The Construction FROM THE American Flag History Essay

The American flag was made more than 200 years ago to show our nation's have difficulty for self-reliance from Great Britain, the power that increased through this freedom, and the amount of liberty our country possessed. On the fateful day in-may of 1776 our flag was hand-sewn with a now famous girl, Betsy Ross. With her own hands she built a flag that now, hundreds of years later, represents the well-earned democracy of the United States that Americans still prosper in today. Why should one destruct a symbol of our region? With destruction, not only is one destroying a national image but also the honor of veterans who fought for the "freedom" in the flag. These wars produced the deaths of millions of soldiers who will in the long run be dishonored for a flag they pledged to and fought for whether this maintain the Vietnam Conflict, World War One, World War Two, or even the Conflict in Iraq. In addition, in this current warfare in the Middle East you have terrorists who threaten our freedom on a daily basis abroad, as well as in our own country. The desecration of the American flag increases the ongoing hate terrorists contain in finishing the development of this sought-after country. The flag has also become proof the history in america. With this flag, one recognizes the symbol of our own freedom that this country was founded on whatever has lasted through time. This foundation provided by the religious flexibility the colonist wanted and the freedom to live that they needed. The flag signifies the independence the people of america live every day, and the independence from Britain who threatened to take this away. By desecration of the American Flag, is in a way assisting the endings of our background and the feats this country has trudged through. This all therefore combines to create for a spot in cessation of the using of america flag.

