The Cultural Connection Between Iran And India History Essay

A review study on cultural connection between Iran and India can show more exchanged ethnical elements between two countries during centuries. It can be a huge area from before history, when Aryan became two parts and immigrated to different places in Iranian plateau and Indus Valley. The relation could trace until, when India comes into colonization period. At that time the official dialect in India was Persian which, is today Iranian national language. The common details led business and cultural trade between two countries. 'For illustration the first Persian printing machine established in Calcutta by Charles Wilkins (1749-1836) in 1781 that designed type for magazines of literature in Persian and was appointed as translator of Persian and Bengali to the Commissioner of Revenue so that as superintendent of the Company's press. ' Newspapers opened a new window to the relevancy. Later was shared more Persian documents in India, which led Iranian into Constitutional Revelation by the publication Habl Al-Matin which, shared in Calcutta from 19 December 1893 until 9 December 1930, by Sayyed Jalal al Din Mo‰ayyed al Eslam Kasani (1863-1930).

The daily Habl Al-Matin was a liberal, reformist, and patriotic papers, publishing information and political commentaries. . . The freedom of the press liked in Persia following a establishment of the Constitutional federal government prompted Habl Al-Matin's management in Calcutta to start a daily newspaper in Tehran.

The Iranian communities in India were close to court and some them known as different Identify in these countries, for illustration; Mirza Abu Taleb Khan (1752-1806) is one of the travelers to Asia, Africa, and European countries. 'Pursuing his Western sojourn, Abu Taleb's exceptional Shi'ite pilgrimage through current Turkey and Iraq further enhances his meditation on the face between Islam and European modernity'. He published his itinerary in Persian Safarnameh E Talebi (Journeys of Talebi) in London, 1814, and reprinted by Sona Publications, New Delhi, 1972. This publication was a remarkable recovery to familiar Iranian to European life's picture. In Iranian literature he presents an Iranian that has ken speckle by origins of his daddy, Isfahan. Iranian called him Mirza Abu Taleb Isfahani which his family name relates him to be from Isfahan a big city locates in center of Iran. In other hand he presented as an Indian Travelers who 'implemented his father in to the service of the Muslim rulers of this region, the Nawabs of Awadh. The politics vicissitudes of eighteenth century India, however, induced the family to decamp to Bengal, where Abu Taleb experienced the supervision of the Uk East India Company, then beginning to establish its rule in that province. ' It indicates at the same time a person known as two different nationalities. There may be more examples of these kinds of similarities that could examine close relations of two nations.

The similarities could be seen also in modern theatre stream, because of origin of New Theater was from the Europe which set aside traditional theatre and made a new form on inexperienced program. However the review could make clear similarities when examine from a wide view indicate modern theatrical courses in both countries, but by examine information on advancement of modern theater and understand the dissimilarities, then can attract a picture of evolution quality of modern theatre in two countries. The picture signifies the new theater how could frontward in seam stream but different situation and ethnical platforms. The progressive of both countries gloated to such words; independence, nationalism, criticism, etc. and shown of such of these crucial identification in Modern theatre, however the different track record of traditional theatre and cultural understanding, led those to deal with different point for theatre at end. This chapter has effort to examine and express those factors.


Examine of traditional theater's place in front of folkway, really helps to better understanding of the backgrounds structure of accomplishing arts in this research. Before preceded to the development of modern theater in Iran and Bengal, a glimpse analysis will made a definite picture, because the traditional theater in Iran and India has an extended history but different record and stood through to different opinion systems. Origins of traditional theatres are not clear however in continue, it appears religious beliefs was the major factor of traveling traditional theater in content and guidelines. Corresponding to evidences, faith ceremonies and rituals were based on carrying out activities. Richard Schechner signifies the theatre might have a ritual origins;

'Rituals are performative, They are really works done and performances are ritualized, these are codified, repeatable activities. . . Rituals emphasize efficacy: healing the unwell, initiating neophytes, burying the useless, teaching the ignorant, developing and cementing communal relations, maintaining (or over throwing) the status quo, remembering days gone by, propitiating the gods, exorcising the demonic, maintaining cosmic order. Theatre stresses entertainment; it is opportunistic, developing wherever and every time a masses can be collected and money gathered, or goods or services bartered. Rituals are performed on plan, at specific locations, no matter weather or attendance. '

At From Iran, faith was rose on worship of one god, Ahoora Mazda. Zoroaster was the prophet and brings the Ahoora Mazda's text messages through the holy e book Avesta. Some area of the publication performed caroled as dialogue.

