Studying The Designs In Take great pride in And Prejudice English Literature Essay

Two literary works, both released in the Nineteenth Century, portray highly contrasting designs and protagonists. The main idea of this research essay was to analyse the way the changing position of women in the Nineteenth Century is reflected in 'Pleasure and Prejudice' by Jane Austen and 'A Doll's House' by Henrik Ibsen. The literary works are only seventy years apart, yet society's views altered so significantly in those seventy years. When Satisfaction and Prejudice was posted, marriage was the best. All of that was spoken of was wedlock and how to attain it. WHENEVER A Doll's House was published, women's rights were starting to become more important in population. Of course, even then, there have been still some outdated intellects. Torvald Helmer was the epitome of what Ibsen disapproved of. As many folks analysed, Ibsen had written this play to make the world progress quicker. It is unknown whether or not his play actually made an enormous impact; however, women's position in modern culture has changed dramatically since.

Even between the two publications, there was a dramatic change. Nora Helmer was an implausible personality to Jane Austen. By the time Ibsen acquired his play performed, women were starting to think independently and seek self-importance. Austen and Ibsen experienced different viewpoints of the modern culture they resided in. Austen arranged with the basic structure of population, but wished that women would live life more than they do. Elizabeth was a woman whom Austen wished all women were like. Ibsen criticised his population. He wanted what to change - and change quickly. He created a daring woman, for that to occur. Both literary bits survived thus far as a result of greatness of their literary merit - one as a sparkling template for charming comedies, the other a sharply drawn socially natural portrayal.



Pride and Prejudice by Jane Austen and A Doll's House by Henrik Ibsen can be regarded as landmark literary assertions about the lives and communal positions of women.

Austen's classic book, publicized in 1813, depicts a snapshot of elite British world where young women and men looked eagerly towards marriage; the conclusion of her romantic-comedy was a celebratory occasion as the primary characters were bound in wed-lock. Writing 70 years later, Ibsen illustrated firmly contrasting styles to these.

The simple period in history between 1813 and 1879 witnessed great changes in the type of European contemporary society that, in many ways, transformed traditional connections.

It is not the subject of this article to take into account the sweeping effects of modernisation and democratisation that had taken part between your writings of Austen and Ibsen. This essay will alternatively seek to analyse each work to, as it were, establish literary 'book-ends' that present the values, which been around at each level.

Two authors, both having been around in the same century, with completely different attitudes concerning the way the world should be observed, in the eyes of a woman. Jane Austen thought it only natural for relationship to be on a lady's head. Henrik Ibsen, however, thought it improper to show relationship as always being the best; the traditional future. Ibsen portrayed women as 3rd party or, at the minimum, seeking self-reliance. He been successful when wanting to portray women as more than hopeless girls whose life goals were to be hitched. Both are completely conflicting stories; both are extremely successful.

Elizabeth Bennet compared to Nora Helmer

Elizabeth Bennet lives with her mom who pesters her five daughters about matrimony. Elizabeth is a woman in the days when marriage and prosperity was just what a woman was expected to desire. She accepted the matrimony idea noticeable in the modern culture. Nevertheless, she didn't have confidence in betrothing herself to someone she actually is incompatible with. Elizabeth is a distinctive woman; she actually is intellectual and cares for more than money and possessions. She still would like to marry - but marry someone with the same mind as her own. That is apparent when she rejects Mr. Collins, a economically stable young man. "You could not make me happy, and I am convinced that I am the previous woman on the globe who would make you so, " Elizabeth ensures him as he proposes. They are not as well; therefore she could not marry him, for all the money in the earth. If she do, she would have to be wedded to him forever in misery. Parting was never a considered option. Hence, if you wed a person, it would be eternity. That is why Mr. and Mrs. Bennet remained together as yet. They are not a suitable match. Mr. Bennet mocks his better half. He's an intellectual who committed for young ones and beauty. Yet, she could not leave him because divorce was considered an function of ungratefulness, on the woman's part. Compatibility had not been a standard thought when contemplating matrimony. Financial security was all that was regarded. That's the reason Charlotte Lucas will not hesitate before agreeing to Mr. Collins' relationship proposal. She needs economical protection. Consequently, Elizabeth recognizes well-suited marriages. She wishes someone she can spend the rest of her life with without regret. Relationship is what she would like but it is not the marriage her mom or modern culture would ever understand.