The American flag is not only a piece of fabric that is flown through to a metal pole, but more of a representation of the annals of america. In burning up this "fabric", one also melts away the symbolic representation in our history that the flag has stood for. The flag, itself, represents the liberty this country won as soon as the colonists step foot on this soil. When People in the usa first showed up here, they were escaping the bonds of spiritual torment, and wanted to be able to "worship freely and have an opportunity to choose which religion they wanted to take part in (Olmstead par. 5). " Therefore, this created a spiritual variety in the establishment of the "Quakers, Puritans, Anglicans, Roman Catholics, Protestants, Lutherans, Lutherans, and even some German religions (Olmstead par. 5). " Folks from around the globe began arriving in search of this sough-after independence you start with the "Scotch-Irish. " This is actually the same sense of desire to have freedom whatever was shown in the wars against Great Britain in the American Groundbreaking Battle as the colonist fought for freedom in the years 1775-1783. In this fight, George Washington got expression of Lord Cornwallis' position in Yorktown, and "raced southward from New York to link up with the French fleet under Admiral Comte de Grasse in the Chesapeake Bay (Klos par. 2). " While English reinforcements never originated from "General Henry Clinton or the British isles fleet, " Washington arrived to "bottle-up the Britishwith three weeks of shelling (Klos par. 2). " Meanwhile, the French fleet "blocked aid from Cornwallisand Lord Cornwallis soon surrendered on Oct 19th, 1781 (Klos par. 3). " This resulted in the putting your signature on of the "Treaty of Paris" which was signed on Sept 3, 1783. This peace treaty in the long run "formally ended the United States Revolutionary War for Independence (earlyamerica. com). " In addition, it "gave formal acknowledgement to the United States, established United States boundaries, given certain fishing privileges, allowed creditors of every country to be paid by individuals of the other, restored the rights and property of Loyalists, exposed the Mississippi River to individuals of both nations and provided for evacuation of all British makes (earlyamerica. com). " Thus, "giving the 13 colonies political independence (legislations. jrank. org). " The flag shows these "fights" and "desires" for freedom in the history of the American people, especially in the well-fought battle for indpendence from an overpowering "mother-county, " as well as the turning of colonies to claims in the depiction of superstars. This is provided for in the "Act of April 4, 1818, which made for 13 stripes and one celebrity for each talk about, to be added to the flag on the 4th of July following a admission of every new talk about (usa-flag-site. org). " This represented a historical event alone American finally became its own country. One can also start to see the background the flag displays in the development of the beliefs of the flag itself. This is shown in the courtcase from 1989, Johnson vs. Texas. Here you have an instance over a guy known as, Gregory Johns who poured kerosene and established an American flag on fire through the Republican National Convention in Dallas, Tx in a protest against President Ronald Reagans renominatin (Hacht and Hayes par. 1). Immediately after, Johnson was arrested and "convicted of violating a Tx legislation which charaged the action of defacing, damaging, or otherwise physically mistreating in a way that seriously offends more individuals who notice or discover the action with a misdemeanor offense (Hacht and Hayes par. 2). " Texas provided two justification of offenses toward him through the circumstance, "preventing breaches of the peacefulness brought about by the offense that desecration inflicts and preserving the integrity of the flag as symbolic of nationwide unity (answers. com). " From there, the truth was observed by Justice William J. Brennan who got to include the values of the First Amendment, and whether "Johnson's" desecration was 'do' or 'speech' (answers. com). " "After being first appealed and reversed by the courts, the United States Supreme Court made a decision to hear the situation. In a very vote of 5 to 4, Justice William Brenna "noted that but the amendment specifically refers to "speech, " the Supreme Judge possessed long considered the cover to extend beyond the spoken and written term to perform "with elements of communication (Hacht and Hayes par. 3). " With this the Supreme Court rejected the boasts of the Texan government bodies that experienced an "fascination with claiming tranquility [without a] riotand the debate that it got a pastime in safeguarding the flag as "a symbol of nationhood and nationwide unity (Hacht and Hayes par. 4). " Later, Justice John Paul Stevens expresses, "That tarnish is not justified by the trivial burden on free manifestation occasioned by requiring that an available, alternative setting of appearance - including uttering words critical of the flag - be used (freedomforum. org). " There was much opposition toward the case's results, and by "July 1st, 1989, significantly less than a month following the decision, members of Congress had introduced thirty-nine independent resolutions phoning for a constitutional amendment authorizing regulations forbidding desecration of the flag (Spiropoulos par. 2). "Following this circumstance, the Flag Security Take action of 1989 was put into result and later triggered Eichman to be caught. This function was the "GOP's first attempt to overturn Texas vs. Johnson. Soon the Flag Protection Act was passes by both house of Congress, and became a rules without the current president, President George Bush, Sr. 's personal (Apel par. 1). " In this particular new amendment of america Code, it mentioned that whoever knowingly mutilates, defaces, literally defiles, burns, sustains on the floor or floor, or tramples after any flag of the United States will be fined under this title or imprisoned for only twelve months, or bothdo not prohibit any do consisting of the disposal of a flag when it has become worn or soiled (Spiropoulos par. 1). " This action was followed by a similar court docket circumstance to Johnson vs. Tx in the case, United States v. Eichman. In this case, Eichman was billed under the courts in Washington Talk about and Area of Columbia by the Flag Security Act for getting rid of American flags. These courts argued that his actions went from the First Amendment. Soon this circumstance changed onto the Supreme Court. Within a 5-4 decision, "the Supreme Courtroom held that the flag burning was a form of expression covered under the First Amendment (infoplease. com). " Justice William Brennan "rejected the government's debate that regulations defends the flag's integrity as a countrywide image, as well as considering Congress's finding of any "national consensus, " against flag getting rid of (infoplease. com). " Justice John Paul Stevens argued that "government can put limited constraints on expression if there is a legitimate reason behind them that is unrelated to the ideas being portrayed and if other ways of expression can be found as alternatives (infoplease. com). " In these decisions, it sparked a stampede of controversy and opposition, which in the long run highlighted the fact to the unfairness. "Polls [used after these hearings] mentioned that an overwhelming majority of People in america-70 percent or more-opposed the rulings (Jost par. 2). " Because of this court case, the House of Staff voted to "adopt suggested constitutional amendments banning flag desecration in 1990, 1995, 1997, and 2000" each in the long run never receiving the necessary two-thirds approval in the Senate (infoplease. com). "It is not a limit on freedom of speech to say that certain must use another method more dealing with speech as opposed to the burning of one's own country's flag (Jost par. 4). " In this situation, one recognizes the lasting history our flag has carried through time. Even by having a court case like this, the flag still keeps its threatened importance especially in the words of Justice John Paul Stevens. One sees simular representaion years later in the history of the American country in the tragic event of September 11, 2001. In this particular horror, "the flag became a symbol of desire and pleasure. Though tattered and dusty soaring above the rubble of the World Trade Centre, it, like our country would prevail (toritako. com). " In this event, folks found strength in this flag to symbolize the will to make it through even via an function of terrorism, and getting rid of of an incredible number of Americans. That is like the sense Francis Scott Tips noticed as he seemed up to the flag in the middle of the bloodied sea to see even through "the bombs bursting in air [it] Gave confirmation during the night that our flag was still there. Thus, increasing the fact that the flag has saved the history inside our nation, whether it be in the 1700s or the 2010s. It is definitely evidence to the American region that the people can survive through the annals this flag shows, and bears. In this particular flag, one recognizes the effects of our own countries in wars, and tragedies. With the act of getting rid of of the flag, one ruins the history that the flag represents, and degrades it to ashes. The flag itself symbolizes the feats the United States has completed, the toils they have bared, and how far it offers come and for that reason is becoming an important part to exhibiting our record.