'As such the dialogues of the Avesta (ca. 1000 BeE) may be considered as a source for, if not really a form of, this ritual spiritual drama as may 'Taziyeh-Khvani' or Shi'ite religious tragedy. '

In pursuing Zoroastrian glorified the god with more vocal rituals and less doing. Religion didn't try acknowledging and allowing propagating ritual performance which latter reduced executing activity from religious rituals.

'Over time some of these contextual ritual enactments became divorced from their religious meaning and they were performed throughout the year. '

The Music accepted by Zoroastrian, as a soul purifying, but faith had no idea about theatre, which was performed in courtroom as entertainment for king.

'The official responsible for the performers at Sassanid judge was the Khoram-bakhsh (the joy-giver), who accountable for all entertainment, including minstrels, storytellers, musicians, and acrobatsIt may be inferred from these Chinese language explanations that similar shows also will need to have taken place at the Sassanid judge, where allegedly 12, 000 maidens served at the judge of Parviz as singers, dancers. '

Latter after Islamization of Iran, new faith had not 'especially' good idea about performance. In Islam, whatever leads the person towards God and goodness is lawful, whatever leads them on the devil, and badness is unlawful. Thus cannot say that the theater is lawful or unlawful in Islam. In fact, this thoughts and opinions is is determined by the theatre's message, function and content. In addition, the effect of those ideas is visible clear during Constitutional Trend, that will discuss about in next discourse. In this era unlawful music and theater were legal for kings who nobody could lay claim against him.

'Like the Sassanid kings the new Islamic rulers of and in Iran also amused themselves with the shows of minstrels, performers and musicians, as well as acrobats, magicians and pet trainers. The Arab caliphate and the courts of its provincial governors drew heavily on Iranian types of amusements, culture and courtroom standard protocol. '

However, world was a suitable bench which clergies could expand the energy of faith against unlawful' entertainment. The commentary on the holy book, Quran, caused to make the strong distance between theater and religion. Thus the secular performance falls to cheap value and may prohibited in front of religion, but merely theater as tragedy like Taziyeh, became lawful for pass on religious massages in the united states.

'Religious epic storytelling received a massive raise with the establishment of Shiism as the state of hawaii religious beliefs of Iran in 1501. At that time, most of the population of Iran had not been Shiite, although there is basic veneration for the Shiite Imams. However, the Shiite meaning needed to be out there to get souls as a required supplement. . . What Shiism needed was a ritual built on existing values that would be attractive and had the actual to mobilize the masses, for Sunnis still experienced the quantities in the early 1500s. '

Nonetheless, secular and enjoyment entertainments were ignore before 'Sharia', that leads performers and spectators to hell at end. Even though the Taziyeh acquired a polytheistic value for a few fanatical Shiite market leaders and they did not accept any sort of performance.

'In the mid-twelfth century an Islamic 'E book of Mirrors' explain that singing shouldn't be done by women and children, not be associated with the harp, lute and Iraqi flute, rather than contain any obscenities. '

Based on those beliefs, traditional theater especially secular sorts persisted in the narrow highway. Scholars were strange in touch of traditional theater as well as in such manners there is absolutely no theory effort for understand of theatre aspects by scholars.

In the contrary side, India presents an alternative picture, because Architect of Theatre is religious beliefs itself. Crisis descended from heaven, then developed and shielded by Gods which society accepted all types of theatre varieties with exhibiting admirer and passion. It generally does not need much work to prove the original theater is so close to religious way in India. Bharata in his publication Natyashastra summarize a myth history, what was the primary purpose of creating of episode by Gods, and then why they delivered it to earth for humankind.

'Indra, delegated by the other gods, approached the throne of the Godhead, and said: "O Brahma, we desire to feast our eyes and ears over a remarkable spectacle; deign to generate the merry play for our satisfaction. " And the Creator nodded graciously, and fell into a profound meditation. And from the Divine Thought sprang the Natya Veda, that is, the Veda of the Theater. '

In fact, the storyplot is not far from real values, because Hindu faith did a perfect effort to support of theater at whole proportions. In next ages, theater in India gained the powerful result in all contemporary society levels, which possessed religion signification. It is a point that presents a major different between view of traditional theatre in Iran and India. In addition it notice in India are present a complex ideas, methods and classifications ideas around theatre in the Natya shastra which is the holy book of performers. Bharata in the reserve clearly disclosed the trick, that theater brings massage of mercy from Gods to humankind. This notion triggered the writing of Natua Shastra, which articles powerful Theory behind theatrical elements.

