The Art Of Taxidermy English Literature Essay

Lastly I will be considering one of the most influential taxidermist of this era; Walter Potter and his approach towards this art, analyzing key work such as 'The Kittens' Tea Party' will help set a grounding in what has been done during this time period and will help compare what modern day artists are doing in taxidermy. Helping argue this case I am going to analyze three contemporary artist's work.

Firstly taking a look at Damien Hirst, an artist who does in a roundabout way use taxidermy within his work but uses methods of preservation, can help understand the way in which aspects of taxidermy are being adapted in contemporary art and whether it is significant.

Secondly looking at Polly Morgan, a completely qualified taxidermist and artist, can help realize what contemporary taxidermy work has been made. By comparing just how she uses traditional and modern elements within her work. Also by analyzing key work such as 'Departures' (2009), it can help identify Morgan's way of thinking and ways of working. Furthermore comparing similarities to Walter Potter's work will argue what advances present day taxidermy has developed compared to the Victorian era and whether it had an influence.

looking at David Shrigley's work and the advances he is making in this particular fi.

Lastly an interview with George Jamieson, today's day traditional taxidermist will help understand what importance taxidermy has in being used in modern-day art and whether it's suited.

Introduction

The word taxidermy derives from Greek; 'arranging or preparation skin'. It's the art form when a taxidermist stuffs and mounts dead animals skin, creating a realistic representation of that specimen by presenting it to resemble its naturalistic pose from when it was still alive. Taxidermy can be applied to most vertebrate species of animals. The foundation of the craft is uncertain. However, taxidermy has been around for many centuries within a number of civilizations. Looking back again to when man first started to hunt. Using tool such as

'The rude flint knives and scrapers found in such caves of Dordogne and many other places '

It is evident that early man had a simple understanding of how to take care of and dress skins. Using such skins and pelts for clothes, tools and ceremonies man has always relied upon and used animals for their survival. Although just skinning animals is not what's classed as taxidermy it is evident that is the earliest starting point of what became the first 'taxidermist'. However, preservation techniques didn't evolve so rapidly which is interesting to see how different societies adopted their own techniques throughout history in tanning skins and embalming the bodies of the dead.

For example the Inca Empire, dating back again to the first 13th century, used to bring their dead to high mountains situated in Peru leaving them to dry in the cold altitudes, which would help preserve the bodies. The bodies would be kept in households for an extended period of time before burial or performing a ceremony. This is a very basic way of preserving the dead by letting natural salts and minerals dry out the skin.

However there were a variety of societies that practised this technique throughout history. It is evident that the Ancient Egyptians were the first to use superior techniques of embalming animals and humans like the Incas. The Egyptians used their surroundings to help aid the process of preserving their dead. By burying their dead in small pits in the desert the heat and sand would effectively help dry out the skin, which would help them, maintain their real life quality. Nevertheless the stereotypical 'mummy' image we associate with the Egyptians progressed over many centuries, as they experimented with various ways in preserving the dead. The procedure of mummification took around 70 days to complete

" After removing the internal organs, the body was washed inside and out with astringent palm wine and then filled with pounded aromatics such as myrrh, cassia and cinnamon. The body was then kept covered in natron, a type of salt mined from the dry lake beds nearby the Nile River which accelerated the dehydration of the body. After a period of almost a year, your body was washed again and wrapped with bands of fine linen smeared on inside with gum, which the Egyptians used instead of glue allowing your skin and muscles to become rigid. "

It was only on important people such as Pharos and Nobles that mummification was practised on; with this the Egyptians used to preserve a lot of their animals in the same process, such as cats, dogs and different birds.

It seems odd why the Egyptians would take so much time and effort to mummify their rulers nonetheless they believed that preserving the bodies after death would allow them in to the afterlife. It is apparent that many cultures preserved their dead for several different reasons and uses whether it be religious or sacrificial. However with mummification being one of the only advanced techniques at this time to avoid the decay of dead bodies it can't be considered as taxidermy as the technique solely evolves the drying of bodies in comparison to removing and stuffing skins. Yet this is evidence as the first stages and first steps towards the start of the art of taxidermy. Through the next few centuries preservation methods improved drastically and the eye in preserving human bodies became less apparent.

