NoSQL databases Voldemort db


NoSQL databases make reference to database management systems (DBMS) that change from RDBMS in some way. NoSQL databases avoid join procedures and normally level out horizontally.

Here are a few of the features of NoSQL datbases.


  • Elastic scaling: NoSQL directories size out horizontally. Usually we can add low-cost commodity servers and size NoSQL directories.
  • Big data: NoSQL databases are normally designed to deal with huge unstructured data. Social Networking sites such as Facebook, Linkedin use NoSQL systems for their operation.
  • Less DBA requirement: NoSQL directories require less disturbance from databases administrator. With designs such as read-repair, data circulation and replication there is less administrative activity still left for the DBA.
  • Flexible data models: NoSQL systems such as MongoDB is document-based database. It does not have any natural schema requirement. Thus the schema of the data can transform on the take flight.

However there are a few difficulties of NoSQL, that ought to be kept in mind.


  • Maturity: NoSQL directories have recently began attaining momentum. There are not many experts who know these systems in and out and most of the databases are not mature.
  • Support: NoSQL databases are largely open-source and built with the aid of community effort. Therefore they may lack quick support, customer care, etc.
  • Administration: NoSQL directories installation require good complex skills. The maintenance of these systems is also tiresome.
  • Expertise: A couple of few NoSQL designers and the majority of them are still in the training phase.


NoSQL implementations can be classified by their types of implementation.

Here are different categories along with an implementation.

  • Document store : MongoDB
  • Graph : Neo4j
  • Key-value store : Voldemort
  • Wide-column : Cassandra

Voldemort Introduction

Voldemort is a allocated key-value storage space system.

It's various characteristics are
  • Automatic replication of data over multiple machines.
  • Automatic partitioning of data, so each server consists of only a subset of the full total data
  • Transparent handling of server failing
  • Pluggable serialization support
  • Versioning of data what to maximize data integrity
  • No central point of failure as each node is self-employed of other nodes.
  • Pluggable data location strategies support for things such as circulation across data centers that are very good geographically.

Voldemort is utilized at Linkedin.


For availability and high-performance reasons, only trivial key-value data gain access to is allowed. The queries which were supported are

* value = storeClient. get(key)

* storeClient. put(key, value)

* storeClient. delete(key)

Both tips and beliefs can be simple or sophisticated items like lists, maps. The keys and values are then serialized.

Though the query format means that there may be no complicated query filter systems, no international key constraints, no causes and that joins must maintain done in code, there are several advantages like
  • Easy distribution across cluster
  • Ready-made caching layer
  • Predictable performance as only questions listed above are possible
  • For keeping the services loosely coupled, we have to do database-joins in code anyways.
  • For performance, anyways serialized format is necessary.
  • Clean separation of reasoning and storage.

Architecture of the System

Logical Architecture of the System

As we can easily see the logical architecture of the system is a split architecture. Each coating perform its singular process such as serialization, failover or getting together with the underlying storage space engine. For instance, in serialization covering the system manages the work of translating items to byte arrays. That's suppose I've a key, value set to be stored in the Voldemort 'store'. And suppose key is string and value is a complex java object. I QUICKLY have to declare this that serialization for key is string, and serialization for value is java-serialization in stores. xml data file in the config listing of Voldemort. Then appropriate classes are being used to attain serialization.

The beauty of the split architecture is the fact that, we can mix-n-match different tiers and conform the architecture according to a particular use-case. For example we can compress the serialized data and then transfer it over the network, by adding a 'Compression Coating' after serialization. Likewise the architecture can be modified for deserialization.

Also data can be intelligently routed to its appropriate partition. This is achieved by pursuing three approaches

* 3-Tier, Server Routed: Within this partition-aware routing is done on the server part.

* 3-Tier, Client Routed: With this partition-aware routing is performed on your client side.

* 2-Tier, Front-end routed: Within this the client needs to be very smart and it'll manage the routing of data to its appropriate partition. Typically the client must be very strongly tied to implementation details of the repository (like written in java, using Voldemort libraries).

The following is pictorial representation of the same

As we can see from the amount, fewer hops will be required when we move the intellect of routing in the stack. Performance is generally degraded by network hop and disk-access. As stated above we may use the versatility of the architecture in eradication of the network hops. Staying away from disk access can be achieved by partitioning the data and wherever possible caching it.

