'Motivation refers to the psychological operations that lead us to do certain things. Common-sense views of determination tend to view it as an individual factor that people can have more or less of, and which energise what folks do. Many ideas about the role and importance of desire in education have a tendency to portray it as a form of personal quality, which can straight have an impact on learning. ' Long, (2007:101)
In every classroom, the motivation of the pupils within the category is paramount for a tutor, to allow them to have the ability to learn effectively and also to maintain a steady order on the behaviour.
Many theorists have written on the advantages of these theories, a few of which have benefited educators, whilst others have grown to be dated and failed. Throughout my readings, and from my own personal observations, it has become clear if you ask me that there surely is no 'one-shot' treatment for motivating a category of pupils.
Bandura's Self-efficacy theory and Weiner's Attribution Theory.
Hierarchy of Needs: (Maslow, 1970). This theory is, in my opinion, important to the determination of learners. I found it particularly highly relevant to the drive of major school-going children. The model is very interesting for educators through its common sense and composition, as Maslow's theory is organised in an ordered vertical lines representing the basic needs, as shown by image A.
Maslow's theory on Hierarchy of Basic Needs: 'postulates certain basic human needs and arranges them within an order, a hierarchy, the needs becoming more 'individuals' as one proceeds through them' Child, 2007:239
Lean Developing Concepts
Maslow's theory is split into specific needs, as shown by image A, where the bottom level of the triangle represents the physiological needs, (this is when the kid requires the basic needs of water and food to become encouraged). Once this need is satisfied, then your child, corresponding to Maslow, will require stability and regularity in his/her life. Pursuing on this, the necessity of owned by a group, or even to be loved or nurtured. Following this need is satisfied the kid will require building of his/her self-esteem; this can be done by attaining esteem from others and obtaining praise on the work and finally, personal actualisation needs. Regarding to Maslow, this need is the most prioritised, which is when the kid is determined to work. Unlike other theories I will be investigating later, this theory is very difficult to relate it to all children's determination levels. Indeed, it is clear, and I understand that each child will demand each one of these needs to be able to reach the optimal motivation level. Discussing image A, the kid will have possessed several needs prior to arriving in college. The parent product will have presented the child to physiological needs, along with safety needs and sense of belonging. It really is then required of the tutor that they should encourage the development of the rest of the needs for the child, for the kid to feel content and be motivated to work independently and well in a class environment.
From my college experience thus far, I now can affiliate this theory your of the children whom I had been teaching. If a kid, for instance, was lacking a sense of owed, or their basic physiological needs weren't being met, then it would be clear that the kid wouldn't normally be encouraged to learn whilst at institution.
Self-Efficacy theory: (Bandura, 1986). This theory depends upon the way the child perceives themselves in conditions of their ability. Bandura also speaks of 'if a child has high self-efficacy', then this child will be quite happy and able to remain on task and work independently, also the child will screen high degrees of self-assurance and generally have a high self-esteem. These are certain of their ability and competence with the task in hand.
'Success tends to generate higher goals and a more positive self-concept, resulting in increased motivation, effort and success' Long, (2007:119)
In compare, Bandura's theory of low self-efficacy says that children who aren't confident or believe that these are 'pointless' or limited at completing a specific task will eventually lose motivation, and this sense can be carried over onto other responsibilities or subjects. They may even avoid interesting with the duty, perceiving it to be too difficult or challenging. If a child has too little motivation using their potential to complete a given task, they will apply minimum effort.