Victorian Taxidermy

It is evident that the abundance and increase of practising taxidermists in Britain rose during the 16th - 19th centuries with the hunters of that time sparking a surprising rvelation in showcasing animals as trophies; Victorian taxidermy was created. The sudden fashionable craze within everyone at the moment meant that everyone wanted specimens either dead or alive. Taxidermy was now being found in all aspects of Victorian life from the decor of rooms to fashion. Although taxidermy became highly fashionable during this era there are a variety of different factors that helped contribute towards advance in techniques in this particular craft. How the qualities of skins were being treated was still experimental and little is well known of the beginnings of stuffing and mounting animals and displaying them as ornaments, the advances made during this time period where still far from perfect. Like the Egyptians, taxidermists at this time were tinkering with a number of different ways in trying to dry the skins of the pet; the import of foreign spices such as nutmeg, cinnamon and cloves helped the development within this field.

A) Good vs. Bad Practice

However one of the main factors in the development of taxidermy in this era was because of the education of the practisting taxidermists. During this time there is a lot of bizarre and amateur work being created by people who did not have any understanding about the craft. Like any craft or trade a person would reap the benefits of a four year training to help them learn and understand all the key factors of the intricate art. To be a taxidermist the final result of the stuffed specimen is not enough to deem his of master of these trade. To be always a great taxidermist you can't be you need to be great at stuffing yet have no prior understanding of the muscular structure or form of the animal. An expert taxidermist must learn and use a good amount of skills in their practice

'A solid understanding of modelling and form; a good understanding of biology; a solid grounding in anatomical structure; the analysis of the skeleton; the habits of the animals in nature such as feeding, breeding plus they manner in which they conduct their young; location of habitat and plantation. '

Using this abundance of knowledge a taxidermist must also have a strong hand at drawing and sculpting; making study drawings of specimens within natural habitat can help the taxidermist observe a number of poses which he/she could replicate. This also helps the taxidermist understand how the specimen reacts to different elements within its surrounding environment. An impatient taxidermist may never achieve the perfection this art can give. It really is clear by the number of skills that the artist must perfect that taxidermy is an art and that many people do not realize or give little appreciation from what is needed to create such compelling work.

However it is evident that the abundance of ill-educated taxidermists creating work won't last, as bad taxidermy is easily recognizable and can be due to a variety of factors, such as the manner in which the pet lacks its biological form or that the specimen has distress cracks in your skin due to bad practice of the treating of your skin. Bad and botched taxidermy cannot always be so obvious, infestation and decay can occur which manifest from the inside of the stuffed specimens, this is principally due to insects. Commonly moths, cockroaches and different beetles destroy and attack your skin. This again is because of the way in which the skins are treated, dried and mounted. An untrained hand without prior understanding of taxidermy may miss or leave parts of fat or muscle when skinning the specimen. This attracts these unwanted guests as the tissue will eventually begin to rot and decay. Moths are attracted to certain wools because of their larvae eating the proteins in hair shafts leading to many so-called taxidermists encountering infestation problems

"In 1892 a study was exhibited where an owl figured; the painting was simply perfect and learned- however the bird! A ragged, moth-eaten old specimen, stuffed by some incompetent hand; and the artist, as artists constantly do, failed to recognize the utter atrocity of the lines of form. "

With a majority of well-trained taxidermists producing good work the cause because of this bad practice to evolve can be due to the rise in popularity within taxidermy through the nineteenth century as it is hard to expect the quality of work to boost as the demand for increasingly more taxidermy increases. The Director of the Natural History Museum, London commented in 1881 that

"I cannot refrain from saying a word after the sadly-neglected art of taxidermy, which is constantly on the fill the cases of the majority of our museums with wretched and repulsive caricatures of mammals and birds, out of all natural proportions, shrunken here and bloated there, and in attitudes absolutely impossible for the creatures to have assumed while alive. "

