The Impact Of Subject And Learner Centred Designs Education Essay



Daniel Tanner (1980) identified curriculum as "the prepared and guided learning encounters and planned learning final results. The curriculum is developed under the auspices of the school through the organized reconstruction of knowledge and encounters, for the learner' to continuous and willful progress in personal communal competence. Fundamentally, there are three types of curriculum designs; that are subject-centred designs, learner-centred designs and problem-centred designs.

Subject-centred curriculum focuses on this content of the curriculum. The curriculum design corresponds usually to the textbook written for the specific subject, for case languages, mathematics, knowledge, history, arts and many more.

However, learner-centred curriculum focuses on certain areas of the learners themselves. It could explore the learner's encircling environment. The primary idea behind the practice is that learning is most significant when subject matter are highly relevant to the students themselves.

The problem-centred designs placed students in the interpersonal setting to handle the problems. The model focuses on the problem faced by society. The target is to prepare students with relevant knowledge and skills to allow them to fir the world when they leave their university.

The essay partly A talks about the impact of subject matter and learner-centred designs in coaching and learning in two portions. The first section targets the type of subject-centred designs and the impact of subject-centred designs in coaching and learning. The second section targets the type of learner-centred designs and the impact of learner-centred designs in teaching and learning. We will discuss the impact of each design from instructors, students, population and material aspect.

What is Subject-centred Designs?

In 1949, Ralph Tyler construct the subject-centred designs in his publication BASICS of Curriculum and Teaching. His publication becomes the building blocks for the subject-centred on learning but still using in many countries. Subject-centred designs give attention to one subject a period, aiding learners building on the data gained.

Type of Subject-centred Designs

Five different techniques have been suggested in the subject-centred designs; they may be academic themes design, discipline founded design, broad areas design, relationship design and process design (Phillips, 2007).

Academic things design

This is the oldest and most widely known design. Students have no to choose what is meaningful for them to study. There are a number of books and sources to support this design. Instructors find it much easier to transmit ideas and knowledge thru textbooks.

Discipline centered design

In discipline design, the coaching of the disciplines in its 100 % pure form is emphasized. That is, a student who studies physics would plan the topic as a physicist while those who examine music will study it as musicians. This approach will slim the view and knowledge of students.

Broad domains design

This design is also called the interdisciplinary design. The look combines several related themes into a one reasonable subject. For example, Biology, Astronomy, Chemistry, Geology and Physics were constructed to form General Research. Students may achieve a greater integration of learning experiences however the knowledge will be superficial.

Correlation design

This design model is between the educational design model and the wide field design. This design attempts to relate a topic to others while maintaining their identification as subjects. For example, students read a book that pertains to once period while studying a period in history.

Process design

Thinking operations such as critical and creative thinking, problem solving are taught under this design function. The purpose of the curriculum is to enhance process skills suitable to all disciplines. Under a major job, i-THINK, the Ministry of Education Malaysia is currently growing thinking skills in all Malaysian colleges.

The Impact of Subject-centred Designs in Coaching and Learning

In a subject-centred classroom, it is acceptable that the tutor who is an expert in a subject be the person who impacts that knowledge to the students. Educators are in charge of the complete learning process, organized instructional design and teaching techniques. Every training is from top-down, wherein knowledge is approved from teachers to students via sharing, leaning material, transmits values, behaviour and ideas. These make a teacher very professional. Educators attend a university to receive a degree in their chosen field and then become a specialist in that subject in college. In this example, students won't get incorrect information from the tutor.

However, the problem isn't that anticipate inside our country. Some university or college students attended a post graduate professor program, KPLI (Kursus Perguruan Lepasan Ijazah) or DPLI (Diploma Perguruan Lepas Ijazah) to become a professor after graduate. They might be graduated with amount of arts but finish up become a terms teacher following the course. These educators might be less expertise compare to those who show up at a university to receive a degree in their chosen field. This is going on not only due to the teacher shortage concern but also due to curriculum design. Since there are pack of teaching supports and references to aid subject-centred design, it can certainly allow teachers to instruct with existing materials. With the data of a degree holder, a school student may easily change as a instructor.

Subject-centred design lends itself to mass creation. This traditional strategy has many resources for learners and instructors. Teachers communicate the ideas and understanding of certain topics in verbal form in textbooks because it is not hard to interpret in textbooks and those books are commercially available support materials. The curriculum reduces the content into small components that are evidently definable and measurable. Students and professors will get many workbooks that break down reading or math into sub skills and processes. This makes benefits and drawbacks to both students and professors. As I brought up earlier, some of the professors nowadays are not really expert on what they're teaching. This know-how insufficient may cause students slice classes or even skip college, especially in extra institution because the university student can go to tuition course from an skills teacher rather than teacher without professional knowledge. Resources or books may also give to hastily of professors in coaching. However, the advantage of the mass development is learners and educators can engage in self research or personal improvement.

Subject-centred design is beneficial for dedicated educator. The teacher will be able to guide the coaching and learning process in the class with a good teaching plan. Professors will determine all coaching content. On the other side, students can acquire new knowledge sufficiently during the complete learning process. Instructors can also make their own teaching aids relating to students' history and so make the lesson more efficiency and interesting. For instance, a second vocabulary teacher plans to teach members of the family. The tutor can show students how to address own family members before teaching them how to handle relatives. This kind of step-by-step coaching and learning is effective and not challenging.

However, there also troubles for teachers to instruct under correlation design. Teachers must at least know the partnership about the material and content and ways to connect the other person while teaching. Professors entail must find time and energy to plan lesson cooperatively.

Most folks were informed under subject matter centred design. This format of education is more familiar and suitable compare to other curriculum designs. Teachers will know well at which level students are in their learning at all times in the long run of the course when assessment and analysis of learning were executed. Every course that is taught should be evaluated. Standardized, multiple choice, true-false, and comprehension tests are being used for evaluation (Ahara, 1995). If the learning is subject-centred design, the pace of learning is noticeable, thus testing can be executed at the correct time. Through the use of test report, a teacher can easily quantify and justify the students' accomplishments. Ratings are also motivating students to attain better in the foreseeable future evaluation.

