The GEOGRAPHIC AREA Systems (LANs) can provide only a small geographic area and there's a limitation for the full total amount of hosts that may be attached to a single network. To be able to communicate between your hosts network devices like hubs and switches are used. Thus a set of LANs that are interconnected by switches will form switched LANs and this lab is focused on the performance evaluation of the switched LANs.
The main goal of this lab assignment is to compare and review the performance of turned local area networks (LANs) that are integrated through the hubs and switches. The performance study of various guidelines like throughput, amount of collisions, and wait of the network is performed through the simulations extracted from the project implementations and the questions are responded from the simulations.
The execution of the turned LANs is done through OPNET IT Master software. The software provided detail by detail procedures. Inside the first step, the network is established with the hub configuration having nodes from node_0 through node_15 and the hub is known as as HUB_1. The Ethernet connection 10BaseT, manages at 10Mbps and is employed to link between the 16 hosts present in the network. The network nodes are then separately configured for the traffic generation guidelines and packet generation parameters features. As the hub construction would send the packets received at its input to all or any the end result lines regardless of the destination the hub construction network design is really as shown below.
The second settings uses both the hub and the change. Here a switch is used between the two hubs named HUB_1 and HUB_2. Each hub is linked to 8 nodes and the connection is established through the Ethernet 10BaseT link. The primary difference between the hub and the swap is usually that the switch runs on the store and forwards mechanism. Thus it'll onward the packets received at its suggestions port to the required vacation spots and sometimes buffers because of the network traffic. The network construction for such a mixture of hub and move is detailed in the below simulation design.
The above two network configurations are analyzed for the characteristics packet generation and traffic generation parameters. Both of them are similar and the packet era occurred for every 100 seconds. The simulation of the configured network is run for each and every 2 minutes and the details are captured for further evaluation.
OBSERVATIONS AND RESULTS ANALYSIS:
The simulation results for the configured systems are plainly depicted by the graphs. Fig 3 details the traffic delivered over the hub and the hub-switch combination. From the graph we can identify the amount of traffic directed across both configurations remained the same. Fig 4 shows the packets that are received at the destination for both configurations. Through the graph we can declare that the hub-switch settings is more efficient on the hub alone construction.
The analysis of that time period wait in Fig 5 gives a clear idea about the efficiency of hub-switch construction. The hub-switch settings had a hold off of 0. 020 secs constantly for a particular load and there is absolutely no such criterion for the hub only construction.
The collision matter in Fig 6 depicts that the collision count up for the hub exclusively is practically 2300 for a frequent timeframe and the truth with the hub and change combination is far less which matters to practically 900. Thus we can say from the graphs that the efficiency of hub and turn network construction is more when compared to the hub by itself network configuration.
QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS:
Question 1: Explain why adding a transition makes the network perform better in terms of throughput and wait.
Answer: Through the simulation results it is apparent that a move performs well by dividing the network into smaller collision domains. Thus the throughput could be increased and also the switch provides the network bandwidth of 10 Mbps completely on each of the nodes and therefore the wait of the network is reduced effectively.
Question 2: We analyzed the collision matters of the hubs. Is it possible to review the collision count number of the "Switch"? Discuss your answer.
Answer: Yes. The collision count of a switch can be examined with the habit of the transition. The switch uses a store and frontward mechanism. Thus it also offers the capability of buffering the packets in times of network traffic. These major