Crimes are never good. Even when someone should it inadvertently with no intent to damage, it continues to be always an awful outcome. The situation of Andrea Yates is one of the most notorious murder instances in the modern-day U. S. Based on results from the truth, I felt it was a blend of neglect on everyone's part-that should have backed her--regarding the indicators of one of the most lethal psychiatric symptoms (psychosis), Because of the rarity of her psychotic condition and the abhorring results if not cared for, many Americans, especially women, will evaluate women like Andrea Yates, absent of any empathy on her behalf, as she is suffering two things now: the loss of life of her children and her mental problems that likely triggered her to commit murder. . I assume that the jury's non-guilty verdict was a logical and moral decision because Yates never really had the support she needed in conjunction with the fact that I don't consider she recognized what she was doing.
What the general public should reiterate is the fact by comprehending this catastrophic illness Yates got, it in no possible manner condones the behaviors implemented because of the condition. Andrea Yates' first face with a psychiatric examination is at July 1999, 2 yrs prior to the killings. Her psychiatric express got worse quickly. She was encountering symptoms of severe major depression and then a little later, throughout a week hospitalization at Methodist Clinic Psychiatric Unit, she was diagnosed as possessing extreme depressive disorder, intermittently with psychotic features (Mydland, 2008). This is dismaying in itself. Her first symptoms of psychosis occurred a long time before the killings (and after) that occurred in 2001. When she was analyzed by way of a psychiatrist called Dr. Starbranch and Dr. Rics, their findings regarding their analyses uttered that the initiation of her depression started out about six weeks prior along with psychotic symptoms (Mydland, 2008). Again, shortly later in the same time in 1999, and in another psychiatric medical center, leading psychiatrist Dr. Melissa Ferguson (2007) provided her testimony that in her thoughts and opinions, Yates was experiencing psychosis.
I find it very alarming that knowing, in retrospect, that Andrea Yates gradually and unconsciously built a strong record for her mental problems without anyone realizing her condition deteriorating and the disregard of who should be promoting her. Her mental history is extensive. Only briefly proceeding following the first child's labor and birth, she experienced her first psychiatric symptoms of hallucinations about stabbing something with a blade, coupled by acoustic delusions of Satan talking with her. Suzanne O'Malley, a proficient journalist, read at length of Andrea's medical details. What she witnessed were various mal-diagnoses, exiguous treatment, incorrect medications, and what appeared to be a more pharmaceutical treatment than a clinical one. Indeed, O'Malley observed in Andrea's record mentioned she had been psychotic and manic before and after she drowned her children (O'Malley, 2004).
Yates, who confessed to getting rid of her five children, acquired in prior taken anti-psychotic medications which are being used for psychosis and experiencing voices. Yates possessed, prior to the killings, been cared for with anti-psychotic medications, such as Haldol. She had taken this together with an anti-depressant. One doctor known this drug blend was very alarming (Ackerman, 2001), presumably indicating she was experiencing mental symptoms so severe she needed anti-psychotic medication. Dr. Lucy Puryear acquired made a strong declaration when she said that, "Haldol is prescribed for psychotic patients hearing voices or thinking delusional. " (Ackerman, 2001) The point is that Yates possessed serious mental incapacities which inhibited her cognitive capabilities to make good judgments. She also got other inhibited mental skills. Dr. Dan Williams (2006) stated (regarding Yates) that "[post-partum psychosis] is seen as a homicidal and suicidal impulses, hallucinations, delusions, disorganized and bizarre thinking. " Williams' professional statement raises a huge doubt on other thesis about the killings.
Her mental background contains various hospitalizations for post-partum depression. Later, she was hospitalized for having psychotic features. She's a thorough record of psychiatric-induced hospitalizations, two being attempts to commit suicide. In those days, individuals were turning a blind eyes apparently. The largest debate in her security is that long before drowning her kids, she have been diagnosed with postpartum depression with psychotic features and schizophrenia. It may or might not exactly matter if she took medication for the health issues, because some medications can aggravate the conditions they treat. Dr. Dan Williams mentioned that post-partum psychosis is "rare, " but extremely lethal. Dr. Williams (2006) carefully talked about that post-partum psychosis is "characterized [by potential lethal part effects, such as] homicidal and suicidal impulses, hallucinations, delusions, disorganized and bizarre thinking. " (Williams, 2006) The treatments that Andrea received on her behalf mental diseases were a combo of anti-depressants and anti-psychotics.
In 2002, Andrea Yates was convicted of murder for three of the fatalities of her five children who had been found drowned in her home in 2001 (Spitz, 2006). In April 2005, her conviction was overturned on charm because of an error in the testimony of a specialist witness for the prosecution in the first trial (Montaldo, 2010). In March 2002, a jury declined Yates' plead for insanity security on her behalf exoneration. They rejected it but did not seek the death penalty. However, this original verdict around January 2005 was reversed because a psychiatrist called Dr. Area Dietz, who was simply from California-also a see for the prosecution--admitted he lied in his testimony. Thus, the guilty verdict was thrown out and a re-trial was put in place. Then, later in January 2006, she had not been convicted and was released predicated on insanity. Essentially, the prosecution's discussion was that Yates was emotionally cognizant and for that reason understood what she was doing was wrong. The defense's area was that she was practically crazy, inhibiting her ability to function in life, such as making bizarre judgments.