If the scores achieved weren't as good as anticipated, a tutor might do some adjustments and alterations before the final evaluation. The professor can provide tutorial classes for many who are weakened in the subject. Special instruction might be given for gradual learners to allow them to catch up with others.

However, testes in this curriculum design are based only on regurgitating material. The checks given may not an overall comprehension or understanding of students in the themes. Students can simply memorize what they have to know in order to cross the test. At last, they could learn or bear in mind nothing following the test. Therefore, it is difficult to check the data in sensible use of the materials in everyday life to resolve problems. Hence, professors should test students over comprehension however, not memorize skills.

Even there are some quarrels about the ways of teachers analyzed students in this curriculum design; we can't declare that subject-centred design is simpler for students to remember information for future use. Students may easily realize the important knowledge that they need to learn through the lesson. Results have shown that many successful students attended out of this design over time (Silvestri, 1997).

Just because the subject-centred designs corresponds typically to the books written for specific themes and the commercial creation of literature and sources, tutors without much training can simply teach from a preexisting curriculum. This circumstance is well known as tuition classes inside our country. The ramp of tuition classes in our country has truly gone beyond control. Parents who expect high ratings will send their children to many tuition classes. Initially, tuition classes are present to help students which need more help than others, but nowadays, even smart students are participating in tuition classes. Parents today are typically working; they treat tuition classes as day health care center to look after their children while learning. This sort of action seems eliminating two birds with one natural stone but it indirectly obliterate children's child years with studying. Because of this, students do nothing like to study and find out new things.

By using the subject-centred design, teachers will have better control in school where students will not have an opportunity to disrupt a classroom. Corresponding to Karen Silvestri (1997), a disciplined class imparts a feeling of self-discipline. Experience shows in the last era that children who are raised in a disciplined construction in school do indeed learn better throughout their university life as well as possessing a balanced approach to life generally.

However, this sense of self-discipline and subject-centred design might omit the value of learner activities (Scheidies, 1994). Subject-centred design takes a learner to accept the information being transmitted alternatively than concern. Students are passive in a subject-centred design school room, there are seldom learning sound. Students is only going to believe in literature and afraid to ask questions beyond the framework. This subject-centred curriculum is only going to foster passivity about learning and knowledge. Finally, students with shortage critical and creative thinking skills are well produced. Unfortunately, the work environment nowadays will not require people who are "walking encyclopedias". Employees are complaining about our graduates, especially insufficient analytical skill, life management skills, cooperation skills, social skills and so forth.

Furthers, the subject-centred designs will depend upon something of specialist (Scheidies, 1994). Students' needs are considered only together with type and difficulty degree of the material (Scheidies, 1994). Subject-centred learning does not take family situation, cultural record or other large selection of options into account that will impact learning. Students haven't any to choose the content these are most meaningful on their behalf. They are expected to soak up whatever material trained in enough time allotted. Learning materials will not change irrespective of students' needs and must be covered promptly. The pro is, students can learn the data in satisfactory time however the con is slow learners may have no choice but follow consequently.

On the other hands, subject-centred curriculum prevents students from understanding the wider context of what they are learning. Split lesson on languages, mathematics, sciences, record, arts and music is trained without respect how one subject impacts another subject matter. Students may find out about history but they do not know how record is influencing our country and culture. That is why we could hear the question "Why are we studying history?" This sort of parting of subject-centred curriculum make students feel weary and difficult to understand when mastering.

Differ with academics subject design, broad areas design provide interdisciplinary or cross-disciplinary studies. Students review a subject merged from different subject matter that have linkages between each others. Even the syllabus may not as depth as a genuine subject matter, this will indirectly help students to determine their own interest. For instance, a student research General Science which was constructed from Biology, Astronomy, Chemistry, Geology and Physics find his fascination with Biology and therefore further his review for the reason that field as his expert. Furthermore, breadth views about different things will at least wider a student's visual field.

As a realization, subject-centred curriculum designs possessed created many benefits and drawbacks to learners. There are still many countries by using curriculum design, this office in charge should screen the progress of the curriculum from time to time and make advisably alter to keep pace with the society needs.

What is Learner-centred Designs?

According to Collins & O'Brien (2003), learner-centred teaching can be an instructional approach where students influence the content, activities, materials, and pace of learning. This learning model places the scholar (learner) in the heart of the training process. The trainer provides students with opportunities to learn independently and from one another and instructor them with the skills they need to accomplish that effectively. The learner-centred teaching approach includes such techniques as substituting dynamic learning experience for lectures, assigning open-ended problems and problems demanding critical or creative thinking that cannot be solved by following word examples, including students in simulations and role has, and using self-paced and/or cooperative (team-based) learning. Properly applied of the design can result in increased inspiration to learn, better retention of knowledge, deeper understanding, and even more positive behaviour towards the topic being taught. (Ibid. )

Type of Learner-centred Designs

Learner-centre designs include three types of design identified as child-centre design, radical design and humanistic design.

Child-Centred design

Learners are positively taking part in the teaching-learning process. The look stresses on the needs and passions of learners. Professors and learners make a deal the interest and content to be contained in the curriculum.

Radical design

Schools indoctrination learners into a particular cultural view somewhat than educate and emancipate them. This design greater emphasize on reform culture. Students need to gain recognition, competencies and attitudes to take control of their lives.

Humanistic design

The curriculum should be made to enable learners to be involved in the process to become. Abraham Maslow and his theoretical concept of self-actualization is one of the main element influences of this particular curriculum design.

The Impact of Learner-centred Designs in Coaching and Learning

Learner-centred designs are emphasizing the needs of learners as opposed to the needs of the educator or the institution. The curriculum offers students flexibility on what, where, when as well as how to learn. By using this curriculum design, learners are more active on members in their own learning. They learn to create knowledge by getting together with teachers and peers. Thus, students can improve their communication skills via activities. An excellent communicator has better chances of success. This is something learners might not study from subject-centred curriculum, where one way communicating is given.

