Introduction Of Goods Service Tax Gst In Malaysia Economics Essay

In the new global current economic climate, more companies are operating cross border, and therefore are confronted with the need to deal effectively with many different fees, often in a variety of countries, each with different rates, ruling and program. In conjunction with this, the regulatory environment is significantly challenging. The IMF has been endeavoring to push for any countries to look at the Goods Service Tax (GST), or also known in certain countries as Value Added Taxes (VAT), in order to create a more level using field amongst trading nations. Direct taxes have in the past been used to camouflage 'protectionism' policy of certain countries. High tariff on certain product like motorcar has avoided healthy competition between trading nations. The overall populations of this country are remaining without a choice but to consume the neighborhood products, as imported products have grown to be more expensive with the high tariff. Often, because of this, the neighborhood products tend to be substandard in quality as there is no real incentive to contend.

Other possible known reasons for putting into action GST are

Presently, the common delivery rate is 2. 2, so that it is expected that by 2030, 12% of the population will be above 60 years old, twice the current quantity. The current 15% of the working inhabitants paying taxes will therefore reduce, adding a greater burden on the smaller group of people. GST is a broad-based taxes that distributes the burden of taxation among a more substantial section of the populace based on use.

GST protect the motivation to work and motivates enterprise as it isn't a progressive income tax. The duty rate will not increase according to income level; it is level at the decided rate.

GST is levied at the creation and distribution periods, thereby making use of a self-policing device that facilitates supervision and helps it be more difficult to avoid or evade. This further reduces the possibility of revenue damage through understatement of tax evasion.

The GST model put in place in Malaysia is not expected to have cascading, or pyramiding, effect as the tax on a specific good depends upon its last value, rather than the amount of production and syndication channel it moves through. Furthermore, the productivity tax to be paid will be offset against the input tax, and there is no GST levied over GST.

GST is likely to give a more stable source of revenue as usage is less afflicted by economical cycles compared to tax.

GST can be a powerful tax on the 'shadow current economic climate', as those included would consume, and therefore pay indirect fees through GST. It is likely that those involved in such activities would buy luxury goods, which would be subjected to GST.

The federal is trimming its operating expenditure in 2010 2010 by 13%. This shows it is aware of the growing deficit that has widened due to the stimulus package. Recently, Fitch rating organization has cut the score of the ringgit, which might cause brought in inflation if it depreciates, and the International Monetary Fund commented that the GST must be applied urgently.

Malaysia's budget 2010 records on GST; is the fact that, it happens to be at the final stage of doing the analysis on the implementation, where experts are calculating the cultural impact of its presence in Malaysia. The Malaysian authorities said that maybe it's possible for those to implement this in the near future. Looking at Malaysia in a broader level, GST can not only have an effect on big businesses, but small and medium companies (SME) as well. Although there have been nimble of past information saying that a food outlet can only charge GST if it's annual turnover is above RM3 million (3, 000, 000 Ringgit Malaysia), the GST compliance requirements and thresholds is not officially declared.

If we were to take into account GST's implementation into goods and services, we must assume that it will eventually all levels of the supply chain; which means from the purchase of raw materials or start-up goods completely to end-user (consumer ready) products available for sale. Ultimately in something, GSTs charged to every level are offered to another person and in the end, the buyer.

1. 2 Background

In the 2005 Budget, the Malaysian Government announced that the existing sales duty and service duty would be substituted with a broad-based usage tax to be known as the Goods and Services Tax (GST). The tax is dependant on value added strategy and is suggested to be put in place on 1 January 2007. This move was necessary, to enhance the government's income without affecting the populace from the lower income group. Since this taxes is dependant on goods and service consumption, it employs that the rich would be the ones more damaged since they have a tendency to take in more. The Leading Minister recently declared that increase in income will be utilized mainly to fund the hike in Civil Servants' salary also to funding other infrastructure works for the benefit of the nation most importantly.

A Taxes Review -panel was formed in middle of 2005, and it has turn out with a Debate Paper intended for businesses to comprehend the essential administrative requirements and methods when GST is integrated so that they know the impact of GST.

Secondly, the Taxes Review -panel invites the business enterprise community and other relevant organizations and organizations to review the proposal in that paper.

