Analysing THE ENTIRE WORLD Intellectual Property Corporation Economics Essay

According to this is of the World Intellectual Property Group (WIPO), intellectual property now applies to creations of brain or technology; literary and imaginative works; and symbols, names, images, and designs found in business. Legally, intellectual property includes patents, trade secrets, trademarks, and copyright. Scholars prefer a straight broader view of intellectual property. They favor a definition which includes individual creative imagination and socially followed enhancements, as well as collective knowledge (Gollin, 2007).

Intellectual property privileges (IPR) are legal entitlements awarded by governments within their respective sovereignties that provide patent, brand, and copyright owners the exclusive right to exploit their intellectual property (IP) for a certain period. Defined other ways, IPR, broadly, are protection under the law granted to the people who create and own works that are the result of individual intellectual creativity. The main intellectual property privileges are copyright, patents, trade grades, design rights, security from moving off, and the protection of private information.

IP is normally grouped into two categories particularly commercial property and copyright. Industrial property includes inventions (patents), industrial designs and trademarks and copyright comprises of musical works, literary works like novels and poems and creative works like picture taking, paintings and sculptures for instance. The essential rationale for IPR coverage is to offer an incentive for development by granting IP owners an opportunity to retrieve their costs of research and development (NERA Economic Consulting).


As pointed out above, IP can be divided into two categories namely industrial property and copyright. Copyright assures legal safeguard for literary works (for example poems, catalogs and film scripts), musical works, creative works (such as paintings and sculptures), photography, software applications and cinematographic works. Copyright rules is meant to safeguard authors by giving them special privileges to commercialize copies with their work in whatever material form (paper publication, audio recording, film, broadcast and so on) is being used to communicate their creative expressions to the public. Even though enrollment is not normally necessary, it is advisable for authors to possess their name put on the task. Nonetheless, legal coverage includes the "expression" of the ideas included, not the ideas themselves. Copyright offers owners exclusive privileges, usually for the distance of the author's life plus 50 years. As for audio tracks recordings, copyright is usually bestowed for 50 years and is accessible to the author or company in charge for creating the tracking.

Authorization is possible to involve repayment of royalties. These are known as moral rights and stay with the writer even if the latter exchanges the copyright to somebody else. Economic rights allow the rights owner to acquire financial reimbursement from the exploitation of his/her functions by others. Copyright owners are awarded rental rights in order to receive royalties for commercial lease of their works.


Industrial property is evidently specified in the Paris Convention for the Safety of Industrial Property (Article 1 (3)): "Industrial property will be known in the broadest sense and shall apply not only to industry and commerce proper, but in the same way to agricultural and extractive establishments and also to all manufactured or natural basic products, for example, wines, grain, tobacco leaf, berry, cattle, minerals, mineral waters, ale, flowers, and flour. " Industrial property takes a variety of varieties. These contain patents to safeguard inventions and commercial designs, which are visual creations establishing the looks of commercial products. Industrial property also includes trademarks, service marks, layout-designs of designed circuits, commercial brands and designations, as well as physical indications, and safeguard against unfair competition. In a few of these, the aspect of intellectual creation, although existent, is less plainly defined. What counts here is that the object of professional property typically contains symptoms conveying information, specifically to consumers, in regards to products and services offered on the marketplace. Protection is intended against unauthorized use of such signals more likely to deceive consumers, and against deceptive methods generally.


A brand is a sign which helps in making the difference of the products or services of one company from those of another. Such signs or symptoms may use words, characters, numerals, pictures, styles and colors, as well as any combo of the above. It usually contains a distinctive design, word, or phrases, generally positioned on the product label and sometimes showed in advertisements. For example, L'Oreal is a hallmark that can only just be employed on products made by the L'Oreal Company.

A great deal of countries are now allowing for the enrollment of less regular forms of hallmark, such as three-dimensional signs (like the Fanta container or Toblerone chocolate bar), audible signs or symptoms (sounds, including the roar of the lion that precedes films made by MGM), or olfactory signs or symptoms (smells, such as perfumes). But many countries have laid down perimeters as to what may be signed up as a hallmark, generally consenting to only signs or symptoms that are aesthetically perceptible or can be represented graphically.

