What is land getting?

This paper we aim at providing a view over land getting on the globe as well as answering the concrete questions, first of all: which variations can we find on land getting occurring in various parts of the earth? And second of all: can it be considered as a chance or as threat?

It is organized in three different parts and a conclusion. In the advantages we will try to describe the bases of land grabbing, but without going into detail: what is land-grabbing, why it is occurring nowadays, which are the actors involved with land- grabbing. In another part we will examine individually the several ways in which countries are facing land getting and their unique circumstances. We will distinguish between Land getting in Africa, Land- grabbing in Asia and lastly land grabbing in Ex lover soviet countries. In the last of our parts we've made a compilation of the opportunities and threats that we have found through the reference point review. And we'll conclude the documents with the conclusions obtained throughout the research.


- What is land getting?

Land grabbing is the word used to spell it out the acquisition (leasing or purchasing) of arable lands in expanding countries by other countries or general public or private companies aiming at food security in their home countries, fuel equipment or as investment.

This practice is not new along the annals; the same aims have induced developed countries to wait the demand in their low- resources home countries using resources allocated in growing countries rich in resources. We are able to name for example the European colonialism age in the 19th hundred years where the farmland was globalised. Or the 20th century where companies located in developed countries took over huge berry plantations in Central America and Southeastern Asia.

- Reasons for land getting.

In this aspect we have to distinguish between your reasons leading developed countries to acquire lands in developing countries and why developing countries aren't only eager of leasing or selling these lands but also sometimes even promoting it.

1. - Why is land getting interesting for the investors.

To find the reasons we must go through the current situation on earth in three fronts

Food security: In a World where in fact the food prices are reaching historical maximums and the populations is doing only growing regularly, resources such as land and drinking water commence to be scarce. That's the reason export food dependant countries make an effort to reach balance in their food materials by acquiring lands in other countries.

Bio fuels source: Aswell as food, energy is getting increasingly more scarce and expensive. Furthermore, in developed countries there is an increasing demand of bio fuels, sometimes even recognized by insurance plan for example in European countries.

Safe investment funds: The global crisis taking place has had lack of assurance into the financial market. In this particular rarefied atmosphere opportunities in agriculture provide certain balance due to the ineslicity of the agricultural goods.

2. Why is land getting interesting to sponsor countries?

There are lots of benefits or better said promised and expected benefits which render land- grabbing interesting to developed countries governments. These expected benefits are creating that countries like Pakistan are offering their lands to the rich countries.

Public and private investment in developing countries it is very low, and provokes that the developing process it is slow. Investment funds of developed countries then it is seen as a repulsive to boost this example.

Also, these countries usually have lack of technical alternatives and infrastructures which could help them to increase their productions several times. Helping also to make sure food security.

Most of the times, the agreements are made for lands that governments classify as degraded or not suited to agriculture but with the appropriate technology approved by the traders these lands could be effective providing to the united states food and employments.

- Actors engaged.

The more noticeable stars in land grabbing will be the both mentioned previously, the investors and the government authorities. The first one counts with the funding and the second one has the final word to simply accept or reject the land acquisition proposal and it is the main one negotiating the conditions under which the deal will need place.

But we cannot forget that underlying these actors we likewise have the population moving into the land which is directly affected by the contract and which they'll be deprived. Also the global market will be afflicted by these agreements, since variety countries will begin to produce more and entrepreneur countries will demand less.


For shareholders:

As we've mentioned previously, from the investor's part the pros would be depending on their particular interest: Food security, bio-fuels supply and safe assets. But these purchases have some hazards, because in the majority of the conditions the web host countries have problems with inestable governments and sometimes not sufficiently supported by the favorite people. Also popular riots against these operations are commonplace, brought on by having less information on rural issues that most of number government authorities have which lead them not to consider rural inhabitants' needs in their contracts. An example is the arrangement reached by the government of Madagascar with the South Korean company Daewoo that was followed by popular riots against it and provoked the change of the government and the cancellation of the agreement.

For number countries:

On the medial side of the sponsor countries the professionals expected from these international contracts are foreign assets which would beneficiate the united states in the areas of scientific and infrastructures development, food security, increasing the employment in rural areas.

The potential of these agreements is vital for the number countries, in most cases suffering from lack of nationwide and international ventures. But the the truth is that the majority of these exchanges are unequal because the investors are big powerful companies or rich countries and the sponsor countries are on the contrary countries with a lot of needs and not with many internal politics problems.

