Impact of Globalization on International Conflicts


Globalization is an activity that relies upon strategies internationally with the aim of expanding business operations on the facial skin of the world. That is with the aid of global communications, which were made possible due to developments in technology, innovations in the politics leading, socioeconomic, and the environment. Another definition to globalization is cross-border connections being intensified and countries depending on one another. This explanation shades light how the international system has altered. Relationships have changed in individual state governments due to depending using one another and whatever occurrences are ongoing outside their restrictions will have an impact within their territories. In this paper, we will go through the conflicts and exactly how different countries are embracing globalization to help root out these conflicts, (Holm and Sёrensen, 1995). [1]

Global change is an instant process and it is hard to keep track of the new and many innovations. Nevertheless, fads are observable and they all soon add up to globalization. Currently, there is a contradiction in globalization being in full force and the global governance functions that are around have insufficient vitality, the scope and an expert, which means that a certain course is followed, as well as laws that all business lead to success for all celebrations involved. Thus, generally, globalization will not offer equal effects and it is disruptive. New difficulties also have rose in companies (the general public ones), which become less autonomous and are weak in their support. The process of globalization is turbulent, as analysts have found out. In addition, it can be touted as representing a logical economy, however, there is a dark area to it. Critics have always presented the medial side of globalization that runs soley on economic power. Furthermore, it favors the american civilizations and their corporations, which places a whole lot of areas and jobs vulnerable. Rich countries have an exploitative mother nature; they harness cheap labor from countries that are poorer. This creates hazards to the environment and will not uphold the key points of democracy and/or sociable stability. This is through plunging political institutions of the country into unavoidable forces of change throughout the market. Moreover, a significant level of essays highlight that globalization is unequal, (Holm and Sёrensen, 1995). This is analyzed in conditions of its functions as well as its results. It ends up with concentrations and deprivations which, normally, encompass a proper defined structure of vitality.

Globalization creates issues, which, using one end, give attention to social issues as well as personality, and on the other, the issues are primarily monetary. From historical archives, communal change can be closely from the ever-rising levels of conflict. Sorokin do a study, which explored this, mainly, (1937: 409-475). His review encompassed twelve countries and it revealed to what extent what he identifies as cultural strife was at its greatest in eras whenever a certain culture was involved with an alteration that was significant (for example, faith). Such a moment of change is transitional and it cannot go by without it being muddled in conflicts of prices and pursuits.

There is also the paradox of reflectivity. Analysts say that increased reflectivity originates from effects of fast changes. These changes emanate from societies from all over the world. These rapid changes subsequently donate to incidences of discord.

There is also the effect of globalization in conditions of identity. In essence, globalization looks for to homogenize people but additionally it is an undeniable fact that it does increase public heterogeneity as a knowledge. There are very a number of groupings whose identity rests upon competition and ethnicity, religion, and vocabulary. These groupings have used multimedia in a global sense to voice their discontent. By the end of cold war, ethnic revival was unleashed. It's understandable that cold war was a conflict [2]among state governments and it propagated the primal need for a national individuality in a worldwide society. During the 1990s, this notion was weakened by globalization. It had been less effective in making sure that people complied or being able to integrate a culture nationwide. This means that minorities are better off in reasserting their personal information in mention of cultural forces of hegemony. These minorities therefore identify the state of hawaii as not being a reliable promoter and protector of the interests (that are domestic in characteristics). They see the condition as collaborating more with exterior makes (Scholte, 1997). Therefore, in the 1990s, we can argue that conflict is not mainly found between and among says, but rather, their state and its categories. In cases like this, we can easily say that globalization has helped root out conflicts between claims but resulted in creating conflicts within the state of hawaii itself.

In the economical world, globalization compels businesses to adopt diverse strategies with regards to the new pattern of ideas so as to bring on average the protection under the law and interests of your person and the entire community. This makes the businesses have a competitive front side on earth. This also gives business leaders, management, and labor a significant change. That is through acknowledging the contribution of workers and this of the federal government so that company strategies and guidelines are developed and implemented. In cases like this, globalization has reduced conflicts. It permits companies from different countries to share ideas, transact business jointly, make dealerships, et al. however, it should be known that some companies may decide to undertake competition. In any event, it is healthy. Businesses will be determined to accept new ideas, strategies, and guidelines. The reduction of risks can be done through diversification. Companies will be engaged with finance institutions internationally and thus making partnerships with businesses locally and with other nations.

The process of globalization also escalates the dire need for knowledge on the variations of culture between countries as well as the culture of the corporate world. Employers every once in awhile send their experts to other countries so that they can build subsidiaries and/or support the ones that are already around, (Beaverstock, 2012). For a successful subsidiary, vocabulary skills are fundamental, so are the affects of the sub culture, the styles of communications which they are different, societal conducts. This points out to the actual fact that in terms of current economic climate, globalization will not create a conflict, it deals away with any discord that is present.