B) Natural History Museums

Taxidermy is seen in several different uses ranging from museum dioramas, medical studies, fashion and gamesmanship, much like the British Empire expanding rapidly at this time, explorers such as Watson Perrygo (taxidermist and field collector) were employed to work with the British Museum. Several men would go on collecting expeditions and hunts all round the entire world to recreate foreign and rare specimens to taxidermise and then showcase in these museums. New and exotic animals such as rhinos and zebra meant that British taxidermists had to learn and adapt their ways to preserve these animals, the sudden advances and demand in this particular practice can be right down to man's urge to accumulate and catalogue. Helping this develop was the start and setting up of the Natural History Museum, which owes much to the responsibility of Sir Hans Sloane, an eighteenth-century collector. Sloane's earliest collecting saw that he had up to over 80, 000 different items, which range from a large variety of foreign taxidermy specimens to a massive library of rare books, fossils and oddities. Sir Hans collection was the major throughout Europe at this time; hence with his death in 1753, the federal government came forward and bought his entire collection as they agreed that it should stay intact. This abundance of unusual artifaces helped lay the foundations for the beginnings of the Natural History Museum which opened it door to everyone in 1759.

Natural History museums have now been set up about the world helping boost the amount of taxidermy being produced, yet it can be said that taxidermy is uncommon nowadays as almost all of these early works and dioramas remain on display and have not been replaced with modern examples. It is unfortunately that during this era, nature was now seen as a commodity and fashion item and for most people the partnership between animal and man became distorted as the public could only study these rare specimens within the confines of the museums enabled by the skill of taxidermy.

Legislation as well as the Guild Of Taxidermy

No legislation or protection for wildlife was put in place during this time period period; hence the ways in which Victorian taxidermists collected their specimens can be deemed barbaric compared to modern standards. Ways of examining many flying or dangerous specimens such as lions or vultures would be shoot first study afterwards. This had drastic effect on many species and is reflected today as many of these species are threatened with extinction and are now being protected. To combat this, new laws and legislations are being protecting our wildlife and things like the Guild of Taxidermy have now been created. George Jamieson, a modern day taxidermist in Scotland, create The Guild of Taxidermists in 1976 to help improve the standard and just how taxidermy had been conducted. George Jamieson is at the frontline of present day taxidermy within Scotland. Edinburgh born Jamison has been working within this practice since 1974, with commissioned bits of his work being featured in Natural History Museums, hotels and television adverts, such as Irn-Bru and Famous Grouse Whisky. George Jamieson is a well-respected taxidermist and by 1982 this scheme had been adapted and taken on at nation-wide level. The Guild of Taxidermists has helped the typical of taxidermy become recognized within the UK with stricter and tighter laws and legislations on which kind of specimens can and can't be stuffed and mounted. It has effectively helped wildlife and helped taxidermists identity where their specimens have come from. For instance animals that die from natural causes or road casualties can be mounted compared to specimens that are hunted or poached. Illegal means of hunting and capturing animals will never die out yet it is reassuring that many practising taxidermists are dealing with this scheme in order to protect our wildlife.

C) Walter Potter

Leading taxidermist Walter Potter (1835-1918) was one of the pioneers in changing the macabre nature taxidermy was associated with; by introducing more humorous elements, by creating his own style known as anthropomorphic taxidermy; meaning that the specimens were now designed to represent and display human behavior, set alongside the traditional style which mimics its naturalistic pose. Potter achieved this by posing his specimens in homemade dioramas that helped distance the specimen, as they didn't have any recognizable natural characteristics that the viewer could identify. So Potter would dress up his specimens in tiny human clothes, create miniature props and go to great lengths to make outstanding detail within his dioramas. For example kittens were dressed up in their Sunday best and frogs and toads would play croquet; this helped to alienate and detract from the natural beauty of the pet as the way Potter represented his specimens bewildered the viewer. Potter's work was one of the first ever to feature taxidermy that mimicked human characteristics and behavior, this helped changed the direction taxidermy was going in and showed a fresh light In the way of working which many followed.

