The American Airlines and US Airways Merger

Mergers and acquisitions match the definitive changes for businesses. In the modern-day business environment, they may be increasingly being implemented to enhance competition through increased performances. Similar organizations combine hence their long-term survival in the competitive environment (Weston, 2014). Typically, mergers and acquisitions cause organizational financial development. The companies involved develop their market show and capacity thus increasing on investment portfolios to help risk reduction. They gentle the improvement of joining new markets, adding up to shareholders value and provide better economies of scale. At this perspective view, nearly all publicly traded companies have experienced a major acquisition at some point in the United States, so performed the American Airlines and US Airways in 9th December 2013. Both companies operate under the same radar of airspace business.

The American Airlines and US Airways merged to create American Airlines Group, Inc. as a publicly traded airline positioning company located in Fort Worth, Texas, United States. The mark company was North american Airlines. North american Airlines looked after 72% of the company while US Airways got the rest 28%. A lot of the shares were sent out to US Airways shareholders and American Airlines previous collectors. This merge upshot the most significant airline internationally with 336 locations in 56 countries worldwide, over 6, 700 daily flights, more than 100, 000 employees and an operating income of $40billion. As yet, North american Airlines Group, targets to adopt the delivery of over 600 new aircrafts including a minimum of 500 narrow-bodied and 90 wide-body international plane tickets (American Airlines News, n. d. )

Examine the circumstances that led to the merger or acquisition for the decided on company. Speculate on two (2) reasons why the producing decision to merge or to acquire / be received was made.

Circumstances that resulted in the merger of American Airways and US Airways

The primary circumstances which lead to America Airlines and US Airways merger from an abstract point of view collections from the financial problems. US Airways was an North american Airlines creditor corresponding to a personal bankruptcy court filing mentioned under Chapter 11 bankruptcy security. It acquired already been subject to through more than a decade of losses and retrenchments. The management team had considered a stand-alone restructuring plan before. In addition, it revealed that American Airlines looked forward to merging with another air travel and US Airways presented the fit. Subsequently, both companies acquired similar businesses. These incidents provided surge to possible workable and potential merger action which materialised in the end as they both agreed to a merger.

Reasons that resulted to the merger

The first reason as to the reasons the resulting decision to combine was made was the actual fact that the merger would build a booklet balance by absorbing out the individual bankruptcy court processing after appropriate paybacks and other repayments. Henceforth, the merged company would operate in financial independence achieved for the long-term results. Operating together with the pooled cost of capital would lower operational costs and realize increased earnings than if both companies functioned separately (Weston, 2014). It might be cheaper for both North american Airlines and US Airways to internally make investments and eyes for development of its businesses and operations. Acquiring new aircrafts and other related investments would be cheaper because of the united good deal purchase.

Secondly, North american Airlines and US Airways would bring about a horizontal merger that could form a strong pillar to accomplish a competitive border in the global range. This might lead to obtaining extra value in airline functions and business on the international market. The projected synergy value, would guide the merged companies to varieties that could deliver higher profits, lower bills and the overall cost of capital (Cooper, 2014). The merger and acquisition of the firms would give the merged parties an advantage over their rivals in conditions of business opportunities. After the merge, they would exploit the growing trends on the market together. This might also help out with gap filling up of the party's weakness and upbringing of significant durability paramount for dominance in the air travel industry. These reasons changed North american Airlines and US Airways to consider to merge.

Assess the significant positive (or negative) ramifications of the merger or acquisition. Provide at least two (2) types of those effects now that the merger or acquisition has been completed.

Effects of the merger

Completion of the American Airlines and US Airways added to lots of significant positive effects. The major key gain was power consolidation and control over the market. This facilitated the access into new market segments and larger shares in the existing market. It better economies of level which corresponded to acquisition of more possessions by means of aircrafts (Cooper, 2014). Posting taxes increased financial leverage making them utilize much of its benefits by keeping costs (Ulijn, 2013). Because of this, the combined airline company offered far more convenient schedule to travel plans with access to more destinations round the world. Their put together fleet persisted penetration to use more routes with the major fleets of airbuses throughout the world connecting more people and promoting diversification of global businesses and multicultural. For instance, it is already operates 336 destinations in more than 50 countries in the world. Currently, the blended company utilizes over 100, 000 people across the globe (Cooper, 2003).

Merging the two airlines resulted in the formation of a solid union of your well organised customer support than before. The union undertook to oversee organized arrangement in cases of personal bankruptcy hence giving employees more power to negotiate and maintain their pay. It raised off workers' suffering in the past years. Upon conclusion of the merger, it provided better benefits and settlement for the put together airlines employees. In addition, employees are significantly profiting from being part of a respected international company with more robust financial basis and competitive system for better long-term profession opportunities as well as more occupations.