On June 14th 1777, the Continental Congress used the American flag in "wanting to promote national take great pride in and unityand resolved that the union between your thirteen starts, white in a blue field [symbolize] a fresh constellation (ushistory. org). " Ever since this day, American troops have fought and offered under this flag in their pledge to "solemnly swear (or affirm) that I'll support and defend the Constitution of america against all opponents, foreign and home; that I'll bear true beliefs and allegiance to the same; which I will obey the purchases of the Leader of america and the orders of the officers appointed over me, matching to polices and the Even Code of Government Justice. So help me God. (oath-keepers. blogspot. com). " Because they are sworn in, with their face to the United States flag, they and others like them before have pledged their life to the coverage of the country's freedom symbolized in the flag itself. Using the desecration of the flag, one isn't just destroying the symbolism of the history of the United States but also the honor of the millions of soldiers who have fought for the benefit and goodwill of this country. Denny Rehberg, member of the House Appropriations Committee and the home Liberty Caucus expresses his opposition toward flag-burning in the assertion, "This about honoring and respecting the sacrifice of hundreds of thousands of People in america who served to safeguard liberty and flexibility. These high ideals have always unified People in the usa, and even though some may denounce our country and our soldiers, why they might want to physically desecrate a symbol of freedom is beyond creativeness (rehberg. house. gov). " "Immediately after 1890, veterans and other related organizations started out protesting the serves of damage on the United States flag with concerns on the effect on the American people's patriotism (Goldstein par. 2). " With these protests, many regulations were made between 1897 and 1932 in every, previously, 48 states. These laws consisted of outlawing the "attaching anything to or putting any grades on the flag; using the flag in any manner to promote purposes; and literally or even verbally "harming" flags in any way, including "publicly" mutilating, trampling, defacing, defiling, "defying" or casting "contempt, " either "by term or action, " after the flag (Goldstein par. 3). " Furthermore, the Flag Desecration Amendment was suggested on June 26, 2006, which explained, "Congress and the claims shall have power to prohibit the physical desecration of the flag of the United States (usa-flag-site. org). " This amendment came into effect in response to the Supreme Courts decision over previous hearings in the banning of flag burning up. The supporters of this amendment explained that the flag deserves special security because it symbolizes flexibility and unites a diverse country (usa-flag-site. org). " With this attitude, the supporters required the amendment to the House on June 28th, 1995 where it was approved with a vote of "312-120, with 93 Democrats signing up for 219 Republicans in almost all, while 12 Republicans sided with 107 Democrats in opposition (usa-flag-site. org). " On July 20th, the Senate Judiciary Committee approved it also, with a vote of 12-6. Yet, as it surely got to the Senate things started to downfall. The Senate will need a two-thirds bulk vote to be able to have an amendment to be ratified by the areas. However, even with just causes, the vote failed by one vote in the Senate, with a vote of "66 to 34 slipping brief of the two-thirds bulk required (Babington par. 2). " Many opposing this amendment, including Russell Feingold, argued "that Congress must protect the right of all Americans expressing their views about their federal, however hateful or spiteful or disrespectful those views may be (Babington par. 20)" However, Senator Diannne Feinstein commented upon this unfortunate outcome stating, "The flag's special symbolic status makes its desecration not the same as holding an indicator denouncing the president. Losing an American flag in anger is "conduct, not conversation" because the flag is "the image of our own democracy, our shared values, our commitment to justice, our remembrance to those people who have sacrificed to defend these principles (Babington par. 8). " A vital discussion was also indicted by General Patrick Brady who states, "In the movie "Saving Private Ryan, " his simple, haunting, using question was whether he was worth the sacrifices of Captain Miller and those who preserved his life. Those opposed to the right of the visitors to protect their flag tell us that it's the flexibility to burn up the flag that makes us worth their sacrifices. If Private Ryan's saviors observed that they passed on on America's battlefields so that their flag could be burned up on America's avenue corners, they might turn over in their graves (collection. cqpress. com). " This gives perception to the thoughts in a troops mind. The soldier knows his sacrifices for his country are worthwhile anything he has to lay out, including his life. The fact someone would make an individual choice to damage those sacrifices and dishonor them in a single flick of an match is simply inexcusable. Senate Bulk Head, Trent Lott, increases this by stating, "The American flag is a sacred, basic, important symbol of our own nation's ideals, the image of those important values for which we've asked our young men and women to combat and die. Allowing the desecration of our own national image is not a sign of strength, it's a sign of self-indulgence (infoplease. com). " The term "actions speak louder than words" becomes type in the discussion for the banning of using up American flags. American military, this second, are out struggling with for our liberty to continue coping with a full selection of opportunities not tainted by dictators or emperors. Along with the American flag pinned on the arm these are fighting within an function of patriotism that "flag-burners" threaten to demolish. Together with the desecration of any flag, is putting the deeds of troops over a burner, degrading their honor and their lives to ashes. Even through free conversation one must protect the individuals who fought for this country's "free speech. " In this particular, one is attracted to the point that "the Constitution gives us the to peacefully protest the actions of our federal government. That is that which you are doing. It does not give us the right to violently protest the [deeds of men who fought for the establishment of this Constitution. ] That is what flag burners do (collection. cqpress. com). " With dishonoring the flag, one dishonors those who deal with every day to keep this land intact.