Where can we find this in the source code ?

In voldemort. store. Store program we can easily see that it subjected basic operations such as get/put and delete. The voldemort. store deal has several sub-packages and for the reason that we find the execution of different functionalities for each and every store. This is exactly what provided it practical layering. Some of the deals here are

* voldemort. store. routed : This implementation grips routing to nodes.

* voldemort. store. serialized : This implementation handles converting items to byte array.

* voldemort. store. storage : Implementation of in-memory safe-keeping engine.

* voldemort. store. versioned : When a value is 'put' more than once for an integral, its version is incremented. The execution is based on this package deal.

The main server aspect code are available in the offer voldemort. server, where the main category is VoldemortServer. It really is in charge of bootstrapping all the needed services like safe-keeping service, http service, etc. Pursuing will vary service types in Voldemort

general population enum ServiceType






Storage area("storage-service"),





private last String screen;

private ServiceType(String display)

this. screen = screen;

open public String getDisplayName()

return this. display;

The client aspect code resides in voldemort. client bundle. The StoreClient class is the key interface that an individual handles.

Partitioning of data and Replication

The first question we have to ask is why do we need to partition the data ? Why can't just about everyone has data in one drive? The answer is that if we'd the data about the same disk or an individual server it might be a single point of failure. This means that if the server falls, all our data is lost. Now-a-days the price tag on information is large and it is very important to keep multiple copies of data rather than to keep all eggs in a single basket or all the data in one location.

Also partitioning helps enhance the performance. We are able to understand this as follows. Suppose one of the node includes the whole data-set, that is, it is just a "hot" node. Then if multiple concurrent queries are strike on that node, it'll be a performance reach, and the response will be slow. On the other hand if we split the info into multiple locations / partitions and we know which partition the wanted data belongs to, each partition will mostly have fair insert.

So lets say we partition the info into S partitions (one partition per server) and we store redundant copy of each key K on R machines. Now we can affiliate the key K with R machines using modulo hashing

a = K mod S

and then the worth can be stored on the machines a, a+1, . . . a+r.

This system pays to because we can know the positioning of data, given its key K. And this query can be answered by any of the peers and you don't have of central server which stores the mapping of secrets to the server location. However its downside is seen whenever a server is added or removed. Let us understand why with an example
Problem with Hashing in a cluster

Modulo hashing: k mod(n) where, n=10

Lets put 100 documents in nodes: 1. . 10

18 mod(10)= 8. . . etc

Say, node 10 dies

So, n=9

Now, if you would like 18th doc: 18mod(9)=0

Node0 does not have 18th doc! It's in Node8!

Solution: You need to re-hash all the prices!

Expensive when you have 100Petabytes of data.

Consistent Hashing helps here.

Let's visualize constant hashing by making use of above diagram. In consistent hashing, the nodes reside on an imaginary ring which is put into say 2^31 partitions. An arbitrary hash function is utilized to map the main element onto the wedding ring and we opt for R unique nodes responsible for this key, by traversing the engagement ring in clockwise way.

Thus in regular hashing whenever a server is removed or added the strain is automatically well balanced between the machines.

Important details in Consistent Hashing

  • There are 2^m tips in an m-bit key space.
  • Keys ordered in a ring topology
  • In circumstance of server inability, it reduces re-balancing or rehashing of tips between two nodes.

Important tips of Replication

  • Ensure strength and
  • High availability of data
  • Replication strategy: Data is not only persisted in nodeA, but also in next N nodes (clock sensible manner). Where N=Replication factor
  • So, when node A is down, demand is handed to another node in the band.

Where may i find this in the foundation code ?

The configuration files cluster. xml holds all information regarding the clusters present and the partitions it maps to. The server. properties file contains the individual node identification which is utilized in the cluster. xml file.

The bundle voldemort. customer. rebalance included code related to re balancing the cluster. The course RebalanceController is the key class and functions as the central controller to make the decisions regarding balancing the cluster.

Data Model and Serialization

As we've seen, Voldemort helps simple businesses such as put, get and delete. Both secrets and worth can be simple or intricate things. Serialization means translating the thing into an byte array for transmission on the network. Pluggable serialization in Voldemort is a very good feature and this allows one to use one's own serializer.