Analyzing the work "The Kitten's Tea Party", 'fig1', is one of Potters renowned pieces. The display depicts seventeen taxidermise kittens surrounding an over sized dinner table packed with a variety of objects, such as tiny china plates, cake and sandwiches, and kittens pouring tea for every single other. The focus on detail within Potter's displays helps submerge the viewer in Potters surrealist world and helps the view forget that the topic matter is stuffed dead kittens and treat the diorama as any other tea party or a day-to-day activity the viewer would partake in. This is what makes Potters work so powerful.

Derek Hudson, author of 'Animal Fantasy: The Taxidermist of Bramber' gives us an insight of what Potters bizarre Museum was like

"The first impression of the interior of the museum is a glorious Victorian jumble of odds-and-ends. Stuffed birds and animals abound, including a number of freaks. There may be even a massive Coypu rat, forty inches long, that was shot over a bank of the river Adur, near Bramber; as it is a native of South America, the supposition is the fact that it disembarked from a boat carrying timber at Shoreham, and was exploring a nearby. An alarming apparition! But I soon forgot the rat in the contemplation of some old musical instruments, a length of telephone cable, an albatross, a Siamese war saddle, butterflies, beetles, boomerangs, and leading foot of Indian elephant made into a waste-paper basket and twelve engravings of the Wandering Jew by Gustave Dore. As the attention accustomed itself to the rich, inconsequential mixture, the major works of Walter Potter- in regards to a dozen of them, in their show cases- steadily detached themselves from other surroundings. I became aware of a whole " new world " of fantasy, in which kittens played croquet with fastidious enjoyment, squirrels gravely drank wine and ate nuts, and rabbits frowned over their slates in the village school. "

Again this can help us envision what Potter's collection must have been like, filled full of unusual and curious dioramas and cases, such as toads playing leapfrog and going to the barbers and where rabbits and kittens would put their uniforms on and go to school or even have tea parties. How Potter gives the subject matter a whole lot life creates undertones of subtle humor giving the pieces the popularity they actually. Potter was main in support of people producing taxidermy such as this at that time and his collection expanded so significantly that he required a particular building to be constructed to hold the majority of his work. The different approach Potter had in creating his work showed a huge contrast to what had been displayed at the Natural History Museum. This helped gain popularity as his work stood out considerably compared to what traditional taxidermists were creating at the moment. Potter, although an extremely well traveled man, lived and constructed almost all of his displays in the villages of Bramber and Steynin West Sussex. They attracted more than 30, 000 visitors each year and with Potter's death in 1918, his collection was passed on to his daughter and subsequently to his grandson. His grandson kept his Bramber museum open for quite some time and it became a famous tourist attraction. It is unusual to notice that Potters collection is one of the one existing examples of a whole Victorian Museum. Sadly Potter's collection was auctioned in 2003 which is unlikely to ever be re-assembled. It sparked a lot appealing among collectors and taxidermists with famous works such as, 'The Kitten's Wedding' choosing 21, 150. One of the biggest modern artists Damien Hirst, who also works together with preserving animals, put a bid for the whole collection at 1million. Hirst wrote towards the Guardian saying

" I've offered 1million also to pay for the price of the auctioneer's catalogue- simply for them to take if off the marketplace and keep the collection intact- but apparently, the auction has to go ahead. It really is a tragedy"

As time progressed the skilled talent of taxidermy started dying out and became outdated. However, within modern day art taxidermy is currently being adapted and found in a number of different ways.

Taxidermy in modern art

Although taxidermy is not as popular as it was during the Victorian era it has now digressed into the art world; does it still holds its as a significant talent? The transition from museums to gallery is interesting to address. With different approaches artists are taking in rebirthing this dying art. Certain elements of taxidermy are being used in modern art with artists such as Damien Hirst, Polly Morgan and David Shirgley and lots of others either using dead animals, preservation techniques or taxidermy within their work. The roots of the historic practice are now used in modern context, but could it be any different to what Walter Potter and other artists where doing a long time before?