On Sept 11th, 2001 this land experienced an atrocity that remaining millions across the whole USA speechless. As you watched the two towers fall to the pits of the earth, one could only think of the hundreds dead with the crush of debris and the family those individuals left behind. The next question, following the initial impact of the massacre was, who could have been so heartless? Now, in the year 2010 you have concreted this response to the battle on terrorism. These terrorists, which haunt ones mind in the image of those two towers crashing down, are the lone reason this warfare has lasted such a long time, with so many military dead. The sense of emotion is visible in former President, George Bush's affirmation, "How do I respond as i see that in some Islamic countries there is vitriolic hatred for America? I'll tell you how I act in response: I'm amazed. I'm amazed that there surely is such misunderstanding of what our country is about, that people would hate us. I am, I am -- like the majority of Americans, I just can't believe it. Because I know how good were, and we've go to do an improved job of earning our case. We've got to do a better job of explaining to the people in the Middle East, for example, that people don't deal with a war against Islam or Muslims. We don't carry any faith accountable. We're struggling with evil. And these murderers have hijacked a great religion in order to justify their evil deeds. And we cannot let it stand (Klein par. 4). " This one statement shows the effect September 11th got on our nation, making us clear but with a single purpose of destroying whoever tried out destroying our freedom in our country. These terrorists are the ones who crave the American people's position, and life. Ex - President, George Bush, really places a clear communication out along with his statement in an address to Congress, "Why do they hate us? They hate what they see the following in this chamber - a democratically elected administration. They hate our freedoms: our flexibility of religion, our flexibility of speech, our independence to vote and put together and disagree with the other person (library. cqpress. com). " This jealousy is what drives those to get rid of our men oversees, bring in suicide bombers to your countries, and threaten our lives. One example of this consists of the recent luckily unsuccessful bombing of the Detroit bound planes. Nigerian, Umar Farouk Abdulmutallab "attemptedto murder and use a weapon of mass devastation in to wipe out almost 300 people (timesonline. co. uk). " The twenty-three calendar year old tried to "destroy the plane by injecting chemicals into a package of pentrite explosives concealed in his clothes (timesonline. co. uk). " It had been later proved that Al Qaeda have train this individual in Yemen, "a country grappling with crushing poverty and lethal insurgencies, " where he was instructed to attack the Detroit-bound airplane in the us (Gordon par. 6). In a period of conflict, terrorists are posing threats to ruin independence, like in this past event. Now years after Sept 11th and the increase of proposed terrorist disorders on America's borders, America would again commence to question the beliefs in it's nation to safeguard them, being just what the terrorists want. This is exactly what leads to the drop in patriotism and therefore the using of flags. Terrorist communities have even removed as far as brainwashing little kids. For example, "in Midsection East and Central Asia children are being shown little but the need to handle holy war against the Western. Here [bin Laden] is preaching to a ready-made group. By get older 8, 9, 10, they already are shouting 'jihad, death to America (library. cqpress. com). " This hatred melts away deep, and only increases the dependence on patriotism, like in the words of Osama Bin-Laden broadcasted on the Al-Jazeera television set network, "[Americans] those killers who have abused the blood, honor and sanctuaries of Muslims (collection. cqpress. com). " However, many burn off the American flag instead to protest the conflict leading to the succumbing to these dangers that constantly fight us. By using the flag the first is encouraging the ideals that the Taliban and Al Qaeda represent. The flag itself presents the American people's independence. As a student, one stands every day with one's hand over the guts to honor this liberty. This same respect keeps on as a grown-up at, for example, a football game where in fact the National Anthem is sung. This esteem runs deep in the sovereign of this nation. In a time of war, when flags are being burned up all across the United States one is kept to believe where has this country's patriotism eliminated? By literally, using the symbolism of the country's freedom, one is strengthening the cause of the terrorist who watch this country such as a hawk looking for any faltering. In using up the flag, one is doing precisely what the terrorists want one to do. They want to see one loose beliefs in their region. They would like to see one dishonor their people, and become rebels to their own government. With the using up of the flag, it is no more just a piece of textile engulfed in flames, but the symbolism of your region and the freedoms, patriotism, and values the American people symbolize. If one gives into the wishes of the terrorists, displaying them that a person no longer prices one's liberty or supports one's country it increases their cause. This in the end strengthens their hope to one day take over our region, take our independence, and take our will to fight back.