The indicators were luminous regarding Yates' psychiatric condition, which out of neglect and simple stupidity, turned fatal. Years prior to this obscene offense, Yates was little by little deteriorating, juggling between postpartum depression and psychosis. Yate's status of affair was carried out in the M'Naghten Rules, which is only an attempt to rationalize the mentality of the unlawful involved in terms of legislation towards mentally ill defendants. This murder could, should, and could have been averted if Yates got any real support or experienced doctors. Among the earliest warnings regarding Yate's deadly condition came up in July 1999. Yates possessed a breakdown where she tried killing herself double and more importantly, she later was hospitalized with postpartum psychosis (McLellan, 2006). The original psychiatrist of Andrea Yates, Dr. Eileen Starbranch, under oath, proclaimed that any children beyond Yate's four she already acquired, "would send her in guaranteed psychosis. "
One of Yates' doctors, Dr. Saeed, out of concern of Yates' condition, once proclaimed and managed to get a bold indicate Andrea's husband not to forego his patient (partner) unattended. Despite these early on warnings from certified psychiatrists, Andrea acquired another child. Then Yates' conceived their fifth child one month after her discharge. Yates has a huge background of hospitalizations for psychosis and post-partum depression, where the postpartum psychosis part is incredibly dangerous. They knew this for a long time before she drowned her children in a bathtub. MUST I agree with her insanity plea and exoneration from jail? Yes, I do agree with the decision that she was so emotionally incompetent; coupling with the actual fact that she experienced very little to no support for her issues, that could have prevented this.
Instead, no one did anything, and for that reason, she determined a offense. Since Yates experienced a notorious background of psychosis, and despite what her first doctor possessed warned about, it is unfathomable how one can still position the blame on Yates. Any doctor who's reputable would understand to take care of psychosis really. She had a long record of psychosis and negligence. Why convict her when years passed that she searched for treatment, and folks flipped a blind attention. The defense's expert witness, who was a accredited doctor, proclaimed that she was indeed psychotic bordering the fatality of her children. Additionally, after the period of the killings, a publication termed Perilous Times, compiled by the Woronieckis in 2000, was placed as support into judge for her in the trial because they aided in creating the primary stipulations that underlie her psychotic delusions.
She had severe mental illnesses which were long observable and treatable, yet no one took the proper measures to follow that standard protocol. A psychological treatment might have been done years before this happened. No one nowadays can rationally say that it was most of her fault that her children died by her own hands. She has a debilitated history of extreme mental health problems. Her biggest problem & most likely the culprit influencing the killings was her entering psychosis, which is defined as, "losing touch with reality. " When you are into psychosis and "lose base with truth, " the items you decide to do sometimes you do not realize you're doing them. Or, your poor common sense as a result of the psychosis makes you do erratic things (Gelder, 2005). Psychosis is probably the worst psychiatric sign of a mental condition that one can undergo.
People in psychosis don't know very well what they are doing, where they can be, why they are there, and do damaging things when it's really the result of a chemical substance imbalance. Additionally, the brevity of the psychiatric ranking scale has conjured the level of 18 indication constructs of psychosis. Some of these symptoms are life threatening or just overall dangerous. Being hostile, being cautious about things, hallucinations and delusions, grandiosity, etc. (Overall & Gorham, 1962). Mr. Yates didn't talk with the physician about his treatment plans, and Mr. Yates proceeded to go against the doctor's medical advice and remaining his wife isolated with her children before the drowning's (Lezon, 2006).
But this still will not mean that she wiped out them because Mr. Yates didn't watch the kids on a regular basis. Dr. Saeed, among many doctors like the defense's expert see, experienced diagnosed Andrea as psychotic. It is so evident that the overlook of Andrea's spouse, friends, doctors, family, and other would-be supporters got nothing really. But Mr. Yates made a good point. He mentioned that Dr. Saeed, as a licensed psychiatrist, was responsible for knowing and properly treating his wife's psychosis, not really a medically untrained lay down man like himself (King, 2002). My contentions for advocating her verdict must take note a couple of things. The physician and Mr. Yates directed fingers and did not give Andrea the proper treatment and support she needed a long time before the killings. Lastly, regarding her mental background and her acquittal, I am going to state that her mental record contains various diagnoses from multiple doctors that she had an illness that can inhibit her normal setting of functioning, even triggering lethal repercussions. This is enough to cast an acceptable uncertainty that she was at a mental state where she understood right from wrong.
I think that the jury's non-guilty verdict was a rational decision. It is because Yates never really had the support she needed for a horrific analysis, which was mainly psychosis. It is one of the worst & most dangerous psychiatric symptoms in mental health. Her bouts of psychosis occurred long before the killings. Her doctors diagnosed her psychotic yet no one had taken it really. Even up to the murder, no one would help her. She could not help herself if she is at psychosis. That is what support is designed for and I in a way feel empathetic for Andrea because I can relate to her mental illnesses
Also We Can Offer!
- Argumentative essay
- Best college essays
- Buy custom essays online
- Buy essay online
- Cheap essay
- Cheap essay writing service
- Cheap writing service
- College essay
- College essay introduction
- College essay writing service
- Compare and contrast essay
- Custom essay
- Custom essay writing service
- Custom essays writing services
- Death penalty essay
- Do my essay
- Essay about love
- Essay about yourself
- Essay help
- Essay writing help
- Essay writing service reviews
- Essays online
- Fast food essay
- George orwell essays
- Human rights essay
- Narrative essay
- Pay to write essay
- Personal essay for college
- Personal narrative essay
- Persuasive writing
- Write my essay
- Write my essay for me cheap
- Writing a scholarship essay