Positive Social Repercussions: The Industrial Revolution

Poor conditions in factories, coal mines and the surroundings were a negative social consequence; aiding the view that industrialisation was not best for the proletariat in the uk. Factories were constructed with poor air flow, were noisy, and workers in these factories were put through extreme conditions, harsh consequences, low income and a large amount of the workers were children required into labour. Employees were whipped or beaten with rods if the machines weren't maintained and controlled to the adequacy of the foreman of the factory and were required to work for extensive periods of time, including anything up to sixteen time per day. The extended hours resulted in the reduction in importance of the family, as they were spending less time collectively. For modest offences such as whistling, strident fines received and pay were low and generally consisted of tokens to be used at the shop, which was amalgamated with the stock. Industrialisation led to the gradual degradation and pollution of the environment and the discharge of large concentrations of greenhouse gases such as skin tightening and, which cause the decrease in quality of mid-air and global warming, and this issue thus far remains uncontrolled. In addition to this, children, mainly of the working school, composed the majority of personnel in factories, as these were employed at cheap or free rates but still likely to work in the same conditions as all the personnel in the manufacturer. This led to a technology of children who have been ignorant, had minimal education, had health conditions and diseases and an increase in child mortality rate. Such was that case that in the 1840's, 57% of children working in factories did not reach age five. In 1832, a supervisor commented on the cruelty in a certain mill, stating,

'there was a young female deserting this mill; and she was helped bring back again to make up for the lost time and the expenses incurred. 1 day I got alarmed by her cries. She was lying on the floor, and the expert acquired her by the wild hair of her brain, and was kicking her in the facial skin till the blood vessels was operating down. '

However, not all personnel in factories were subjected to such conditions and some stock owners prohibited the work of children, fines for minor offenses, whipping and defeating with fishing rod as abuse and reduced working time. In 1800 one manufacturer owner, Robert Owen, hired employees on such conditions. And despite these negative sociable consequences, industrialisation resulted in the gradual upsurge in standards of living, as even the employees in factories, on average, were becoming more and more dynamic consumers and spending a greater sum of money from a greater income on comforts such as food, heat, clothes and home utensils than the previous agrarian and rural personnel. However, this is achieved at a high cost and negative interpersonal consequence: the indegent conditions in factories, coal mines and environment. Thus it is apparent that although industrialisation was good for the proletariat in the uk, in the short term, poor manufacturer, coal mine conditions and the environment suggest usually. Hence, it is noticeable that the indegent conditions in factories and coal mines were a negative social outcome and claim that industrialisation was the proletariat in Britain only to a moderate magnitude, as the positive final outcome was achieved at a high negative expense for a while.

In distinction to the indegent manufacturing plant and coal mine conditions and the surroundings, the Labour motion was a positive sociable consequence; aiding the view that industrialisation was good for the proletariat in Great Britain. Industrialisation caused an increasing gap between the rich and the poor, and thus the emergence of the proletariat; the working class who performed in factories and provided action to the Industrial Trend. Contrary to previous times, where Great Britain was an agrarian society and the population was scattered, industrialisation sculpted cities where the many the population were the lower and working school seeking employment. The lower and working class, with the impetus to be together in large numbers in professional centres with advanced communication, were able to gain political electric power and attention from the higher classes. Because of this impetus, trade unions were made which backed the needs of the lower and working class for self-betterment and allowed them coverage and appearance, eventually leading to the formation of the parliamentary get together, the Labour Get together. These factors allowed for the establishment of a working class culture, in a way that over the Industrial Trend, the proletariat declined various churches, rather helping the Methodist faith, which complemented their aspirating goals. However, despite this positive social result, political and public equality were not achieved in the short term, rather, the Labour activity planted the seeds for permanent change. As the gap between the rich and poor increased, more of the lower and working category were kept unemployed and unnoticed. Those that were wealthy gained more riches and those who were poor became even poorer. Such was the circumstance that in 1842, the working course Labour motion pressured the Parliament to examine and allow the People's Charter, which explicated the politics and sociable inequalities of the proletariat. However, this was unsuccessful and was declined by the Parliament. Thus it is noticeable that the Labour movements was a positive interpersonal consequence which suggests industrialisation was good for the proletariat in Great Britain to a moderately high magnitude, as it was more effective in the long term rather than the short-term.

