Explore JUST HOW MUCH Ado About Little or nothing Present Ideas About Love English Literature Essay

Figuratively, the reasonable lord represents clean love and the woman represents lust. These two types of love are contrasted against each other, that allows the reader to evaluate and think about the ideas each type of love presents. However, where is the mankind through this sonnet? There is absolutely no reference to humans; you can only be classed as an 'angel' or a 'devil. ' How would one go about attaining an angel, one of the purest beings that dwells in heaven? Perhaps the simple fact that Shakespeare has likened the good lord with an angel is made for the simple fact that he cannot attain him, that pure love can't be attained.

This idea of likening wish to something that is unattainable is replicated in Much Ado About Nothing. Shakespeare gets the character Claudio show up deeply in love with Hero initially eyesight. When Benedick asks Claudio if he'll buy her, he replies

"Can the world buy such a jewel?"

Despite likening Hero to something as perfect as a jewel, again there is no humanity within the jewel. Combined with the idea that the globe cannot, in simple fact, buy this jewel seems to suggest that Hero (this completely clean virgin) is unattainable. Perhaps Shakespeare is wanting to claim that if you compare love with wonderful and perfect things then you just won't be in a position to attain it, just like you cannot attain an angel or a precious jewel.

This idea does apply in society. In Much Ado, Hero is portrayed as this completely genuine and innocent virgin. Being in comparison to that of unattainable invaluable jewels, Shakespeare shows how a girl like Hero (generally) is unattainable. In the current modern society it would oftimes be extremely rare to find a female like Hero, whereas perhaps in Shakespeare's time it was more common, especially if the girl was of high communal position. One might say that there was more of an expectation for women to behave in certain ways during Elizabethan England. However Shakespeare added the type of Margaret to his play, perhaps to juxtapose the expectations society placed for a higher class woman to that of a typical servant. Margaret appears to symbolize more of an authentic view on how love and romantic relationships will be, not natural and perfect, but flawed and tainted (by physical love).

Shakespeare appears to allude a more pragmatic and reasonable view to love is needed in order for it to succeed. "Sonnet 130" requires more of a practical view to love. Its interpretation is easy: the dark lady's beauty cannot measure up to the beauty of your goddess or even to that found in nature, for she is a mortal human being. Shakespeare rejects deification of the dark lady

"I grant I never observed a goddess go;

My mistress, when she walks, treads on the floor. "

Here the poet overtly declares that his mistress is not really a goddess and cannot even commence to rank near one. Although this appears to be extremely unflattering, additionally it is the truth. In the end, no mortal being can actually compare to a god or a goddess. She actually is also not as beautiful as things found in nature

"My mistress' eyes are nothing beats sunlight;

Coral is a lot more red than her lips' red. "

Yet Shakespeare loves her in spite of this, and in the final couplet says that she actually is actually as astonishing ("rare") as any girl depicted with such overstated or bogus evaluations. Shakespeare has accepted the actual fact that his mistress is not perfect and this she will indeed have defects, yet so does he. "Sonnet 130" may be recommending that if you recognise and acknowledge the fact that love will have flaws which is not some perfect idealistic emotion, then the odds of the love prolonged is much more likely.

This blunt but captivating sincerity is also observed in Much Ado between Beatrice and Benedick. Both of these characters haven't been pleasant with each other, and whenever they meet, they often continue a "merry battle" between them. They may have known each other "of old" and seem to be to enjoy fencing insults at each other, using them showing their true feelings of fondness towards each other. Once the playwright makes his character types confess one to the other there is no work of blank verse, just simple prose. Beatrice and Benedick's confessions appear to not in favor of the stereotypical, grand Shakespearean love confessions

"I protest I really like thee"

"I got about to protest that I loved you"

These two people look like alert to their downfalls and seem to be to have a mutual admiration between them. The love between these two appears to be more genuine than the "bashful sincerity and comely love" that is out there between Hero and Claudio. However, for that reason there is apparently more room for Beatrice and Benedick's wish to grow.