'When students received negative information about their performance over a mathematics task (irrespective of how that they had done), their following success and engagement in similar responsibilities were often significantly reduced'. Bandura (1986)
On my recent institution experience, it was interesting to note that Bandura's theory was accurate and this children do work relating to their degree of motivation. Some of the children that made frequent mistakes in literacy and numeracy would build-up a barrier with their learning because of this of negative feedback from either the instructor or the classroom associate. Also, I found that some of the children 'automatically' believed that these were poor at a topic if indeed they were browsing a support employee for extra help. The children would make the excuse they are poor at a task, on the reasoning that they were weak in this area of study. Zimmerman et al, (1992) provides that 'children will set their goals according from what they understand they are capable of and will stay away from the emotional effects of inability'. From my experience as of yet I have found this to be specifically relevant, especially in the children I have already been teaching. Several children experienced a low degree of motivation and can make many excuses to avoid doing the mandatory process. These excuses ranged from wanting to be "excused for the toilet" or "can I move onto another question". The kid I studied carefully within my Individual Needs Assignment (make reference to SEN project), (whom I know now to have experienced a low self-efficacy), has generated artificial barriers to his own learning, and this, I feel, has resulted from his previous connection with being chastised over his flaws in his work, with a former tutor.
Attribution theory, Weiner, (1980, 1992) is the next most dominant theoretical strand that we, in my professional experience, found to be very common in the area of desire. This theory is centred on the principle that, as professors, we have to be able to understand the pupil's motivations for success. To do this, we have to analyse their mental feeling and assumptions in what triggers their success or inability. Borich, (1997)
This theory is particularly relevant in the school room, in which a child will present his/her completed good article, passing a course project/test or winning a game between their peers. The typical types of attributions that the kid will need to display in this situation are: luck, ability, effort, or strategy. Following on from this, the typical outcome for this child calls for certain psychological reactions, based how the activity or task has gone. The kid will reveal this by having an optimistic or negative sentiment. Rotter, (1966) grows this attribution theory further when he expresses: 'one form of attribution is how individuals can have a sense of whether control hails from themselves - an interior locus, or from things distinct from them - an external locus'. The external locus concentrates on how the kid believes in 'luck' rather than ability. In this specific instance the child is said to have lower accomplishments and lack of effort. I particularly felt that this affirmation was relevant, as to date, I've experienced this among some of the children in my recent college experience. The kids would make an effort some questions, knowing that the questions were basically attempted, and not accurately preferred.
Seifert, (2004) brings -'that if a kid is to face regular compliment with good work, this will motivate the child to take care of the level of desire that will benefit his/her work or capability. This can indeed supply the child with a good sense of achievements and the child will strive to perform to the same capacity the next time'. He continues - 'in compare to the positive end result, there is also a negative end result deriving from the less-successful children, these children become habituated with the feeling of negative feelings associated with failing, this will lead to the child blaming their own lack of ability to perform or on other factors that they cannot control, a few examples include: dyslexia, attention-deficit disorder. Similarly, in self-efficacy, I've grasped this to be especially evident in my own professional experience at this point, the afflicted child would avoid the duty, thinking it to be challenging or too difficult to attempt. Again, in this instance, the kid would give some reason or excuse for avoiding the work. In turn, the child may begin misbehaving with other children within the class.
It is the very characteristics of the classroom environment, where many types of inappropriate behaviour are witnessed. Just lately on my institution experience, I shared per annum six classroom with eighteen pupils and a instructor, where the degree of behavior ranged from the 'trivial' facet of conversing aloud to the greater 'serious' acts of inappropriate behavior. In this situation, I witnessed a kid spitting on another child and also another example in which a child intentionally kicked a couch at me whenever i was remonstrating with her regarding her continuous poor behaviour. Out of this particular school experience I discovered many different types of poor behaviour. The most common was the continuous murmur of discussion one of the pupils. This discussion had not been part of these learning and was excessively noisy sometimes, when i was required to speak loudly to drown-out their chatter. This sort of behaviour is reflected and talked about at great period in the Ofsted record on Improving Behaviour, (2006). My personal view is the fact that dialogue among pupils should be prompted, as Personally i think that it helps their learning experience, but, when the level of chatter interrupts your coaching or class it will becomes highly disruptive and will detract from the learning opportunity of others within that class. To be able to curb this development, I needed used many different examples of behavior management, ranging from low tone speaking to raising my tone. I quickly understand that some strategies of coping with their behaviour were limited and required different methods of avoiding them from communicating unnecessarily. Therefore, I modelled good behaviour by encouraging them to raise their hand and I rewarded them with 'house items' for pursuing instructions. I also used my body language more by refusing to raise my tone of voice, as this process alone, (of continuous enhanced vocal levels) can get very wearisome, both on the instructor and those who aren't misbehaving; therefore I would stop and continue to be silent until I got their attention again. With regards to the more serious examples of poor behaviour, several young ladies within the category used some unsavoury words and also made guide regarding my own body parts. This action was so serious these girls were excluded from school for just one full week and positioned in isolated teaching steps in another room on their own. Another time, I witnessed one lady in the school, kick a seat from the bottom and it struck me, whereby I instructed her to return and place this seat back again. Upon her refusing, this warranted the top educator to again intervene and resulted in the placing of this this child in special methods for an interval.