In traditional methods, learners have the knowledge passively and shaping as well as being shaped by experience. However, learner-centred designs encourage learners to get for knowledge. They can be permitted to explore, experiment and find out on their own. Learners possess the autonomy to point their learning. Learners are accountable for the success of a lessons. Therefore, they tend to feel more responsible for their learning through trial and error. They began to accept failure bravely and dare to use challenges.

Learners are highly motivated in learner-centred curriculum. They feel they have got a genuine stake in their own learning when they have a chance to decide what is the most important to learn for them. Motivation and assurance are gained by learning what they have to know. Further, they can create higher success with the inspiration and self-assurance when they attribute success to their abilities rather than to success or help. These will coach learners as proficient problem-solvers, that will impact not only in institution life but also working life.

The active mother nature of the learner-centred way helps students work and look for information rather than hear and stored. Their brain could work and store them for a longer time frame by dealing with the information. Activities can increase real learning and performance. Throughout a language course for example, students can keep in mind better how to use a phrase in real group practice than simply pay attention to teacher's instances.

Learners also work in collaboration with the other learners in learner-centred curriculum. Learners think of creating and various ways to accomplish tasks. They figure out how to collaborate with the other learners through the whole process. We can also see fast learner is helped or leading poor learners. This isn't only enhancing educational achievements but also promote the development of other personal learning skills, such as critical thinking, problem dealing with, management skills and communicating skills. By working together with peers, learners also share ideas and study from others.

Leo Jones (2007) said that a student-centered classroom isn't a place where in fact the students determine what they want to learn and what they want to do. It's a place where we consider the needs of the students, as an organization so when individuals, and cause them to become participate in the learning process all the time. Students may be working by themselves, in pairs or in groups at different time. Students are preparing ideas or making programs when working exclusively. This will encourage them to involve in learning and give opinions. Some learners feel more secure and less stress and anxiety when employed in groupings; therefore, group activities are a good place for them to words out their suggestions or views.

Learner-centred coaching is adaptable to meet up with the needs of every student. In order to design a lessons, a educator must think of the students, as opposed to the content. Instructors must design activities that let students take effort to find the meaningful information because of their own lives. Professors must understand the students' individual basis in order to better respond to the individual needs and hobbies of the students. However, there is not much training provided for teachers in these fields. Teachers nowadays are lack experience used learner-centred teaching. They don't know how to execute knowledge in different ways than subject-centred curriculum. These are confused by the rigor as a teacher. Some teachers have a tendency to feel prone using learner-centred way, so they retreat to a lot more familiar form of lecture at the end.

Teachers are facilitator in learner-centred curriculum. But this does not take away the overall responsibility of the instructor but require the teacher to negotiate with learner about the goals, content and strategy used for learning. Professors have to provide information and support for learners from time to time, especially elementary students in order to meet specific learning goals in a learner-centred environment. The impact, instructors will feel over work load working with every single process of learner-centred curriculum.

The other great impact on learner-centred curriculum is class management. A school of students might have different talents, different experience and different needs. Educators have to create a lesson centered to learners' needs. Inside a crowded classroom, it appears to be difficult to have group activities. A thirty minute lessons might end up busying divided students into communities and giving instructions. Teachers might possibly not have a chance to pay attention and guide every group. And for that reason, the learning goal of the lesson cannot be achieved. However, this type of problem can be solved after several activities. Students who used to the curriculum designs can simply group up and work together to complete an activity.

For the mix-ability classes, the poor students might won't try or speak during group activities. In this situation, teachers should set students with different capacity. This can encourage better students to teach or lead vulnerable students while will motivate weaker students share their recommendations and develop self-assurance. Sometimes, professors can design different activity for students with different potential. Simple and self-explanatory task for poor organizations; while multiple or critical process for strong groups. The pro is fragile students able to handle the lesson however the con is the gaps of students' capabilities and skills might be wider.

A noisy school room is another concern for most of the teachers to endure learner-centred approaches. Instructors have to accept learning noise while using learner-centred curriculum designs. Learners free to discuss and talk to peers making the school room getting rid of its control. But what worst is learners might discuss something out of the topic. Therefore, teachers must monitor the training process at all times and guide learners to the correct information during talk. The seating of group associates can be closer so that they can discuss softly during talk.

As a facilitator, the teacher might spend times to interact with every group. Consequently, timing is very important. If a instructor fails to control the timing for a task, the planning for your material might be interrupted. A teacher should well make and plan before running a learner-centred activity. Prudent with time but still be versatile to prolong an activity when students appreciate it or minimize it brief when the experience isn't going well is also a way to emerge a teacher's vocation.

The learner-centred curriculum will increase teachers work fill by preparing for the class and evaluate students' works. Elementary students need help and monitor in gain access to and process information. They don't learn how to look for knowledge. The data provided will at last transmitted to learners by the original teaching and learning method. By the end, parents are doing the task for his or her children and instructors are assessing parents' project.

Parents and even society today needs quantitative results. They would like to understand how well a child can score to choose how intelligent a kid is. At last, teachers and universities might back to the subject-centred curriculum design to fulfill society needs. This is all because the culture still couldn't completely acknowledge learner-subject curriculum. However, It is suggested teachers to assimilate learner activities with coaching to get attention while students get accustomed to the curriculum design. These will also bring benefits to the procedure of teaching and learning.

Student-centred curriculum implicates the whole syllabus design. The process of learning is very important. Because of this, constant and professional development in this field is paramount. Good practice should be discovered. Nevertheless, working out for tutor in educating with student-centred is important little. The federal government may need to invest training and resources to carry out the complete curricula.

As we can see, the education ministry is trying to integrate subject-learner curriculum in to the syllabus nowadays. The whole process usually takes up to several years, and the result is still an uncertain. But as a professor, this design should be at the centre of your preoccupations as educators where we discuss, learn and develop as well as our students.


Finally, both subject-centred and learner-centred curriculums have their own edge and cons. The curriculum used will impact the complete society anyhow. But there is not always mutually exclusive. Rather, subject-centred and learner-centred curriculums can be constituted a continuum. Professors can provide lectures while making students interact more actively with ideas and information, beyond lecture. On this sense, task or problem-based workshops and seminar which encourages students to activate actively with one another with a number of information are motivated.