Damien Hirst

It is interesting to recognize a modern-day artist such as Damien Hirst attempting to keep Potters collection intact. Hirst works in several different practices ranging from drawing and painting to large-scale installation and sculptures. The majority of Hirst's work is similar to taxidermy and deals with the partnership between art, life and death. Hirst wrote that

"Art's about life and it can't really be about other things there is not other things, "

Hirst's desire for the delicate balance of life and death came to him as an adolescent. A pal he knew who worked at Leeds Medical School would make a number of visits to the anatomy department in which where he would draw the cadavers. This digressed into Hirst's work in 1991 when he started introducing and experimenting with dead animals. Although Hirst does not use the art of taxidermy in his work, how he has adapted preserving techniques, (like many before him) helps him change and create something new in this field. A lot of the dead animals Hirst uses are preserved with a chemical called formaldehyde that includes a volume of uses, one being that it decreases the pace of decay drastically and is suitable for essentially pickling dead body parts or tissues. Hirst's early series of works such as 'zoo of dead animals' created his distinctive style we can recognize today; the use of minimalist steel, glass tanks filled with gallons of formaldehyde solution with some sort of dead animal suspended in the tank. In an interview with Mirta D'Argenzio, Hirst explains his first experiments with formaldehyde

MA- ' That which was your first experience with the animals in formaldehyde? How did you get the theory, and what does it mean for you?'

DH- ' I put envisioned the formaldehyde series. I suddenly realized that I really liked the formaldehyde, the look of the formaldehyde. It had that kind of tragedy that things are falling apart, that kind of arrested decay, however, not quiet. I needed visitors to think < That shouldn't be within an art gallery> as well as questioning why these are in an memorial, or thinking that they are really in the wrong place. The things in formaldehyde are excellent, they always look great. I remember things like that from school. In art class at school we always had frogs in jars and things like that. We just used to draw from those and skulls that we had lying around. '

It is essential to recognize that nothing has changed throughout the years of displaying dead animals, as like Potter, Hirst has adapted his own way of working by creating his own style inspired by the things he has encountered like the frogs in jars in his school art class. The similarities between Potter and Hirst's work are evident. As such, Potter shied away from traditional taxidermy and created his unique bizarre dioramas, just as Hirst is pushing the boundaries of what can be done in contemporary art by getting visitors to question what should and shouldn't belong in an art gallery. It really is key to highlight that both of these artists have generated a big public audience, as their approach towards creating their work can be shocking, yet without the original components of taxidermy both artists work wouldn't normally generate the power it can. This shows how the practice of taxidermy has been able to evolve and adapt for different artists. However with Hirst's worldwide fame he uses a range of different artists and tradesmen to make nearly all his work. Emily Mayer, an extremely respectable taxidermist, has helped Hirst with some of his most renowned pieces such as 'Away from the Flock' (1994) 'fig. 3' Mayer has dabbled in this area of work since she was 12 years old until entering art school as she felt she couldn't express herself through taxidermy and calls herself an 'anti-taxidermist'. Mayer and Hirst have created lots of powerful and surrealist works. Although the final finish of the work is very simplistic how the animals are suspended in the tanks gives the work its impact, as the unbelievable detail of the specimen is intact because of the formaldehyde and the notion that you are considering a once living creature now suspended in a tank of formaldehyde gives the piece a timeless quality. Using animals like this in Hirst's artwork has meant many animal rights groups have targeted him

" I had fashioned a very strange thing eventually me once, which was with the animal rights people, where I actually contacted them because they stood beyond your exhibition and said < Damien Hirst is this, etc. And he kills animals for art>. I contacted them and said, < I don't kill animals for art. Were making a spot of getting already dead things. We don't kill them for art; we get things that die naturally>. Individuals just said < oh look, we don't care really. And we were like And they said < No matter. We must come and picket your exhibitions because we are in need of the attention; we have to find the publicity> It really is quite scary when you think about it because the people who follow them can be pretty dangerous and can believe them. "

