A Research Of War Poetry English Literature Essay

This poem presents war through the experience of the conflict photographer. We find out about war through just how that he serves and through his thoughts. We learn that conflict must be emotionally troubling and distressing and exactly how it can psychologically damage someone. The atmosphere in the darkroom is solemn and frosty. It really is almost like a church with 'softly glowing red light'. The shooter sees himself just like a priest 'setting up to intone a mass' since he's taking this technique of growing these photos very seriously. They are special photographs to him so he does not have any other choice but to treat them with reverence. He needs to act appropriately because they are so very harrowing. He places an importance in these photos and because he is treating them with so much seriousness, it is nearly like a priest organizing a cathedral service. The photographer's reaction to the developing photographs is that of surprise. He's now being what he should have felt before - delayed stress. As the 'half-formed ghost' appears, appears get back to him and it's as if he's haunted by the images of the man's death and he'll remember those violent happenings. He's lumbered with the flashbacks of conflict. In 'War Photographer' it isn't necessary to have great fine detail about the photographic images, simply because the poem is not about the images. We won't need to know about them because we only find out about conflict through the photographer's reactions to the images and also his applying for grants them. Carol represents the public's reaction to the images very diversely to the photographer's reaction to highlight the comparison between the two. 'Between bath and pre-lunch beers' means that readers will only check out through this article as something extra to do in their leisure time, and they'll forget about it directly after placing the newspaper down. Therefore that no-one cares about what's occurring on the planet, and no-one comprehends what the professional photographer understands. Duffy shows her irony at the end of the poem 'prick with tears'. It only just touches the readers, nonetheless they won't weep and weep for the a large number of lives lost, because that's what's likely to happen in warfare. The photographer appears down on the general public because of this, and he feels frustrated and bitter that no-one understands or cares about the truth. I believe he feels annoyed that he's the only real person to comprehend war, and everybody else in 'Rural Britain' have their problems of their own. The professional photographer has been condemned into anger and distress through his job, which explains why I feel extreme pity for him. I feel sympathetic towards the shooter because no-one else apprehends him and so he can't share his emotions with anybody. No-one else appreciates the truth of battle.

Carol Ann Duffy has thought meticulously about the words and phrases she uses in order to connect the hurting of the warfare photographer effectively. It appears as though the shooter has looked forwards to having the ability to release his emotions because he his 'finally only'. We realize this because his hands learn to tremble and he gets flashbacks and feels anger. Also he might be dreading being by itself since he now has to be confronted with his suffering souvenirs. No matter the method that you interpret this is, either way the photos are inescapable. Duffy has utilised the alliterative term 'spools of enduring set out in ordered rows' to demonstrate the point that the photographer is wanting to contain his pain. He doesn't want his thoughts to take hold of him so he tries to organise everything to keep himself concentrated. She shows the distinction between our 'Rural Britain' and 'Belfast, Beirut and Phnom Penh' by highlighting the actual fact our 'common pain' can be cured by 'simple weather'. But how about the pain of those who get dragged into conflict and suffer? How about the 'exploding fields' and 'problem heat'. Simple weather can't get rid of that! Duffy turns sarcastic and makes the comment; at least our children don't blow up. I think that the key message behind this poem is how we take everything for granted, and we don't appreciate what has been given. Carol uses the image of 'working children' to set before us the thought of dread and vulnerability. She's done this to expose the contrast between children of Britain and children of conflict. How children in Great britain are so protected and clear of problems, and given everything to live life fully compared to the vulnerable, weak children in war. In such a poem visual images are quickly raised, and the words used is also very remarkable (bloodstream). The idea of 'bloodstream stained' gives the impression that it is unnatural and it shouldn't be there. Again the atmosphere of any chapel and of a funeral service is thought due to collection from the bible 'all flesh is lawn', basically most of us return to dust. The complete poem is approximately loss of life and it seems very depressing to learn it. But Carol did this deliberately to make the poem thought-provoking and also to give it a tone of pain. 'The cries of any man's wife' is an extremely specific and immediate recollection that will remain with the professional photographer forever. Additionally it is an individual experience that he will never forget and can probably have problems with for the rest of his life.

'The Man He Killed' by Thomas Hardy is the next poem that I will look at. Hardy makes an over-all point about battle. The main idea of the poem is the cruelty and absurdity of computer. Hardy talks about the pointless reasons of conflict and exactly how normal men begin to call each other foes to see the other person as enemies. The main element concept of the poem is the tragedy of conflict. Throughout the poem, Hardy makes a joke of conflict and emphasises precisely how silly and ridiculous it truly is. The author uses words effectively and the best way is in the title. Even though poem is written in the first poem, the title is in the third 'The Man He Killed'. Hardy has intentionally done this to associate the poem to everyone to focus on the fact that can happen to any regular person. In the ultimate stanza, the soldier means that everyone would do the same thing by expressing 'you' and 'you'd'. This makes the viewers feel like the soldier is communicating straight at them. The poem tells us how things might have been different and how warfare changes all relationships; how it prohibits camaraderie and distorts thoughts. It troubles the soldier when he feels about how exactly he might have been friends with the person he wiped out if it hadn't been for conflict. Although this poem was written long following the war we can see how the soldier still can't ignore what he's done and that he's still attempting to come to terms with his actions. Hardy is exhibiting us how conflict make a difference a soldier, even as yet. After such an extended time frame it is still problematic for the soldier to think about a suitable reason concerning why he killed the man. Repetition of 'because' demonstrates he's stumbling to think about grounds why. Hardy has chosen a very gentle way of revealing to us his main subject matter: 'yes; quaint and wondering war is!' This brand is worded almost like it's a tale - but there's a lot of bitterness in it. The exclamation make makes it seem to be more than just a joke. At a target distance war looks a little more than 'quaint and curious', it appears absurd. The firmness through the poem is very thought-provoking. You are constantly considering each and every point the soldier makes and questions are automatically being elevated as to why!

