedrich, Ferrell, 2002) Virtue Ethics includes trust, self-control, empathy, fairness and truthfulness. (Harvey, 2010) Attributes as opposed to virtue would include lying, cheating, fraud and corruption. The issue of virtue ethics comes in its implementation within and between cultures. Those that practise virtue ethics exceed societal norms. For example, if an organisation tacitly approves of corruption, the employee who adheres to the virtues of trust and truthfulness would contemplate it wrong to sell unneeded repair parts regardless of the organisations approval to do so. (Ferrell, Fraedrich, Ferrell, 2002) Justice is fair treatment and due reward in accordance with ethical or legal standards. Justice deals more with the problem of what individuals feel they may be due predicated on their rights and performance at work. (Ferrell, Fraedrich, Ferrell, 2002) One kind of organisational justice is distributive justice. It really is predicated on the evaluation of the outcome or results of the business relationship. If you perceive that you are underpaid, you may scale back on your amount of work output. Another type is procedural justice. It is based on the processes and activities that produce the results or outcomes. A procedural justice climate is likely to positively influence workplace attitudes and behaviours related to work group cohesion. (Ferrell, Fraedrich, Ferrell, 2002) Interactional justice is a different type of justice. It really is based on the evaluation of the communication processes used in the business enterprise relationship. Supervisor visibility and work-group perceptions of cohesion are associated with procedural justice. Wainwright Bank and Trust Corporation in Boston has made a committed action to market justice to "all its stakeholders" with a "sense of inclusion and diversity that extends from the boardroom to the mail room". This example illustrates that procedural justice seeks to establish relationships by giving understanding and inclusion in the decision-making process. (Ferrell, Fraedrich, Ferrell, 2002) Organisational Justice is the study of fairness in organisations. Companies may promote organisational justice by paying their employees what they deserve, offering employees a voice, openly following fair procedures, training all personnel to be fair and explaining decisions thoroughly in a way demonstrating dignity and respect. (Harvey, 2010)

An ethical issue is a problem, situation, or opportunity requiring a person or organisation to choose among several actions that must definitely be evaluated as right and wrong, ethical or unethical. Ethical issues typically arise because of conflicts between individuals personal moral philosophies and values and the values and attitudes of the organisations where they work and the society in which they live. Ethical issues can be explored in terms of the major participants and functions of the business. A good guideline is an activity approved by most members of an organisation and customary in the industry is probably ethical. An issue, activity, or situation that can withstand open discussion and survive untarnished probably poses no ethical problem. (Ferrell & Fraedrich, 1994). A reason for unethical behaviour is individual variations in cognitive moral development. Situational determinants of unethical behaviour involves the organisation encouraging behaviour that violates ethical standards or staff emulate the unethical behaviour with their superiors. (Harvey, 2010)

Also We Can Offer!

Other services that we offer

If you don’t see the necessary subject, paper type, or topic in our list of available services and examples, don’t worry! We have a number of other academic disciplines to suit the needs of anyone who visits this website looking for help.

How to ...

We made your life easier with putting together a big number of articles and guidelines on how to plan and write different types of assignments (Essay, Research Paper, Dissertation etc)