Taming FROM THE Shrew Is Too Misogynistic English Literature Essay

At enough time The Taming of the Shrew was written, the customs and traditions were of the radical nature; ranging from women to working conditions. The main notion of matrimony was identified in a totally different way since some men wedded for wealth plus some simply got married since it was almost compulsory. You can say men were actually a lot more dominant, since they were the anchor of control when it arrived to deciding who to marry, as opposed to the ladies who got no say in the problem whatsoever. In this article I am discussing my viewpoints and if I feel that the representation of women in the play is relatively the epitome of misogyny.

To many people who read and analyse The Taming of the Shrew, they could observe it as may be to be completely misogynistic, an excruciating illustration of female representation in the 16TH century Britain. However I feel that this is far off from real and intensely superficial. The Taming of the Shrew offers many interpretations of its true interpretation and does actually express some kind of highly relevant to a modern modern culture, to an extent I feel that The Taming of the Shrew is too misogynistic for today's audience to appreciate it as comedy and I have many factors to support my opinion.

In the play Shrewish Kate is tamed by Petrucio who's described as; conscienceless, corrupt and deceitful. Petruchio moves on to using Kate's fathers prosperity as his only reason to entrain on his matrimony, even though Kate attempts her hardest to withstand and avoid she actually is left without choice. He abuses her by humiliating her and degrading her, all the way up to the ultimate picture where Kate openly. He embarrasses and degrades her, culminating in the ultimate scene where Kate abandons her self-reliance with ease by putting her palm under petruchio's ft. and carries on to lecture the rest of the women in what they must be doing and informing them of the original role to be a servant within the barriers of marriage.

"Forth, I pray, since we have come so far And it be moon, or sun, or what you please" (ACT IV Field V 12-13). Here we can see that Kate and Petruchio become nearer whenever Petruchio permits Kate to redirect the aggression he directs at her at another sufferer. In this case, Kate blamed her fault on 'the blessed sun'. But there is a definite suggestion of an gap rising between how she views herself and how she reacts in relation to Petruchio when she identifies herself in the 3rd person '. . . whatever you own it named. . . it shall be so for Katherine'. The terms of Kate and Petruchio reinforces the notion of relationship. In 16TH Century England, female talk was associated with feminine independence which, was forbidden. However Kate is an assertive and articulate specific as is clear in Take action II Landscape I when she brands Petruchio a 'moveable' an 'ass' and a 'jade'. Her wordplay with Petruchio in this picture clearly indicates these are suited: PETRUCHIO: I swear I'll cuff you, if you hit again KATE: So may you loose your hands. If you punch me, you are no gentleman, And if no gentleman, then why no forearms.

In the sight of the feminist critic throughout the play Kate is not silenced, instead she propounds her views and articulates male terms in a refusal to be manipulated and categorised by the power structures by which men subordinate women. Kate describes Petruchio as 'no cock of mine, you (Petruchio) crow too such as a craven'. Her happy engagement in interactions containing erotic puns or innuendo emphasises her colloquial parity with Petruchio. Thus it is Kate who's educating Petruchio rather than the latter educating the ex - about the role of ladies in marriage. By engaging in loquacious debate, Kate's refusal to comply with the conventions of 16TH Century Britain functions as a well-defined caution to Petruchio that he cannot simply bamboozle her into marriage.

There are a great many other explanations why this play is not unpleasant. The play after all is a funny, not really a tragedy or play. While it would be fair to accept a suppression of Kate could have been appreciated by a 16TH Century audience, it could be doubted as to whether this is exactly what Shakespeare expected. Surely he wouldn't want to offend the country's first feminine monarch so profusely? The audience is not likely to derive entertainment from the 'taming' of Kate, but from the comic and farcical way in which their courtship and eventual relationship is delineated - as almost a battle of equals. The actual fact that the play has a happy closing and this both are triumphant emphasises this comic genre.

The plot's composition underlines the idea that play is a illusion and not actuality. The surreal induction moments containing Sly, in which it is made clear that the pending performance is intended strictly for his entertainment, presents the theme of a play inside a play and so is designed to detach the audience from the matters of the plot. It also signifies a path of mindful deceit, which links to the deception of Kate and Petruchio on the wager. The constant swapping of identities among the list of other character types again furthers the idea that all were viewing is merely role-play. Furthermore, although individuals such as Tranio and Lucentio are Italian by name, nevertheless they are certainly not naturally, which again acts as a comic device that play is never to be taken significantly.

The plot's worthiness as a humor for contemporary fun as well as criticism shows the fact that the designs considered within the play are still important in modern society. Indeed the play raises a number of relevant questions about topics like the role of women, the role of and meaning of matrimony, and the reason why for marriage, so that it is a worthy piece of educational literature. You can only find the play offensive if one detects society offensive because the themes or templates of deception, gender variances, greed and want are prevalent in world today (both to the benefit and downside of women). The fact that people still live in a patriarchal culture shows that its structure hasn't fundamentally changed and then the play cannot be considered an anachronism. The Taming of the Shrew only configures with the thoughts of other creators or poets such as Chaucer who in his Stores Story depicted an almost farcical marriage where the bride-to-be deceives and outwits her male counterpart in order to gain the marital domination. It is the play's durability that it can be interpreted in many different ways. As well as the conclusion it depicts the suppression of women or the outwitting of men by women, a Marxist research may conclude the play as the gaining of status by the lower class mortal or as the push of love triumphing over want. The fact that popular musicals such as Kiss Me Kate have prevailed as well as many other similar productions highlights its worthiness as a play and reason to continue with its creation.

One reason the play should be extended in production is that it educates its audience about the historical contexts of 16TH Century Britain. Between 1550 and 1660 Britain was worried about an extreme preoccupation with women who are a obvious hazard to the patriarchal system. Shakespeare was not alone in writing about this subject, instead he positively employed in the controversies of your day. The Taming of the Shrew troubles the assumption that the better half will simply send to her master's wishes as well as question whether this hierarchal framework can continue if it's threatened by rebellious behavior.

Based on numerous reoccurring recommendations, with some being aforementioned, throughout the play The Taming of the Shrew, it is plain to observe how a woman's judgment is easily disregarded, her position is automatically put a notch under men, and she is valued as one would value a non permanent possession. For a woman in the 16th century, life is a struggle. Not only are women struggling to speak their heads, they are shunned if indeed they do. Being considered lower-class is something all of them must live with on a daily basis - the fact that they can never be considered "good enough" in the eyes of men. However, one must be seen as a individual before being placed into an equal category with men. Unfortunately, this is a long way off for women because they are seen as mere possessions. The impact the male modern culture has on the treatment of women is so tremendous that even someone categorized as shrewd can be "tamed" into following a expectations with their society.

Also We Can Offer!

Other services that we offer

If you don’t see the necessary subject, paper type, or topic in our list of available services and examples, don’t worry! We have a number of other academic disciplines to suit the needs of anyone who visits this website looking for help.

How to ...

We made your life easier with putting together a big number of articles and guidelines on how to plan and write different types of assignments (Essay, Research Paper, Dissertation etc)