Celebrating Nerdiness The Glorification Of Nerds English Literature Essay

The article, "Celebrating Nerdiness" by Tom Rogers seeks to improve and perfect the society's misunderstanding of any nerd, by providing the readers with reasons to respect and accept nerds, as well as to influence nerds to be proud of themselves instead of feeling ashamed therefore of rejection from the modern culture. From the start of his article, Rogers obviously recognizes himself as a nerd, and uses first person and simple terms to talk to the readers. From your style of dialect he has chosen, his visitors are able to understand and relate with him. Hence, effectively communicating and engaging along with his readers.

In this content, Rogers remarks that he and both his sons are nerds, and gives examples of their past experiences showing how they were ostracized and tormented as young adults because these were called nerds. Yet, they grew up to be successful men. Before examining the article in detail, Rogers appears to suggest that nerds should be seemed up to rather than being viewed with contempt, as experienced by him and his sons. With the samples that Rogers pointed out, it is visible that he feels that him and his sons are "extraordinary" nerds, whereby they include sociable and physical skills, which defies the stereotypical impressions of your nerd identified by the world.

However, after evaluating the article in greater detail, there are several substantive weaknesses in Rogers's things. While he tries to convince his viewers that being a nerd is "wonderful", he supports this by showing him and his sons as remarkable individuals possessing qualities not typically associated with nerds in the sight of the society. Hence, in unlike his argument that nerds are "wonderful", he creates the impression that he and his sons are not typical nerds, or in truth, not nerds, making his discussion unsubstantiated.

Part 2

In this short article, the writer is inconsistent in his debate. However, Rogers have brought up some pertinent factors. From the beginning of this article, he claims that he and both his sons are nerd, as seen from his affirmation "I'm a nerd". Also, his main purpose of the article is to glorify nerds and convey the communication that "being a nerd was not simply Okay but something wonderful. " In order to support this, he boosts some valid evidences, saying that "virtually every modern blessing from democracy to electric motors originated with a nerd" and this Newton and Einstein, who were arrogant and absent-minded, are now considered geniuses. With these evidences, it is obvious that nerds have indeed been sold short. Despite their efforts to the society in a wide variety of ways, we often your investment improvements they have got brought about with their intellect and eagerness to move forward the modern culture. Hence, not only performed Rogers effectively support his claim that being truly a nerd is wonderful, but he also handles to tone of voice the injustice experienced by nerds, who are constantly undervalued.

Nonetheless, rest of the article is incoherent with his main point of being a nerd is wonderful. It really is clear from Rogers's good examples that both his sons didn't have a convivial youth or teenage years, due to the fact that these were nerds. His elder boy "endured hell at the hands of bullies", while his youthful son's educator "publicly informed him he'd never graduate from high school". Evidently, his sons were not given admiration from peers or professors, and endured through middle institution. All of which are despite of their capacities. Therefore, this opposes the primary message Rogers attempts to convey, as the viewers are unable to comprehend the awe to be a nerd. Instead, Rogers has outlined the negatives to be a nerd for his visitors, contradicting his own argument.

In this post, Rogers appears to categorize nerds into two categories: typical nerds identified by the population, "friendless, book-smart sissies who suck up to power figures", and the exceptional nerds who can perform well in various areas, like his sons and himself. He groups his sons and himself under the "exceptional" group of nerds, as they own qualities that go over typical nerds. This implies his aspire to stick out from the stereotypical impression of nerds, while declaring to be proud to be a nerd. Evidences in the article suggest that he is proud to be always a nerd, like "I'm a nerd" and "being a nerd was not just Fine but something wonderful". Yet, parts of the article also appear to suggest that he didn't desire to be determined as a nerd, and wanted to participate in a lot of the society. For instance, "I largely survived by understanding how to keep noiseless in the school" could imply he did not want to be designated from the course as a nerd. Thus, as a audience, I'd question his cases on being happy to be always a nerd, as he seems to want to squeeze in with the rest of the society. In addition, from "And nowadays no-one would slip-up him for a sissy", it shows that Rogers still seeks acceptance from the world, again, showing his desires to fit in or be accepted by the population while being area of the minority of the nerds.

Rogers also provides evidences to show that he and his supposedly nerd sons are not typical nerds or, might not exactly even be nerds. Being a youth, he was raised being called a nerd. However, perhaps like any other teenager, Rogers saw the need to be considered a unique specific, whereby he defines himself as a nerd, but not a typical one. There was an instance where a band of "Russian policemen threw his elder son a party after he accepted their invitation to take a mid-December drop in a springtime filled up with near-freezing water", yet he was described as "just too small" and "pale and unathletic" when he is at middle-school. His young son, who was simply misinterpreted by his senior high school teacher, is now able to deliver a "ten minutes of stand-up comedy". Both sons proved drastic changes actually and socially. However, Rogers cases that both his sons "remained specialized in nerds". With these transformations, they no more fit the stereotypical image of nerds, who are "friendless" and "book-smart sissies". Hence, is Rogers justified to still label his sons as nerds, when they no longer possess the qualities that define nerds in the eye of the society, or are they not the typical nerds? Therefore, this brings us to the desire for authenticity pitched against a need to maintain a stereotype image. While Rogers and his sons strives to be amazing nerds who possess sociable and physical skills, they may no longer fit into the stereotypical image of a nerd, that is, the society's impression of an nerd.

In conclusion, when Rogers's points of arguments claim that the article writer himself is no longer a nerd in the eyes of the modern culture, is he still in the position to "celebrate nerdiness"? Also, from the article, the reasons brought up to "celebrate nerdiness" actually make a nerd less of a nerd. Hence, will there be really a "celebration" as it pertains to a nerd? It really is evident that the writer's debate is very weakened, since he is struggling to make a engaging argument and influence the audience his point of view, especially when the majority of the points described are opposing his main concept of being a nerd is something "wonderful".

Also We Can Offer!

Other services that we offer

If you don’t see the necessary subject, paper type, or topic in our list of available services and examples, don’t worry! We have a number of other academic disciplines to suit the needs of anyone who visits this website looking for help.

How to ...

We made your life easier with putting together a big number of articles and guidelines on how to plan and write different types of assignments (Essay, Research Paper, Dissertation etc)