In the financial front, there is certainly what Schumpeter identifies as 'creative damage', (1942: 84). Companies are catapulted into creativity because of competition; surely, a firm cannot just take a look at its competitors embracing new ideas while it is just stagnant. Technology here involves both products and the process of production. On the other hand, industries and areas can undergo damage or marginalization. This is because competitors may become more progressive in a certain area and take lead.

In an overall economy, that has been globalized, national limitations and distances have diminished, (Ake, 1995: 26). It is because the many obstacles have been done away with thus making sure market gain access to. Cost of deal has been reduced significantly as well as the time [3]and distance being compressed which refers to the international trades. Several changes have been brought about by globalization. They include trade dynamics, movement of capital, and technology copy. Markets and creation present in different countries have made these countries rely upon each other. International competition, as said previously, is increasing in power and subsequently increases the tactical interactions over the border. This further makes the various business enterprises to arrange and structure themselves into transnational networks. Globalization is characterized by increasing interdependence on various levels. For instance, foreign direct investment goes hand in hand with technology transfer and the knowhow. In addition, it includes the move of capital, which is in form of international loans, equity, revenue repatriation, et al. this helps the export of goods and services from countries that are trading.

In this case, also, globalization has brought countries together to a united economic front. The goal is to develop interdependent business across different countries. It is scheduled to globalization that we have trade blocs, (Sorensen, 2004). People in the same stop undertake trades as it were of their national boundaries. However, we can remember that the countries outside this trade bloc suffer from what's called trade diversion. This country will never be in a position to get the benefits the countries within the bloc are receiving. It is from this trade ties that conflicts happen. A country may feel sidelined and thus any ties to the countries in the trade bloc may be severed.


Globalization by description is a process, which relies on international strategies while aiming to expand businesses internationally. The purpose of globalization in cases like this is to give organizations an higher hand in competition through decreasing costs, increased range of products as well as services and customers. Globalization has an hand in issue creation as well as turmoil resolution. In the economic industry, globalization has unified various economies and countries. International trade is currently a likelihood and countries rely upon one another. Cross boundary costs when performing trade have been raised and transportation and communication between countries performing trade have been upgraded. Borrowing of ideas for implementation far away has also resulted because of globalization. New businesses have been started in other countries which is basically because there are establish insurance policies and strategies. In addition, for businesses to be global, knowledge and vocabulary skills come in convenient to understanding a foreign market and knowing the buyer needs.

Globalization also increases cultural diversity. Folks from different ethnic communities, big and small, have a worldwide audience for his or her cultural values and beliefs. Finally, international trade may be facilitated by globalization, however, due to the introduction of trade blocs, some countries are left out. That is trade diversion and it could create a turmoil between countries in a trade bloc and those without.

This means, therefore, that globalization boosts and reduces issues in the international system at the same time. However, the larger part it plays is to reduce conflicts or handle them.

Reference List

Ake, C. 1995. "The brand new world order: a view from Africa. " In Holm, Hans-Henrik and Sёrensen, Georg Eds. , Whose World Order: Unequal Globalization and the End of the Cold War, Boulder: West view.

Beaverstock, J. V. (2012). Highly skilles international labour migration and worldcities:expatriates, executives and enterprisers. In B. Derruder, M. Hoyler, P. J. Taylor, & F. Witlox, International Handbook of Globalisation and World places (pp. 240-249). Cheltenham, Uk: Edward Elgar Publication Ltd.

Scholte, Jan Aart. 1997. "constructions of collective id in a period of globalisation. "http://nexxus. com. cwru. edu/amjdc/paperwork/76.

Schumpeter, Joseph. 1942. Capitalism, socialism and democracy. New York: Harper.

Sorensen, G. (2004). The transformation of their state - beyond the myth of retreat;Palgrave Macmillan.

Sorokin, P. A. 1937. Social and social dynamics, vol III, fluctuations of cultural relationships, battle and revolution. NY: America Catalogs Co.

Holm, Hans-Henrik and Georg Sёrensen. 1995. "Introduction: what has altered. " In Holm and Sёrensen, Whose World Order: Uneven Globalization and the End of the Freezing War. Boulder: West view.

[1] Holm, Hans-Henrik and Georg Sёrensen. 1995. "Introduction: what has improved. " In Holm and Sёrensen, Whose World Order: Uneven Globalization and the finish of the Cold War. Boulder: West view.

[2] Sorokin, P. A. 1937. Community and ethnic dynamics, Vol. III, fluctuations of communal relationships, war and revolution. NY: America Literature Co.

Scholte, Jan Aart. 1997. "Constructions of collective identity in a time of globalization. "http://nexxus. com. cwru. edu/amjdc/paperwork/76.

[3] Sorensen, G. (2004). The transformation of the state of hawaii - beyond the myth of retreat;Palgrave Macmillan

Also We Can Offer!

Other services that we offer

If you don’t see the necessary subject, paper type, or topic in our list of available services and examples, don’t worry! We have a number of other academic disciplines to suit the needs of anyone who visits this website looking for help.

How to ...

We made your life easier with putting together a big number of articles and guidelines on how to plan and write different types of assignments (Essay, Research Paper, Dissertation etc)