Artists will usually try and push the boundaries of what can and cannot be done within art, with either the subject matter or message they are trying to convey. Yet artists will always utilize animals in art, it's the manner in which they conduct themselves with using such delicate subject material. Hirst crosses this fine line which is interesting to see how he has adapted this process of preserving by showing beauty in something that has already been dead, the fundamental elements of what taxidermy is wanting to attain. Although Hirst's work will not consist of taxidermy it can't be eliminated as it demonstrates the talent can be adapted to new ways of working and this has a significant effect on this practice.

B) Polly Morgan

Polly Morgan is at the front line of rebirthing this talent. Morgan is a fully qualified taxidermist

'Polly Morgan is an associate of the Guild of Taxidermists, which adheres to and promotes the law pertaining to taxidermy, and keeps a detailed log of all animals in stock. All taxidermised animals are either road casualties or have been donated to the artist by pet owners and vets after natural or unpreventable deaths'

Being brought up in rural Oxford, Morgan at an early age was surrounded and fascinated by animals. With this Morgan explains that she quickly surely got to grips with the concept of death at around age three and she used to accumulate the fur and feathers that had fallen off many animals and keep dead chicks and mice in match box cases

"My mother explained that easily didn't bury them they would rot. So the little burials began. "

Morgan tried lots of career paths but her adolescent love and interest of animals lead her to lead the intricate art form of taxidermy. Taught under the fully qualified guilded taxidermist, George Jamieson, Morgan's work follows the traditional elements and skills that taxidermy teaches but Morgan displays her specimens inside a contemporary setting. As such Morgan does not want to mimic the natural habitat of the animal but to display them in unexpected scenery like the work of Potter. This helps explore the observation between beauty and mortality and the partnership we tell animals. It is interesting to see the traditional and contemporary mix-up in Morgan's work

"I began learning taxidermy without particular intention to be an artist but neither did I wish to be a traditional taxidermist, mounting pets or hunting trophies. I suppose having both old-fashioned and modern elements makes it out; the taxidermy and the bell jars could be antique yet the cast balloons and the polished telephone receivers have a far more Pop influence. "

It is this that Morgan, like Hirst, wants to set-up; something outwith the boundaries of taxidermy. However Morgan explains that she has no fascination with creating work like Potter. Although his work was well respected in his era it is not original by modern standards and Morgan expresses her dislike of 'rogue taxidermy' the art of chopping and changing elements of species to make beasts and mythical creatures such as mermaids and dragons

"Walter Potter's taxidermy wasn't technically skilled, but he became quite legendary because he made these kitsch, outlandish displays; a kitten's wedding where all of them are dressed up in finery and a tea party where they are all huddled around a table, drinking out little china cups. He would also taxidermy freak animals, such as chickens with four legs or lambs with two heads. When I first started learning, almost anything I found is at a naturalistic setting, with the animals looking as it had in life. I needed to keep the birds or mammals looking dead, as they looked when they came if you ask me. I can realize why people want to resurrect them, but I thought there was something quiet beautiful about their death pose which i thought worth preserving. I needed my work to be less ornamental plus more monumental. I began to be more thoughtful in what I undertook and not to rush into anything"

The work 'Departures', 2009, fig. 2, is the largest of Morgan's work at this point and dominated the area at the 'Frieze' exhibition. Morgan used the scale of the sculpture to run threads of narrative through it, the inspiration in creating this monumental piece was due to a Victorian book about inventions

"I read a book called 'Flying's Strangest Moments' by John Harding, which comprehensively covers all recorded attempts by man to fly. I was touched by the men who'd fashioned primitive flying machines out of strap-on wings and balloon-clusters tied to their chairs in their obsessive quest for flight"

