Stricter Firearm Control Laws

Gun control in the United States is a controversial issue over earlier years, especially in light of the recent occurrences of the Sandy Hook Elementary university shootings. Gun control is the rules of the selling, buying, and use of guns. Americans have multiple reasons for owning and using fireplace arms, both positive and negative. The next Amendment of the Constitution gives the rights to Americans to keep and bear arms.

On the positive area of the problem for stricter gun control laws in america, there are multiple reasons how we will keep a safer environment within our country. Stricter gun control laws will reduce the overall range of accidental shootings. It will also make it more challenging for criminals to acquire guns. Semi-automatic weapons, which are the leading types of guns used in mass shootings could be eradicated from having the ability to be purchased and can ultimately lower the number of overall deaths if the shooting were to occur.

Creating stricter weapon control laws may possibly also hurt or haven't any effect on the number of overall shooting in america. Individuals who want guns and cannot obtain them legally, can buy them through the black market. Most people simply want guns because of their own safeguard and self-defense.


The most gun owners acknowledge that owning a gun provides them a sense of guarantee and security. The ownership of a weapon adds to the safety of the dog owner especially during dangerous occurrences like, burglary, attempted murder, and other criminal offenses alike. Ownership of an gun could gratify the second degree of the hierarchy of needs as dictated by the well known Maslow's Hierarchy of needs. This simple fact could prove that the ownership of a weapon is necessary to live a life comfortably.

Prohibition is not the best solution. Banning guns will not kill weapon culture. The usage of guns won't disappear or make sure they are any less hazardous. It could even promote against the law purchases of guns. As explained in the last paragraph, safe practices is a need, and people are likely to do whatever it takes to assure it for themselves and for their families. Citizens are not only ready but likewise have the to protect themselves, their own families, and their house. If owning a gun is the simple, then why not?

Many people also need guns for other reasons. Farmers need hearth arms to protect their domains and livestock from wildlife. In case the banning of guns will push through, the livelihood of the people will be greatly afflicted. The least that could happen is them resorting to technology that are way above their budget to compensate for the security provided to them by the confiscated guns. In case the banning of guns is after the welfare of the folks, these realities are not to be disregarded and really should be looked at. Though these folks are a minority set alongside the whole society, their voices should be treated as those of the majority.

Shooting is a significant sport loved by many law-abiding people in the United States. Exactly like other sports, taking is recreational; it encourages willpower, and camaraderie and healthy associations among its lovers and experts. There are even more sports activities that are considered to cause more injuries compared to shooting sports. Statistically, the activity with most accidental injuries reported is hockey; shooting accidental injuries are less likely to happen because the guns aren't pointed at humans but to inanimate, lifeless focuses on. Practicing filming for hurting people is not the objective of the sport. Shooters shoot items to improve exactness and accuracy in taking pictures lifeless objects, and lifeless objects alone. Sportsmen have right to continue their chosen leisure activity. Also, spending on guns and ancillary equipment commissions large amounts of income in to the economy.

Law-abiding individuals are worth the right to protect their own families in their own homes. Despite having the banning of guns, criminals will still get access to firearms bought from the black market. In fact, most guns used in heists and planned crimes are guns do not have legal papers, bought from the black market. Thus, the banning of guns will place the potential victims into a disadvantage. Law abiders won't even think of buying from the dark-colored market. Criminals do not think this way. They obtain the dark market since it makes them harder to locate. Would-be rapists and armed burglars will think twice before attempting to break right into a house where owners may keep firearms.

Some occurrences of shooting tend to be averted when both people owning guns. Although guns assure self defense, it generally does not actually help you dodge bullets. It is only an advantage when, the other party is within no possession of a firearm. Thus, when an armed attacker knows you running a gun, he'd begin to acquire second thoughts about using his firearm as a result of possibility to be shot back again. Therefore, this concern with being shot again neutralizes the attacker's need to shoot the victim. Rather than a life lost, a life is spared.


Gun control has been a very controversial and heated matter worldwide. Guns will be the reason the crime rate is still high and it'll stay or increase if there are no actions that will be taken to lessen the against the law use of firearms. The primary function of your gun, like any other weapon, is to kill. Guns were invented to be utilized in war. Though guns have the potential to protect its owner from injury, the fact that someone from the other get together will be, or should be, subsequently harmed will not justify its goal. Though the understanding of this idea will vary among different levels of morality and beliefs, the fact of someone getting injure, a terrible person or a good person, shouldn't be disregarded. The usage of guns to market tranquility will be ineffective without its capacity to damage others. Though guns are not the sole weapons, they can be certainly more effective in taking away lives.