Nora Helmer is created as a hitched girl living an obviously content life in a city apartment. She points out to her friend Mrs. Linde that she's "been so happy these previous eight years" living with Torvald and in comparison to Mrs. Linde's life, this seems highly likely. Nora is well-dressed, living in a comfortable apartment with wonderful children and a loving husband. Although she experienced a process of taking increasing financial responsibility and doing everything in her power to support her husband's inflated self-concept, she is deeply stunned and shaken by Torvald's selfish arrogance when her against the law activities are subjected. In the beginning, she didn't realize that Torvald and she "never exchanged a significant word on any serious subject matter. " Nora was living the 'fantasy;' everything was developing perfectly for her. However, once Torvald reveals his true home, she realises that coping with him is not just how she wants to live. He is exactly what is retaining her back. You can find a lot to see on the planet; a lot to learn about; and here she actually is, residing in a doll's house, limited to a town that is not wide enough, nor exciting enough, for her brain. Finally, she leaves her dismal life, to have her own life, to learn new things, to go to places she's only have you ever heard of. She wants to experience life, as she never had before and she cannot do this whilst living under the same roof as Torvald Helmer.

Both these women are of great depth and interest. Both Elizabeth and Nora have different thoughts to the standard flow of their surroundings. Elizabeth rejected the relationship the culture endorsed - marriage for monetary security - abnormal as it was in her time. Nora didn't expensive being imprisoned in a home, which offered no enthusiasm and no learning opportunities. Both people are similar in that they both proceeded to go against the most common span of those around them. However, they are different in the things they wanted eventually. Elizabeth sought after marrying someone a lot like her. Nora wanted to learn more about the planet and herself before committing to anything more. Pleasure and Prejudice concludes with Elizabeth and Jane Bennett celebrating their marriages to compatible husbands. A Doll's House, on the other palm, ends with Nora walking to the globe, ready to embrace long lasting world provides. In under seventy years, the experiences discussed women and their position evolved dramatically. Women were beginning to be observed as more capable, more equal. Relationship was no more the single thought occupying their imagination. After all, it isn't that women frantically want to marry - the culture and the situation contemporary society put them in mere made it appear doing this and by enough time Henrik Ibsen published his play, those types of thoughts were beginning to waver.

Torvald Helmer compared to Nils Krogstad and Dr. Rank

Torvald Helmer thinks in particular positions for women and men. He does not approve of the idea that women must have the same position in society as men do. Torvald Helmer is trapped in times of male dominance. He considers himself as the first choice, the person in control. He offers his family - that's his job. If his wife were to begin with providing also, the entire world would have flipped upside-down. He is a traditional man with an out-of-date way of thinking, living in a society, which is speedily changing.

In A Doll's House there are two other male people whose thought process is undeniably changing with the population. Nils Krogstad and Dr. Ranking both believe in equality of the sexes. Ibsen created these two personas as a contrast to Torvald. Both Krogstad and Ranking have different views. Krogstad is correctly fine with the thought of Ms. Linde attempting to provide for their family. "ONCE I lost you, it was just as if the very floor got given way under my foot. Look at me now - a shipwrecked man clinging to a spar. " He also highly feels he needs her in his life to feel complete. Torvald is his own person. Even though he liked Nora, he didn't hook up with her on any ground than the actual fact that she was his wife and the mother of his children. Without Kristina, Krogstad dropped apart; he had nothing.

Furthermore, when Rank enters the house intending to see Torvald, he will not leave when he learns he is busy. Alternatively, he rests with Nora and converses with her, as he'd with any man. "In under per month, perhaps, I will rest rotting in the churchyard. " List discusses concerns of seriousness with Nora, whilst Torvald will not. Torvald never once had a serious dialog with her, which demonstrates how little he thought of the supposed impartiality between them. It is clear that List has a mind like the moving society compared to the brain of Torvald, which is obviously not moving forwards.

Mr. Fitzwilliam Darcy compared to Mr. Charles Bingley

Mr. Fitzwilliam Darcy and Mr. Charles Bingley of Delight and Prejudice both have distinct views on the ideas that their society lives on. Both own large fortunes - the previous just a little wealthier than the latter. The two will be the closest associates; however, their views could not become more dissimilar.