Thirdly, with a public appointment, it provides an appropriate forum for both general public and private organizations to switch views with people of the Duty Review Panel to be able to understand the rationale behind the proposals initiated.

1. 3 Problem Statement

The GST was said to be carried out in Malaysia in the entire year 2007; however the government must defer the move scheduled to critical reviews by certain quarters. After getting rid of four Says to the opposition, it must tread over a careful path to be able not to lose more general public support. It cannot manage to make any more major oversight in the wake of its dismal performance in the last General Election.

GST is normally known as a tax system which results in regressivity (i. e. people with less pay a larger share of the resources than people that have more), on the other hand with the perfect aim of progressivity which is normally sought when putting into action a tax. It really is sometimes argued that a GST system can not work in an unhealthy region such as Africa, where most countries have heavy external personal debt burdens, malnutrition, civil wars and lack of food and medications which often result in inhuman living conditions. Nevertheless, with the support of the IMF, VAT/GST systems were designed in many African countries to fight or at least reduce the adverse effect of VAT/GST regressivity by having a list of exemptions and zero-ratings which apply (generally speaking) to basic foodstuffs and other basic needs.

GST is not necessarily easy to administer, unlike what the advocates of GST will need countries to believe during the change stage. Unless a proper GST administration, backed by modern technology and digital communication systems can be carried out, GST supervision will inevitably be expensive for both the Revenue Specialists and the business sector. The productivity/input mechanism of the GST system, in conjunction with GST refunds, may provide the ideal chance for fraudulence where corrupt officials and unethical businesses exploit weaknesses in the machine. This again ends up with a defensive frame of mind from the Income Authorities, leading to bad communication, cashflow and other GST cost.

In 1992, a free of charge Trade Arrangement (FTA) was signed which reduced import tariffs between ASEAN member countries. Inside the first three years of the FTA, exports amongst the ASEAN countries grew from US$43 billion to US$80 billion. In 1997, the leaders of ASEAN implemented the perspective to build a stable, profitable and highly competitive economical region, in which there's a free move of goods, services and assets, a freer move of capital, equitable monetary development and reduced poverty and socio-economic disparities.

The plan is to remove all tariffs for the six more developed countries by 2010 and for all countries by 2015. The summit also progressed the work to incorporate ASEAN with the much bigger economies of Asia- Pacific, specifically China, Japan, South Korea, India, Australia, and New Zealand. China agreed upon a pact to expose the world's most significant free trade zone by 2010, covering almost two billion people. Japan authorized a similar arrangement to take effect by 2012. India agreed to interact by 2011. Australia and New Zealand have agreed to talks starting next yr to free up trade within a decade. The get good at plan is to have a free trade zone that can compete with the US and EU. In South East Asia, Malaysia remains one of the few countries yet to adopt the GST system, which would indirectly be in the way, if you want to participate this master plan.

In Malaysia, it was released that essential goods and services will never be subjected to GST, but concerns that GST will spark a chain response that will raise the prices of most non-controlled items should not be dismissed. We have seen numerous examples of when there is an upsurge in a certain item; it sparks a cost rise generally in most goods and services. For instance, when the petrol price increased to RM2. 70, prices of most goods, foods and services were hiked. But after the petrol price fallen, there has not been a considerable correction in the costs of goods, food and services.

The relevant ministries are powerless to mitigate the situation and curb the necessary inflation. A recently available example is on the removal of the subsidy on white bread resulting in price increase of one loaf of breads by 20 to 30 cents. The Deputy Household Trade, Cooperative & Consumer Affairs Minister can only just comment that the price adjustment had not been necessary, urge merchants to practice corporate and business cultural responsibility and ask the consumers to do their power at hand. All these claims won't effectively curb unnecessary profiteering and traders taking opportunity to boost the price of goods and service. The general public would want to know how the government intends to steer clear of the similar predicament

Chapter 2

2. 0 What is GST and exactly how does indeed it work?

GST is a utilization tax recharged on an array of local & international products, goods and services. It's a broad-based tax imposed on every level of something, from raw materials all the way to done goods. The proposed implementation of GST will replace the current Malaysian service taxes and sales tax.