When employed in association with the marketing of the products, the sign can happen in adverts, for example in magazines or on tv, or in the house windows of the retailers where the goods are sold. Trademarks facilitate the choice to be produced by the consumer when buying certain products or using certain services. The hallmark helps the buyer to identify a product or service which was already familiar to him or that was advertised. The owner of a registered hallmark has an exclusive right so far as his mark can be involved. It offers him the right to use the symbol and to prevent unauthorized use from it.


Legal action can be performed against those who violate the patent by copying the technology or advertising it without authorization from the patent owner. Patents can be bought, sold, chosen, or accredited. When performing a patent software, some criteria need to be satisfied. The patent examiners should be convinced that the 'invention" is

Several types of patent may be granted (Lesser 1991, p. 14)

Uses: covers a precise only use. Hence, it could cover these drug distinctively as a cure for cancer rather than for just about any uses that are later uncovered.

Products-by-process: involves only products made by the process described in the application. Therefore, it could cover the drug, but only when manufactured by a particular process.

It must be observed that not absolutely all inventions that satisfy the above mentioned conditions can seek safeguard by patent. In many countries, medications and genetically changed organisms cannot be patented in any way. There are variants in countrywide patent laws because each country has its preferences when it comes to defining what innovations may be branded and these laws and regulations normally comply with the country's perceived countrywide interest.


Since the first intellectual property system came into existence in the Western, humanity has gone through nearly four hundred years. Within the nearly 500 years of history, intellectual property protection under the law have completed their transformation from feudal power to people's private rights. Today, it is irrefutable that the revolution helped bring by IPR hasn't only broadened the traditional content of property rights system, but also led the intellectual property system to become the world's most significant property privileges system, and also made a profound effect on mankind in the 21st century. However, the introduction of this new system is not really a straightforward process. Using the development of new solutions and individuals cognitive aptitude, as an put into action to balance the private protection under the law and public pursuits, the intellectual property system has always stumbled after difficulties and disagreements.

The IP system was first introduced in the western world and was later established across the world. For the IPR system, Patent legislations is the first system to be launched on the planet. The appearing out of the patent system offered birth to individuals intellectual property system. The United States even founded the theory of security of proprietary technology in the Constitution, made patent safeguard to the elevation to constitutional level.

The record of copyrights has some strong monarchical electricity background. Before the beginning of the copyright system, many countries experienced long-standing system of producing privileges. According to the franchise system, the king can give a printed to license the computer printer rather than the copyright owners. In 1709, Britain built the first modern copyright legislation - "the Queen Anne Action. " Following this, the uk, France and Germany set up the copyright system respectively. Under the influence of these countries as a pioneer, the copyright system has been steadily acknowledged by Governments. Trademarks started in Spain. The brand system in the present day sense started in the 19th century. In 1857, France established the first legal system on the planet to safeguard trademarks. Subsequently, the hallmark system rapidly grew in other areas of the world.

Many countries accepted and applied a variety of kinds of intellectual property rights in different way and evolution. At the same time, new types of intellectual property protection under the law have continued to be progressively incorporated in to the system of intellectual property privileges. All these trends uncover that the historical development of the intellectual property system has truly gone through a stage of continuous development. By the end of the eighties, the new trend of civil legislation started to emerge. Many countries attempted to build up the Code of intellectual property or combine intellectual property regulation in to the Civil Code. These activities began a influx of codification of intellectual property rights.

Since the late 19th century onwards, combined with the new technical development and the extension of international trade, intellectual property transactions in the international area have also started with the formation and development. At the same time, there was a major contradiction between international demand for intellectual property rights and local constraints. In order to find a solution to the contradiction, some countries have signed the International Convention for the cover of intellectual property, and founded lots of global or local international organizations. Something of international cover of intellectual property privileges was setup on earth.

The convention of "Paris Convention for the Cover of Industrial Property"(create by France, Germany, Belgium, and 10 other countries and launched in 1883) is the first international convention in safeguarding IP. "Berne Convention for the Safeguard of Literary and Artwork" is the first international convention about copyright. The establishment of International Conventions specified that the intellectual property system experienced come to the international level. Among them, approved under the platform of the World Trade Company (WTO) in 1993, "Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Privileges Agreement"(TRIPS) succeeded to come quickly to conclusion between developed country and growing country, which amplified the nationwide standards of safeguard of intellectual property protection under the law to a unified higher system. More about these regulatory body and agreements will be discussed afterwards.