Shakespeare seems to favour the thought of love as an reality than an excellent because he appears to suggest that thinking of love as an excellent will end in tragedy. In "Sonnet 116" Shakespeare identifies love as

"the superstar to every wandering bark. "

While the image given to us by the poet is at first one of constancy, the idea that love will guide those who abide by it to their desired destination, one must question the feasibility than it. Stars are living up in Space, even though it holds true that they can be used to provide direction (in the case of the North Celebrity, Polaris), you can never touch a legend. In fact, one would never be capable of geting near to a star, as it is a mass of burning gas that could have you significantly burned up before you might even try to get near it. Because of this, you can't ever attain a star and so perhaps with this line in the sonnet Shakespeare is trying to state that, although love has the potential to be this wonderful, glowing ideal just like a star, the reality is that if you blindly follow this ideal then you'll get hurt.

Another point about personalities is that they will eventually burn up and die, they do not last permanently. This seems to create a contradiction in "Sonnet 116" as the overall theme of this sonnet is apparently how frequent and everlasting love is. Shakespeare even runs so far as to state that

"Love's not Time's fool, "

Yet personalities are always falling victim to time, being ravaged and then eventually damaged because of it. This seems alternatively ironic and appears to reinforce the thought of love being something that is unattainable, especially if you cling on to the perspective that love is something that is constant, perfect and clean.

Not only does Shakespeare mention Polaris in "Sonnet 116", but he also mentions it in Action 2, Scene Among Much Ado where in fact the personality Benedick is saying that Beatrice

"would infect the north star. "

The fact that the type of Beatrice is so nasty that she can affect something that's not even reachable sets her in an exceedingly negative light. In the end, if she can affect something as excellent and 100 % pure as a superstar, then she make a difference anything. This promise not only appears to besmirch Beatrice's reputation, however the idea of real love itself. Perhaps Shakespeare introduces this idea of pure love being impressionable so in early stages in his play to make the audience consider realism in love. One may argue that quote highlights precisely how easily influenced clean love can be, and how it could be tainted.

"Sonnet 144" continues the idea that clean love can be tainted:

"And whether that my angel be switched fiend

Suspect I might, yet not directly tell. "

Shakespeare could be suggesting how easy it is for 'natural' like to be polluted by that of physical love. Perhaps he's suggesting that it is extremely hard to just have ex - because an impure aspect will eventually sully it. Though love may bring out the best in every of us, it can also cloud our judgement and expose the most detrimental in all human beings.

Claudio is used by Shakespeare to demonstrate this point further. This identity is constantly put through the sentiment of jealousy. During the masked ball, Claudio immediately calls for Benedick's assertion of, "The prince hath received your Hero" to imply that Don Pedro has betrayed him and wooed Hero for his own. Down the road in the play, Don John convinces Claudio that Hero is having an affair. Instead of proceeding with things in a relaxed and adult manner, Claudio makes a decision to exact revenge on the big day. This immediate change of center in Claudio makes one question the effectiveness of the love Claudio retains for his fiance. One point in time he is completely infatuated with her, discussing her as a "jewel", yet the character is phoning Hero a "rotten orange" and accusing her of being an "approvЁd wanton" the next. Claudio's ideas of love being this perfect ideal are shattered over the events that happen in the play, yet he appears to grow because of this. Shakespeare made it so that Claudio had to figure out how to appreciate Hero, and then for him to understand that not absolutely all can be perfect as it pertains to love. Because of this, when both characters finally get married at the end of the play the audience is given the impression that their relationship actually has a base on which to can flourish, as opposed to the unstable marriage that was more likely to happen between both of these had they obtained married on the original big day.

Shakespeare uses a vast selection of techniques within his sonnets and Much Ado that spotlight how love really is an unattainable, perfect ideal. Most of Shakespeare's sonnets consist of three quatrains and your final rhyming couplet which is composed in iambic parameter. The rhyme program for the sonnets are 'ABAB. ' "Sonnet 144" is not a exception to this, and is constructed in the usual Shakespearean sonnet manner. Possibly the poet selected this conventional method of writing the sonnet because the ideas shown within the sonnet are regular. It is not to hard to assume becoming disillusioned between your two types of love, as most of us yearn for something long term and long lasting, a pure love, yet humans also succumb to temptation and can fall season sufferer to the desire for a solely physical encounter. As both of these types of love both offer something very different, one must battle to choose the 'right' one, which Shakespeare says is the '100 % pure' love shown by the good lord. However as I pointed out earlier, it is not possible to achieve an angel. The fact that "Sonnet 144" is written this way is rather ironic as the poet is writing about his conflicting feelings and the disorder that they bring, yet iambic pentameter suggests order and tranquility. Perhaps Shakespeare could be recommending that you can try to make love a perfect and purchased ideal but the reality is that you'll, in most cases, have some element of discord.

