Love and Matrimony in Geoffrey Chaucer's Canterbury Tales

Love and Matrimony Insanities

Making sense out of love and matrimony ideals is not a fairly easy job, especially as individual actions in mental circumstances do not follow any logic. It is a fact that is proven consistently as time passes, across cultures which is also corroborated by lots of the stories within Geoffrey Chaucer's Canterbury Stories. Specifically, The Knight's Story and The Miller's Story, that happen in two different social settings, make fun of classic values about love and marriage in the context of principles such as bravery, street smartness, morality, and faithfulness. Through their plots, the narrators' styles, and the distinction they create between valued and practiced ideals, the two stories highlight that human behavior in charming situations is often unstable, crazy and coloured by one's social class, confirming that there surely is no such thing as a model love or matrimony.

Although The Knight's Tale plot is set in the halo of honor, chivalry and courtesy, the story's occasions and the individuals' actions show the silliness in how they treat love. For example, both cousins, Arcite and Palamon, are prepared to kill each other for a woman neither of these has spoken to. After escaping from the jail, Palamon discovers Arcite's love for Emily and angrily issues Arcite to a struggle. Arcite responds, "And I denounce all covenants that stand / Or are alleged, between me and you / remember love is free / And I'll love her! I defy your might. " (Chaucer 46) It really is ironic that Arcite, who as a knight should keep his phrase and follow rules, is happy to break his early on oath not to come in the way of his cousin's love pursuit. Arcite justifies breaking his vow because as a free of charge person he is not constrained whom he enjoys. He is ready to do whatever needs doing to get Emily and doesn't worry how strong Palamon is. Despite the fact that people can behave irrationally in things regarding love, both Palamon and Arcite are being stupid in this instance. Neither of them recognizes what Emily feels. Isn't it exemplary love a two-way romantic relationship? Whom are they courting and quarreling about? Are they willing to visit the extremes of eradicating the other person for a woman who currently doesn't symbolize anything apart from an image, mark or trophy that they've seen from a distance? Why is this even more bizarre is the fact Emily doesn't even want to get wedded. She prays to Goddess Diana, "That I'd be virgin all my life, / And would be neither mistress, no, nor wife. /. . . of thy company, / A huntress walk the woodlands wild". (Chaucer 65) Emily doesn't just like a man's company, prefers hunting and doesn't want to marry or keep children. This exposes the foolishness of what Arcite and Palamon were up to, even though they supposedly follow all the ideals of aristocratic course such as bravery, honor, connection and courtly love.

The Knight's Tale depiction of love is highly inspired by its narrator, a knight, and his worldview. Within the Prologue, the narrator is released as somebody who ". . . adopted chivalry, Fact, honour, generousness and courtesy. " (Chaucer 4) Since in a knight's world, bravery and physical battles take care of disputes, it is not a surprise that in his story, a event clash is the ultimate way to negotiate the rivalry between Emily's two suitors. She actually is no better than a trophy to be gained in a contest. The Ruler Theseus snacks Emily, in the practices of the aristocratic school, as a gift to win tranquility and harmony. Despite the fact that she apparently does not have any say, her suitors make an effort to woo her with flowery dialect according to their traditions, traditions and code of carry out. As an example, Arcite, while in jail, describes his thoughts towards Emily to Palamon, "And with a profound and piteous sigh he said: / The freshness of her beauty attacks me deceased / Unless I at least see her daily, / I am but dead" (Chaucer 33) Arcite is using elegant language to say that he'll expire if he doesn't the thing of his love every day. However the story symbolizes love in flowery terms and as a bravery contest, reflecting the narrator's perspective, the storyline and individuals' actions speak of the irrational twists and changes in intimate pursuits.

In comparison to the refined words and high-minded principles of the knights' world, The Miller's Tale depicts intimate situations in vulgar and comical shades, and in the process, makes fun of typical do's and don'ts about love and matrimony. For example, just how Alison deals with her two suitors, Nicholas and Absalon, isn't just hilarious but also a not subtle middle-class snub of the upper-class imposed view about love. When Alison's spouse leaves for work, Nicholas tries to woo her with competitive sexual innovations. In response, she reacts, "Swearing she'd love him, with a solemn promise / For being at his removal / When she could spy an opportunity. " (Chaucer 91) She actually is so attracted to the street-smart Nicholas that she has no problems in coming to his 'disposal'. She just needs to wait for the right opportunity when it is safe for her to cheat on her behalf spouse. In stark compare to slipping for the physical advances of Nicholas, Alison refuses the dignified courtship of the parish clerk Absalon. Not merely will she spurn his passion, she does indeed so by tricking him to kiss her genitals. After this trickery, "Teehee!" she laughed, and clapped the, window to; / Off travelled poor Absalon sadly through the dark. " (Chaucer 103) Alison's contrasting reactions, towards her suitors, focus on the characteristics, a middle-class gal like her, admires the most: street smartness, boldness and physical fascination symbolized by Nicholas. On the other hand, she humiliates Absalon, making a mockery of his gentlemanly approaches and great words. Further, by being part of extra-marital affair, she actually is unfaithful to her spouse. She also participates in Nicholas's system to deceive her naive hubby, that eventually ends up making him a laughing-stock of the town. When John fell from the sail boat and no one paid attention to him, Alison and Nicholas advised the city people, "That he was mad, Some kind of nonsense about 'Nowel's Overflow' All started out laughing at this lunacy". (Chaucer 105) This tv show, in addition to her infidelity, was Alison's payback on her behalf matrimony with the much elderly carpenter and his remarkable protective characteristics. Maybe, she was married to him because he was rich, a practice that was common in established marriages in the medieval middle class.

The Miller's Tale narrator's drunkenness and middle-class perspective shapes his history in direct, crude, and vulgar conditions. Inside the Prologue, he happily suggests that "One shouldn't be too inquisitive in life / Either about God's secrets or one's wife. /God's plenty all you could desire / do not enquire. " (Chaucer 88) Through these words, the narrator expresses his view that men shouldn't care about their wives' or God's private affairs. There are several women in this world to choose from and men shouldn't enquire about the others. Maybe the narrator has loose morals. Or, his middle-class perspective conditions him to discuss frankly about themes like physical sex and infidelity. Inside the narrator's real life, instant gratification is more functional than high-minded ideas or morals. It is also an environment that rewards streets smartness and "land pick up" mentality of Nicholas and appears down after the poetic verbiage of Absalon. In any case, the narrator's choice of words and the chemical of his tale sets up a significant contrast with the refined language and plot of the Knight's Story.

Although both tales, set in different public contexts, are inspired by their narrators' style and language, both stories spotlight that there surely is no universal standard one can use to guage human activities in love and relationship. The Knight's Story, despite its depictions of idolized ideals such as honor, bravery, and courteousness, boils love down to essentially a competition rather than a two-way marriage. The Miller's Tale, despite its vulgarity and crudeness, reveals the day-to-day happenings in love and matrimony in ordinary folks' lives, in stark distinction to the "ivory tower" world of the aristocratic category. Both stories, however, confirm that human habit in love and relationship circumstances is often moody, irrational and erratic. It is, therefore, foolish to make predictions about human being tendencies in such matters where the guts rules the mind.

Also We Can Offer!

Other services that we offer

If you don’t see the necessary subject, paper type, or topic in our list of available services and examples, don’t worry! We have a number of other academic disciplines to suit the needs of anyone who visits this website looking for help.

How to ...

We made your life easier with putting together a big number of articles and guidelines on how to plan and write different types of assignments (Essay, Research Paper, Dissertation etc)