Ahara, K. (1995). Teacher-centered and child-centered pedagogical techniques in instructing children's literature. Education, 115(3), 332.

Brown J. Student-Centered Instruction: Involving Students in Their Own Education. Music Teachers Journal [serial online]. May 2008;94(5):30. Available from: Publisher Provided Full Content material Searching Data file, Ipswich, MA. Accessed October 26, 2012.

Collins, J. W. , 3rd, & O'Brien, N. P. (Eds. ). (2003). Greenwood Dictionary of Education. Westport, CT: Greenwood.

Cunningham, C. (1980). More about curriculum development. [Online] Retrieved from: http://cuip. uchicago. edu/wit/2000/curriculum/homeroommodules/curriculumTerms/extra. htm.

Dale, L. (2012). Learner-Centered Activities for the Classroom | eHow. com. [Online] Retrieved from: http://www. ehow. com/list_7675709_learnercentered-activities-classroom. html.

En. wikipedia. org (2009). Student-centred learning - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia. [Online] Retrieved from: http://en. wikipedia. org/wiki/Student-centred_learning.

Fulcher, L. (2004). Learner-Centered Outcomes in Subject-Centered Establishments: Metaphors for Muggle Learning. Learning and Coaching in ADVANCED SCHOOLING, 1, 1-7.

Ils. unc. edu (2004). INLS 242: Curriculum Issues - Records on Curriculum2004. [Online] Retrieved from: http://www. ils. unc. edu/daniel/242/CurrNotes. html.

Jo Pulist, S. K. (2001). Learner-centredness: An issue of institutional insurance policy in the context of distance education. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, 2(2), 39-47nes, L. (2007). The Student-Centered Class. Cambridge School Press.

Jones, L. (2007). The Student-Centered Class room. Cambridge University or college Press.

Lalwani, P. (2011). Curriculum design and models. [Online] Retrieved from: http://www. slideshare. net/PrincessLalwani/curriculum-design-and-models.

Lee, H. (1998). Learning-Centered Syllabi. [Online] Retrieved from: http://www. celt. iastate. edu/teaching/syllabi. html.

Malhi, R. (2004). Open up letter to the PM. The Celebrity, January 4.

Ornstein, A. (n. d. ). Curriculum Contrasts: A Historical Guide.

Ornstein, A. , & Hunkins, F. (2008). Curriculum foundations, key points, and issues (5th Ed. ). Boston: Allyn and Bacon.

Phillips, Ashley H. (Volume 4 No. 2, Fall season 2005) The Ramifications of Student-centered, Technology-based Education on the intrinsic desire of extra students

Phillips, J. (2007). Curriculum Development. 2nd Ed. Selangor: Start College or university Malaysia, pp. 143-149

Prevedel, A. (2003). Beliefs and Beliefs: THE EARTH View Behind Curriculum. Focus on Basic principles, 6 (C), pp. 8-13.

Pulist, S. K. (2001). Learner-centredness: A concern of institutional coverage in the framework of distance education. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, 2(2), 39-47.

Scheidies, C. (1994). The Cons of Subject-Centered Curriculum | eHow. com. [Online] Retrieved from: http://www. ehow. com/info_12000458_disadvantages-subjectcentered-curriculum. html.

Silvestri, K. (1997). Great things about Teacher-Centered Learning | eHow. com. [Online] Retrieved from: http://www. ehow. com/about_5387185_benefits-teachercentered-learning. html.

Tanner, D. , & Tanner, L. N. (1980). Curriculum development: Theory into practice (pp. 142-190). NY: Macmillan.

Thinkingschoolsinternational. com (2012). Thinking Schools International. [Online] Retrieved from: http://www. thinkingschoolsinternational. com/tsi-community/international-community/malaysia/.


What is CIPP?

The CIPP model of evaluation originated by Daniel Stufflebeam and his fellow workers in the 1960s. CIPP means for Context, Input, Process and Product. The CIPP model is a comprehensive platform for guiding formative and summative evaluation of tasks, programs, staff, products, corporations and systems (Stufflebeam, 2003).

The model is configured for use in interior assessments conducted by an organization's evaluator; self-evaluations conducted by job teams or specific company; and contracted or mandated exterior evaluations (McLemore, 2009). Stufflebeam (2003) said that the model has been employed throughout america and around the world in short-term and long-term investigations both small and large.

CIPP targets providing the foundations for validating and deriving particular criteria via an interactive relationship between the evaluator and customer. The CIPP model requires evaluators to operate on a basis of trust, displaying respect to all or any stakeholders, regardless of electric power, gender and cultural backgrounds. (Tan, Lee & Hall, 2010)

According to Tan (2010), CIPP focuses on improvement of designs. The main concern is given to the look and implementation of development efforts. Evaluators must take into consideration the feasibility of the job scope, safety for any users, the importance of the impact that the evaluation is wearing the task as well as project outcomes, and collateral for stakeholders and decision producers when commencing the evaluation review using CIPP. The communication between evaluator and stakeholders is kept open, to allow for the gathering of data, as well as further analysis and synthesis. (Ibid)

Below we will discuss a summary of the key areas of the CIPP model after review of four articles on Stufflebeam's CIPP model (as Appendix).

The Four Component of CIPP

Context evaluation, insight evaluation, process analysis and product evaluation are used to guide evaluation of CIPP model. For every of the components, CIPP asks specific questions pertaining to the current stage of development within the evaluated process (Tan et al, 2010).

Context Evaluation

Context analysis is the stage for planning decisions. It decides what needs are tackled by a program and what this program already exist helps in defining aims for the program. The seeks of context analysis are to detect problems and examine needs. Decision designers need to define the look decisions and context information during context evaluation. It's important to determine goals, priorities and targets.

The selection of problem components is also considered. For instance, a context evaluation of your sport program might involve an examination of the prevailing objectives of the activity program, achievements test results, community and staff concerns, perceptions and needs.

Methods are used for data collections during context analysis. Matching to Stufflebeam (2003), the methods use to undergo context analysis include survey, books review, stakeholder interviews, secondary data evaluation, synthesis and many others.