In this new century, intellectual property rights system is facing new difficulties. The undesireable effects of intellectual property system are showing slowly. In some producing countries, the safeguard of IPR has brought about the exorbitant cost of some drugs and other needs; the price of some products with IPR is so high so it cannot meet up with the needs of people in difficulty. To solve these problems, developed countries have started a new group of amendments to the legislative activities of the intellectual property system. New laws and regulations continue being used, and the opportunity of intellectual property's items has persisted to grow.

In spite of the, the concern for IPR system is becoming an appealing trend. Developed countries take its monopoly of advanced scientific knowledge as an appealing weapon for technology command. Growing countries take the absorbing and creating knowledge as an important way to meet up with developed countries. It can be anticipated, that the next era isn't just to build up and possess communal substantial resources, but also to build up and possess mortal knowledge resources. In addition, with the development of global economical integration, the international procedure for intellectual property system will definitely increase. Coverage of intellectual property privileges hasn't only become the compulsory conditions of your country to market financial development, but also it is known as a prerequisite so as to maintain international competitiveness.


As a interpersonal system stimulating innovation, the intellectual property system has been founded in the European countries initially, and has later spread on the globe. Walking along with its historical development, the span of intellectual property system in Traditional western countries has truly gone through three main stages which called as germination level, development and internationalization phases. Intellectual property, possibly a present-day phenomenon as well as perhaps too narrative to some, nevertheless has portrayed european economics, multi national co-operations and supported western economical colonization.

As discussed recently, IPR was and still is a controversial subject matter. While Europe may have fared fairly well in comparison with the US, problems are increasing in the European union as well. From an financial perspective, there's a dependence on harmonizing Western administrative and legal methods in the area of IPRs while increasing the quality standards used in these system. In addition, a fresh balance between your owners of privileges and users of the safeguarded subject matter needs to be within many fields.

With its Lisbon Agenda, the European Union has nurtured another vision of an area focusing on learning and creativity so as to sustain high degrees of productivity and wealth. To achieve these objectives, European union policies will need to promote technology and encourage purchases in new plus more competent products, operations and organizational regimens. Intellectual property performs an important part in this vision, and in a number of areas, the EU has embarked on a course meant to reinforce rights that foster development.

Examples of some controversies in European countries involve the arguments on copyright and Digital Protection under the law Management (DRM) systems, on the cover of computer software through patents and/or copyright, and the degree of patent protection for biotechnological inventions.

In many jurisdictions, the rights of IPR owners have been strengthened as compared to the protection under the law of other get-togethers. Wholly new IPRs (such for database protection) have been designed. These amendments have brought about lots of insurance plan issues.

Patent systems are under strain not just in Europe, but in other countries as well. Like in america, both patent submissions and patent grants at the EPO have increased considerably faster than Research and Development (R&D) inputs in OECD countries. From 1990 to 2000, EPO patent applications rose from 70, 955 to 145, 241 (an average progress rate of 7. 4 per cent per annum) while OECD R&D inputs grew from $398 to $555 billion which unveils an average gross annual development of 3. 4 per cent. As for the actual offer rate (the show of patent applications resulting in a patent grant) remained almost steady at about 65 percent for patents with program years from 1978 to 1995.

There are three major obstacles to the near future design of Western european IPR guidelines, the first being harmonization. In the event the EU wants to become a region concentrating on innovation without having to be bothered by countrywide barriers, there is certainly a need for coming up with truly European IPR plans and institutions. That comprises of harmonized interpretation of IPR laws, harmonized courtroom proceedings and the establishing of legal institutions which resolve circumstances which have been very much controversial.

A second significant criterion is the concentrate on balance. The naive perception that more and better IPRs are always excellent for innovation has been contested by scientists in empirical and theoretical work during the last decades. Balance in copyrights means that reasonable use of protection under the law of consumers need to be considered critically.

Third, IPRs that are granted based on an assessment process should be of high quality in the sense that they create legal certainty, rather than uncertainty. Western institutions, in particular the European Patent Office, should seek to grant high-quality patent protection under the law which are based on tough standards for novelty and inventive step.