Mainly, they are different in what they need ultimately. Naturally, as was the traditions, both want to marry; however, Mr. Bingley is not finicky with who his future bride is to be. He is more speedily to label a woman as 'accomplished' also, which increases the differing views of him and his friend. "It is amazing to me how young girls can have patience to be so very achieved, as all are, " estimates Mr. Bingley. Mr. Darcy, of course, scolds him for thinking such a thing. Mr. Darcy clearly disagrees. After describing an accomplished female, Mr. Bingley listens to Mr. Darcy's words, "All of this she must have and to all this she must yet add something more substantial, in the improvement of her mind by comprehensive reading. " To the reader, it is obvious that Mr. Darcy, intentionally or not, is talking about Elizabeth Bennet as achieved.

When the men choose their wives, it is even more noticeable what their views on women are. Mr. Bingley chooses Jane for her unmistakable beauty and kind nature. His affection on her behalf is not based on an intelligent mind or extensive reader. Mr. Darcy, on the other hand, favours Elizabeth. Although she actually is not so attractive as Jane, her brain is more developed. She will take pleasure in reading and intellectual conversations. By getting started with Mr. Darcy with Elizabeth and Mr. Bingley with Jane in matrimony in the long run of the book, it is clear what Austen would like the audience to learn: marry someone you are compatible with. Although Mr. Bingley marries Jane on her behalf attractiveness, their relationship is compatible because each is kind natured and good spirited. Both are not intellectuals, like Mr. Darcy and Elizabeth. Actually, they are quite the contrary, yet their matrimony still works. When comparing both main men of the novel, you'll be able to say that Mr. Darcy and Mr. Bingley are the guy counterparts to Jane and Elizabeth Bennet, which opens a window to their future romantic relationships. As readers, it is simple to assume that their marriages are similarly happy, because they married women whom are like themselves.

Work in the Nineteenth Century

In Pleasure and Prejudice, the Bennets' are gentleman's daughters, therefore they are not expected to work - or have any interest in working. Even the information of an attained woman does not include any work experience. Evaluating this with Ibsen's play, it is apparent how different the positions of women are. Nora needs to work and seems achieved when she does indeed.

The changing position of women is made clear as time extended from then. Women became more and more prominent in the working industry. In the beginning of the Doll's House, it appears that the times have never evolved enough when Kristina claims, "A better half can't acquire without her husband's consent. " Out of this statement, it gives the impression that the population Nora is surviving in is just like the population Elizabeth Bennet was living in, where men dominated in every areas. Nora also says, "I got lucky enough to obtain a whole lot of copying to do. " This lines proposes it was atypical for ladies who have been of middle and upper classes to work.

However, as the play produces, it is clear that what's truly popular is independence. "It had been tremendous fun relaxing there working and making profits. It had been almost like being truly a man. " Nora reveals to Kristina that the three most gratifying weeks she's ever before experienced were the three that had her working. Needless to say, Kristina knows just what feeling she is referring to, as is open when she points out, "All my life, so long as I can keep in mind, I've worked well - that's been my one great happiness. " Patently, Nora and Kristina are customers of a newly emerging professional middle class; that is, women were beginning to be seen in the professional district of society. Gone was the English world that encompassed everything Elizabeth Bennett recognized. In its place was a far more urbanised civilisation that would continue to change and renew itself.

Writer's Purpose

As writers, both Austen and Ibsen got distinct purposes for their publications. When reading their works, it is clear to many that each wanted to encourage the public to confront their culture. Austen did trust her world, essentially. She approved of relationship but wanted the reason for marriage to improve. Ibsen, though, advertised women's freedom and guaranteed his audience proceeded to go away with new ideas about the equality between the sexes.

In the first Nineteenth Century, women were quite restricted. They could not vote, cannot engage in many legalities, especially those in court and even experienced limited control over personal property once they became somebody's better half. Women were likely to be inferior compared to their fathers and husbands. They didn't have many occupational choices - unless they wished to work as domestic servants or labourers. However, with the onset of industrialization and the progress of the marketplace economy, things began to improve. Women's future was looking excellent. They were voicing their views in the kinds of literacy and politics. Women were given the to vote, using places of the world. People were becoming far more prepared and open-mindedness was backed. Satisfaction and Prejudice and A Doll's House sat at either part of this drastic world change. If views on women were not changing, Ibsen could not have been able to make a woman fearless enough to test society.

