Outsider And No One Writes Colonel Reviews British Literature Essay

Both, 'The Outsider' by Albert Camus and 'No One Writes to the Colonel' by G. G. Marquez are novels full of subtle symbolism and certain absurdist elements. I will be evaluating these in the context of the two novels, since I assume that these stylistic details add huge value to the texts by essentially enlivening them. The central identity of 'The Outsider' is Meursault, as the central character of 'No One Writes to the Colonel' is 'the Colonel. '

At the starting point, this essay will acquaint you with the environment of the two novels, which is critical to further the inspection. The Outsider is defined in Algiers, which is the present capital of People's Democratic Republic of Algeria (circumstances with a large Arab community). However, when this novel was originally printed in 1942, Algiers was under French colonial rule, and was considered part of France. On the other hand, Marquez has placed his Novel in Colombia during 1948 to the late 1960s, a period called 'la violencia' that found a civil conflict between liberals and conservatives. An in depth understand this novel's locale implies that it's occur a town which is under dictatorial 'Martial rules. '

Interestingly, both these novels begin with fatalities, which are symbolic of the forebodings of turbulent times. In 'the Outsider', Meursault's mom dies within an old-age home. In 'No One Creates to the Colonel', the Colonel's town experiences a natural fatality for the 'first' amount of time in several months. Such a start was for the readers to symbolically understand the tyrannical political atmosphere in the Colonel's town. The Colonel, a retired military-officer is looking forward to his pension to arrive for 19 long years. His expectations of getting the pension-letter are smashed every Fri- 'It was supposed to come today for certain, ' the Colonel said. The postmaster shrugged. 'The only thing that comes for certain is loss of life, Colonel. '

I assume that 'Fri' is employed symbolically, as it would only be apt that the day on which this world lost one of its ideal spiritual leaders in Jesus, the Colonel deplorably manages to lose his hopes of a pension - week after week. For Meursault, his name itself is symbolic of his destiny. In France, Meursault means 'sea and sunshine'. They meet at the beach, where Meursault commits the devastating act of getting rid of an Arab.

Camus has delineated Meursault as symbolic of truthfulness. He's a guy who agrees to die for real truth but doesn't lay. When Meursault's mom dies, he shows indifference at her funeral and refuses to see her body. Corresponding to him, it doesn't really matter if one sees a dead-woman or not. Furthermore, he enjoys himself at a beach with Marie the very next day, would go to watch a comic movie and sleeps with her during the night. Why? So far as Meursault can be involved, Sundays are designed for relaxation and enjoyment - not for heading to the Church. He is a man who won't lie, refuses to go to a brothel, won't pretend, and also refuses to have confidence in god. Meursault has his own rules, which will vary from those of the general public. He's thus an 'Outsider' in the morally constricted French Religious society.

Likewise, Marquez has used latent symbolism in his book. 'October' is a case in point. The Colonel says: 'The trouble is that in Oct I feel as though I had family pets in my own gut. ' 'Oct' symbolises the handicapped and agonizing life that the Colonel's family is leading. Analogously, sunlight is a solid symbol utilized by Camus in 'the Outsider. ' Meursault is averse to the uncomforting Algiers warmth. The sun can be interpreted as a symbol of the society around Meursault, as it is the sunlight that seals his fate. He's too tired as a result of heating on his mother's funeral- 'The glare from the sun was intolerable. ' Moreover, it's the sunshine that is the main catalyst in Meursault's murderous act on the Arab. Blinded by sunlight on the beach, Meursault instinctively pulls the cause of his weapon, an action which kills the Arab- A shaft of light shot upwards from the steel, and I experienced as if an extended, thin cutting tool transfixed my forehead. Every nerve in my body was a material spring and coil, and my grasp closed on the revolver. 'October' and 'the Sun' are thus very likewise employed by both novelists, in the sense that both of them become 'negative' elements causing soreness to the protagonists of the respective novels.

It is exceptional that the man whom 'Meursault' killed was an Arab. As stated before, the France enjoyed colonial power in Algiers, where Arabs were focuses on of racism. I think that by choosing an Arab as a sufferer of Meursault's bullets, Camus wished to question the so called 'Moral' world, that actually was quite definitely colonial and racist in its ideological premises. One might think of 'The Outsider' as a delicate indictment of the world by Camus.

Moving back again to 'No One Writes to the Colonel, ' the rooster is an essential mark. The Colonel's boy was wiped out for distributing clandestine literature at cock battles during the 'la violencia. ' The rooster is a fighter, the best one in the area. He is thus symbolic of Augustine's legacy. In addition, he is symbolic of hope, expect a much better tomorrow for not only the Colonel, but Colombia all together. Marquez has also personified the rooster, offering an impression that he is aware of the Colonel's feelings-The rooster was quite definitely alive next to the vacant can. When he noticed the Colonel, he emitted an almost individual, guttural monologue and tossed his head back. He offered him a laugh of complicity: 'Life is tough pal. ' Thus, one might say that the rooster made a great associate for the Colonel, perhaps much better than his wife- The colonel recognized that forty years of shared living, of shared hunger, of shared suffering, had not been enough for him to come to know his partner. He believed that something got also expanded old in their love. The rooster can thus be interpreted as a symbol of unselfish companionship.

If we look at stylistic elements, the one that adds enormous value to 'the Outsider' besides symbolism is the first-person narrative style in which Camus has written this book. He creates a different perspective completely, that of an absurd world. It is for this reason that people have, according to me, one of the best starting lines in world literature today- Mother passed away today. Or possibly, yesterday, I don't know. I had developed a telegram from the house: MOTHER PASSED AWAY. FUNERAL TOMORROW. YOURS SINCERELY. ' It doesn't mean anything. It could have been yesterday. It is this brand that presents us to the absurdity in Meursault's world. It really is quite bizarre that a man has no feelings towards his mother's fatality. Likewise, love is next to nothing at all for Meursault. He is prepared to marry Marie- a female he doesn't love. Many a men put on a facade to love their fiancee with regard to a stable relationship, but Meursault can be an exception. That is another illustration reinforcing Meursault's honesty, howsoever absurd it could seem.

In my estimation, Marquez's novel also offers absurdist elements. It is quite absurd that the Colonel, his partner, and many others are dependent on the rooster. In the case of the Colonel's family, they can be helplessly reliant on the rooster to win in the forthcoming cockfighting season. The end of this book is also quite open-ended. We don't know what happens next. Does indeed the rooster win? Will the Colonel sell it off or does indeed the Colonel's fight against poverty and monotony of the shattering Fridays continue? It really is quite absurd to end a wonderful tale like this with out a defining end. But that is what is Absurdism- a school of thought stating that the initiatives of humanity to find so this means in the universe ultimately are unsuccessful (and hence are absurd), because no such interpretation exists.

To conclude, I would like to restate that both of these books can be interpreted in eclectic ways. What I believe is the fact Camus questions the population and its rules through his absurd and existential work, looking to persuade his readers that a man cannot be labelled as a callous monster simply for not crying at his mother's funeral or eradicating a guy under extenuating circumstances. Marquez, on the other side, throws some light in to the Colonel's helpless life. He effectively uses symbolism to summarize specific details, and also provides an absurd touch to his book along the way.

Also We Can Offer!

Ошибка в функции вывода объектов.