Art And The Orange Fish English Literature Essay

A short-story that uncovers the partnership of Skill and society. Art fills a void, offers essence of specific existence, and gives an possibility to find our thoughts in its products. What lengths is Skill useful? Is it feasible whatsoever to interpret a piece of work? In what level will be the interpretations aim or subjective? These are the questions, that Carol Shields' The Orange Seafood endeavors to find answers, in an exceedingly original and dangerous way, which apparently destroys everything: the short-story itself, the audience, the Orange Seafood, and the common ideology of Art. But at the same time, it message or calls the focus on the cohesive force and to the need of Artwork as well. Could it be the disillusionment of the author from Art work or only a mockery on it? The next few pages intend to analyse these problems of the short-story, and touch after the narrative strategy and the composition of this Orange Seafood.

Originally, the picture about a seafood was bought to complete the void on your kitchen wall and to decorate the house. But the fish later becomes a tool for the heroes to analyse themselves, as well as for the audience. This picture gets an elevated so this means, becomes overrated, however, not only for the couple, but also for those who own the other parts. With this, the Fish gets a mystic function, and brakes through its restrictions, steps out of its shape. It is not only a poster that hides a blank opening on the wall membrane, but something that provides an chance to the owners to interpret their own thoughts, and to be present in a socio-cultural programme. While the totally unrealistic, technically impossibly summoned communal gathering has been held, the readers end up forgetting about the initial function of the picture, and learn to look for their own emotions in the Orange Fish. In this sense, the viewers act the same way as the personas do. But this is when they probably end up from the situation, and take notice of the scene from an alternative perspective, from outdoors, from above the individuals: it turns out, that the reader is the victim of a severe irony. The copy writer makes fun of the "artificial" interpreters, not only folks, but also of the few. Carol Shields places the reader to a position where in fact the petty argumentation is ridiculed, and where the readers and the heroes are not on a single level any longer, destroying the validity of most interpretations, as well as the short-story itself. The issue of the deconstruction will be discussed later in this essay.

What does indeed actually the Orange Seafood imply for the personas? The husband projects his concerns of aging and emptying of his life to the picture. "The orange seafood will never grow old"- he says. For him the Seafood symbolises eternity and a full life. Initially, he is seated in your kitchen, and is meditating on his unfulfilled dreams, as the blank gap on the kitchen wall shows the emptiness of his soul, what is going to be include aging. This makes the parallel between his heart and your kitchen wall visible. By putting something on the wall, he finds this is of his life, which is far from acceptance, because it can't be a long term solution, what he does not discover. He observes himself from an external point, will not confess that his feelings just hide the true problems, just like the way the fish hides the blank hole on your kitchen wall. It is still a help for him to confess his problems in ways, with the help of which he involves a pain relief: "Each folks feels our deepest concerns have been given form. " For Lois-Ann the fish means something different. As she puts it, it symbolises an unknowable and regular world, then one that decodes and interprets the "wordless world". On her behalf it can mean the desire to understand life and her man, therefore she also requires a solid psychological backdrop, which she found in a picture. Still, the main changes brought by the seafood concern their life collectively. The picture instantly brings a quiet and lovely atmosphere to their relationship, and they get nearer to the other person through minor gestures and little steps they try improve their marriage. It renewals their life, resolves unuttered tensions, which is - after so a long time of marriage - is a genuine relief. The seafood is a widespread remedy for people's problems, since through the social gathering each individual interprets in different ways. In this admiration, without worries of exaggerated generalization, it could be said that Art work can cure mental health problems. But could it be really what the short-story intends to make clear to us?

As discussed above, the irony which exists constantly under the surface deconstructs the task itself, as well as the fish. Both have the same ultimate role: being absurd because of its mock-interpreters, but still they will vary. On the main one hands, the picture is ironical because of its over-idealization and place in the life span of the character types. Alternatively, the work is deceiving because it parallelises the readers and the characters in a sense that they both lack the knowledge to understand their own situation, at least until a certain point. Viewers do not recognise their own position as victims, and since mock-interpreters.