The representative questions for context analysis include

Should this program be offered?

What content will be included in the program?

What is the background of this program?

What are the program goals?

Is there a need for this program?

Input Evaluation

During input analysis, structuring decisions that determine how we should do are made. Structuring decisions are important to find where there is the most support for change, to discover which alternatives are most feasible and cost-effectiveness for achieving planning goals. Decision designers considered the steps and resources needed to meet the new goals and aims.

The first orientation of insight evaluation is to search and critically evaluating potentially relevant techniques. Then, is to inform potential or interested functions about the ultimate way chosen.

Generally, decision manufacturers setting up and confirming programs and budget at this stage. This analysis also helps the extensive band of users to guage this program performance and interpret the outcomes. The purpose of input evaluation should support the choosing of resources.

The method uses in this analysis are such as task reports, feedback conference, literature review, trip to other programs, advocate clubs, comparative or experimental design studies.

Sample of questions regardless of input evaluation is

Are the objectives suitable?

How to put into action the training?

Which material should we use?

What resources can be found?

What is the inspiration of the prospective?

What regulations relate with the program?

Relevant criteria such as cost, potential performance, administrative feasibility, responsiveness to evaluated needs and potential effects are used to examine whether potentially appropriate solution strategies are present.

Process Evaluation

Process evaluation assesses the execution of programs to help staff carry activities. The look has been set up and put on trial at this stage. It is an ongoing check up on the plan's implementation and paperwork of the process. Based after the results of the pilot test or evaluation, decision-makers will understand how well the program is being implemented.

According to Tseng (2010), process analysis provides information for decisions, to make sure the procedure of plans and also to forecast the fault of developing. Staffs are guided to increase the steps and budgetary plan properly in this level. Evidences and opinions are accumulated while monitoring. This evaluation provides important data which can be used to interpret the impact of change.

Stufflebeam (2003) laid out that, an activity evaluation distinction activity and expenditures with the plan and budget. In this stage, decision-makers learn can understand the process of the programs, talents and weaknesses of materials, issues, change of strategies and success. The analysis also describes execution issues while monitoring staff in addressing problems. It is documented and examine the attempts' cost before reporting to the observers and individuals.

For process analysis, results are from surveys, document literature, on-site observer, stakeholder interviews, photographic record or last report.

The evaluator will ask questions such as through the evaluation process

How well are the clients performing?

What are the cost from the program?

Are the budget cost well implemented?

What is the problems conference when implements this program?

Are there any problems when consumer applying the program?

How is disciplined maintained?

What is the weakness of this program?

Product Evaluation

The goal of product analysis is to find out whether the instructional program or idea actually made a difference. It identifies and asses supposed and unintended effects. The data short term and long term help stakeholders keep an organization focused on attaining important outcomes. The process evaluation will help the broader group of users measure the effort's success in meeting aim for needs (Stufflebeam, 1999).

For example in assessing students' change in a curriculum. Product analysis solution changes in performance weighed against the old curriculum. The range of analysis included the improvement of students from knowledge and personal skills, compare benefits, side results and needs.

In product evaluation, decision machine should decide whether the changes should be continued, terminated or changed. It also could evaluate the output of the program. Based upon the information gathered out of every evaluation level, it refers to assessing the difference between your results and predetermined standard or absolute standard.

There are several methods found in executing process evaluation, such as sessions to other program, study, database, interviews, feedback meetings, document review or whatever methods necessary and useful.

Example of questions asked when jogging process evaluation is stated as below

How satisfied will be the client with this program?

Is the program helpful for customer?

Is the program effective?

Should this program be prolonged?

What is the merit of this program?


With the combination of rigorous instructions, CIPP provides evaluator to conform it regarding to program purpose with a functional framework. The aims of CIPP model is to improve instead of demonstrating a study.

However, there are talents and restriction of CIPP model. Formative and summative information can be used in an analysis study. Formative assessments are interim reports directed at different stage of an evaluation study to inform clients and stakeholders while summative analysis is retrospective comparison and sum up of the program's merit. Formative accounts are important for advancements and revisions. Summative reviews are used to determine the accountability for success and failures.

Input and process evaluations tend to provide formative evaluation and product analysis is helpful in the summative analysis. Corresponding to Stufflebeam (2003), there is not necessary to execute all four components of a CIPP model, as the model treats analysis design as a cyclical process of continually figuring out and employing the correct means.

Evaluators are advised to regularly advise and seek assessment from stakeholders in order to increase the prepared activities throughout the analysis. Stakeholders' consultant in CIPP model analysis is as energetic participants assisting to gain and provide information.

Critics of the CIPP model said that the top-down and managerial model practice in the model required some cooperation. The procedure of analysis can be slow, costly and intricate to assemble information and facts provided for all stakeholder teams. The politics occurred within and between departments and organizations also affecting the evaluation to run smoothly.

Finally, CIPP model is a simple however, not infallible system model applied to program evaluation. The duty and accuracy depends upon the decisions of the business conducting. However, CIPP helps to give a way to get evidence-based data to develop a clearer understanding of the process and the issues occurred to enhance the plan.


Cronbach, L. J. 1982. Planning Evaluations of Educational and Social Programs. SAN FRANCISCO BAY AREA: Jossey-Bass.

McLemore, A. (2009). The CIPP Model

Robinson, B. (2002). COLLIT task: A record note from Bernadette Robinson.

Stufflebeam, D. (1999). Foundational models for 21st hundred years program analysis.

Stufflebeam, D. (2003). The CIPP Model for Analysis: An update, an assessment of the models development, a checklist to steer implementation. Paper read at Oregon Program Evaluators Network Discussion, at Portland, OR. http://www. wmich. edu/evalctr/pubs/CIPP-ModelOregon10-03. pdf

Tan, S. , Lee, N. , Hall, D. , Andrews, T. , Dixon, J. , Tout, D. , & du Toit, L. (2010). CIPP as a model for evaluating learning places. Unpublished manuscript. Swinburne College or university of Technology, Australia. www. swinburne. edu. au/spl/learningspacesproject.