However, the merging of the two companies possessed some negative effects as well. Their combo composes those to behave just like a monopoly because of operating in the similar industry. Monopoly designed less competition and higher prices. Establishing high journey prices credited to lack of competition hurts the holidaymakers and other service consumers. This lead to frequent lawsuits from the opposing body, this is disruptive to the thriving business (Cooper, 2003).

The merge of American Airlines and US Airways implied a blend of similar operational functions together with over capability. A lot of the US Airways employees encountered frictions by the internal competition and had to be retrenched hence the business ended up losing a few of their skilled workers. Labor difficulties extended because of the bankruptcy which resulted in iced pension and reduced benefits. For instance, the Labour Legislations still follows up in perseverance of fair terms.

Examine the organizational composition that has resulted from the merger or acquisition. Examine the major variations between the ensuing company and the original two (2) organizations.

New Organisational Composition Outcome to the Merger

The organisational composition effect to the merger included positional shift amongst the personell. Doug Parker, the pre-existing mind of the united states Airways became the C. E. O of the merged company while Tom Horton became the outgoing. He became the chairman of the new company's mother board of directors. Derek DeCross preserved his role as the vice chief executive of the global sales for the new North american Airlines. Leader Scott Kirby performed the same role at the new American Airlines. The rest of the organisational composition was a blend of positions that maintained the most competitive human learning resource (Cooper, 2003).

Difference between your causing Company and the Original Ones

There is a amazing difference between your original company and the merger. That is related to the consideration that American Airlines was regarded as traditional in terms of business promotion and carry out while US Airways was known to be less formal and translucent. The resulting new American Flight is a solid blend of their difference in culture, formality and transparency. American Airlines dished up 277 places while US Airways offered 193 destinations. The new American Airline merged this number to create several more vacation spots connecting the entire world. The ensuing company, therefore, formed a more stable structure that comprised of a bigger operational group than the original companies (Ulijn, 2013). In the beginning the original companies handled domestically but their alliance offers them capacity to function internationally paving way to global dominance.

Determine whether or not the human resources management routines of the company were altered to reflect the results of the merger or acquisition. If no changes were necessary, speculate on why these were not. Give a rationale for your response.

Modification of Human Source of information Management Practices

The human reference management procedures of the business made changes to think about the outcome because this area demonstrated a big challenge prior to the merger. Profit-sharing and performance incentives, direct compensation, old age options and benefits packages were all upgraded and up to date. They consolidated much of their training at the primary hub and at the new headquarters to be able to provide the most thorough hands-on skills necessary for the processes of the merger. This went down to drive supervisors and managers at both airlines tasked with making certain employees centered on their jobs through the drawn-out airline merger. The original combined management team was made to consist of US airways employees, but the split became more levelled in the managing and supervisory ranks (Cooper, 2003).

The Human Source of information team was rearranged such that it got US Airways on the marketing communications side. More so, the US Airways had already snagged Chris Kelly Singley from Delta; the best communication organization group, to be the managing director of communication, very vital tool in the merger procedure. Chris was designed to technically work for all of us Airways where she would play a very important role in joining the North american Airlines US Airways marketing communications departments to aid the new airline. From Kelly, the team was broken down to provide the air-port functions geographically where in fact the hub Vice Presidents would continue to be unchanged on the organisational graph. Regional carriers' market leaders were fetched from North american while one cargo employer overran the similar position. Hector Adler was tasked to run the in-flight group at the new American Airline as was the case back at US Airways. It had been established that from US Airways, David Seymour would lead the maintenance group while someone from North american Airlines would look after platform maintenance (Cooper, 2003). All of those other unmentioned human reference team such as anatomist and finance remained in their positions in order to enhance their tasks in the merged company.

Rational for modification

Modification of the individuals management practices needed to be factored in to offer an organised program for workflow and a better move for the employees who acquired to leave work. The mixed company needed the best practices for human tool functions as they are a fragile component of merger and acquisitions. Strategic decisions had to be centralised to one company. These routines were changed to reflect on the advertising fairness during working under a complex merger. With no improvements in the practices, employees' benefits for the merged company would be difficult to handle.


American Airlines News. (n. d. ). Retrieved February 13, 2015, from http://hub. aa. com/en/nr/pressrelease/american-airlines-us-airways-merger

Cooper, C. (2003). Developments in mergers and acquisitions. Vol. 2. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science.

Ulijn, J. (2010). Strategic Alliances, Mergers and Acquistions: The influence of cluture on successful co-operation. Cheltenham, UK [u. a. : Elgar.

Weston, J. (2001). Mergers and Acquistions. Blacklick :: McGraw-Hill Companies, The.

Also We Can Offer!

Other services that we offer

If you don’t see the necessary subject, paper type, or topic in our list of available services and examples, don’t worry! We have a number of other academic disciplines to suit the needs of anyone who visits this website looking for help.

How to ...

We made your life easier with putting together a big number of articles and guidelines on how to plan and write different types of assignments (Essay, Research Paper, Dissertation etc)