The hint for interpretation would be that the self should break its boundaries and place itself to the outer perspective. On the one hand, the viewers should get through their own interpreting behaviour and empathy, and get to a spot where they may have the opportunity to examine the heroes, and their behaviour towards the seafood, more carefully. Because of this, the readers realize the individuality with the character types, not only in a way, that they look for his or her feelings in the Orange Fish as the narrator does, but also in a sense, they are also the victims of the illusionist mockery of any work of Art. On the other hand, the narrator hears himself communicating from an outside perspective, still it isn't enough for him, he does not have the data to understand his own deception, because he is still too occupied with his problems. Therefore, though it could seem a dangerous lay claim, the reader's self-awareness and knowledge is positioned above the heroes power to realize their position as victims.

The climax of the total destruction of Artwork is in the last few paragraphs. The uniqueness of the fish is dissolved by the actual fact, so it becomes a mass-product. Firstly, this means that the interior emotions of the personas to the picture disappear, and the authenticity, uniqueness to them is lost. The fish does not provide any opportunities for specific interpretations any more, especially for those who gathered to share their ideas about it. It is the ideal lost for the initial owners. Indeed, the fish is no more the thing of interpretations, no more an instrument to project the emotional problems on something. The empty hole on the kitchen wall appears again for the narrator, and the planet becomes unknowable for Lois-Ann again. Second of all, the fact that the fish becomes a mass-product can be identified differently: the writer means to criticise all works of Art which is famous and well-known all around the globe. According to this viewpoint, Art loses its magnificence by getting cherished by everybody. The subjective interpretation is changed by an objective, most commonly used interpretation, which means less value in the case of this picture. The validity of the assertion can be questioned just by discussing well know works, like Mona Lisa: known all around the globe, still valuable. Certainly there is absolutely no one-single good interpretation, still the task suggests, that the only "useful" and constructive viewpoint is if the task remains unique and personal. But this is when the decisive questions happen: What's the role of Art? Could it be for self-interpretation, or for something that touches and moves public of people? Is not it the ultimate goal to attain everybody? They are the questions which can be almost impossible to answer to a certain extent, that is why this essay does not make an effort to find an ultimate solution.

Of course, it would be a mistake to investigate the motives of the author, but nonetheless: Is this work a disillusionment from the universal meaning of Fine art? From one perspective it is, since until this aspect, the ironical technique of the short story was discussed. It mocks the uniqueness and the possible interpretation of a picture, and the short-story itself. From another perspective, it is paradoxical, because the power of Art to get together people, as well as the energy to job problems on an image is looked after and emphasised. Fine art has this type of supernatural power to assemble people form all around the globe. Carol Shields will not tell how it's possible in any way to get know who owns the pictures, and how can more and more people from around the globe find a decent place and period to discuss their problems. Thus, until the few paragraphs Skill is a robust force, which can solve emotional and personal issues, but this pressure is dissolved by the end. It appears that this question remains unanswered, at least in this essay.

As a conclusion, it is visible, that the Orange Fish deconstructs itself and this is of Fine art, as well as the readers. To draw your final conclusion is very difficult, because these general questions are impossible to answer. What requires a summary is that the character types find the Orange Seafood very good remedy for their internal conflicts, and they enjoy the alternatives that are given in the form of a communal activity. There are still points that may be further discussed, for example, the mentioning of other literary works which package with this problem, or the evaluation of great thinkers' ideas on the role of Art.

Also We Can Offer!

Other services that we offer

If you don’t see the necessary subject, paper type, or topic in our list of available services and examples, don’t worry! We have a number of other academic disciplines to suit the needs of anyone who visits this website looking for help.

How to ...

We made your life easier with putting together a big number of articles and guidelines on how to plan and write different types of assignments (Essay, Research Paper, Dissertation etc)