Morgan references this notion to an anonymous Victorian inventor as she found an etching that depicts flocks of birds' (eagles) harnessed with leather straps and mounted on a strange cage like structure, scientifically and physically unrealistic. Morgan felt the duty to give this idea life:

"I needed to build it as an homage to the inventor, who plainly never realized his plan. THEREFORE I redesigned it and made the carriage like a giant birdcage. I love the idea that it's not queit clear if the passenger or the birds are free. The passenger gets the freedom to travel while the birds are tethered; yet they have the true ability to fly while he is caged. I love that dichotomy between the human and the pet. We harness them in a myriad of ways but they are the ones with ultimate power"

Taking two years to complete and a conveyor-belt of various birds to stuff and attach, Morgan's flying machine is a true wonder to witness as it pays homage to Morgan's ideas and visions. The work deals with multiple levels of surrealism and the playful nature of the piece touches on the subtle nature of life and death. Morgan's work may also be seen in a minimalistic sense as by using smaller scale, specimens such as chicks, forces the viewer to interact and examine the pieces more intimately. The positioning of the specimens including the way the legs of your barn owl are sitting to the amount of whiskers on a foxes face can drastically enhance or detract from the emotion of a piece. This reinforces that taxidermy is a good art form similar to a painting; one brush stroke can transform a whole painting's mood.

Morgan gives her specimens human like poses and behavior that introduces humor into her work, seen in her piece, 'Still Life After Death (rabbit)'. A stereotypical white magicians bunny is displayed curled up lifeless on top of a magician's hat. It is nice to start to see the subtle nature of the human and animal relationship within Morgan's work set alongside the brash nature Potter displayed.

Keep choosing Morgans work. ------

C) George Jamieson Interview

Artists such as Polly Morgan, a skilled taxidermists, create powerful work using taxidermy. There are a variety of other artists creating similar work which is interesting to identify whether these artists are also paying respect to the dying talent. In an interview with a modern day taxidermist, George Jamieson, it is interesting to understand what his views are on this matter, as he has done so much because of this practice.

Question -"What are your thoughts on taxidermy being used in modern-day art and could it be suited?"

Response- "I have no issue with taxidermy being found in contemporary art so long as it is well thought out and done well. I am not keen on badly come up with work such as items of different species stuck to one another. Everything depends upon the skill of the artist "

However, Jamieson will not like when species of different animals are combined in creating a final piece. Work like this is classed as 'bizarre and rouge taxidermy' which has been with us from the Victorian era. An abundance of this type of work being created isn't just insulting the wonder and delicate nature of the specimens but also the knowledge of learning taxidermy. Certain taxidermists and artists make an effort to create mythical creatures from folk tales. Such as for example combining parts of different animals to make griffins, unicorns and mermaids. Walter Potter was one of the first ever to create such spectacles yet more and more contemporary artists are creating work such as this.

D) David Shrigley

Glasgow based artist David Shrigley is at the forefront in creating bizarre work like this. Known for his dark love of life and sketches he also uses components of taxidermy within his work. Shrigley again has his own distinctive style, adapted from early the Victorian era much like Morgan's work for the reason that Shrigley introduces present day objects with taxidermied household pets such as dogs and cats. The exhibition 'Brain Activity' shows his way of working, by creating an extremely blunt and flat atmosphere. The task is refreshing to see as this thought-out crude approach digresses throughout the majority of his work and pays homage to the bad and bizarre taxidermy. Musician David Bryne described the world of Shrigley as

"Strangely moving, romantic and sincerely emotional"

Shrigley has his unique style in dealing with life and death and creates his sculptures into almost one liner jokes. Simon Tomlinson, a skill critic from the Daily Mail, backs this up point

"On making death not so grim: Welcome to the macabre world of David Shrigley, the artist-cum-taxidermist who in his own unique and graphic way offers a witty twist on the subject of death. For a man whose drawings were once described by novelist Will Self as like those of a serial killer, there is no shortage of the bizarre, the disturbed and the debauched at his new exhibition [] His moral (if that may be the right word) of the storyline may stink of the pointlessness of existence, but Shrigley is keen for people to laugh about it. "

