John Proctor was a husband, a farmer and town commoner. All this was represented by his name. The name of John proctor could be looked at his most valued possession. It had been his most precious asset. That is understandable because reputation was enormously important in Salem, where general population and private moralities were one and the same. However, throughout the play Proctor also experienced incredible internal turmoil, which might have led to his decision to perish at the end.
Early on in the play, the audience comes to understand that Proctor experienced an affair with Abigail Williams, while she was working in his home. Proctor presumed that his affair with Abigail irreparably ruined him in the eye of God, his partner Elizabeth and himself. Although he have succumb to sin and commit adultery, Proctor lacked the capacity to forgive himself. He resented his partner Elizabeth because she couldn't forgive him and trust him again, but he was guilty of the same thing. His own inability to forgive himself just intensified his reactions to Elizabeth's insufficient forgiveness. In addition to struggling with the weight of his sin, the actual fact that he had to one day expose his shameful act to his better half further tormented Proctor. His best possession was his good name and the admiration and integrity associated with it, and he didn't want to reduce it. Once he had acknowledged his affair with Abigail, Proctor effectively branded himself as an adulterer and lost his good name in his own eye. He dreaded ever having to show you his sin as he had been overwhelmed with guilt and regret. He also thought that a public screen of his wrongdoing would only intensify the amount of his sin, therefore multiplying his guilt. It was for this wish to protect his good name that Proctor select never to testify against Abigail through the trials. Although he understood it was the right thing to do, he didn't want to injure and embarrass his favorite wife by revealing his shameful affair in public. Therefore, he selected never to testify against Abigail. That is also partly why he was ready to die at the end of the play. Proctor felt that he couldn't have continued living when he had this sin looming over him every day. This makes the audience perceive Proctor as a good and commendable man.
Another reason Proctor chooses to die is because he couldn't double-cross his friends. He experienced that by reselling out his friends, he'd be committing an additional sin which would then blacken his name further. He would have then had to live everyday hating himself for what he do. He wouldn't have had the opportunity to live a life with himself understanding that other innocents got died while he had escaped fatality by lying. The actual fact that he previously three sons also inspired his decision. Proctor couldn't increase his sons to walk like men on earth if he himself wasn't a genuine man. Family life and friendship were very important to John Proctor and he noticed that if he had resided, he couldn't possibly have raised his children to be men on the planet knowing that he himself was a sinner who thought we would sell out his friends. He wanted to coach his children that they ought to operate for what they assumed in rather than give in to unjust courts or even to any injustices in life. By dying, he thought that he'd show his children that he wasn't a sell out and also that he had payed for the sins that he previously committed. He required his sons to know that their daddy got died with honour and integrity.
Proctor had a very strong opinion that if his name was blackened, there was no reason to live. This is the major influence in his decision to die by the end of the play. In Work IV, Proctor wrestled with his conscience over whether to confess to witchcraft and save himself from the gallows. The judges and Hale got almost confident him to take action, but Proctor couldn't bring himself at hand in the confession. Partly, this unwillingness mirrored his desire not to dishonour his fellow prisoners, but more importantly it also illustrated his obsession with his good name. Proctor thought that individuals would look down upon him with disdain, which it would permanently blacken his name if he authorized the confession, as it would have been set up on the cathedral door for open public view. His obsession with his good name was further shown when he raged, "I've given you my spirit; leave me my name!" This strong desire to defend his name allowed Proctor to muster the courage to pass away heroically, along with his goodness intact. This courage, along with Elizabeth's forgiveness, enabled Proctor to forgive himself and finally restore his good name and self-respect in his own eyes. At this time in the play, Proctor acquired come to a genuine understanding of what a good reputation meant and what plan of action it necessitated. He realized that he had to be honest and that he shouldn't rest to save himself. Although he very much wanted to live, escaping fatality was not well worth basing the rest of his life over a lie. What was most significant to Proctor was to produce a stand from the insanity of the city, for himself and for God. He used this as a final vacation resort to make people aware of the corrupt happenings and phony accusations during the trials. This previous stand for righteousness was a good example of Proctor's great persona and rationale. Proctor felt strongly about creating a good name and about taking it to his grave. He weighed both edges of his inside conflict and noticed that he couldn't make another fault. Therefore, he sentenced himself to loss of life. Throughout Act IV, Proctor learned all about the strength of his will and about the energy of his name. He knew that it was important most importantly to maintain his good name and the integrity of his family. By the end of the play, as the courtroom officers led him to the gallows, Proctor finally found serenity for the very first time in the play.