'Poor behaviour can't be tolerated as it is a denial of the right of pupils to learn and teachers to teach. Make it possible for learning to take place preventative action is the most effective, but where this fails, academic institutions will need to have clear, strong and smart strategies in destination to help pupils take care of their behaviour;' Practitioner's Group, (2005)
In this record is offers advice to all schools and instructors on methods to improve on behaviour problems in a localised environment of the class or on a whole-school methodology.
Similarly, Chaplain, (2006) reports that there surely is a tendency for teachers at fault factors within pupils that they haven't any control or ability over: for example (personality, their esteem for authority, or their growing up levels), instead, Chaplain shows, that as educators, we might choose to disregard that their behavioural problems might be at the palm of internal factors like poor coaching, inappropriate seating agreements, overcomplicated work or jobs, lack of willpower or behavior management on the part of the teacher. Other factors which contribute to this are, issues like interpersonal deprivation in the neighborhood community and lack of value located on the education system. For instructors, we have to go through the overall scene somewhat than choose one area to be blamed for the child's behaviour problems and, by doing this, will inform the tutor of how to best plan the next teaching session. When a teacher was to incorporate this to their learning, she or he would better understand the pupils' point of view and have greater insight into how to approach their behaviour then.
From past experience in the class, beyond this academic 12 months, I have always prepared a classroom behaviour policy, and this would be analyzed annually by the educator (I) and the children, where we collectively, would write up procedures of accepted carry out and behaviour management. This insurance policy would state clearly what is expected of the teacher and the kids alike. It would also tell them of the rewards and sanctions due to the guidelines in the arrangement. My strategy is mirrored by Chaplain, (2006), and Jacques (2007) both of these authors have discussed the utilization and implementation of a classroom behaviour policy or 'agreement'. This agreement would be determined upon by the students and tutor of the school. By giving the pupils the opportunity to decide what guidelines to include, it is said by Chaplain, that gives the students an self-reliance and they'll have already stated the guidelines and obligations to which they should abide. Once the contract or behavior policy was completed, both the teacher and each scholar would normally sign off onto it and the completed file would be then be fixed to the wall structure or each child given a duplicate of this for future reference point. From an individual point of view, I found it very helpful and it was great to remember upon in case a pupil was breaking the code of conduct, whereby I'd ask the pupil to make reference to the contract which they had signed. By doing this, it made the kid think about their behaviour and how they had preferred this generally that was not acceptable. Within the first few days or weeks of the institution year it's important for the teacher to establish a ground between your teacher's professional position and the pupils activities. Everyone ought to know who's the 'director' of the school room. Rogers, (2006) displays about how the first few weeks of a school year, is essential for the tutor to determine this ground between the professor and pupils. He discussions of the way the teacher must 'placed the build' and give course to the pupils and also model good behaviour techniques.
He areas: there exists 'a mental and developmental readiness in the students for his or her teacher to describe how things will be this specific year with regard to objectives about behaviour and learning in this category' Rogers, (2006:36)
Although, the professor has a fair idea of what they want to include on the insurance policy, the children feel that they all got a collective effort in applying this policy which will ensure its success as they will try to maintain a well-behaved school.