The death count when a gun is used is much greater than when knives or other weapons are used during an assault. Household brutality assaults relating guns are twelve times more likely to effect a result of fatalities than those without guns. These fact is nothing new. Shooters generally photograph to get rid of, and, even if indeed they shoot to maim or alert, the unstable trajectory of bullets can still kill. The more instruments of demise and damage we remove from our social norms, the more secure we will be.

The law has recently made appropriate fines for offences like fraud; burglary should not be punished by vigilante killings. Nothing is worthy enough to cover a human life. Even crimes of murder are not punishable by death, the legal sanctions for these crimes should be cured as seriously, impartial, like legally owning a gun - which is difficult to observe because most killings affecting guns are initiated when the shooter is a high emotional state, not in his/her rational mind.

In 2005, 75 reported conditions of children 14 and below passed on from accidental firearm-related accidental injuries; most children of the group have age groups which range from 10-14 yrs. old. The majority of unintentional gun-related deaths among children take place in or around the household; 5 out of 10 situations happen at the victim's home while 4 out of ten conditions happens at a pal or relative's house. Keeping firearms at home for cover often contributes to accidental fatalities.

Common cases for gun shootouts is that folks having it have mental health problems, goes out and photograph people. People with mental illnesses haven't any right to possess firearms but the challenge is that sellers of these guns have no idea if the buyer is mentally unwell until they go out and take people. The federal government, though they performed something concerning this case. The issue on the emotionally ill people who can simply have got guns is on warmth especially on the recent circumstance of shooting in the United States. People with tendency towards violence and those with histories of mental disease are not allowed to be able to obtain firearms in america. But experts, as what they call themselves, says that the laws and regulations regarding the possession of firearms is only applicable to individuals who have been considered by the specialists to be unsafe. The government mandates that people should be examined before the issuance of firearms to them. Background checks and interviews are supposed to be done before a person can acquire any firearms. 60 that the federal government has insufficient cash to sustain the process. Thus, the government resorted to just allow the people who want to acquire firearms after executing simple exams.


My opinion on this matter is simple and goes combined with the stating "guns don't kill people, people wipe out people. Although firearm laws today have become stricter, those who want to destroy or damage others it's still able to do it. It doesn't matter how hard it is to secure a firearm, an individual can still find other ways to damage others, even without guns. The problem whether or not semi-automatic weapons should be permitted to be sold is something that is understandable and can have a positive result. These types of weapons should certainly not be used for hunting, and also have no reason to be on the pavements of the country. The difference in the quantity of people you can harm or get rid of is greatly different and can make an overall difference in the number of deaths each year.

After the Sandy Hook Elementary Institution taking pictures, several people started to talk about buying a weapon before stricter regulations came into result. My own daddy did that. My mother is definitely against getting a gun inside her home until recently. She had recognized that it's better safe than sorry. My dad went and requested a permit to own a gun and is currently in the process of the background check. He packages to keep it locked up, and used only when necessary.

I in person feel safer, and better about the well-being of my parents if they have a gun for protection of their home. There are countless numbers of robberies and disorders that arise every day in our country. Running a tool for the pure safe practices of yourself and your family is a valid reason in my brain.

The important goal of the regulations pertaining to owning a weapon is to keep the firearms to those individuals that are likely to do violent actions and the ones that are psychologically challenged. But then there is no existing effective system that can prevent these folks to legally obtaining a gun. The government has to do something positive about the stricter implementation of the regulations regarding the people who are mentally sick and wishes to get a gun. Usage of mental health takes on a vital role in this case thus even the government should go over its beneficiary requirements and money. The required background checks and mental health evaluations should be stricter plus more useful so that proper data and proof can be evaluated properly and maybe it's a great help lessen violence in america.

Also We Can Offer!

Other services that we offer

If you don’t see the necessary subject, paper type, or topic in our list of available services and examples, don’t worry! We have a number of other academic disciplines to suit the needs of anyone who visits this website looking for help.

How to ...

We made your life easier with putting together a big number of articles and guidelines on how to plan and write different types of assignments (Essay, Research Paper, Dissertation etc)