Geoffrey Chaucers Troilus And Criseyde British Literature Essay

Troilus and Criseyde is an extended poem by Geoffrey Chaucer place to the background of the Trojan war. The storyplot of Troilus and Criseyde acquired long travelled before it come to Chaucer's time and literary skill. The immediate predecessor of Chaucer's work is Boccaccio's Il Filostrato however in fact the storyplot can be traced back again to the French poet Benoit de Sainte-Maure and the twelfth century. In the course of this long voyage the story maintained its original plot and main idea but improved considerably in persona and ideology.

What makes Troilus and Criseyde different from Il Filostrato is the existence of the knighthood element and the traditions of courtly love. That is of course all very natural as a result of difference in the literary tradition to which each of the works belongs. The ideas of knighthood and courtly love aren't only expected but associated with English medieval literature and perhaps that's the reason at first eyesight Troilus and Criseyde may appear unremarkable or even predictable to some readers. In fact, the poem uncovers the importance of these two peculiarities of the middle ages English value system and just how they change the motives and ideas of the individuals.

In rule Troilus and Criseyde employs the mechanism of Roman de la Rose: we've the lady in the face of Criseyde, the fan displayed by Troilus and the helpful friend - Pandarus. However, Chaucer does not leave the things so simple and contributes a certain amount of complexity to the individuals and makes them appear plausible and human-like. Within the heart of the middle ages tradition Chaucer develops every persona as a certain pattern of habit: Troilus is the fearless warrior struck by the power of love, who would do anything for his much loved; Criseyde is the stunning and virtuous lady who eventually turns out unfaithful; and Pandarus - the faithful and witty good friend who changes the affair between your lover and the lady into a mission of his. The character types do not change or develop in some unexpected way: they may be rather perfectly detailed and follow very purely the path their personality suggests. No doubt Chaucer should get some credit for the mental dept he achieves in building them.

After the short description of the Trojan conflict and the problem the Greeks and the Tojans are involved in we have been immediately offered a world that very much reminds us of your medieval judge gathering (although it occurs in a temple). Chaucer does not hesitate to mix the ancient traditions and traditions with an image of his own contemporary society and its own courtly system. In the very first lines of the information of the folks in the temple we find out about knights and gals: "And particularly, so many a lusty knight, / A lot of a lady fresh and a mayden excellent" (E book I, 165-166). Knighthood was an important area of the courtly tradition in middle ages times and Chaucer as a person very much involved with this tradition supports its worth and key points dear. Troilus is the primary identity of his work & most probably the natural method for Chaucer to present him as a true hero was to ascribe all the knightly virtues to him. The poet will not try to cover this at all. When we see Troilus for the first time after the prologue he's presented as the leader of a group of young knights: "This Troilus, as he was wont to gyde / His younge knightes, ladde hem up and doun" (Book I, 183-184). Our company is first informed that Troilus is a knight and we recognize that he is not an regular one, but one more advanced than others, which suggests the exceptional bravery and skill of the character and so his higher position in culture. He's of course one of Priam's sons which provides inborn nobility to his figure. At this early on level of the poem we've Troilus outlines as a knight and he's to justify tis later on in the poem. Indeed this happens, but in the first scene Troilus sounds a bit immature. In the temple Troilus encircles with his group of knights posting his thoughts on the matter of love. For him love is a throw away of energy and it can nothing better than switch people into fools. After stating that he will something that gives out the fact that what he says might not exactly be exactly an instance of personal experience: "And your expression he gan cast up the brows, / Ascaunces, 'Lo! Is tis nought wysly spoken?'". Troilus is actually innocent when it comes to love. He hasn't experienced love before. Boccaccio's Troilo has some experience which includes led him to similar thoughts but Chaucer's knight has undergone nothing of the type. Troilus's attitude towards love is immature and overall his action may be described as childish. Only later on when struck by Cupid's arrow will he commence to grow up. That leads us to one of the top features of the courtly love system: love ennobles men. Troilus grows and matures because of his love for Criseyde. His thoughts become wiser and his understanding further. At a certain point he demonstrates on the clash between free will, God's foreknowledge of things and Fortune's role. What he concludes is the fact that free will will not exist which everything that occurs to you is merely a matter the circumstance God has ready for you. These are already a lot more mature thoughts a lot more suited to a knight. In a way love makes Troilus an improved knight - he becomes an improved soldier and eliminates all his vices. Even when confronted with the decision whether to stick to the knightly ideals or to get away from them and declare his wish of Criseyde staying in Troy in front of his brother Hector, Troilus determines to preserve his lady's honor and not reveal their secret. A bit later on we see that there is an instant when Troilus offers Criseyde to elope with him but that is within as soon as of total despair before she leaves - an instant where in fact the above- described resemblance between your characters and genuine people is visible. Very plausibly Troilus provides way to his real feelings and for a moment abandons his knightliness.