The following types of serialization are reinforced

* json

* string

* java-serialization

* protobuf

* thrift

* avro

* identity

Let's see json enter greater detail.

JSON Serialization

The data should be easily translated between the following different claims

Object † Network transmission † Content material Representation

JSON is being widely used in the industry as it facilitates common data-types across various programming languages. It does not have an inherent schema. However we can specify the schema by determining the 'type' of field. The 'type' can be 'int32', 'string', etc. .

For the store containing a straightforward 'Customer' object, we could establish type as

"firstname":"string", "lastname":"string", "id":"int32"

In this circumstance Java code will go back a Map. It will contain each one of the keys that have been specified, and the equivalent value.

Where may i find this in the foundation code ?

The bundle voldemort. serialization contains implementation for the various serializations backed.

Some of the sub-packages here are

* voldemort. serialization. avro

* voldemort. serialization. json

* voldemort. serialization. protobuf

* voldemort. serialization. thrift

Consistency and Versioning

In a read-only repository, when the data is fetched, it will be steady as there are no updates in the read-only repository. In a normal RDBMS, regularity is retained by using transactions. That is at a time only one process is allowed to change the info at a row-level.

In a sent out world, the info can live on many machines and there can be multiple reproductions of the info. In the event an update is made, all the copies of the info should have same value. That is possible using a distributed business deal but it's very slow.

Another way is that we tolerate a little inconsistency. According to CAP theorem, for obtaining both supply and partition-tolerance we ought to relax regularity. Such AP systems are known as eventually constant. Following figures gives an overview of NoSQL databases based on CAP throrem

What is eventual consistency ? Eventual consistency means that on the time period the revise of the info will reach all the nodes in the cluster.

Approaches such as Two-phase commit and Paxos-style consensus prevent long lasting inconsistency. Voldemort uses Read Repair for attaining uniformity. Let's understand Read Repair

Read repair strategy means that the nodes in the cluster will eventually have latest version of data. In this process, all the inconsistent principles are written to the nodes when there is a write request. During reading, it is inspected if the version of the data read from a node is stale. If yes, a conflict is discovered and then all nodes should be synchronized so that nodes discuss the same value.

Weak reliability in read operations means that the performance of read will be optimized by coming back requested data before all the nodes are synchronized with the same data. That's, a read procedure earnings immediately, and sets off an async process that will care for synchronization of data across all nodes. This does indeed perform faster than strong steadiness, but has drawback that the info returned is not always consistent.

Strong uniformity in read businesses means that constant data will be returned to the user. Within this when stale data is found at time of read, all the nodes are synchronized with the same data and then your response is directed. This does indeed perform slower than vulnerable consistency, but has warranties that the data is always dependable.


Versioning can be achieved in a centralized data source by positive locking. We just store a counter-top for every row, and when the row is updated we increment the counter-top. Here the revisions are only allowed when the 'counter' value is right. This way we know the latest version of data.

In a sent out system, versioning is difficult as servers can fail, servers can be added and replication of data can take time. We have to know for every single server what was the latest data value recently and the info to determine if that is outdated.

# 2 servers fetch the same value simultaneously

[client 1] get(12345) => "name":"tushar", "email":""

[consumer 2] get(12345) => "name":"tushar", "email":"il. com"

# client 1 posts the 'name'

[consumer 1] put(12345, "name":"tushar sjsu", "email":"")

# customer 2 changes the 'email'

[client 2] put(12345, "name":"tushar", "email":"")

# We now have the following conflicting versions

"name":"tushar", "email":""

"name":"tushar sjsu", "email":""

"name":"tushar", "email":""

Thus here the original value is overwritten by both clients. But we have no idea which is the latest part on each customer. And also we are in need of information to find out which of the version is obsolete.

This can be achieved by vector-clock. A vector-clock helps us by retaining a counter-top and upgrading it on each write and let's us know when 2 variants are in conflict, and which is the latest version.

A vector-clock can be thought of as a set of server:version pairs, where version can be an indication that server was the expert for your no. of writes

[1:50, 2:3, 5:66]

"A version v1 succeeds a version v2 if for any i, v1i > v2i. If neither v1 > v2 nor v1 < v2, then v1 and v2 co-occur, and are in conflict. " Here is a example of 2 conflicting variations

[1:2, 2:1]

[1:1, 2:2]

Following diagram shows the working of Vector clock.