Tseng, K. et al. (2010). Utilizing the Context, Source, Process and Product model to evaluate an executive curriculum. World Trades on Executive and Technology Education, Vol. 8 (No. 3).


Using the Framework, Source, Process and Product Model to Assess Principal Institution Standard Curicculum (KSSR)


Essentially, curriculum analysis is a process of locating the value of a curriculum. Thus, the analysis needs to be objective-based and ongoing. The essay below discusses about the Primary College Standard Curriculum (Kurikulum Standard Sekolah Rendah, KSSR) based on the CIPP model. We advocate that CIPP model evaluation isn't only useful in providing a framework conducting and confirming evaluations but also the evaluation of different facets of the curriculum as it is designed and put in place.

This article expands on these says in four sections. The first section focuses on the background, aims and intent of Primary School Standard Curriculum (Kurikulum Standard Sekolah Rendah, KSSR). The next section analysis the curriculum based on the the different parts of the CIPP model. The third section discusses about the strength of the curriculum. Finally, the last section advises possible regions of improvement of the curriculum.

What is KSSR?

In 2011, a new primary college curriculum, Primary College Standard Curriculum (Kurikulum Standard Sekolah Rendah, KSSR) was presented under overview of the national curriculum. Relating to National Viewpoint of Education, "Education in Malaysia can be an on-going effort towards further developing the potential of individuals in a alternative and built in manner, so as to produce those who are intellectually, spiritually, emotionally and physically well-balanced and harmony, predicated on a firm idea in and devotion to God. Such an effort was created to produce Malaysian citizens who are competent and skilled, who own high moral standards and who are responsible and capable of achieving a high level of personal well-being as well to be able to contribute to the tranquility and betterment of the family, the modern culture and the nation at large". The overview of nationwide curriculum is to ensure a alternative curriculum which provides knowledge, skills and worth that highly relevant to a balanced individual capital to permit students to handle current and challenges of the 21st century.

The concept of KSSR was based on the National Philosophy Of Education Malaysia and the KBSR. The Integrated Principal College Curriculum (Kurikulum Baru Sekolah Rendah, KBSR) was put in place in primary institution since 1983. The transformation is no only focus on the skills of writing, reading and arithmetic but also reasoning skills, creative imagination and development, entrepreneurial, information and communication technology. KSSR aspires to create students with a well-balanced, creative thinking, critical and progressive through-spinal wire communication, knowledge and technology, physical and visual development, humanity and spirituality, attitudes and values and personal skills.

Beside keeping all the ideas of KBSR, KSSR also concentrate on an integrated way. It means that every subject wedding caterers to the intellectual, religious, emotional, physical and cultural aspect for development of a thorough specific. KSSR also provides wide and fair opportunity for all students to acquire knowledge and skills that are complete and well-balanced. This equitable education principle gives chances and time for the gradual learners to explore. Lifelong education in KSSR provides the knowledge and skills needed by all students as a basis for take difficulties of daily life and lifelong learning.

Six interrelated and included key areas were discovered under this Key Institution Standard Curriculum. A couple of communication, technology and technology, physical development and visual, spiritual, frame of mind and worth, humanitarian and personal skills. Communication permits students to utilize oral dialect skills in verbal and non-verbal form during in interacting. Knowledge and technology emphasis on clinical knowledge, skills and scientific attitudes, knowledge, skills and ideals in mathematics and knowledge and technology based mostly skills. Physical development and aesthetic focus on physical and health to well-being while fostering creativeness, creativity, talent and understanding. Spirituality, attitudes and principles foster students to appreciate religious practices, values, attitudes and worth. Humanitarian motivates students to talk about knowledge and practices of the neighborhood community and the environment, countrywide and global. The humanitarian in KSSR also concentrate on foster patriotism and unity. Finally, students are trained in leadership and personal development through curricular and extra-curricular activities in personal skills.

Elements Mix Curriculum (EMK) was created via Primary Institution Standard Curriculum. These elements have to use in coaching and learning process. Beside the original elements, the imagination and innovation, enterprisers, and information and communication technology are determined as complementary work to enhance the quality of implementation of the new curriculum.

In Primary College Standard Curriculum, topics were prepared in two different levels. You will find three modules in the first level and two modules in the next level. Basic central module, themes core module and elective module are included in Level One (Yr Someone to Three). Basic primary component compulsory students to cover the essential learning module comprising English, Mathematics, Physical Education and Health Education. Muslim students must study Islamic education while non-Muslim students must research Moral Education. The main thematic module is composed World of Visual Art work, World of Music and World of Technology and Technology. The elective module is offered to help students to master other languages. The institution must choose either Arabic, Mandarin SK, Tamil SK, Bahasa Iban or Kadazan terms to use in Elective Module by institution readiness in conditions of teacher supply, demand from students and school infrastructure. In Level Two (Years 4-6), the subject matter depends communication, knowledge and technology, physical and aesthetics, spiritual frame of mind and prices and humanitarianism.

The Program of CIPP Model In Key School Standard Curriculum (KSSR)

Context Evaluation

Stufflebeam(2007) said that framework evaluation assesses needs, assets, and problem within a precise environment. The goal of context evaluation is to recognize the correct of the environment in order to attain the focus, goals and curriculum goal. The purpose of Primary Institution Standard Curriculum is to to create students with a balanced, creative thinking, critical and progressive communication, knowledge and technology, physical and aesthetic development, personal skills, mankind and spirituality, behaviour and principles centered on the National School of thought Of Education Malaysia.

The past curriculum, New Major Institution Curriculum (Kurikulum Baru Sekolah Rendah, KBSR) was analyzed in order to produce students which is able to meet current and future problems. The brand new curriculum is student-centred which focus on fun learning, critical and creative thinking, reasoning skills, communication and Information and Communication Technology (ICT) literacy.

In the 21st hundred years, people are compelled to be better at absorbing, handling and merging information. Impressive thinking skills, higher-order cognitive skills, social awareness, sophisticated communication and cooperation skills are demanded in the foreseeable future working environment. The four pillars of education in the 21st hundred years were becoming learning to know, learning to do, understanding how to be and learning to live alongside one another. Thus, a change of curriculum inside our country is a superb urgency.

