Discussing THE POTENCY OF Offender Profiling Techniques Criminology Essay

This essay will be talking about the potency of offender profiling techniques. First of all the article will be looking into detail what offender profiling is and talking about it. Second of all the article will be looking at the contrast of the united states and UK solutions and the performance. Finally a final result with be attracted to look at the differences between your UK & US approaches.

In the legal justice system, there is a growing demand for experts in the field of human behaviour who can assist law enforcement with solving unconventional homicide cases. Police agencies often seek help from psychologists, criminologists, psychiatrists, and other specialists that focus on human behavior when seeking to catch a suspect. Criminal profiling is within location to help detect and get criminals, it has now are more common during many a unlawful investigation. Criminal profiling in addition has been recognised as one of the most readily useful techniques in offender profiling, a technique used to help explain the behaviour of the offender before they reach the height of their legal career. This gives the Authorities a good notion of important facts of an criminal's personality; facts such as: Career, environment in which they live and whether it's possible for those to strike again or not. Offender profiling is commonly found in crimes such as paedophilia, rape, satanic and ritualistic crime, lust and mutilation murder and as well as much other offences. The goals of profiling are: to make assessments from the crime scene that gives the authorities an idea of how to capture the unlawful.

According for the Guardian (the jigsaw man, Steven Morris 2000) 'The modern history of what came to be known as "offender profiling" began in the 40s when the united states Office of Strategic Services asked William Langer, a psychiatrist, to draw up a account of Adolf Hitler. After the second world battle, Lionel Haward, a psychologist doing work for the Royal Air Force, drew up a list of characteristics which high-ranking Nazi war criminals might screen. Then in the 50s, James A Brussel, a US psychiatrist, drew up what considered be an uncannily accurate profile of any bomber who was simply terrorising New York'

According to Holmes & Holmes (1996) there must be three main goals of offender profiling, these are to provide the police with basic information about the characteristics of the offender such as era, race, personality, career and marital status, to suggest any property the offender may have that could relate him with the crime world (such as souvenirs the police may choose to seek out) and also to provide interviewing strategies and recommendations the police could use when questioning a think. The American approach to developing a account of the offender has been developed from a short sample of interviews with 36 convicted serial sexual murderers, combined with detailed information from criminal offense scenes.

The next part of this essay it will be discussing the potency of both UK & US offender profiling and discussing the contrast of both solutions. Firstly, the US approach is recognized as "holistic" or "top-down" methodology and data from picture and from MO compared with previously known information. The FBI's Criminal offenses Scene Analysis contains six steps, that are summarized in the section that uses.

Profiling Inputs: a assortment of all evidence, including anything found on the scene (i. e. materials, paint potato chips, etc. ) and anything produced from the crime scene

Decision Process Models: facts is arranged to locate any types of patterns, such as set up crime is part of a series of crimes, the particular victims have in common.

Crime Examination: the data has been planned, the crime scene is reconstructed. Researchers use habits to know what happened in what order, and what role each victim, weapon got in the criminal offense.

Criminal Profile: the blended first three steps are being used to create a criminal profile including the motives, physical qualities, and personality of the perpetrator. Also, the researchers use this information to select the best way to interview the suspects based on their personality.

The Exploration: the account is given to investigators on the truth and to organizations which may have data leading to the identification of any suspect. The account may be reassessed if no leads are located or if new information is learned.

The Apprehension: this stage only occurs in about 50% of instances. When a think is recognized, he/she is interviewed, investigated, compared to the profile. In case the investigators have reason to assume that the suspect is the perpetrator, a warrant is obtained for the arrest of the individual, usually accompanied by a trial with expert witnesses including the forensic psychologist and other forensic experts, including those involved in the crime science analysis.

According to Jackson (1997) 'Offences most well suited for profiling involve those where in fact the suspects behaviour at the criminal offenses scene revel important details about themselves. Arson and sexually determined crimes where in fact the criminal has shown some form of psychopathy seem to own best chance of useful information being disclose. ' A number of types of profiling where its most effective are crime moments revealing proof sadistic torture, posturing of the body, ritualistic behaviour or staging. According to the F. B. I case which entail mere devastation to property, assault or murder throughout a commission of any robbery are usually unsuitable for profiling as the personality of the lawbreaker is not frequently not discovered in such criminal offense scenes. However medication related crimes give themselves improperly to profiling because the true personality of a criminal is not accepted.