Vector Clock

As shown in the diagram, Alice, Ben, Cathy and Dave are friends. They want to decide every day to meet, which is versatile for all. Following sequence of steps happen

* Alice creates 'Wed' on the clock and transmits to relax all.

* For Ben, it isn't possible on 'Wed' so he updates clock with 'Tue'. However this update is overlooked by Cathy.

* Cathy is comfortable with 'Thu' so she changes clock to 'Thu'.

* Now Dave gets two changes; of 'Tue' and 'Thu'. Dave makes sense and realizes Cathy was not in loop for 'Tue'. So he sends 'Thu' as last Cathy and Alice.

* Alice directs a final verification with clock value 'Thu' to all.

Where can I think it is in the code ?

The deal voldemort. store. routed has implementation for routing data across all nodes in the cluster. The class ReadRepairer in this bundle is responsible for undertaking read-repair.

The information of course says

"Repair out-dated reads, by sending an up-to-date value back to the offending clients"

In deal voldemort. versioning you will get implementation of Vector-clock in the course VectorClock.


In one in our database class jobs, we had to explore NoSQL databases. We'd to choose one NoSQL database for every category particularly, key-value, wide-column and document-based. So we choose the next
  1. Key-value: Voldemort
  2. Wide-column: Cassandra
  3. Document-based: MongoDB

The goal of the job was to examine these NoSQL directories and get a feel of how the data is stored in these databases and exactly how these directories perform for CRUD functions. Wikipedia was used as the source of data as it provided a wealthy assortment of interconnected documents that was essential for us to analyze the performance of three databases.

We used Site Scraper to acquire data from Wikipedia site. We fetched data from Wikipedia and stored it in our local file and then performed our operations considering the record as source. The Site Scraper uses a preset set of stop-words through which the downloaded report is passed through. These stop words are filtered out and remaining data consists of keywords, links, url and subject. This data is then stored in each one of the NoSQL databases and CRUD performance is assessed.

Following Junit test instances were written for each directories and each test document acquired five test cases.

* Case1: inserts all nine webpages into respective database

* Circumstance2:gets rid of particular page

* Case3: retrieves the web pages whose title consists of 'desk' word

* Case4:search the site and improve the title of the page

* Circumstance5: retrieves a single page given the key

Above lab tests were performed on a single-node cluster. All three databases were installed on the same machine and were jogging all together while testcases were executed. The performance figures varies if replication and sharding were to be utilized over a multi-node cluster. We'd establish the timers in each one of the No-SQL implementations on our put, select, delete and update operations to obtain comparison on the time considered for doing each operation.

Let's see how Voldemort executes in CRUD operations

In Voldemort, data is stored in the databases as a "store". Data in Voldemort is stored as simple key-value data. Both keys and values is often as intricate as lists or maps. Each key is exclusive to a store, and each key can have for the most part one value. Inside a multi-node cluster, data will be automatically sharded into multiple machines and hence it'll be highly available. Each server would contain only a subset of the total data.

Voldemort Configuration

In Voldemort server functions are primarily managed by three configuration files

* cluster. xml: This config record contains information about all the servers in the cluster like their hostname, interface they use, etc. It is identical for all those voldemort nodes. It generally does not contain information which is specific to this node such as tuning guidelines or data folders for those nodes, but rather information which is general public to the cluster.

* stores. xml: This includes information about all the stores in the cluster. Information like required-reads and required-writes to keep up consistency, and also the way the serialization of keys and values is done, is stored in this record. It is equivalent on all noded in the cluster.

* server. properties: This has tunable quarrels that control a particular server (node). Local node id (which corresponds to the entrance in cluster. xml ), threadpool size, and also local persistence engine motor parameters. This document ranges on each node.

Here is cluster. xml for our project






0, 1

Here it's important to note that partitions are not static partitions of node, but a way for partitioning the key-space in a way that each key is mapped to a particular data partition. Which means that a particular cluster may support multiple stores each with adjustable replication factors. That is significant, since some data is more critical than other data, and the trade-off between consistency and performance for one store might not exactly be same as another store. The count number of data partitions is fixed and can't be changed.