The Education Ministry's Curriculum Development Division (BPK) possessed benchmarked against the uk, Singapore, Hong Kong, New Zealand, Australia and Scandinavian countries before releasing Primary University Standard Curriculum inside our country.

According to the deputy director of The Education Ministry's Curriculum Development Section, Dr. Lee Boon Hua, a pilot test concerning 500 classes was completed throughout the country and they get positive responses from the educators, pupils and parents involved. This less-exam focused curriculum makes learning more fun and interactive.

The Education Ministry's Curriculum Development Department (BPK) had recognized and investigate Major School Standard Curriculum (KSSR) as a model for the contemplated program. Three new Cross Curriculum Elements (EMK) were added accompanied by English, Research and Technology, Environmental Education, Worth and Patriotism. The new elements are Ingenuity and Innovation, Entrepreneurship, and Information and Communication Technology.

Besides, special education is also highlighted under this new curriculum. Students with learning disabilities, hearing problem and eyesight problem will obtain knowledge under special attention.

Input Evaluation

Input evaluation assesses contending strategies and the work plan and finances of the new curriculum in this article. Therefore, the teacher skill and knowledge, Combination Curriculum Elements (EMK), workshops, equipment, time program, principal financial allocation are emphasized.

Assessment, instructor training, monitoring and coaching and learning methods were evolved under the new curriculum. In order to prepare tutor about the curriculum, training and camp drive were planned. With the change of the new curriculum, professors should always aware of the new necessity and teaching techniques. Therefore, trainings are essential from time to time.

The teacher trained in the Primary University Standard Curriculum (KSSR) is based on the cascade model. Get better at trainers for all those content have been trained before training teachers in the respective states. Through the training session, track record and release about Primary College Standard Curriculum (KSSR) were also given accompanied by interrupting Combination Curriculum Elements (EMK) atlanta divorce attorneys subject.

Since knowledge and teacher skill is an important factor in input dimension, trainings are also given to lecturers from instructors college to ensure that the Cross Curriculum Elements (EMK) are conducted for new educators. Talks are given to instructors in the school about Combination Curriculum Elements (EMK) and ways to incorporate into teaching and learning effectively. Programs controlled aims to improve the teachers' ability in order to fulfil professors with skills and good worth knowledge in keeping the curriculum need.

To support the syllabus and curricula of Most important Institution Standard Curriculum (KSSR), new textbooks have been sent out to the school. Creativity handbooks and recognized materials are also provided to teachers so that they enhance their coaching knowledge. Besides that, classes and talks about Primary Institution Standard Curriculum were also given to the plank of management and educators to allow them to comprehend the curriculum activities, ideas, budget, management and filing procedures.

Under the new curriculum design, students spend 1380 minutes a week in school. Subject are redesigned either by incorporating several disciplines of knowledge into one subject. Therefore, there are new themes replacing Living Skills, Civics and Citizenship Education and Local Studies. The new subjects introduced in the new curriculum included Design and Technology/Information and Communication Technology, Visual Arts and Music and Background/Malaysia Negaraku.

Media such as reports, press releases, general population transports, discussions, carnivals and exhibitions are also carried out around the country in promoting the strategies and work plans of Primary School Standard Curriculum (KSSR) for the general public in order for them to have a better understanding about the new curriculum.

The Administration Senior Assistant in every school is in charge of the filing of Primary University Standard Curriculum (KSSR). All the manual about the processing system has been given and monitoring is conducted from the Education Ministry's Curriculum Development Division (BPK). Officials from the department will go to the college to ensure that the school achieve the new curriculum requirements while fixing problems satisfied.

Furthermore, academic institutions and teachers are encouraged to make use of the infrastructure available in universities, such as computer laboratory, notebooks and LCD projectors during World of Technology and Technology. Administrators should also ensure that the facilities are in good condition can gain access to during school hours.

Process Evaluation

Process evaluation relates to the execution of teaching, ways to evaluate students and programs that teachers went to. The process evaluation is important to describe the student's need to be able to reconstruct the program.

In Primary Institution Standard Curriculum (KSSR), instructors need to commence the essential literacy skills to be able to build a strong base of terminology skills. As a way to strengthen the command of Bahasa Malaysia and British among primary school students, the Bahasa Malaysia and English periods have increased. Students are also guided in the right way to hold a pencil properly under penmanship.

The Ministry of Education acquired run the course spread about the new curriculum. The educators were trained in line with the subject they instruct. Teachers were found very well educated and trained, they in a position to relate their activities and knowledge to be open-minded to students' needs. That is coherent with the student-centred idea of the Primary College Standard Curriculum (KSSR). Working out for teacher atlanta divorce attorneys subject is transporting on a term by term until 2015, where the first badge of Calendar year 6 students in the Primary Institution Standard Curriculum (KSSR) are in 2016.

In schools, panels from every subject matter undergo meeting. During the meeting, committees will plan and determine the allocation of the budget provided. Fundamentally, the budget are strategies in purchase coaching materials, stationery and learning tools. Materials bought will disperse to teachers appropriately for uses in class activities.

Other than that, a group of committee out of every school will track record the internal training for instructors regarding to the Primary School Standard Curriculum (KSSR) for respective subjects and report to the District Education Division. After collecting records and responses from schools, the State Educational Department will article and feedback to the ministry. The city members, including the educators and parents will comprehend the improvement of the curriculum.

In order to practice the learner-centred procedure, contextualized and purposeful activities are advertised to permit students learning by doing in fun-filled activities. Besides saving the reflection of each lesson, teachers may also discuss their problems with their committee users during division meetings. Teaching techniques and experiences are distributed to increase the idea of the curriculum.

Teachers have to instruct based on the content standard while students learn predicated on the benchmarks of learning. Content standard specific in what students should know and can do in a period of time covers the knowledge, skills and principles. Standard of learning is a set of criteria or signals where in fact the quality of learning and achievements can be measured for every single content standard.

