Does India Desire a Dictator?

DOES INDIA REQUIRE A DICTATOR?

  • Kritika Singh

TY A (3093)

As we cross 65 years of our Self-reliance, with each year passing by we discuss our achievements, innovations, and the progress our land has made since 15th August 1947. However the plight of the normal man in India is inevitable and increasing. He's the one who's bearing the pressure of inflation, problems, discrimination, price hike, petrol price surge, corruption, policy malfunction, and sociable turmoil ultimately leading to disruption of tranquility in the country. The question to be responded and pondered after is that who is responsible for all these? Who is to be blamed? Our representatives who are jogging India, their self interests, the framework of our economy or ourselves! If we actually think, there exist loop openings and faults in every of these. The perfect solution would be putting each one of these into order and modify them for concrete development.

The society is filled with dire incidents with rape conditions and criminal offenses against women increasing at a startling rate. Most of us get furious even with the thought of the gang rape of intern in Delhi last year which I believe was the pinnacle of cruelty. A juvenile who do the maximum injury was set free because of the so called 'stringent' laws and regulations. Why? Again, lately a 51 years of age Danish woman was raped in Delhi. She was our guest, "atithi" once we call it. She forgot the path to her hotel, but rather than guiding her three Indian men looted her and raped her continually for three hours. Where is the immediate abuse? This is actually the condition of security and degree of women safety in our Capital City. India really needs a new mentor who can completely change the modern culture. The society requires a change in thought/mentality even if it has to be enforced.

India may possess the best set of Legislation and Order on paper but when it involves the implementation we stand nowhere. This responsibility of execution should be discharged by an able innovator who is demanding with his decisions. Corruption is further aggravating the problem.

Is the solution to the, the ever mentioned democracy versus dictatorship issue? The switch from democracy to dictatorship is an extremely high-risk step. Dictatorship has its pros and cons as two sides of a coin. Let us consider these two parallel thoughts.

One area of the gold coin shows that dictatorship will lead us to development through uncomplicated and unambiguous decision making. A dictator being the all mighty head of the country won't face any disagreement and questioning from other get-togethers as in a democracy. A democratic country is for individuals who not only work for his or her self interest but in the eye of the contemporary society or country. It really is designed for a country where in each individual cooperates in any way possible for the implementation of your insurance policy/decision for general public/mass benevolence. Today, India falls not even near a country which may be called selfless. A Dictator is the one individual who can save the country from the hands of such 'selfish' people; they can exercise control and work with individuals.

As background shows under dictatorship people are exempted from liberty, but this allows the implementation of regulations without retaliation. With dictatorship comes the idea of control of discipline. In case the dictator is a diligent man any country can be diverted to the path of progress and development, including the ruling of Kemal Pasha helped Turkey to attain the way of glory. Hitler's dictatorship is the biggest in the history. Despite of his terror and brutality towards Jews, he raised Germany from an awful position. Dictatorship provides order, rules and discipline inside our country. In simple words, dictator should be kind, a profound thinker with the grade of farsightedness and an instant decision maker who are able to catalyze the acceleration and perfection of execution of his decisions. Presently, our bodies of democracy is not near what it should be delivering. Everyone is merely behind obtaining their chair and no person bothers about the improvement and wealth of the nation. A dictator with a good strategy will surely cause change which is for good. In fact, for efficient working of dictatorship the dictator must be under frequent surveillance of several honest ministers. India leading the little league of corrupt democracies, really needs self-discipline which can only be brought in by a robust and moral dictator. Discussing the economics of both these systems, Dictatorship appears to be a more monetary establishment. Poverty tops the list of the immediate problems of our own country but it is luxury to spend millions on elections. The need of the hour is a selfless, diligent and an educated dictator who is well versed along with his responsibilities. When he'll have absolute power in his hands and knows what they are worthwhile, he will surely change India.

The other area of the coin depicts an entirely opposite storyline which refutes to believe that dictatorship is preferable to democracy.

"Dictatorships historically have only been able to find legitimacy in overly busy economic development (especially in our secular world)", says a student on a conversation forum. Hence forth, the outcome is an influential federal that misleads people to ignore the problems somewhat than solving them. This might lead to civil wars after the end of dictatorship witnessed by Yugoslavia, Somalia, Russia, etc. Dictators just generate a false impression before us that the sociable problems are receiving settled, whereas democracies silently release cultural and cultural strain through even development and will capacity to coexist on earth around.

Indians being impatient with the sluggish expansion of the Indian current economic climate and delayed activities of the Indian government to solve issues, it is likely that the citizens would look at a dictatorship as a feasible option. Looking at countries like USA, they think about "why isn't our authorities so productive?" The simple response to this is that western countries have shorter background. India has its problems trailed back to its vast background. It really is thus challenging to resolve old public problems as people are incredibly fond of their culture and record. Dictatorship always assists with brief- term development. A country like India having such an enormous population and such diverse ethnicities and communities can not be ruled by an individual leader. To get a great country like India, to check out republican guidelines and norms is the same as attaining a milestone. Never to forget, our foreign plans will be on the line again because we don't know very well what type of procedures and reforms will accompany the new leader. It is obvious from the health of Germany and Italy that dictatorship cannot can be found nowadays of rapid expansion and globalization. The switch of political system from democratic to dictatorship cannot assure development. The development of any country totally relies on the advancement of every specific which comes through freedom to believe and apply new and ground breaking ideas resulting in development of individuality. Record shows us a definite picture of the problem of folks under dictatorship. It really is terrific to assume the repercussions if such a massive country is solo handed. It really is thus right to get any doubt that the leader risk turning into another Hitler, with covetousness in his bloodstream and selfishness in heart.

Every argument in the favor of democracy has a counter argument for this and vice versa. In case there is India, changing the political system completely can lead to dire effects but departing it as it is will further lead to the aggravation of the economy. Hence, I think that India needs a democratic dictator. India should be governed with a democratic system but the prime minister of India should be very responsive and magnetic enough for taking decisions as a dictator would have taken. This might sound very theoretical however in my opinion it is a trusted and quick solution to deal with the situation. The dictator does not have any pressure on him; in the same way our best minister also needs to lead us fearlessly. There shouldn't be 10 different people trying to effect him. He should not take decisions ranking at the tip of a blade. So in short we need to have a democratic installation where the chosen leader (the best minister) should function as a dictator. Pretty much, whether it is a dictatorship or democracy, it rarely matters, so long as the one who running the whole system should be able to make right decisions and also have skills.

Also We Can Offer!

Other services that we offer

If you don’t see the necessary subject, paper type, or topic in our list of available services and examples, don’t worry! We have a number of other academic disciplines to suit the needs of anyone who visits this website looking for help.

How to ...

We made your life easier with putting together a big number of articles and guidelines on how to plan and write different types of assignments (Essay, Research Paper, Dissertation etc)