Broadly, GST functions by offsetting GST paid on acquisitions (input taxes) against GST credited on sales or items made (end result tax). That is known as the credit offset mechanism. The multi tier levels of tax really helps to ensure that GST paid by businesses for purchases does not result in being a long lasting cost. However, the consumer ultimately bears the responsibility of the taxes. Conceptually, GST is imposed on the worthiness added to goods or services by each split processor in the development and distribution chain.

This is seen in the simple illustration below.

2. 1 SOME Matter ABOUT THE Advantages OF GST.

There were some concerns that Malaysians could go through even more with the release of the Goods and Services Taxes (GST). GST-driven inflation would be a calamity that the battling lower-income group could do without.

The GST Expenses was tabled in Parliament by the end of the Budget sitting down that concluded on 17 Dec 2009. At its first reading, the monthly bill was just brought up, but there was no explanation of the charge or any controversy. The next reading is when the costs is available for debate and suggested amendments. This might come as soon as March 2010 for the GST Monthly bill. Once approved, the new duty can be executed as early as 2011.

The table below lists the government's duty income for 2008 which contributed RM112. 9 billion or 70 % of total federal revenue.

Government Tax Revenue in 2008

Personal Income Taxes RM 15. 0 bil

Company Taxes RM 37. 7 bil

Petroleum Duty RM 24. 2 bil

Export and transfer duties RM 5. 4 bil

Excise obligations RM 10. 7 bil

Sales and Services Duty RM 11. 7 bil

As shown in the stand, the biggest way to obtain tax earnings is company tax, which at 26 % of declared earnings, currently brings in RM37. 7 billion into federal coffers. Petroleum duty makes up the second biggest taxes item while the duty levied on the 1. 5 million people who are now currently paying personal income taxes in Malaysia makes up the third biggest. All these taxes are regarded progressive for they taxes the richest individuals and the companies that are making money. Progressive taxes do not load the poorer sectors of society. Progressive taxes have a tendency to equal out income differences between the rich and the indegent in modern culture.

It was argued that regressive taxes regimes, on the other hand, burden the poor. Sales taxes are generally regressive as they tax consumption and not income. But sales tax in Malaysia has different rates for different types of goods and the federal government can make them less regressive by levying sales taxes specifically on good that are consumed by the richer areas of society such as expensive vehicles, big houses, international travel, expensive restaurants and other luxury items.

The Goods and Services Duty, however, is perceived to be even more regressive for this is levied at a set rate on an extremely wide selection of products including many items that the poorer people need to buy. It might lead to a growth in prices and would definitely strike the poorest the hardest. As generally in most countries with the GST set up, a reduced amount of corporate taxes and personal tax will observe suit. This then, sometimes appears as the real reason that the GST is being brought in - to make Malaysia more "business friendly" by reducing corporate duty (which includes already been reduced markedly from the 40 per cent level in 1988 to its current 26 %).

2. 2 LACK OF INFORMATION AND Misunderstandings ON GST.

The piecemeal release of information is creating great matter among the list of people and available sector. For example;

Will the regulators furnish an intensive list of item that'll be recharged GST, and exactly what will be exempted?

If a product, like grain or chicken is exempted, does indeed the exemption apply across the board regardless of the form of the product? For example, is cooked grain or cut, frozen or marinated chicken breast also exempted?

What is the difference between exempt and zero-rated GST?

Will there be any reduction in personal and corporate tax?

What changes will be produced to the sales and service tax?

There is a perception that as GST is a multistage duty, it would bring about higher effective taxes rate than 4%. As GST is very specialized, most people are unaware how it'll impact them.

When will the GST rate be reviewed?

Recent media declaration on its impact did not improve view on the release of GST. It is reported that under the sales and services taxes system, the burden on the indegent is 2. 38%, but under the GST it'll be 2. 17%. For the bigger income group, the taxes burden will be reduced from 13% to 2. 74%, according to the Finance Ministry. The overall savings for homes will be between RM14. 52 and RM346. 92 annual. This obviously contradicts other affirmation from politicians, and the general public notion, that the GST will be inflationary. But as no further details are given how the personal savings are attained, general population sentiment remains negative on GST.

CHAPTER 3

EXPECTED IMPACT OF GST

3. 1 Impact on the people in the pub.