Despite a complete array of guidelines on the protection of intellectual property, counterfeiting and piracy have extended to rise on the planet because offenders possess the possibility of making considerable profits without risking any serious legal effects. In July 2005, the Payment presented a two times proposal for a directive and a Council framework decision targeted at introducing criminal sanctions for IPR infringements. The general penalty is made for the judge to grant damage to the patent owner, necessitating the offender to pay a certain amount of money to the patent owner.


Countries differ to a great extent concerning the safety and enforcement of IPR, with expanding countries being normally associated with much lower criteria for IPR coverage than developed countries.

This amount does not consider any imitation of products created and consumed in the same country or counterfeit digital products sold online. Some of the theoretical literature considers a stylized world with a technologically developed "North" and a less technologically developed "South. " These models are based on the premise set forth in Chin and Grossman (1988) "where the North innovates and the South imitates the Northern technologies. The main finding of Chin and Grossman (1988) was a persistent tension is present between the North and the South-while the North innovates, the South chooses low degrees of IPR protection because it benefits from the innovative end result of the North. "

The debate for the implementation of 'appropriate' intellectual property protection under the law in the developed countries is fueled since the advanced countries encountered a menace with their pioneering scientific and non- technologies and their commercialization in the developing nations.

Subsequently, expanding countries have long been demanded by developed nations to put into practice intellectual property privileges. The central apprehension by the developed nations is to protect the innovations in the less developed nations from the unlawful counterfeiting and copying. The discourse between both get-togethers, that is, industrialized countries and expanding countries is getting intense because the last 2 decades. The expanding countries are parted within the debate because of the economical conditions, FDI and technical sophistication. The concern for the developing countries is the eventual monetary repercussions for the implementation of such intellectual property rights in their respected countries. The truth can be even harsher for the Least Developed Countries (LDCs), where intellectual property protection under the law have emerged as the foundation for the high technology cost and barriers for technology access to public.

On the other hands however, increased technology copy with foreign immediate investment may somehow validate such routine. But such 'profitable' offers as substitute for IPR in the producing nations, according for some growing countries, are in view of the developed countries benefits and they would be unable to heighten the economical conditions in the expanding countries using their present conditions. The sociable benefits obtained from certain financial systems, proven in the advanced nations may not influence the interpersonal systems of the expanding nations as wished for. So far, different measures, particularly led by the United States have actually compelled the execution for the intellectual property rights in the expanding countries, exclusively backed by the strong business neighborhoods in the United States.


There is a dependence on IPR because, without them, a piece of potentially important information would be subject to overuse, to the idea that access to it isn't costly, from the perspective of its development and growth. This use would quickly exhaust the monetary worth of the info, limiting incentives to create it. The comparison between the mounting need for international exploitation of intellectual property and the territorial (and frequently underdeveloped) mother nature of rights to take action resulted in huge pressures for general change in recent years. These pressures triggered broad bilateral, regional, and multilateral discussions on IPRs, which engendered a significant growth of required minimum requirements, especially in growing economies and countries in changeover.

The World Intellectual Property Business (WIPO) is an international organization create to ensure that the privileges of designers and owners of intellectual property are well known across the world and this inventors and authors are thus identified and rewarded because of their ingenuity. As being a specialized business of the United Nations, WIPO is present as a forum for its Member States to generate and synchronize rules and practices to safeguard intellectual property rights. Most advanced nations have safety systems that are centuries old. Many new and expanding countries, however, are now accumulating their patent, brand and the laws of copyright and systems. Together with the speedy globalization of trade over the last decade, WIPO performs an important role in helping these new systems improvement through treaty negotiation, legal and specialized assistance, and training in various forms, including in the area of strengthening of intellectual property protection under the law. WIPO also caters for international subscription systems for patents, trademarks, appellations of origins and commercial designs. These greatly simplify the procedure for concurrently seeking intellectual property safety in a whole lot of countries. Rather than having to document national applications in different dialects, these systems allow people to file an individual application, in a single language, also to pay a single application price.

In the 1990s the earth has shifted radically toward an international system of IPRs.

Apprehensions about the piracy and forgery of intellectual property have been significantly brought up in developed countries, where a lot of the intellectual property is located. As a remedy to these concerns, the protection of intellectual property was a major region of negotiation at the Uruguay Round of the overall Contract on Tariffs and Trade (GATT). The result of the discussions was the founding of the World Trade Group (WTO) to govern the GATT, the Trade Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Protection under the law (Excursions) and the overall Contract on Trade in Services (GATS).