It is important that both config data files cluster. xml as well as stores. xml be same for each and every node, and also partition and node ids stay same for consistency across nodes.

Here is server. properties for our task

# The Identification of *this* particular cluster node

node. identification=0

max. threads=100

############### DB options ######################

http. enable=true

socket. allow=true


bdb. write. deals=false

bdb. flush. ventures=false

bdb. cache. size=1G

#NIO connector options.

enable. nio. connector=false

storage. configs=voldemort. store. bdb. BdbStorageConfiguration, voldemort. store. readonly. ReadOnlyStorageConfiguration

Here is stores. xml for our task









Here name represents the name of the store, and we say that people use bdb as local persistence engine motor. In relation to routing parameter, we say that customer will perform the routing. Now let's see about the parameters N (Replication factor), R (required reads) and W (required writes). The replication factor says how many replicas do we wish. R parameter is the bare minimum amount of reads that should succeed. Similarly W parameter is the minimal amount of writes that needs to be successful inside our cluster.

Next important things is serialization. We say that people will be using 'url' which really is a normal string as key for every in our record. Therefore key-serialization is string. However for value, we are not holding simple string. It'll a Map. In turn the map will contain different tips such as 'tilte', 'keywords', 'links' and their individual values. That is the reason why we need to use java-serialization.

Get Voldemort ready to go:

  1. Install Voldemort
  2. Make sure all config documents (cluster. xml, store. xml and server. properties) match those given above.
  3. From voldemort folder run the command:
  4. bin/voldemort-server. sh config/solo_node_cluster > /tmp/voldemort. log &
  5. Via Shell: Hook up to 'test' store using following control and then perform store procedures.
  6. bin/voldemort-shell. sh test tcp://localhost:6666

Voldemort CRUD

Connect to store:

String bootstrapUrl = "tcp://localhost:6666";

manufacturing plant = new SocketStoreClientFactory(

new ClientConfig(). setBootstrapUrls(bootstrapUrl));

customer = manufacturer. getStoreClient("test");

Disconnect from the store:

factory. close();

Inserting data:

// Receive the file (wiki webpage) stored on local disk.

Web address pageUrl = new Link("file://"

+ historyfiles[i]. getCanonicalPath());

// Scrape the page with pursuing url

Page pg = s. scrape(pageUrl);

// Get meta-data

String name = pg. getTitle();

String url = pg. getUrl();

// The url functions as a unique key

String key = url;

// We get a Versioned subject for a known key from the store.

// Get procedure of the store

Versioned> currentValue = client. get(key);

// Fill the hashmap, the 'value' for the main element in our store.

Map pageMap = new HashMap();

if (url != null)

urls. add(url);

pageMap. put("url", url);

if (title != null)

pageMap. put("subject", name);

// Similar code for filling up keywords, links in map. . .

//. . .

if (currentValue == null)

// There is no existing key-value match for the given key

// So create new value

currentValue = new Versioned>(pageMap);


// Update existing value.

currentValue. setObject(pageMap);

// Put procedure of the store

consumer. put(key, pageMap);

Retrieving data:

Versioned> currentValue = consumer. get(url);

Deleting data:

client. delete(url);

Updating data:

Versioned> currentValue = customer. get(url);

Map data = currentValue. getValue();

data. put("url", url);

currentValue. setObject(data);

client. put(url, data);

Searching data:

The conditions used for looking across all the internet pages stored in the directories was: "Find all web pages which have the term 'table' in its title".

String searchInTitle = "table";

ArrayList result = new ArrayList();

Versioned> currentValue = null;

for (int i=0; i < urls. size(); i++)

currentValue = consumer. get(urls. get(i));

Map data = currentValue. getValue();

String subject = (String) data. get("name");

if(title. contains(searchInTitle))

consequence. add(urls. get(i));

Please remember that we had inserted nine webpages in the Voldemort store.

Here is the outcome when the test was executed

Test Output

Voldemort's performance in comparison to other databases

The consequence was that people found writes are faster in Cassandra. Reads are faster in Voldemort, MongoDB than Cassandra. These results were for a single-node cluster.

Also We Can Offer!

Other services that we offer

If you don’t see the necessary subject, paper type, or topic in our list of available services and examples, don’t worry! We have a number of other academic disciplines to suit the needs of anyone who visits this website looking for help.