In addition to the indegent stock and coal mine conditions, living conditions and sanitation were also a poor social consequence; encouraging the view that industrialisation had not been best for the proletariat in the uk. Industrialisation led to urbanisation thus making the population concentrated in professional places. Such was the case that in 1800 towns in Britain and Wales that got over 20, 000 inhabitants were numbered at 15, unlike in 1850, where towns that had over 20, 000 inhabitants were numbered at 63. This resulted in overcrowding and a rise in population density, and thus the proletariat got no other available choices but to reside in the small, firmly packed and inadequately built properties which lacked enough facilities. Because of this, facilities such as toilets and normal water supplies were open public and communal, as private piped normal water was beyond the affordability of the proletariat. Because of the absence of clean water and plumbing, roadways transformed into open sewers. They were linked to the river system and thus led to the contamination of water materials. These issues of poor living conditions and sanitation resulted in epidemics of various diseases, such as the epidemic of the deadly disease cholera in 1831, which killed 22 000 people in the course of a year and was the result of contaminated water. Friedrich Engels, in the early 1840s, commented on the real estate an area in London, 'It contains 1, 400 residences, inhabited by 2, 795 individuals and in this overcrowding it is nothing unusual to discover a man, his better half, four or five children, and, sometimes, both grandparents, all within a room. . . '. However, urbanisation and immediate people increase were already in motion before the emergence of the Industrial Revolution. Complementing this were the new technology and work company which led to a rise in production, thus enabling the sustainability of the populace and the way to obtain adequate food and other resources. Such was the case that Ireland, next to Great Britain, simultaneously experienced urbanisation and rapid human population increase however did not undertake industrialisation. Thus, the limited resource and popular of the large Irish population undoubtedly led to hunger through the famines which happened in the mid-nineteenth hundred years. Furthermore, despite the poor living conditions and sanitation, nearly all houses had by the proletariat were still more comfortable than the rural homes, that have been also unpleasant and cramped. Porter claims that the 'wide-spread poverty and continuous risk of mass hungerlessened, [and] overall health and material conditions of the populace obviously upgraded'. Despite these positive factors, epidemics of diseases and poor living conditions and sanitation extended until the past due nineteenth hundred years. Thus it is apparent that, although industrialisation was good in the long term for the proletariat in the uk, the positive final result was achieved at a price, especially to the proletariat who bore the grunt of the poor living conditions and sanitation. Hence, poor living conditions and sanitation were a negative social effect to a higher level, and show that industrialisation, although being good in the long run, was bad specifically for the proletariat in the uk in the short term.

In compare to the poor living conditions and sanitation, reform was a positive social consequence; supporting the actual fact the view that industrialisation had not been best for the proletariat in the uk. The negative public repercussions associated with industrialisation allowed for reform, as the federal government began to see the plight of the proletariat and thus support their dreams. Before the Industrial Trend, a 'laissez faire' approach was taken by most government authorities, in which the belief was that the government bodies should not interfere in issues between employers and employees. This led to the increase of power given to employers and thus they were able to create their own working condition and income. However, employers mainly searched for profit and so working conditions were poor, thus resulting in child labour and low wages which were wide-spread in industrial workplaces. As industrialisation resulted in the concentration of folks in cities, issues coping with poor working conditions captivated attention from the federal government and thus it started to pass laws which improved the social specifications of the proletariat. Such was the case that in 1819, the government passed the Manufacturer Act which prohibited the job of children under age nine in textile mills. The dreams of the proletariat little by little became satisfied as the government introduced various laws such as those regarding pensions, health care and the improvement of sanitation and living conditions. Thus it is noticeable that reform was a positive social outcome to a moderately high magnitude and made industrialisation best for the proletariat in Great Britain in the long run. However, reform was achieved in the permanent and was achieved at a higher cost; in order to gain attention from the government the proletariat experienced poor stock and coal mine conditions and poor living conditions and sanitation.

Thus it could be concluded that industrialisation was good for the proletariat in the uk to a average extent. That is due to the fact that industrialisation possessed many positive cultural repercussions and was best for the proletariat in Great Britain mainly in the long run. The Labour activity, reform and other positive outcomes were mainly effective in the long-term and were achieved at a high cost for a while. This high cost includes the negative communal implications such as poor factory and coal mine conditions and poor living conditions and sanitation. Thus, information shows that industrialisation was best for the proletariat in Great Britain in the long term, however, was achieved at a higher cost in the short term.

Also We Can Offer!

Other services that we offer

If you don’t see the necessary subject, paper type, or topic in our list of available services and examples, don’t worry! We have a number of other academic disciplines to suit the needs of anyone who visits this website looking for help.

How to ...

We made your life easier with putting together a big number of articles and guidelines on how to plan and write different types of assignments (Essay, Research Paper, Dissertation etc)