The TRIPS Arrangement is an essential and lawfully binding area of the WTO that requires all member countries (142 countries by July 2001) to 12 grant patents for innovations in all fields of technology. It needs them to safeguard plant kinds either by patents, by "a highly effective sui generis" system or by the combo of both. Adherence to the Excursions agreement for most, if not absolutely all member countries, means adding more serious intellectual property coverage (IPP). This is expected to have extensive effects on the international transfer of technology and trade relationship between the developed and growing countries, especially in agricultural research.

Finally, according to the large and costly institutional and legal changes these procedures need in countries with limited IPR systems, transition periods are awarded. General commitments (countrywide treatment and MFN) were to be functional immediately upon the execution of the WTO. Growing countries and countries in change should meet up with the detailed obligations within five years (that is, by January 1, 2000) and least-developed countries must meet them within eleven years (by January 1, 2006). The last mentioned countries may, upon need to the Excursions Council, get extensions for an unspecified period, signifying they have been given an opt-out treatment. Countries are free to speed up their adherence to Outings.

The TRIPS Agreement leads in a fresh global framework for IPRs. It obviously built up minimum standards for cover, moving the system nearer to harmonization, and inclines the total amount of financial rewards toward progressive interests and from counterfeiting and imitation. The TRIPS Agreement provides minimum amount national standards for levels of safeguard to the creators of intellectual property. Article 27. 1 of the Agreement requires people to give patents "for everyone inventions, whether products or functions, in all areas of technology".


The net financial effect on producing nations from establishing and safeguarding IPR is not completely evident. Some have insisted that building up IPR security will improve monetary expansion and wellbeing in producing nations, as well as others argue that it will be unfavorable, therefore diminishing overall welfare. On the list of possible costs of this type of plan are reduced incomes in companies that rely upon copying the products of industrialized countries and the related boosts in the costs of protected goods. For instance, increasing IPR cover in the less-developed countries can promote creativity within.

Certainly there are specific short-term costs associated with intellectual property protection under the law for the developing nations, like higher prices for the technology and safe goods. With all this, the truth for tighter intellectual property protection under the law in these countries must count on long-term benefits like superior technology or overseas immediate investment inflows and bigger motivation to national technology.

FDI inflows in a country come mainly by means of Multinational Organizations (MCs). MCs are able to stay really competitive when they are successful in transferring IP and other intangible investments with their global locations of businesses. These resources of competitive gain can be anything from a proprietary creation arrange for semiconductors to a cleaning solvent formula. But before taking any decision to set up any resources in a country, multinational managerial committees should assess whether the country where they will transfer their technology has appropriate IPR to protect the organization against offenders and imitators.

Studying the impact of more rigid IPR safety in a less technologically developed South (expanding countries) on welfare in both the North (developed countries) and the South, Diwan and Rodrik (1991) found that "net-innovation consuming countries (the South) were only determined to guard IPR if the kind of advancement demanded was different from the sort demanded in the net-innovation-producing countries (the North). "

Evenson (1992) refers to these middle-income countries to be in the "technology draught, " because they have a tendency to focus R&D efforts on adaptation, imitation, and invert anatomist. As economies become more ground breaking at the uppermost levels of income, patent safety tends to increase considerably.

According to World Bank or investment company Global Economic Point of view, there are specific particular known reasons for advanced countries, and interestingly for the expanding nations to check out the TRIPS contract, that is, it may offer expanding countries improved usage of agricultural and clothes markets in prosperous nations, an expectation that tighter IPR would also promote further technology copy and technology. However, matching to World Standard bank, the make sure for durable benefits seems doubtful and costly to accomplish in many countries, especially minimal Developed Countries (LDC's). In addition, the administrative costs and tribulations with higher charges for medicines and essential scientific inputs loom large in the thoughts of policy producers in developing nations. Most are favoring considerable provisions in the contract. Some growing countries also requested the provisions in execution for the patent safeguard, particularly in pharmaceutical industry.