Even though Pride and Prejudice was an exceptionally entertaining piece of literature, Jane Austen's respectable worth shone brightly through the words on the webpage. One of the essential values that were presented was the theory that marrying for refuge, instead of suitability, was never the correct choice. Even though both Jane and Elizabeth committed rich men, their purpose was more the like-mindedness they distributed to their lovers. They wedded for the important fact that they connected on an increased level than the fortune their partners owned.

In the times when Austen posted this book, the thinking about Elizabeth and Jane weren't glorified. Austen had taken this to her advantage and publicised intellectual thinking and helped bring compatibility into associations. Apart from the eldest Bennets', the people mainly consider marrying for support above all else. In a natural way, Austen disapproved of incorrect matrimonial fits. By making a character like Elizabeth, the audience could recognize that she found it rather improper for ill-suited men and women to wed.

However, Austen didn't completely disapprove of women marrying for the money. She understood that there are certain circumstances, which cannot be avoided. She composed about Charlotte Lucas, who was simply a girl uncertain of her financial future. She hitched Mr. Collins for his visible wealth and the belief that she'd be economically secure with him as a partner. Although she recognized her uncertain financial position, Austen used this evaluation to her benefit. Charlotte and Mr. Collins' relationship became one of comfort, not one of love and love. Austen didn't forget to remind the reader that their relationship was not successful because of their reason for relationship. She also disapproved of matrimony based entirely on interest, as was Mr. and Mrs. Bennet's marriage. "Her dad captivated by children and beauty, and that appearance of good humour, which youngsters and beauty generally give, acquired married a woman whose poor understanding and liberal mind, had very early on in their relationship end all real love for her. " Their relationship was everything that Austen was against.

She satirises both Mrs. Bennet and Mr. Collins, exaggerating their personas. She portrays Mr. Collins as a rich man, so eager he'll marry any female and can go to any lengths to impress Lady Catherine. Mrs. Bennet is the key comic of the novel, especially with her frequently mocking partner. She wishes her daughters to marry so urgently, she almost faints when Elizabeth rejects the pompous Mr. Collins. Both of these characters, Austen created to contrast against all of that Elizabeth disliked.

Austen's main purpose for developing a character like Elizabeth was to create an exemplar for women to follow. She had a solid personality and her take great pride in was enough to guard herself. "You aren't eligible for know my (concerns); nor will such behavior as this, ever before stimulate me to be explicit, " Elizabeth elucidates to Woman Catherine de Bourgh. Not even her 'superior' ladyship intimidates her for she is a woman who knows her position in life. Another attribute of hers that Austen sought women to note was the actual fact that she rejected Mr. Collins, whilst he was in ownership of a big fortune. Austen wanted this idea relayed to the readers: do not settle for riches. Elizabeth is most surely the heroine of the book and, even though she has to undergo shortcomings, she demonstrates to be always a woman of her period that modern women can admire.

In the end, what could be said about Austen's purpose to write this light-hearted novel is the fact that she intended great things for it. She wrote to claim that it would be better for women if they did not settle for a guy who seems as if he'll not make them happy. She had not been criticizing society. Alternatively, she was aiming to stretch the series just a little - she attempted to change the way a woman's life needed to be; and she been successful, because only seventy years later, A Doll's House was performed.

Henrik Ibsen had written his play in a time when women's privileges were starting to become seen. Women's right to independence played a magnificent role in Ibsen's A Doll's House. That's essentially what he was building towards, right from the commencement of the play. The entire goal for his writing of this play was to relay the subject matter that ladies should begin considering for themselves. He wanted women to believe they will make it on their own; that they didn't desire a man to help them on the way. He did not accept the way world was and needed it to improve more. Austen arranged with the development of contemporary society but wanted life to be lived to the fullest scope, while left over in the composition. Ibsen, however, completely disagreed with the restricting system and criticized it enough to write a play, which hoped to change the audiences' views on women and their protection under the law.