Round up his work

Conclusion

Thus it is evident that with hindsight it is understandable to claim that the artists of the modern day have benefited from the ones of days gone by. Such as the way in which modern artists like Polly Morgan can study and analyze the works of Potter. This can only help her define the approach and message that she wants to provide within her work. Morgan suggested that Potters work is 'crude and badly done' which she will not want to recreate what Potter did. It really is interesting to highlight that they both have subtle similarities of working as they both make an effort to create something new within the practice of taxidermy. Also they both lean from the traditional areas of what taxidermy is and associated with. Walter Potter created his own strand of taxidermy; 'anthropomorphic taxidermy'. The recognition of Potter's work during his era made him main artists to show his work within his own confines, as much of the museums of that time period wouldn't normally take or display his freak and bizarre displays.

This makes the fine line between honoring this talent as the delicate subject material the artist is using. In comparison to painting or sculpting, the artist is using real animal skins as highlighted before a prior knowledge and training through this practice would be beneficial. It is obvious to the viewer whether the execution is skilled or not. As the viewer does not have to obtain any prior understanding of taxidermy to understand that the proper execution or mounting of the animal is inferior badly. Secondly with the subject matter of using dead animal skins; taxidermy comes under a lot of scrutiny, as people may take offence and weary in work done badly, conveying that the hand in question is making a mockery of the talent and the animal involved. Distorting and changing the perceptions we've of animals, arises in the task of Damien Hirst. Hirst wants to provoke the viewer and change our views of the animal; this is attained by displaying the animals within an alien environment and helps ask the question whether it's beautiful or not. Yet his work will not contain taxidermy but deals with most of the issues taxidermy is faced with. It really is interesting to observe how he wants people to question whether work such as this belongs within an memorial and the notion of what a skill gallery should be utilized for?

Modern day taxidermy has been taken out from the museums and placed into the galleries but has there been a noticeable difference between your two? Both museums and galleries are places of study and learning, yet the difference with the galleries are that they depend upon the artist to make work that evokes emotion and meaning by altering the specimen involved, compared to a taxidermist doing work for a Natural History Museum who creates realistic dioramas to depict wildlife inhabiting their own environments that live throughout the world.

Although taxidermy has been at the forefront of British art for the last 25 years can it be said that the shock value has lost its appeal? More and more becoming more popular artists opting for to use this medium of their modern day practice but will it eventually die out and become bland like the Victorian age? As George Jamieson said the execution of the specimen is key, as you do not need to know about animals to distinguish faults within mounting. It really is a simple thing to get wrong and an even harder thing to master, as it's restricted to the absolute imitation of nature, it could be described as a showcase of death. The wonder of it comes from the way that the specimen will be lost and forgotten forever after death but employing this skill it could be reborn and almost suspended in time forever to live on in another life. The power where taxidermy gives specimens another breath makes it such an important skill.

It is evident that taxidermy has evolved with mans evolution, from the earliest beginnings in skinning animals to make clothes to modern standards where taxidermy has been created into art, for peoples enjoyment; it is key to understand that the process of taxidermy has adapted to different changes, yet it'll never die out and will always have a function and use. Thus the continuing future of taxidermy is uncertain and could change throughout time, as much societies have a variety of uses for it, yet it will always uphold its uniqueness as it is associated with a bizarre nature due to the subject matter and connections it offers with life and death. This old-fashioned skill has not only played a huge role in just a social spectrum but also how it has shaped the training of nature all around us. It includes changed how we look at and connect to animals and has shaped a fresh path within modern-day art.

Also We Can Offer!

Other services that we offer

If you don’t see the necessary subject, paper type, or topic in our list of available services and examples, don’t worry! We have a number of other academic disciplines to suit the needs of anyone who visits this website looking for help.

How to ...

We made your life easier with putting together a big number of articles and guidelines on how to plan and write different types of assignments (Essay, Research Paper, Dissertation etc)