Criminal Justice System

Introduction

Criminal justice system is a saying used expressing the interdependent the different parts of the courts, police, and correctional facilities in the government. The word also identifies the criminal justice firms found within expresses in a federal government. As a whole the criminal justice system is thus consisting of the three aforementioned interdependent components. Law-making has often been added by some as the forth criminal justice component, since all authentic activity of the unlawful justice system hails from the law (Fuller, 2005). The knowledge of this is important because if the process of criminal justice is unfair, some of the unfairness will for certain stem from the legal law. The substantive rules aspect displays the "what" of the statute, for the reason that laws are set up to explain certain behaviour as crime, and therefore give punishment to those who violate regulations (Bohm & Walker, 2007). However in the recent years there have been demands an overhaul of the legal justice system. This stems from the diminishing general public confidence in the machine that is accused of unfairness and inequity in carrying out its mandate. Hence an assessment of the legal justice system is aimed at enhancing it to be fair, strong but compassionate, and colour-blind truly

Fair and Effectiveness

The performance of the law can be examined based on the access and equality of regulations, its enforceability, resource efficiency, safeguard of individual protection under the law, and a means to establish a balance between the rights of the population and individuals. To do something effectively, the criminal justice system must render similar treatment to everyone, regardless of their income, education, get older, social status or ethnicity. If it is discovered an individual has been discriminate against, then the unlawful justice system is regarded as to acquire failed if its task. Equality before should have effective adaptations in order to suit the changing prices and behaviour of the contemporary society and people (Karmen, 2009). Another factor that can determine set up legal justice system works well is delays in the machine. Offender justice often will take too long before finalizing cases. Years elapse between your day when the criminal offenses was dedicated, and enough time when the offender is sentenced. Such delays in the legal justice system can lead to the victim experiencing continuous trauma because of the offender not being punished. Delay can also result in witnesses forgetting important information that is relevant to the situation in question. A good and effective legal justice should not be expensive to mete upon everyone. The criminal justice system can be very costly. Numerous individuals cannot find the money for legal representation. In some cases courts have accepted the need for sufficient legal representation. Hence makes an attempt to redress inequalities of accessing the legal system have been done through Legal Help. This offers cheap legal representation to individuals on a restricted income. Nonetheless, not everyone is given the legal aid. In order for people to be eligible for legal aid, they have to go away a test asserting their resources or degree of income, and a merit test where matters are serious enough with a odds of winning (Fuller, 2005). In view of all this issues, the criminal justice system cannot be reported to be wholly effective and good.

The Rule of Law

Doubts have lately arisen on whether the legal justice system abides by the rule of the rule of law. Quarrels have been laid that myths regarding criminal trails, and the power vested in organized offense, is the foundation of the degradation and problem in the legal justice system. This implies that the machine is not carrying out on the rule of guideline of law. Rather than serve the world by safeguarding the victims and convicting the guilty, the criminal justice system is dominated by indifferent court staff and judges, wily defence attorneys and defendants who bully witnesses. Hence the general public self-confidence in the criminal justice system has been eroding with time. Another problem building the contrary view stems from wrongful convictions. In Australia, a spate of wrongful convictions has led to certain jurisdictions sending their judges to attempt courses in avoiding wrongful convictions (Fairchild & Dammer, 2000). Factors like overconfident eyewitnesses and bogus prosecution experts have been recognized among the causes of misrepresented justice. There is also the facet of lying jailhouse informants who invent confession frequently. Inept attorneys and overzealous prosecutors often jeopardize the accused right to trial. Another factor in wrongful convictions is the propensity especially in visible cases, of the authorities, press and general population figures seeking promotion, convicting the accused prior to trial. Comments on if the unlawful justice system stands by guideline of regulation have been plentiful in argument. Some have suggested that the best approach to cut criminal offenses is cultural action, so that the criminal justice concern never arises, because there are no crimes committed. A fantastic exemplory case of that strategy is through job creation. Naturally the problem is the fact organized and disorganized or random crime will not be afflicted by the creation of jobs. Gangs that terrorize neighbourhoods haven't been impressed by make-work and flower planting programs. Therefore the issue of the legal justice system is not fully addressed. Crimes will continue to happen and the criminal justice system will still experience the problems therein