Henrik Ibsen wrote this play not seventy years after Jane Austen wrote her novel. Immediately as the first few webpages are read, it is quite obvious that Ibsen is looking into the future. His structure of Nora is extraordinary. Interestingly, Nora Helmer is a totally inconceivable character for Jane Austen. Never would Austen think a female could leave her husband to find out more on herself and the planet. Although she stretched the limitations of her culture, Austen couldn't consider a woman going to such lengths as these. Nora is a great model of what a lot of women aspired to be in the overdue Nineteenth Century. The experiences speaking of happy relationships were slowly beginning to melt away to reveal less very images. Relationship was slowly but surely changing as the ultimate.

By employing the utilization of Kristina Linde, who performed and provided on her behalf family for many years, Ibsen presented a female who represented the continuing future of the working girl. Mrs. Linde learnt more about the complicated world she lived in. Evidently, it could have worn her out; however, she arrived of it a more experienced girl who could take on anything and wished to. She actually is a distinction to Nora, who Ibsen used showing that a female who has been treated such as a fragile porcelain doll for all those her existence won't know how to think independently. During the course of the play, Nora experiences a gradual realization that her life was a shallow one. She was so happy hitched to Torvald but soon recognises that he is only acquiring her in his home - with nothing at all to learn, no space to expand. His egocentrism awakens her to her true do it yourself, whom she forgotten to be the better half Torvald wished her to be.

When Torvald exhibited his superciliousness, Nora saw her life projected against his. They no more got the same aspiration. They envisioned different futures. Ibsen used Nora's personality for the audience to comprehend that never knowing truly the particular world around you is approximately is something one should never hope for. Even though Mrs. Linde was awfully weary, Ibsen persuaded the audience that this should be the sought-after life.

In Pleasure and Prejudice, the world that Elizabeth Bennett resided in had not been one which questioned lots of things. They didn't question for fear their thoughts and beliefs would be baffled and proved incorrect. Desire to test society did not can be found in Austen's Pride and Prejudice, unlike in A Doll's House. Nora wished to find out more on the modern culture and world she lived in. Elizabeth and folks she knew did not trouble themselves with the affairs of the world. IN A VERY Doll's House Ibsen made it clear that Nora wanted to see as much of the world as it can be. In Pleasure and Prejudice, Austen only wrote about the never-ending quest to find the right person to marry. Whilst Austen confirmed that relationship was what all women wished ultimately, Ibsen proved that relationship life could be restricting. Ibsen also illustrated that traditional husbands use several restrictions on their wives, which eventually denies the women the capability to grow, emotionally. Ibsen persuaded the audience that if a guy performed everything for his better half and protected her, there is no possible way she would grow into a far more developed, more agreeable, more attained person.


Two pieces of literature: different in goal but similarly great. Jane Austen resided in another type of population to Henrik Ibsen. She decided with the most part of her modern culture, except the reason why women married. In her novel, matrimony was still the ultimate but it wasn't the sort of wedding typically endorsed. Women were expected to marry for security. Austen wished to change these ideas and ensure that girls considered more than prosperity when looking for potential husbands. Ibsen did not agree with his society. In fact, he had written his play in order to change population. He sought women's positions to improve. When Nora strolls to the world, it is just a controversial closing world; so controversial, in truth, that another finishing needed to written. However, as time passed and more shows were shown, Nora's decision received applause and cheers. Self-reliance, from then on, was desired and that's what Ibsen had hoped for. Both these classics are fantastically written and the note is printed loud and clear in each. As the years continue, it is visible that the changing position of women in the Nineteenth Century is mirrored in 'Delight and Prejudice' by Jane Austen and 'A Doll's House' by Henrik Ibsen.


Austen, Jane. Pleasure and Prejudice. Britain: Penguin, 1996.

Ibsen, Henrik. A Doll's House. Britain: Penguin, 1965

Also We Can Offer!

Other services that we offer

If you don’t see the necessary subject, paper type, or topic in our list of available services and examples, don’t worry! We have a number of other academic disciplines to suit the needs of anyone who visits this website looking for help.

How to ...

We made your life easier with putting together a big number of articles and guidelines on how to plan and write different types of assignments (Essay, Research Paper, Dissertation etc)