Generally, the general public can be involved that the intro of GST will hit their wallets directly. In an initial analysis, as the GST is expected to be lower than service tax, the monthly bill for a restaurant food will be 1% lower as the service duty rate is 5% and GST is 4%. For other services prone to service duty, a GST rate lower than service duty should result in a slight decrease in charges if the price of the other components in providing the service continue to be the same.

On goods that attract sales taxes, the existing rate seems higher than the suggested GST, hence there might be a reduction if there is no further adjustment. Current rates are the following;

Fruits, certain foodstuff and building materials (5%)

General goods, including motor vehicle (10%)

Liquor and alcoholic drinks (20%)

Cigarette and cheroots (25%)

For hawkers; even though they don't have a turnover of RM500, 000 yearly, so are not required acquire GST, the material procured, for example, noodles, seafood balls, processed meat, chicken, equipments for the stall may be subjected to GST, leading to price hike. But without thorough knowledge or mapping, or even home elevators the duties charged, people are uncertain whether the prices of goods and services will stay stagnant, increase or decrease.

3. 2 EFFECT ON BUSINESSES.

The implementation of GST is likely to impact business in the following manner

Compliance costs are anticipated to be incurred as there is requirement to keep tabs on the input tax and output duty to determine refund or tax to be posted. Despite the fact that some Malaysian companies already are paying sales duty or service taxes, there is no input taxes to be checked and accounted for to offset against output tax.

Business process and procurement need to be mapped out, especially with respect to suppliers and promotional items. For instance, a new car attract GST, but items provided free of charge during campaign - like sports activities rims or a GPS system - may not qualify for an input duty claim. Likewise the organization souvenirs and hampers given out by businesses may not be eligible. The procurement office should start describing the sales tax or the existing tax payed for their items used a raw material. As the GST is expected to be lower than most up to date indirect tax, there should be some potential cost benefits. This is also to avoid being overcharged by supplier that intends to include the GST over the existing price of its resources after sales duty, there must be some potential cost keeping.

Human resource factor: New staff may need to be used to ensure an enterprise is compliant and conversant with the GST need. As most personnel have not been subjected to GST, training needs to be conducted.

Accounting system and bill payable: The business enterprise would require a proper accounting system to keep an eye on the GST amounts. Most systems could be upgraded, which is important to inform software vendors to check run the info to avoid any potential complication.

Cash circulation management: Businesses must be aware that output GST may need to be settled before pay out of sales invoices by customer. On the other hand, payables which input duty has been said but remains unpaid after six months have to be accounted as result tax and are to be reclaimed as source taxes only after payment is made. Companies are concerned about the timeliness of the refund process as delays would ends in a higher working capital cost.

In addition, businesses that contain thin margins are worried about the rate of the refund for input tax, especially if the business is principally exported-oriented and procure its natural material locally.

3. 3 OTHER IMPACTS

The expected impact on corporate and taxes are as released in the news headlines recently. Deputy Money Minister Chor Chee Heung quoted that Malaysia will see a gradual reduction in its corporate and business and tax rates once the suggested Goods and Services Tax (GST) is in place by mid-2011.

He will not think that there is a timeline for reaching this reduction in corporate and taxes, as this is a long-term aim of the government. Once the GST come into play, it'll be a broad structured tax and the trend is, once GST is applied, corporate and income taxes will slowly but surely be reduced.

Chor also disclosed that businesses related to services such as those in the meals and transportation sectors, would be exempted from the proposed GST. He provided assurance that the cost of living and lifestyle of individuals wouldn't normally increase or be damaged with the implementation of a GST.

He also added that the execution of GST wouldn't normally cause inflation. After the GST is in, the service taxes and sales duty (now imposed) would be abolished. Both fees are very high at 10 % and five per cent respectively. The GST at four per cent is considered very low.

Meanwhile, the Fund Ministry's Taxes Review -panel Chairman, Ms. Kamariah Hussain, said there would be earnings gains around 1. 0 Billion Ringgit for the federal government with the GST implementation.

She explained that the intro of the GST was part of an overall tax reform in the united states. While using GST, the federal government would have a better mix of earnings, and not be too dependent on tax and petroleum income.

Second Financing Minister, Ahmad Husni Hanadzlah acquired indicated that while the GST would replace the prevailing sales and services taxes, it could not put pressure on prices and ease the responsibility of consumers, staple foods such as grain, sugar, cooking engine oil and flour would be exempted from it.

