Why do Successful Companies Fail?

Why do successful companies fail? And why do they fail even if they're the leaders in the industry? The Innovator's Dilemma, a reserve by Clayton M. Christensen, helps us to comprehend the happening behind this. Sears, an extremely successful company at one point, overlooked the trend of discount retailing and home centers. This business lead to a huge loss of vast amounts of dollars and they were never in a position to recover from. While these were being praised for the their success, they overlooked all the signals and acquired too comfortable, which led to the demise of a global powerhouse.

Sears had not been the only company that was praised for their success yet later failed. From the outside, it appeared like these were doing everything right. They gathered data before the release of services. They listened to what the current market wished and customized their products predicated on those needs. They continuing to aid their sustaining technology while overlooking the disruptive technology because it had not been needed in the current market. Disruptive technology will not satisfy current needs but the future needs of the market.

Sustaining innovation are technologies that improve a company's performance based on the feedback that they get from their customers. These enhancements help to decrease the defects of the existing offerings or improving the entire quality of the merchandise. This terminology thinks in the theory that customers are always right and tailors their products to meet those needs.

On the other hand, disruptive inventions are products that contain a standard lower quality that don't succeed in comparison to the sustaining products. The products become more active from a need that's not being met in today's market. They can be found in a niche market that has been ignored by the current market offerings. While there might not be considered a need in today's market for these enhancements, disruptive technologies grow to meet up with the future needs of the clients.

These companies are unsuccessful because while they are really following the same management procedures that made them successful, it creates them succumb to disruptive invention. Christensen introduces the five guidelines of disruptive technology and exactly how managers may use them to manage the effects of these innovations. It can help them use these guidelines to their advantages because otherwise they'll fail over time.

A value network is how a firm identifies and reacts with their customer needs while striving for profit. This can help a firm to utilize their competitive advantages and their past choices to discover what the value is good for new technology. A firm then allocates their resources based on what they find is the most attractive to their business lead customers. That means even if indeed they find the disruptive development, their lead customers might not act in response. The first principle is about how exactly the survival of the firms relies on lead customers and investors for resources. Don't count on customers current must let you really know what they could need in the future because it will provide incorrect data that might lead to failure.

The second principle is how small markets do no solve the progress needs of a sizable organization. If a company wants to be successful, they need to maintain their current earnings and create new opportunities as they continue to grow. As they get larger, they have to increase their earnings in order to keep their overall expansion rate. This makes it difficult for those to enter a little market because they might not be able to achieve the same expansion rates that they need to survive.

The third concept discusses how markets for the disruptive development cannot be examined in market that does not can be found. The demand is uncertain for this market, rendering it hard for higher management to consider trading their time and resources. If market does not ensure financial come back then it's highly unlikely that a company would be happy to enter the market. Because of this, new entrants learn by making blunders and then making revisions.

The fourth principle is how organizations' capacities specify its disabilities. A lot of managers assume because they have got employees that are capable of achieving the duty, then the group is capable as well. That's not completely exact because the organization has functions that are different from it employees. The capabilities of an organization are its processes and worth. While people can learn and modify easily when learning new steps, processes and principles are harder to improve. So while their values encourage the employees to focus mainly on high margin go back projects, they can not simultaneously give attention to low margin products. Therefore, sometimes organizations' features can be its disabilities since it stops them from pursuing disruptive technology.

The fifth and last principle is how the technology supply might not equal its market demand. In the early stages of disruptive technology, the demand for the coffee lover is only in small marketplaces. As they continue steadily to grow, they progress to meet customers' future needs. That is because technology innovations faster than the requirements on their behalf. These improvements only exist in niche markets and meet up with the needs of early adopters. So while they could not satisfy the existing market needs, it is going to take over the prevailing market.

Managers that make an effort to fight these key points when dealing with disruptive technology may cause their organization to fail. You can't deal with sustaining and disruptive technology just as or that will cause you to miss the future needs of the market. Christensen advises that managers confronted with this dilemma to check out new ways to manage this. He suggests that you create different division to cope with these inventions that will benefit from these gains. By doing that you will be giving small firms the duty to meet those customers needs. For example in the publication he stated how Johnson and Johnson created over 160 different divisions, which allows them to bring in distributive technologies. Because of the fact that its only part of a little section, if the distributive technology fails they can dispose of it and get to the next one because the exit barriers are low.

Rather than longing to fail by the end, plan to fail when you are still in the early stages. It is because it costs less if you are making flaws at the first levels of the lifecycle. Not only is it less costly but the exit barriers remain low at that level. Christensen advices that you treat failures as a trial and error process to help improve the disruptive advancement to meet customers' future needs. Rather than being truly a follower, be considered a leader in the disruptive market; don't wait for the breakthroughs in technology. The existing qualities of the disruptive technology may not seem attractive to the current business lead customers but it might help to create a new market.

This book was released in 1997 and because of that Personally i think that the catalogs examples are obsolete. The publication should be updated with newer illustrations that will assist the author reach his point across considerably faster. For instance for the way the IPhones were considered a disruptive technology because it advanced the current needs of the marketplace. First, it only dished up a distinct segment market and then smartphones overran the telephone industry. Regular cellphones could not meet the current needs of the business lead customers because that they had higher objectives.

The booklet was very dried to learn and it was very repetitive; I am aware that he was trying to get his point across but I think he could did it with fewer pages. I thought that the book's ideas were very interesting and could see where distributive technology can have interfered with the existing market in today's time. I would suggest this publication to others because I've learned a good deal and can easily see why this e book is still being read though it was written two decades previously. These issues are still prevalent nowadays and will continue to do so in the future as technology continues to evolve.


Christensen, C. M. (2016). The innovator's problem: When new systems cause great companies to are unsuccessful. Boston, MA: Harvard Business Review Press.

Also We Can Offer!

Other services that we offer

If you don’t see the necessary subject, paper type, or topic in our list of available services and examples, don’t worry! We have a number of other academic disciplines to suit the needs of anyone who visits this website looking for help.

How to ...

We made your life easier with putting together a big number of articles and guidelines on how to plan and write different types of assignments (Essay, Research Paper, Dissertation etc)