It is fair to claim that self-assurance and assertiveness on the educators' part is a prerequisite and appealing trait to obtain. By positioning skills is key to maintaining an optimistic learning environment and maintaining a well-behaved classroom. Leaman (2007:8/9) says that 'assertiveness is approximately being charismatic and projecting an air of confidence, not exhibiting your weaknesses to the class'. In support, Ros Hancell, a guest lecturer that seen Brunel School PGCE Principal lectures in 2009 2009 quoted: "keeping your core strong". In my judgment it is essential that the kids see you as a strong figure in a room, this will encourage the pupils to provide you with respect and motivate those to work harder. Other methods of showing assurance to the pupils is by the positive use of body language and posture, the teachers preparation for each lessons, the selection of vocabulary, the firmness, pitch and level of one's conversation.
In order to encourage good behavior, I have been of the judgment that as a educator you cannot just notice bad behaviour. As a educator and a modeller of positive values and behavior, the teacher needs to encourage good behavior by offering rewards or bonus items for keeping a good atmosphere. If a kid or set of children have acted in a mature manner and viewed signs of good behavior they should be rewarded for this. Something of rewards and sanctions should be utilized in the school room, this will distinguish between good and bad behaviour. However having guidelines, compensation systems and sanctions will not always guarantee a successful outcome - it generally does not guarantee good behaviour in your course. Indeed, as instructors, we should anticipate to see the rules being challenged by the pupils. Dix, (2007). I, concur that in my own professional experience, not at all times will pupils be sure you choose the best behaviour in class. Therefore it is essential that the instructor will offer rewards and place sanctions on pupils who choose to break the agreement. The educator should be regular with offering rewards and sanctions, by offering rewards will promote good behavior and sanctions will become a deterrent for the pupil to do something out of character. As Chaplain, (2006) implies, the professor should ask the kid to touch upon his/her reason behind misbehaving, encourage them to make their own choice. I attempted to elicit this notion whilst I used to be in school experience; it was as an entrance of what they does that was regarded misappropriate behaviour.
I have always tried to reward and commend all children on their work. I have commended even small efforts at the job, and my reason behind doing this is the fact the child the next time or on the next task will make an effort to perform better in his/her activity. Praise is among the best motivations to try harder, children like men and women, will always strive for perfection if they know they will work well. Children, like the improperly behaved pupils, would enjoy reading good responses and encouragement and compliment. This technique of desire is, in my opinion, a lot more beneficial to a kid on so many levels, namely: the kid will feel well informed in the duty or subject; the child will strive for superiority and the teacher/adults approval next time.
'Praise is a far more effective behaviour management tool than sanctions. '
He continues in his research to claim that, as teachers, we have to compliment children in a constructive, non-personal way and sensitively and intelligently. For example, he uses the idea of a teacher exhibiting a child's good article to a class, whereby this could have detrimental results on the kid, namely: embarrassment, anxiety and prospect of alienation with his/her peer. Worse still, the kid may not like the actual fact that these were made a good example of and they will the next time not perform to the best of their ability, in light of worries that they may be asked to display their work again.
Finally, it is essential for teachers to help make the best use of time for their pupils. The instructor should keep carefully the children active with tasks, activities or other styles of work. If the kid is kept occupied, the prospect of serious misbehaviour would be significantly be reduced and the children will remain on process, thus developing a conducive environment for learning for the educator and pupils.
Word Count: 3, 248
Also We Can Offer!
- Argumentative essay
- Best college essays
- Buy custom essays online
- Buy essay online
- Cheap essay
- Cheap essay writing service
- Cheap writing service
- College essay
- College essay introduction
- College essay writing service
- Compare and contrast essay
- Custom essay
- Custom essay writing service
- Custom essays writing services
- Death penalty essay
- Do my essay
- Essay about love
- Essay about yourself
- Essay help
- Essay writing help
- Essay writing service reviews
- Essays online
- Fast food essay
- George orwell essays
- Human rights essay
- Narrative essay
- Pay to write essay
- Personal essay for college
- Personal narrative essay
- Persuasive writing
- Write my essay
- Write my essay for me cheap
- Writing a scholarship essay