.

3. 3. 1 IMPACT OF GST ON SMALL MEDIUM Venture (SME).

SMEs form the backbone of the business enterprise activities of any nation. Apart from encouraging the growth of new establishments such as tourism and biotechnology-based industries, the Government (2004 Budget Proposals) too has singled out SMEs to spearhead local growth.

However, there's a group of 'miserable' people representing non-governmental organizations (NGOs) and the public who have expressed their non-approval for the release of the proposed GST. Their main discussion is that GST favours the abundant and burdens the poor most importantly. Their contention is the fact that "it'll burden the individuals and contribute to the widening gap between the abundant and the indegent, not to mention the climb in the inflation rate".

However, tax specialist, Beh Tok Koay is of the judgment that "perhaps this small group lacks a knowledge of the complete system of GST. It is supposed to be broadbased and can replace the service and sales taxes system, and this in turn will reduce tax rates". There may be two GST rates: a lesser rate for SMEs and a higher rate for large companies. Imposing two GST rates is, however, difficult to administer as they offer sufficient room for taxes avoidance and increase compliance cost. Minimizing the conformity cost of GST would reduce the burden of SMEs. When there is convincing data to show that the compliance cost of SMEs are lower if the accounts are computerized, then your Government could provide software packages to the licensees to allow them to appropriately compute GST. Free training and seminars including visits should be extended to SMEs to enable them to have an improved understanding of the conformity requirements. An added option is to exempt small businesses from GST totally but such a choice too has its downsides.

The Government must analyze the income gain when compared with the compliance cost before making a decision to look for the threshold limit. With the two-year window period before GST is in force, all of us have a role to play in contributing to the development of an improved broad-based consumption taxes system which ultimately would help reduce the rates of tax. Without doubt, everyone especially the SMEs will eagerly await the final intro of the GST system and the scope of the expected tax rate slashes.

The business community, NGO and charity company are worried about the power of the specialists to implement GST well. Australia, for example, had to bring in foreign experts to help in rollout of GST. It would undermine investor confidence if the GST is not executed in a organized manner with reduced hiccup.

Burdening the poor and those financially vulnerable: Some 32% of family members in Malaysia have an income under RM2, 000 per month. The introduction of GST without the required revamp of subsidies will cause a heavier financial burden on poor and low-income family members. Families with money below RM2, 000 per month don't need to pay personal income tax. With GST, things that are not basic needs - toys, prepared food, can food, packet beverages, etc, could increase existing inflationary stresses. The ongoing restructuring of the subsidy will also create the tension, discomfort and dissatisfaction as people qualified to receive subsidy could unintentionally be overlooked as the government establishes and attempts to refine its method of distribution.

CHAPTER 4

4. 0 CONCLUSION

GST is unavoidable. It will you need to be a matter of your energy when it'll be implemented. It might not be considered a perfect system, but has worked well as a income basic for other countries. Malaysia's problem may lay more in public areas education, execution and enforcement.

To move forward, Malaysia has to comply with the free trade vision of ASEAN and cannot lag behind the other countries. Currently, aside from Malaysia, only Myanmar and Brunei has yet to apply the GST. GST modernises the duty system by addressing tax evasion committed by free riders who would like every profit but won't pay for it, or favour others to pay for them. GST will surely be considered a good system to improve the Government's revenue. Concerns of it being regressive can be get over by careful and advisable classifications of zero ranked materials and exempt products for essential items as against standard supplies for non essential and luxury items.

One good point of starting later is the ability to learn from the faults of others. The federal government should be fully translucent in the execution of the proposed GST.

In this borderless world, media and knowledge cannot be curbed. The people are getting more intelligent and informed. It will not be prudent for the federal government of the day not to progress towards a far more modern duty system. Instead of blind opposition, critics should provide cases and lessons learned from the weaknesses of other countries in the execution of GST or VAT.

Also We Can Offer!

Other services that we offer

If you don’t see the necessary subject, paper type, or topic in our list of available services and examples, don’t worry! We have a number of other academic disciplines to suit the needs of anyone who visits this website looking for help.

How to ...

We made your life easier with putting together a big number of articles and guidelines on how to plan and write different types of assignments (Essay, Research Paper, Dissertation etc)