Strengths

One aim of the legal justice system is to reduce crime. There is no doubt that a broad consensus exists that the essential composition of the legal justice system should remain as a predominant feature in administering legal justice in Australia. However a range of complementary or choice approaches can be employed within the same framework. Crime reduction can be achieved via reactive means. This includes response to a call for service, arresting, finding a legal conviction, and offering the sentence imposed by the judge (Karmen, 2009). The unlawful justice system can also utilize proactive means like reducing conditions that lead to criminality. The past method of reducing crime is known as offense control, and accurately portrays nearly all legal justice activity in Australia. The second option form of criminal offense reduction is named crime prevention which is less emphasized generally in most countries. The product quality goal of an criminal justice system that dominantly matters as its power does justice. Doing justice has two related implications both which are reflected in the blindfolded female justice, Justitia, who retains a sword and scales and adorns several legal building and courthouses across the nation. It is thought that the sword presents the first meaning of justice, whose purpose is to carry the guilty accountable for the harms and damages inflicted by them. If an offender is not penalized by his wrongdoings, then justice is not achieved and then the unlawful justice system has in itself failed (Reichel, 2004). This form of justice is termed corrective justice as is the situation with abuse or corrections. The blindfold and scales are believed to symbolize fairness, which is the second so this means of justice. Such conception of justice assumes that every specific will be evenly treated in the sight of regulations. That justice will be blind to income, cultural standing, and shade among other inequities in society. Hence justice would be absent in cases where any group is somehow designated or still left for differential treatment by regulations. This form of justice is named procedural justice. The effectiveness of the current legal justice system pulls stems from just how it has both corrective justice and procedural justice. The procedures of the courtroom call for each and every suspect to be looked at innocent until proven guilty by an impartial courtroom of laws. Thus the system allows the offender to go through a fair trial that should be without unfair advantages or external interference. The necessary proof is compiled and witnesses availed prior to the commencement of the trial. This ensures that cases are taken care of with homework, and that the victims or offenders are not disadvantaged by any hurried move by the judge. In addition, judgment in the court is passed based on the collected facts or facts, not on the whims of general population opinion or feelings in the courtroom (Kappeler, & Potter, 2004). Hence correctional justice means that both celebrations in a disputed are content with the outcome of the case, since it contains a high degree of fairness. The role of procedural justice is to guarantee celebrations that the trial is free of just. The various components of the unlawful justice system in the name of the name of the authorities, court and modification process, each performs its part. This ensures the provision of a fair procedure for arrest, hearing, and the modification method. Proponents of justice as an end result seek to help make the Australian unlawful justice more punitive. That is aimed at attaining vengeance for patients of crime and retribution for culture. Research implies that initiatives like increased incarceration, long average sentences and much more executions over the past years, have eroded the types of procedures that produce the Australian legal justice process fair.