Troilus is displayed as a knight not only by his own activities or by what the presenter says of him. He turns up in one of Criseyde's dreams as an eagle. The eagle is symbolic of strength, courage and bravery. She considers him as her protector: something that is very important for her as she is a widow and her father Calcas has remaining her behind getting started with the Greeks. Nevertheless, she acts as she actually is likely to and behaves such as a lady: she will not acknowledge Troilus's love right away. In fact, there is a pretty lengthy passing specialized in her hesitation whether she must do it or not. Her honor is the very last thing she has still left. Again, the subconscious insight of Chaucer comes into action and we visit a woman who is absolutely by themselves, with a father-traitor and, if we expect that the situation is truly courtly-like, she is a perfect victim for the gossips. It's only normal that she actually is puzzling herself so difficult above the question whether to succumb to her desire or not. All together Chaucer is very condescending when it comes to Criseyde: he will not evaluate her as hard as Boccaccio does. The poet refers to her unfaithfulness as "that she was unkinde" (Booklet IV, 16). He will try to reason her in every possible way. Still the storyplot goes its way and the reader is free to judge the girl and her deeds in any manner they want.

As a complete Criseyde plays the normal role of the girl in the triangle of courtly love (the enthusiast, the friend, the lady). She shows all the features the genre of Roman de la increased requires of the girl. She actually is very beautiful: "So aungellyk was hir natyf beautee, / That lyk something immortal semed she" (Reserve I, 102-103). She actually is of a commendable origin and people like her; she is under the cover of Hector himself who regardless of the treason of her dad finds her worth admiration. But Chaucer chosen that beauty and honor aren't enough to make his heroine likable enough: Criseyde is represented as a well-read girl. When Pandarus goes to visit her for the very first time she and two other girls are listening to the storyplot of "the Sege of Thebes" (Book II, 84). This is merely a subtle aspect but it still adds to the overall virtuousness of Criseyde.

As the tradition of courtly love commands Criseyde will not immediately plunge into a love affair with Troilus. At first she only offers to be friendly with him and also to try to plese him on the condition that her honor will be preserved. And again relative to the rules of fine amour Troilus's only reward will be the opportunity to provide her. Criseyde, of course, begins to feel pity for the son and so eventually decides to become his mistress. But once more Chaucer in another way from Boccaccio will not stand for Criseyde as a thirsty for pleasure lustful girl who's in a rush to use her clothes off in Troilus's bedroom. On the contrary: we see her trembling and shaking with shyness in the night time of the storm when the enthusiasts are for the first time exclusively. Indeed this tendency to decelerate the action and prolong enough time of hesitation and uncertainty creates the tender and very intimate air of the poem. The fans should beat the hurdles of courtly love without disrespecting its guidelines, which is a very hard process, but makes the results all the more pleasant.

The connections between your characters may appear superficial initially sight however in fact they are extremely important for the device of the poem to work properly. In this esteem, we cannot neglect the value of Pandarus. He is the truthful friend without whom the addicts could not be mutually.

Differently from Troilus, Pandarus is not what we'd call "a perfect knight". He lacks Troilus's carriage. Pandarus is represented as permanently leaping and running around, pouring jokes and witty proverbs everywhere you go. He hasn't been successful in his love affairs and maybe if the storyplot was to be told with a modernist copy writer, Pandarus would certainly be a man obsessed with the partnership of his good friend, trying to pay his own insufficient romance. The best way or the other, Pandarus really does what he can for Troilus and it is in many respects successful. He is a true friend similar to the traditions of fine amour decrees. He turns his rear on some prices in favor of his responsibility to Troilus: as her uncle, Pandarus should forbid Criseyde to love another man not the same as her dead man, because otherwise she'd become a victim of gossip and that might be a shame for your family. Pandarus never even mentions that. On the other hand - he urges Criseyde to reject her black clothes and to continue with her life of a and beautiful female. He once more puts a friendly relationship above family towards the end of the poem when after Criseyde's betrayal he says to Troilus, "I hate Criseyde". Pandarus is the main one to reject the knightly worth and offer Troilus for taking Criseyde and to elope with her. Companionship and serving his fellow knight are the highest values for him.

These values of Pandarus's prove once again that the customs of knighthood and courtly love do not simply drive the storyline but represent the worthiness system that the characters cannot escape pursuing. These two complicated practices model the patterns and the thoughts of the characters in Chaucer's poem.

Also We Can Offer!

Other services that we offer

If you don’t see the necessary subject, paper type, or topic in our list of available services and examples, don’t worry! We have a number of other academic disciplines to suit the needs of anyone who visits this website looking for help.

How to ...

We made your life easier with putting together a big number of articles and guidelines on how to plan and write different types of assignments (Essay, Research Paper, Dissertation etc)