Nowadays there's a complete lack of legislation on land getting agreements, and moreover are rather not transparent being quite difficult to really know the prolong and conditions on such agreements.

Also the misbehavior of the trader may provoke a finish list of contras in the sponsor countries such as environmental problems derived of the intense use of ground, overuse of water items, food insecurity if all the food produced it is send back again to their home countries or to the international markets searching for broaden the benefits, worsening of unemployment situation if the technology used it is low labor- intensive, new technology not accessible to locals. . .

The host government authorities because of the lack of information on the rural areas share with lands officially classified as low profitable but without taking into account the current uses of them. Examples of those uses ate collection of medicinal plant life, provision of wild food, water supply, . . .

International code of conduct:

As explained in the above mentioned paragraphs, the benefits are very very important to either traders or sponsor countries but the risks are much more evident for sponsor countries. That is why in the international community it is showing the need of encouraging transparency and ensuring that the actual benefits expressed in the contracts become a certainty for the number countries. Within this sense, there is a proposal of creating a global code of conduct leading these exchanges.

This code of do would seek for

- Transparency in the discussions, meaning make information and involvement available to locals.

- Respecting customary and property protection under the law.

- Benefits for local people, the agreements undermine the advantages of the locals from the land use. That is why they should be compensated and obtaining a part of the benefits.

- Environmental sustainability, through impact assessments and monitoring.

- Esteem of countrywide trade policies, for example bans of exports in case there is domestic food problems.

Although, there are critics to the application of this Code of conduct due to the fact that it does not solve certain problems concerning the land grabbing contracts such as how identify the customary property lands when government authorities do not have these details available and have no resources to get it, in some coordinator countries the land property protection under the law aren't clear and there a higher threat of dispossess locals of these land without the compensation, groups of elites claim to be representants of poor- teams accumulating the huge benefits but in actuality they aren't. Also the code of conduct it is criticized by land getting opositors since it assumes that land grabbing is impossible to avoid and unlike that facilitates it and does not give room for the developing of other insurance policies probably more beneficial and lasting for web host countries.


After Soviet Union collapse there is a wild deal with for what before was general population owned land. But the process of acquiring land by overseas traders in this area of the world has persisted and now continues to be happening through land grabbing agreements. Regarding to FAO's research, Russia, Ukraine, Kazhajstan are three of the four with significant potential to have an impact in food supply in the world.

So, what makes ex girlfriend or boyfriend soviet countries' land (especially Russia, Ukraine and kazhajstan) interesting for international companies and rich countries?.

- Low price of the land: It has a competitive advantages over other producing countries like Argentina and Brazil.

- Infrastructure: It really is more developed than in African countries.

- Resilience in problems times: the impact on agricultural is smaller than in other industries thanks to the inelasticity of food prices.

- Climate change benefits: It really is forecasted the improvement of their conditions for agriculture.

Although buying these lands have lots of risks

- Politics inestability.

- Lack definition of the house rights.

- Frecuent restrictions to sales.

- Electricity of the neighborhood elites.

It is difficult to learn or even calculate the number of land or even the personality of the traders. Nonetheless it seems that companies from western countries and recently other countries from the center east are the key traders in the european part of Russia, Ukraine and kazhajstan.

Whereas some Asian countries are investing in the eastern parts, thus China is acquiring huge territories in kazhajstan and Siberia. Japan and South Korea are also employed in getting lands from Siberia.

There are two main variations between Western affected investments and Asian investment

- Assets from European countries are mostly carried out by private companies, whereas Asian purchases are much more likely done by countries.

- American companies in the majority of the cases transfer to the number country the technology and retain labor from the coordinator countries. Contrary to that the Asian investors take technology as well as labor of their own.

Although the countries all together are getting some benefits from the foreign purchases such as development of infrastructure, increasing of grain creation, access to the last technologies. The local individuals are being harmed in many aspects: Powerful local elites favor foreign companies and countries committing, the investment funds are highly scientific and labor- comprehensive worsening the job conditions in the area, lost or sell of the farms at loss by local farmers towards foreign shareholders, judges have been action in favor of foreign investors.