In my thoughts and opinions I feel that "Sonnet 130" utilises iambic pentameter to maximum result. Shakespeare has admitted that his mistress is not perfect, yet he loves her nonetheless. This view the poet appears to keep, that love is better thought of as an actuality, seems to suggest that love will be much better this way. Instead of have everything be perfect, if you understand about the other's imperfections and allow them, then you'll achieve harmony inside your relationship. This is why Personally i think that the utilization of iambic pentameter is essential in this sonnet: it features the fact that the kind of love is much more likely to provide security and a feeling of order, despite not being a perfect ideal.

Iambic pentameter is also found in Much Ado, to elevate the value of love in the play. When Claudio is confessing how he feels about Hero, he promises that when he looked after her

"thronging tender and delicate wants,

All prompting me how fair young Hero is"

Came to him. As this happens in early stages in the play, the audience appears to receive the (wrong) impression of harmony in the partnership of Claudio and Hero being prominent. Yet maybe the playwright deliberately does this to emphasise the fact that the complicated emotion of love can't be completely purchased when the characters relationship falls apart.

In direct distinction with this, the seemingly more purchased love Shakespeare gives to Beatrice and Benedick is written in simple prose. At no point in the play do Beatrice and Benedick speak in blank verse to one another, this suggests that the two personas are more comfortable with one another as well as perhaps feel a feeling of security between them. Possibly the playwright only utilised prose between this few to accentuate the actual fact that the heroes do not view love as a perfect, ordered ideal.

A subtle approach Shakespeare uses to explain his personas and the kind of love they are more likely to have is by their brands. Benedick's name originates from the Latin expression 'bene' meaning 'good' and 'blessed. ' Beatrice's name also has a similar interpretation: 'the one who blesses. ' The love between Beatrice and Benedick is portrayed as a far more realistic view on love, yet ultimately they appear happy jointly. While they have got attained love, they do not view the sentiment as a perfect ideal therefore perhaps this is why their romance is so strong. Shakespeare might have been trying to mention how this view on love is much more likely to last and become blessed by the clever use of the two character's labels.

Conversely, the intended 'love initially perception' that Shakespeare portrays between Claudio and Hero is hinted at as being more chaotic. Claudio's name comes from the Latin expression 'claudus' which means lame or crippled. The playwright may have chosen this name for his figure to demonstrate how this kind of love has no real support, how it is more likely to be crippled. It may also suggest that Claudio's view on love, which is that it's a perfect and natural emotion, is quite handicapped. Claudio looked convinced that Hero must be an utterly pure human being in order for them to attain love, but as I've previously mentioned a female with these attributes is hard to find. This short sighted take on love appears to make Claudio unable as it pertains to things of love, for example: taking Don John's word over Hero's as it pertains to her alleged affair. It seems that Claudio's judgement becomes clouded where love can be involved, and so he had to understand how to appreciate it.

Thus, Personally i think that overall Shakespeare is wanting to say that if an example may be to consider love only as a perfect ideal then they won't attain it, for love is a complex feeling that is definately not perfection. However, if one considers wish to be more of actuality and can admit that themselves, their spouse and their romantic relationship is bound to have a few defects, then love can be obtained. Just because love might not be perfect doesn't mean that we shouldn't strive to attain it.

Also We Can Offer!

Other services that we offer

If you don’t see the necessary subject, paper type, or topic in our list of available services and examples, don’t worry! We have a number of other academic disciplines to suit the needs of anyone who visits this website looking for help.

How to ...

We made your life easier with putting together a big number of articles and guidelines on how to plan and write different types of assignments (Essay, Research Paper, Dissertation etc)