Weaknesses

Wrongful convictions have really dominated the weakness of the criminal justice system. When individuals remain wrongly convicted for several years, major miscarriages of justice does occur. It is in such functions that innocent are convicted and the guilty are establish free. Public judgment has also been counted among factors that contain influenced the procedures of the system (Crow & Johnson, 2008). The courts are confronted with a hard balance to perform. While they aren't controlled by general population sentiment, the courts also needs to not lose the assurance of the populace. A curious reluctance exists, especially among attorneys, in submitting the conceptual underpinnings of the criminal justice system to close exam or empirical home elevators its performing. The establishment of any dichotomy between the legal and moral protection under the law of the victims of offense and accused folks has always been a false business. Most annalists make reference to the way politicians conduct press campaigns on legislations and order, and play or prey on the fears of the populace, for political gain. Hence politicians also make use of this strategies in intimidating the good outcome of a trial that they might be get together or interested. The judge is threatened behind the moments to make certain lines of action aside from the rampant corruption present. The fairness and justice that is meant to be exercised by the unlawful justice system to make it effective, has been afflicted negatively by politics interference (Beckett & Sasson, 2003). The general public often despair of the oversimplification of issues of unlawful justice in the popular marketing. The press using its popularity just like politics is characteristics adversarial. The marketing thrives on the conflicts proven by the dichotomies. Thus it depicts itself as the world where the discord between good and evil is built righteously in the intellects of men. Most issues outlined by the mass media have been reframed in the public discussion of the same issues. Thus the press has using occasions influenced the results of a court docket decision. Nevertheless, it would be preferable if this were created other than via reiteration or iteration. Some scholars have argued that the unlawful justice system lacks clear objectives and is devoid of uniformity. Essentially it is scarcity of the features of something. Hence it is assumed sometimes that the public is apparently more punitive than what the current criminal justice system is. Among the weakness of the existing legal justice system emanate from the delays in executing trials. Offenders spend many years in remand before their conditions are managed. This will not assist the victim either, because there is continuous fighting of injury as the felony is being unpunished. Witness also conclude losing essential information relevant to the situation since it takes long from the time crime is committed to the period the is finally read. The problem of bail over remand has also eroded public self-confidence in the machine. The world has been surviving in dread as dangerous criminals are bailed out to come and perform revenge after being imprisoned and on release. It has been taken in certain quarters as a kind of lenience that stimulates criminals to keep terrorizing the society. Judges also have accused of moving lenient sentences to convicted criminals (Pizzi, 2000). Such weaknesses in the criminal justice system spent some time working in degrading and diminishing the performance of this establishment in eyes of the public, which it is mandated to provide pretty and effectively.

The Current Offender Justice System

With respect to the preceding conversations, the current criminal justice system encounters the litmus test to be reasonable and effective. An examination of the law-making process and legislation manufacturers in Australia reveals some important facts for understanding the techniques of criminal justice. Law designers at both express and authorities are disproportionately white, male, and even more than two decades older than the average Australian. There is a lot of cash mixed up in political and unlawful justice system. The existing system is accused of bias based on gender, color and social status among other guidelines. The issue of how white collar crime is taken care of under the machine is a source of heightened concern. The system has disregarded the most hazardous act against Australians, deeming it unfair as the perpetrators are not held responsible (Lab, 2007). Logically criminal justice activity would be unfair because police, courts and corrections perform criminal rules. Thus the unlawful justice process will not achieve desert, as an essential component of fairness if regulations is applied discriminately. There are conditions where the law enforcement officials, courts and corrections enforce unfair law unintentionally, the term innocent bias is applied. Innocent bias to are present does not require dishonest court staff, bad cops, or unethical correctional workers. The fact is that even if all employees of the justice system were fair, just, equitable, unbiased, impartial, objective and dispassionate, the Australian unlawful justice process would be unjust still due to innocent bias (Reichel, 2004). This is actually the most significant and dangerous form of unfairness, with wide-spread effects that cannot be rooted out easily, unlike most evident forms like corruption, authorities brutality, bribery, and prosecutorial misconduct among others. Hence the unlawful justice system as it stands presently can't be assumed to be good and effective. It should be understood that after the apparent hazards to unfairness have been identified and handled, the problem of innocent bias will still continue to be to hound the efficiency and fairness of the system.

Conclusion

It is important to recognize that the view of the general public generally suggests resident agreement with criminal law. The acts recognized in rules as serious crimes are still those that the populace tends to think are most serious. Because the law enforcement officials probe alleged offences and are the key point of entrance for situations in the unlawful justice system, innocent bias established in the unlawful regulation in perpetuated in the actions of law enforcement. Therefore the disparities in the machine such as predicated on race, category, gender can be minimized, but not dealt with permanently. The idea on innocent bias will be interpreted by either part to relieve their line of argument in accusing criminal regulation. Hence for the machine to be good and effective, a cure for innocent bias ought to be invented when possible.

Also We Can Offer!

Other services that we offer

If you don’t see the necessary subject, paper type, or topic in our list of available services and examples, don’t worry! We have a number of other academic disciplines to suit the needs of anyone who visits this website looking for help.

How to ...

We made your life easier with putting together a big number of articles and guidelines on how to plan and write different types of assignments (Essay, Research Paper, Dissertation etc)