Criminal profiling prevails in large part because of the work of the FBI's Behavioral Technology Unit, a section dedicated to "fast developing new and ground breaking investigative approaches and ways to the solution of crime by studying the offender, and his/her behaviour and motivation"

According to Brent E. Turvey, MS (1998) The features of the Inductive Criminal Profiling model are easily apparent. Foremost is that Inductive Profiling is an extremely easy tool to utilize, for which no specialized forensic knowledge, education, or training in the analysis of criminal behavior or criminal exploration is required. Additionally, standard profiles can be set up in a relatively short time period without any great work or ability for the profiler. The effect is usually a one or two page set of unqualified characteristics. These generalizations can effectively predict some of the non-distinguishing components of individual criminal behaviour, but not with significant amounts of consistency or trustworthiness.

The next area of the article will be discussing the UK methodology of offender profiling. The UK approach to the word offender profile came well known to the authorities forces and everyone during the 1980's. British approach is less subjective and called "bottom level up" method, or "data-driven". Data is gathered and analysed to produce definite, assessed, specific organizations between offences and offender characteristics.

Paul Britton is a Consultant Clinical and Forensic Psychologist who founded subconscious profiling in the united kingdom. He has advised the authorities in over one hundred serious investigations, including some of the most high profile crimes of days gone by 25 years. In his earlier role as brain of the UK's major Forensic Psychology Service, he evaluated and treated thousands of offenders, victims and witnesses. He sat on the Association of Chief COPS (ACPO) sub-committee on offender profiling for a few years, remaining an unbiased consultant for many more, and has liaised with worldwide businesses.

Professor David Canter was a pioneer in this nascent field, assisting to guide detectives in the mid-80s to a offender who possessed carried out some serious episodes. But he found the limits of offender profiling- in particular, the subjective, personal opinion of a psychologist. He and a colleague coined the word investigative psychology and began trying to approach the subject from what they observed as a more scientific viewpoint.

The approach to offender profiling uses the environment and nature of and physical evidence at the crime scene. This accumulates a relationship between your characteristics of the offence and the real offender. This approach also uses scientific statistics in digesting evidence. Each profile is exclusive to the average person offender which gives the approach the name 'bottom-up'.

Offender profiling is most useful when trying to find a serial offender as police can identify the 'type' of victim, especially in rape and/or murder circumstances. The behaviour of the felony can be an important feature in profiling an offender examples of this are; the positioning of the criminal offense, type of sufferer, interaction with sufferer and frequently the timing of the crime. Environmental principles such as 'mental maps' tend to be used in order to develop the theory that typical rapists live in the region that they offend in. This approach to profiling aims to become more clinical, using real information and statistical evaluation.

Canter (2000) states concerns that the F. B. I. 's typologies may be too carefully focused on the conducts of the offenders rather than on this is of the manners.

A detailed examination of the crime world might thus be seen as an essential first step in the gathering of relevant information. While a physical examination is already carried out by forensic experts looking for fingerprints, clothing fibres, semen examples etc. , the scene can also expose other hints to the profiler. detailed examination of the crime scene may well provide clues as to the underlying personality of the offender. It appeared that some offences were completed with significant amounts of forward planning, while others were dedicated with little planning or preparation. In the last mentioned case, a sufferer might have been selected at random, whereas in the former, a victim might have been targeted and seen for some time in advance of the offence. While an in depth examination of the crime arena will be helpful to a profiler, this examination is not always possible. For example, some recent research in the UK (Smith, 1998) has suggested that profilers usually do not be brought in at the earliest opportunity, but rather are contacted when other more traditional forms of police enquiry have failed. By this stage the crime landscape will probably have been disturbed and essential hints possibly lost.

Turvey (1999) warns against using profiling as anything apart from recommending probabilities. He cites the situation of Rachel Nickell, examined by Kocsis et al. (1998).

After looking at both approaches from the united kingdom & US, they both have different approaches to offender profiling. Firstly, Boon and Davies (1992) dispute that the British isles approach is dependant on 'bottom-up' data processing (an evaluation of existing data) desire to being to recognize associations between offences and offender characteristics. The American procedure is 'top-up' and uses subjective conclusions drawn from both experience of crime and interview with criminals. This says that the UK approach looks at the data of an criminal and the data, the US way looks at the legal and gathers information.

Also We Can Offer!

Other services that we offer

If you don’t see the necessary subject, paper type, or topic in our list of available services and examples, don’t worry! We have a number of other academic disciplines to suit the needs of anyone who visits this website looking for help.

How to ...

We made your life easier with putting together a big number of articles and guidelines on how to plan and write different types of assignments (Essay, Research Paper, Dissertation etc)