In growing countries, having less international IPR coverage has helped in creating massive job. India is one of the leaders in reproducing drugs and drugs produced by international companies. The reason why it can achieve this is basically because India's patent work forbids product patents for any invention intended for use or with the capacity of being utilized as a food, drugs, or medication or associated with substances prepared or produced by chemical operations. This in return has unwanted effects on the international pharmaceutical industry. THE UNITED STATES pharmaceutical industry is believed to incur total annual loss of $450 million due to imitation. It would end up being too costly for these countries to look at the IPR laws overnight in its totality. This would mean loss of job for most; inadequate usage of drugs and drugs for needy people and each one of these could eventually lead to communal unrest.

Countries with weakened IPR safeguard are well positioned to gain an instantaneous gain to lower-priced goods or systems. Countries with insufficient strong IPR coverage must therefore compare these benefits with the increased loss of international willingness to get resources or develop products, as well as lessened innovative commodities within the united states.

Maskus (2000) records three potential costs particularly

1. Higher prices for imported products and new technology under IPR protection

2. Lack of financial activity, by the closure of imitative activities.

3. The possible maltreatment of protection by the patent holders, especially large foreign companies.

Some countries have accepted to adhere to TRIPS in order to benefit from concessions in other (non-technological) domains of economic activity, such as more aid, freer and greater usage of developed country marketplaces for key exports and so on. Whether they really benefited in these ways stays an available question, since neither the expenses nor the advantages of Travels associated concessions have been appropriately calculated. Nonetheless such execution would also fuel the local innovation in the expanding nations, permitting those to import the foreign technologies and also have hands-on experience in learning and using the technology.

In addition, the strength and efficiency of enforcement initiatives also are different with economic development stages. This uncovers both a reluctance to endure the expensive administrative bills related with enforcement and the incapacity to take care of lots of the complex technological and judicial things linked with the utilization and infringement of IPRs. However, there is an essential tradeoff between your market power caused by more powerful IPRs, which are likely to improve the capability of businesses to fragment market segments and limit trade, and the market-expansion impact of increasing the expenses of counterfeit activity.

Detractors of the Journeys Agreement claim that the step towards more rigid IPR may harm poorer countries, because they might imply that rents would need to be transferred to multinational commercial patent holders positioned in the world's innovative countries. Additionally, such critics assert that in the post-TRIPs milieu, smaller local firms in producing countries will never be capable to afford the required fixed costs that would help them in carrying out research and development at a level where they could compete with these huge multinational companies. Hence, IPRs can engender cultural costs if the granting of momentary monopolies, lead to high lease seeking by businesses. Legislation without application is not really worthy and utilizing the IPR system implicates a certain quantity of administrative and institutional costs to the current economic climate which comprise of the costs associated with setting up the best laws and enforcement devices within each country.

The Commission payment on Intellectual Property Protection under the law, in submitting its last report to the Government of Britain, affirmed that the international spread and development of IPR was improbable to spawn major benefits for most developing countries and was most probable to entail costs, such as more costly medicines or seeds. This will make the fight against poverty harder. The Commission payment wraps up by proclaiming that the IPR system, in its totality is less good for growing than for developed countries in many areas that are essential to development, such as medical, agriculture, technology and education and information systems. The report suggests that developed and expanding countries implement a variety of policies to boost access to drugs and drugs and other essential goods.


Innovation and R&D will take enough time and sometimes entails large amount of money. It really is properly comprehensible that authors, inventors and makers would want their work to be protected from imitators. However, the price of many products can happen to be extreme anticipated to IPR and many of these products, like medicines for instance, are necessary for the well-being and even survival of many people residing mainly in developing countries. In an altruistic world, it could appear completely normal to talk about inventions and masterpieces that could improve and even save the life span of millions of individuals but the world is mainly materials, focusing mostly on earnings making to the detriment of needy people. Resources are so unequally allocated globally that those who are left out have to consider any kind of means to make a living. The imitation and counterfeiting of products is one such means. Piracy is becoming an important industry in many expanding countries, offering a job to millions. This sort of activity is against the law and thus, it cannot be totally defended. Maybe the answer should be less rigid and tailor made IPR in these countries as compared to advanced countries because the standard of living in these two worlds is totally different.

Also We Can Offer!

Other services that we offer

If you don’t see the necessary subject, paper type, or topic in our list of available services and examples, don’t worry! We have a number of other academic disciplines to suit the needs of anyone who visits this website looking for help.

How to ...

We made your life easier with putting together a big number of articles and guidelines on how to plan and write different types of assignments (Essay, Research Paper, Dissertation etc)