Since the Primary School Standard Curriculum (KSSR) implemented in 2011, there are some changes of plan. For instance, the changes and improvements of description of the School Based Assessment using subjects. They are necessary to follow the needs of students and modern culture in producing critical, creative and impressive wondering skills. Besides, the redesigning also includes benchmarking its learning and content expectations against other country such as Finland. Changes are essential to guarantee the curriculum is aligned and effective with the breadth and depth content protected.

Product Evaluation

Product evaluation concentration to the result of the program that provide a reasonable justification and assessment for decision-making. For this study, product evaluation is the examination of teaching results. The product evaluation could determine if the curriculum should be revised, upgraded or terminated. Product analysis also evaluates the productivity of the curriculum activities. Product analysis compares the difference between the final results and a predetermined standard or total standard predicated on the responses and information accumulated from different phases.

However, there aren't any studies about the effectiveness of Primary School Standard Curriculum (KSSR) towards students from the aspect of the application of knowledge and skills achieved or gain in lifestyle up until now. The Primary Institution Standard Curriculum (KSSR) allows students to speak and learn in fun ways. Students confirmed more enthusiastic about classroom compare with last time. The plan which is designed to uphold Bahasa Malaysia and improve English vocabulary also ensure the new curriculum based on the Government Change Program. Therefore, the results of the Primary College Standard Curriculum (KSSR) are eminent.

Students become more creative and progressive. Opportunities to explore and test students' hypotheses and ideas to help students identify their needs and pursuits. The formative evaluation from school-based evaluation will inform educators on suited remedial or enhancement treatments for pupils. It will help teachers to identify and plan salient and effective class strategies.

To organized and validate pupil performance, the Primary College Standard Curriculum (KSSR) proposes the execution of schools-based assessments. The professors have to do internal school based assessment (PBS) to judge students' accomplishment and gauge students' potential. The School Based Examination (PBS) is all natural and evaluate students with cognitive (intellectual), affective (emotional and spirituality) and phsycomotor (health) concurrent with the Country wide Viewpoint of Education.

The analysis evaluates both academic and non-academic area. This provides a fair program for every scholar to emerge themselves in their smart area. Teachers in a position to evaluate the effectiveness of the coaching and learning process in the classroom through school-based examination. For certain colleges, gleam final exam by the end or several examinations during the entire calendar year. This uses for the school for convergence. However, colleges are not motivated to converge under the Primary College Standard Curriculum (KSSR).

The formative result from school-based analysis is perfect for guiding curriculum-framing. Educators can determine whether students learn a particular idea or knowledge skills from the descriptors. Through the end of every year, the institution will have a conversation day for parents to comprehend their children's performance in colleges. Summative result from the school-based assessment allows parents and teachers to overview the quality of the curriculum produced.

A student's performance is benchmarked in six levels in the school-based assessment. Students were acknowledged to attain each standard with respective evidences as detailed on descriptions. The Ministry Of Education said that this School Based Assessment (PBS) is holistic, involved, balance and versatility. There is absolutely no much longer exam-oriented under the principal Institution Standard Curriculum (KSSR). The inner assessment evaluation system induces slow-learners to get knowledge according to their capability.

The Durability of Primary University Standard Curriculum (KSSR)

The Primary University Standard Curriculum (KSSR) focus on alternative development of the students. Most important School Standard Curriculum (KSSR) includes new elements such as grooming of imagination and innovation, entrepreneurship, and integration of Information and Communication Technology (ICT).

The transformation of the curriculum is important to ensure a alternative curriculum and is pertinent for a balanced human being capital that can handle current and future issues. The complete process involves changing the proper execution, firm, content, pedagogy, examination methods, time allocation, materials and curriculum management in academic institutions. The lifelong learning process ensures students have basic skills for everyday living. At the end of the principal education, students will master the reading, writing and arithmetic skills. They will also expert in reasoning skills, creative and ground breaking in lifestyle. The Health and Physical Education practiced will also create decades that knowing of well-being, no matter in the physical or mental field. The technology from the principal College Standard Curriculum (KSSR) will also practice good principles, honor, trust God, full with self-esteem and patriotism. They are able to also understand and appreciate the national culture.

Compared with KBSR, Main College Standard Curriculum (KSSR) focuses on six key aspects, that are communication, spiritual attitude and worth, humanitarianism, literacy in technology and technology, physical and personal development to create holistic individuals pander to the Country wide Viewpoint of Education.

Under the new curriculum design, students won't get bored with learning languages. The Vocabulary Arts Module stresses on fun learning. Interesting and effective learning is conducted through singing, choral speaking, play, jazz chants, music and others.

The less exam-oriented curriculum promotes students to learn and gain knowledge in a fun and interesting environment. Students received opportunities to explore and communicate with others during the lesson. The cord skills in the principal University Standard Curriculum (KSSR) ensure students are informed and led to a leadership and personal development through the curriculum and co-curricular activities. Students are also trained about the basic ICT skills. These basic skills will improve their usage atlanta divorce attorneys subject.

The constant following and monitoring of educators implemented in the school based examination ensure the students finally achieve the prescribed standard. School centered assessments also allow professors to understand the typical of these students and the effectiveness of teachers' teaching skills. The examination is diverse and can be done through observation, verbal or written form. The representation will indirectly improve creativity and desire of teachers to plan further reinforcement concerning students' achievement and the teaching process.

Every human being has their own cleverness area. Through the Primary Institution Standard Curriculum (KSSR), students will not feel stress in learning. They may have opportunities to explore and find their own intelligence. The student-centred procedure also motivates students to think creatively, use group, communicate, collaborate and study from mistakes.

History subject created under the Primary College Standard Curriculum (KSSR) will establish students' soul with the soul of patriotism and nationalism. Furth

Also We Can Offer!

Other services that we offer

If you don’t see the necessary subject, paper type, or topic in our list of available services and examples, don’t worry! We have a number of other academic disciplines to suit the needs of anyone who visits this website looking for help.

How to ...

We made your life easier with putting together a big number of articles and guidelines on how to plan and write different types of assignments (Essay, Research Paper, Dissertation etc)