One of the most effective uses of terminology in the play was Miller's creation of believable dialogue. He used words to effectively established the time and the tone for the play but he also efficiently were able to ensure that it was typical of the dialect used by 17th century puritans. The dialogue constantly used words such as "aye" or "nay", which although were old-fashioned words, were easy to comprehend. Miller made certain that he used words that although were dated, didn't faze the audience. Other types of this were "hearty" and "bid". Miller also used biblical and spiritual referrals such as "Lord", which established the nature of the religious population and it made certain that the society's spiritual culture was maintained throughout.
Another way, where Miller used language effectively, was by shedding the final "g" from words. This is evidently portrayed when John Proctor says "You'll speak nothin' of Elizabeth!" By falling the final "g" from words, Miller created a rustic and colloquial feel to the language. Another manner in which Miller effectively used words was when he used the verbs "It were" rather than 'It was', so when he used "There be" instead of 'There is'. This dialogue seems alien to the ears of today's audience and therefore it ensures that the period and context of the play is stored. Miller used terms in this manner to help build a believable society, which helped keep carefully the play's essential realism.
Miller wrote "The Crucible" using four works. However, within each of the four functions, Miller maintained the action constant. This allowed Miller to build anxiety and suspense little by little. The constant style also helps the audience to recognize with the different characters, and particularly John Proctor. By building up his character throughout Act IV, the audience may easily relate to and understand Proctor's actions in ripping up the warrant. If the action have been busted, the audience wouldn't have completely perceived his actions and the reasons in it. Miller had also written the play chronologically. This helps the audience follow the development and means that pressure is not lost.
Furthermore, the utilization of the rising of action through the accusations helps the story to build up to the inevitable climax by the end of Act III where John Proctor is accused. These techniques arouse the interest of the audience and also provide an easy structure for the audience to check out. They also help the audience to comprehend all the hysteria.
The end of the play also helped bring the dilemma to a climax. By Work IV, the audience become strongly engaged with Proctor's fate. He had become the central persona in the play and the audience become so involved in if he will falsely confess and save himself. However, this matter appeared to be settled when he advised Elizabeth, "I cannot attach the gibbet just like a saint. It really is a fraudulence. I am not that man. " But as Danforth applied the pressure of the law, Proctor found himself less and less able to escape. First of all he was required to give the brands of other witches that he found and he simply refused to incriminate others. This is shown when he says, "I speak my own sins. I cannot assess another. " Hale and Parris urged Danforth to simply accept this, which he grudgingly do. But he required Proctor to sign a written confession. This was the breaking point and Proctor couldn't bring himself to signal it. Then play then reached its terrifying final result as a complex but noble person was killed.
Miller also used pace as a technique to create stress. The tempo is kept almost frequent throughout all four of the serves to ensure that pressure isn't lost. Through the use of this technique, Miller made the Crucible is simple to follow for the audience. He also uses dialogue and tempo to aid the building of stress up to the ultimate climax by the end of the play.
An audience today could have a different experience to the traditional audience because a modern audience would browse the backdrop information that Arthur Miller acquired included, that may affect how the character's and the play's event are interpreted.
Finally, about the historical context of the play, "The Crucible" was written during the Red Scare of the 1950s, which was a period of great dread in america about the spread of communism. Although Miller's play is approximately the Salem Witch Tests, he planned his audience to see parallels between your treatment of witches in early American societies and the treating communists in his own time.
In finish, relating back again to the question "How come John Proctor choose to expire rather than to reduce his "name"?", John Proctor was a good man who considered his name and his reputation to be his most precious assets. He understood he previously sinned when he dedicated adultery and he presumed that he should serve a abuse for his sin. He thought we would die, rather than to say that to crimes he had never determined and he presumed that he should pass away with honour, whilst protecting his own good name and the integrity of his family, alternatively than having to living his life in pity and permanently regretting the sin that he had committed.
Also We Can Offer!
- Argumentative essay
- Best college essays
- Buy custom essays online
- Buy essay online
- Cheap essay
- Cheap essay writing service
- Cheap writing service
- College essay
- College essay introduction
- College essay writing service
- Compare and contrast essay
- Custom essay
- Custom essay writing service
- Custom essays writing services
- Death penalty essay
- Do my essay
- Essay about love
- Essay about yourself
- Essay help
- Essay writing help
- Essay writing service reviews
- Essays online
- Fast food essay
- George orwell essays
- Human rights essay
- Narrative essay
- Pay to write essay
- Personal essay for college
- Personal narrative essay
- Persuasive writing
- Write my essay
- Write my essay for me cheap
- Writing a scholarship essay