This poem says a great deal about conflict through the knowledge of the protagonist soldier. He is brainwashed into convinced that this man; this stranger is his enemy. He considers a friendly relationship and what a friendly relationship involves. He believes about how he could have been friends with that stranger and exactly how they could 've got drunk collectively: 'we should have sat us right down to damp'. The poem clarifies that because they attained in war, they had no other choice but to photograph at one another. The soldier identifies how he previously no choice but to save lots of his own life, 'I taken at him, and he at me'. He feels a sense of stress because he can't understand war. He attempts to justify why he achieved it; why he killed someone for whom he distributed no feelings. The whole poem provides sense of guilt and pity from the soldier. He empathises with the man he killed, and feels quite deeply in what he has done. The soldier contains a sense of irony about the problem; he's killed a guy who he hadn't possessed a thought about. He's killed a man who was exactly like him. Gleam firmness of puzzlement in the poem, 'that's clear enough; although', since it troubles the soldier that the man he wiped out was probably quite like himself: 'off-hand like - just as I'. He feels about how precisely they both probably joined the army for the same reasons; unemployment and interest. The man he wiped out wasn't even bad, he was just an unemployed man who joined the military because he needed a job, 'No other reason why'. We don't really know what the soldier's name is, and we have no idea anything about his ordinary life, other than what he's written. Hardy has deliberately done this to help make the poem connect with everyone. This could be any soldier talking about any other soldier. The author's very easy point is the absurdity of warfare. There are a lot of questions increased by this poem. Why wipe out someone for whom you talk about no feeling? What's war after all? And really should you eliminate a person you don't know? Should you go directly to the extent of eliminating a being, without a solid cause of the activities you are taking?

Hardy communicates his view of conflict in 'The Man He Killed' through the composition and the terminology of the poem. The first and previous stanza is similar to a wish for the soldier; what if they had met in a pub? What if they had known each other before? The beginning describes the way the two men may have shared some other relationship, and exactly how it would have been ever so different. That is contrasted with the cruel truth; the fact the soldier is finding so hard to accept. The dialect in the next stanza, for example 'face to face' and 'shot at him as he at me' is unusually blunt. The soldier uses rather matter of simple fact, down to globe language to describe killing the man. It is a very simple, straightforward description of an dramatic event. He gives the facts as they are, and says it how it is. This split words contrasts with the serious message behind the poem, and really helps to spotlight the soldier's sense of bitterness. Also the language is working category, which makes it accessible to the normal man such as the soldier. In the 3rd stanza, the repetition of 'foe' and 'because' plus the broken rhythm says us that the soldier isn't assured, so he's trying to convince himself that what he's declaring is right. That stranger was his foe. 'Just so: my foe of course he was'. With this range the soldier is trying to reassure himself that he was right to kill the man although he doesn't consider it. Within the latter area of the poem the soldier uses the word 'fellow' to make the man seem more like a pal than an foe. It almost seems as though he's dialling him a 'chap'; as though they have an understanding between one another and something in keeping. The complete poem is speech marks to make you think about someone speaking aloud. The style of it feels as though a casual chat. The casual, friendly vocabulary, for example 'nipperkin' contrasts greatly with the information of the challenge in the next verse. The colloquial terms makes the poem sound like an everyday speech. The ironic understatement 'quaint and inquisitive', as stated before makes the soldier sound puzzled by conflict.

The general theme of warfare is provided in the two poems: 'The Man He Wiped out', and 'War Photographer' nevertheless the views and thoughts of warfare differ. They are both antiwar poems because similarly Thomas Hardy shows by using a soldier his bafflement for warfare, and his irony at it. And on the other hand Carol Ann Duffy shows via a photographer her sympathy for the innocent subjects who get swept up in war. Despite the fact that they are discussed a hundred years aside, we realise the same thing from both poems, the sense of conflict. The clearly mentioned note from 'The Man He Killed' is the fact battle is senseless, pointless and absurd but Duffy means that war is inevitable. Hardy has chosen to create his poem in the first person to make it appear like a calm reflection, however 'Battle Professional photographer' is written in the third person to build traumatic images. From 'The Man He Wiped out' we do not feel revolted and stunned by warfare, it just doesn't seem sensible. However in the 'Battle Professional photographer' we see how the horrors of warfare can affect people, and since it's in the 3rd person it is nearly as if we could watching someone suffer. It shows more stress, fright, and the destruction battle creates. Carol Ann Duffy has purposely not included any tempo to make 'Conflict Photographer' contain a grave and solemn firmness. 'The Man He Killed' however, comes with an upbeat since it isn't such a significant matter. The solitary worded technique that Carol utilises, 'Belfast. Beirut. Phnom Penh', makes it feel like the labels of the famous warfare scenes will continue steadily to come up, and we ask ourselves how many more? As the shooter 'stares impassively' from the aeroplane windows showing no sentiment, bitter emotions must be within him. I think he feels prepared to face the fact his work is only forlorn. And it'll have no effect on anyone other than himself. He is resigned to the futility of his work, and to the futility of warfare!

Also We Can Offer!

Other services that we offer

If you don’t see the necessary subject, paper type, or topic in our list of available services and examples, don’t worry! We have a number of other academic disciplines to suit the needs of anyone who visits this website looking for help.

How to ...

We made your life easier with putting together a big number of articles and guidelines on how to plan and write different types of assignments (Essay, Research Paper, Dissertation etc)