Population increase, changes in eating habits and demand for bio-fuels are putting farmland at a premium worldwide, this is specially proven in case of many African countries which depend on developed countries for food products and other needs. A good example of one of such cases is widely seen in Ethiopia and the prospective regions will be the fertile lands of Gambella, Afar, Ogaden and Benshangul-gumuz in particular and everything arable lands in general. The folks from these areas will be resettled not too much from the lands they are dispossessed of, so that they will be an excellent source for cheap labor if need come up. Any land there, which traders have not been able to buy, is being leased for approximately $1 per 12 months per hectare. Saudi Arabia, and also other Middle Eastern emirate claims such as Qatar, Kuwait and Abu Dhabi, is regarded as the biggest buyer. Many Punjabi farmers migrated from India long ago are heading to Gambella and other locations for settlement deal. They and their descendants have every right to farm these lands and go on them for another 70 to 99 years and beyond. Moreover, they'll export every grain they harvest to India or even to wherever they create hard currency best. Nothing is still left for Ethiopia farmers. China also offers a huge vested desire for Ethiopia. India and China look for sparsely filled and fertile areas to stay their overcrowded peoples. Other countries like Sudan, Kenya, Nigeria, Tanzania, Malawi, Congo, Zambia, Uganda, Madagascar, Zimbabwe, Mali, Sierra Leone, Ghana are under the capture of land grabbing where British firms have secured tracts of land in Angola, Ethiopia, Mozambique, Nigeria and Tanzania to expand flowers and vegetables.

Land to grow biofuel crops is also popular. "European biofuel companies have received or wanted about 3. 9m hectares in Africa. It has resulted in displacement of people, lack of appointment and compensation, damaged promises about wages and job opportunities, " said Tim Grain, author of an Action Help report which estimates that the EU needs to grow crops on 17. 5m hectares, it is to meet its 10% bio energy concentrate on by 2015.

Production of liquid biofuels is an integral drivers of much recent land acquisition. Compelling reasons include

- Energy security: with fluctuating global olive oil prices, countries are seeking alternative energy resources to increase long-term energy security and reduce energy transfer bills.

- Rural development: a new and profitable land use provides better opportunities and long-term security for farmers and employees.

- Export development: for countries with favorable endowments of land, labor and trade conditions, bio fuels are an opportunity to develop new export market segments and enhance the trade balance.


Land-grabbing is currently being completed by domestic and transnational companies, often with encouragement and support from central government authorities in most of the Asian countries. Most of the products produced - food, feed and gas are exported or are organized to be exported to other countries, within the circuit and reasoning of the global professional agro food-feed-fuel complex, with trade insurance policies such as those by the EU having important implications.

Rice can be an important export product for a number of South East Asian state governments such as Thailand, Cambodia, Vietnam and Laos. Effortlessly, SEA is an attractive region for just about any land acquisition assignments as pointed out by observations created by The International Food Insurance policy Research Institute (IFPRI) in Producing Countries.

Developing economic capabilities such as China, India, South Korea, and oil-wealthy Middle Eastern countries have signed up with the international 'treasure hunt' for wealthy and fertile agricultural lands in a bid to secure their food source. Lack of good agricultural land and normal water in home countries for food development, the increasing distrust of global marketplaces, and a race to contend with others to control land lead to this repercussions, The "alternatives" to handle the current global financial and food crises have provided opportunities for government authorities, business and capital likewise, to make gains. The IFPRI quotes that land grabbing discounts from 2008 to 2009 are between US$20and 30 billion. Whereas before companies may have engaged in deals to buy agricultural products from other countries, there's been a wave of interest in buying or leasing for a long term the method of production in overseas countries. China, with the "VENTURING OUT" strategy, has been leasing lands in the Philippines and other countries in Asia and Africa through free trade and investment contracts.

List of the countries in Asian under the snare of land grabbing

- Burma: Kuwaiti federal staff were in Burma to finalize the terms and conditions of a contract growing design of grain and palm engine oil.

- Cambodia: A technological assistance for olive oil exploration and proposal to switch for an undisclosed large parcel to develop food for export, mainly grain, to Kuwait.

- Indonesia: Qatar Investment Power, their state investment fund, possessed signed a memorandum of understanding with Indonesia to appeal to more Qatari investments in agriculture.

- Philippines: The Saudi Arabia federal government has an investment contract with the Philippine administration affecting food for export creation of bananas, pineapples, mango, and papaya to Riyadh.

- Pakistan: United Arab Emirates federal government is at bilateral talk's with Pakistan to purchase farmland to produce food for export.

Also We Can Offer!

Other services that we offer

If you don’t see the necessary subject, paper type, or topic in our list of available services and examples, don’t worry! We have a number of other academic disciplines to suit the needs of anyone who visits this website looking for help.

How to ...

We made your life easier with putting together a big number of articles and guidelines on how to plan and write different types of assignments (Essay, Research Paper, Dissertation etc)