In the burning of USA flag, one does indeed not just lose colorful fabric but the respect of the country. A nation any particular one is blessed to live in, and that other under-developed countries make an effort to end up like. These functions of destruction disrespect the troops that have passed away to produce this nation, also to make this nation free. Every single flag signifies the "fabric" they pledge to to be able to go protect our country. With the using up of the flag one is not only disrespecting the deeds they did to concrete this nation, however the titles of the troops that have passed on during these wars, currently and inside our nation's history. Furthermore the flag signifies the history of america and the occurrences that have took place in order to access the profitable striving nation you have today. In such a flag, one views the independence bought by the American Revolution, self-reliance from Britain, record of previous wars, and even the establishment of laws that have made this land, free. With all the getting rid of of the flag, in this instance one erases the proof of pride in this nation and the historic events that induce this delight. The flag presents the history, directly. Therefore, some may be getting rid of this "evidence" of record and disrespecting the deeds of previous patriots to the country. Finally, with the threat of terrorism in the everyday life of each American one must keep this frame of mind of patriotism in the United States. Terrorists out there today are jealous of this nation's freedom and exactly how Americans have the ability to live a life so openly. They devout every minute despising the American people for their jealousy. The American flag represents, as mentioned above, this flexibility. With the burning up of it, is supporting the ideals of the terrorist themselves. It brings sparks with their desires in the down falling support Americans have in their country. With this resentment, the terrorist will become strong in knowing they are simply closer to overtaking our country and so that it is just as handled as theirs. Therefore creating several problems that would add to the ending of this nation. Why would one want to spoil more than 100 years spent on creating a nation which could prosper, unite, thrive in flexibility, and belong to the folks? Why would one want to mess up a country governed "of the folks, by the individuals, for people, " as said by Abraham Lincoln. With the using up of the flag, one does this. An example may be disrespecting this country directly, and the prices it is constructed of. With protest you are officially declaring disapproval or objection given by a worried person, group, or business (thefreedictionary. com). " However, by losing the flag an example may be not just making a disapproval or objection to an issue, but an opposition to the whole country. This is actually the flag in which thousands and thousands and zillions of students pledge under every day. This is the flag in which people have stood under in times of trouble to unite as a land. This is actually the flag that is hung at a graveside on the experienced or fallen battle soldier's grave. It presents the freedoms, the triumphs, the terrible atrocities, and the folks of america of North american. Flag burning up degrades all of this, and more. While using threat of conflict in the 21st century, one should not be patronizing the United States but promoting it in patriotism. This patriotism is the sort of feeling that nation has lived on every since the idea of freedom came forth. This is exactly what this country must overcome the lows it is within, and patronizing of this country is not the solution. The American flag is the union People in the usa are built under, a union that should not and can not be ruined in ashes.

Also We Can Offer!

Other services that we offer

If you don’t see the necessary subject, paper type, or topic in our list of available services and examples, don’t worry! We have a number of other academic disciplines to suit the needs of anyone who visits this website looking for help.

How to ...

We made your life easier with putting together a big number of articles and guidelines on how to plan and write different types of assignments (Essay, Research Paper, Dissertation etc)