'These are 'include diverse issues like dramatic premise, people, auditorium, poetics, acting, language, dance, music, instruments, halloween costumes, the religious service to be performed before beginning of the take action, different kinds of drama, poetics, style and abilities required of different character types like the stage director, comedian, courtesan, lead actor and celebrity. '

In India, Traditional performance acquired a good fortune than in its neighborhood country, Iran. Experts in India drive theater in contemplated techniques drawn by previous scholars. They assumed happiness is the key system of performance and evils should be away on level.

'Bharat Muni desired that crisis should also become instrumental in resulting in intellectual and spiritual development of spectators apart from providing them entertainment. '

In other way in Iran the theater itself got a diabolic sprite, for illustration; Justin Perkins (1805-1869) who was simply the first American missionary during his activities at the Iranian city Orumiyeh, reported on Apr 11, 1835

The Persians aren't very keen on such [i. e. , theatrical] entertainments. A German ventriloquist was here, not long ago, and the individuals ascribed his performance to the immediate company of the devil and treated him with equivalent abhorrence.

In Iran tragedy form of theatre experienced endured by faith, but Bharata ignored demonstration of tragedy content on 'holy' stage. Playwrights should choose dramatic theme, from historical or mythical stories with some alterations and love be, the major theme of usually all the works. Drama also backed and esteem religious-societal manners, so mention in Natya Shastra: The hero, the ruler and Brahmins speak in Sanskrit while women and lowly people speak in Prakrit words.

'It is thought that when Brahma created the Veda of episode, he gave this gift idea to the sage, his hundred sons the task of putting this form into practice. Dilemma was to symbolize folks from all strolls of life and be accessible to all. Its aim was to teach and show by dramatizing reports that could carry people attention through their depiction of the experiences of life in all its variety, from warfare to intimate sensuality. It had been to otter "good counsel" and "guidance to people'

Following of Gods' mercy, Bharata Muni identifies 15 types of drama ranging from one to ten functions. The rules for stage design are laid down in some detail. Specific chapters offer with aspects such as makeup, costume, acting, directing, etc. 'Rasa's (emotional responses) offers wide-range expression ability to celebrities, so dimensions of your perfect life can be carrying out on stage according those methods, which considered in Natya Shasta. Stars could touch spiritually of behind truth of theatre and get near hero's life with following orders. In reverse of India, in Iran newer existed the classification theory to drive theater in a certain way. The Taziye which grew under religious consider, produced by audience enthusiasm and of religion-government support and it forwarded to next decades. Actors were not professional and had not theatrical knowledge that signed up with just for religious passion.

In India Gods and Goddesses can be found on level, through those testimonies that perform on stage. Awareness of holy' incarnations of Goddesses creates a powerful interconnection between spectators and stars as medium, which seems totally of level as temple. Hence, the stage became a worship place and Gods mercy became present at that time for the reason that particular place.

'The Gods and the Goddesses, being dancers themselves, have been moving the art work of the heavenly party through many other human stations, whose aptitude, understanding, and personal idiosyncrasies normally varied from person to person.

In the Taziye celebrities called Shabih, (Imitation) which means that who pretend to show Imitation of someone else.

'The word Shabih, which is the formalist description, is more detailed than the term Taziyeh, but both have around the same connotation (Religious Tragedy and Mourning). Thus, the players in Taziyeh are called Shabih as imitation is an element of their performance. '

Actor (Shabih) does not make close internal feeling with the type, so make the distance between itself and identity during whole enough time of performance. Stage is battlefield between holiness and evil, thus Shabih cannot plan one of those extreme. He is merely a guy on the earthy earth. The Play cannot help him to get close to sky' but let him to see suffered of the holy man and his family then crying. Hence may God forgiveness him for his sins following this earthy life. Thus, actors and audience are just spectators who see a tale of battlefield between extreme of holy and evil. They stay on ground and there is not mercy at the time of performance but merely its hesitation situation about the sadness tale.

Those factors show different approach and explanation of traditional theatre in both countries. These basic and show of traditional theater in both countries reveal different level of consider in confrontation of undertaking arts to social beliefs. Traditional theatre in Iran understood as the earthy world art. Theatre cannot help gain any spiritual level in the earthy life which might also spoil the incorporeal gathered. However, in India performance emerged down from heaven as present of Gods for humankind and executing or observation of the theater can flaming the spiritual passion as spiritual experiment.


One of the important different items between two studies areas is Political-Social situation before penetrated of european theatre in consider areas. When new theatre imported to Iran, Qajar dynasty ruled across the country. Naser al Din Shah was the fourth king of Qajar dynasty (1848-1896), also two more Qajar kings ruled under political hurricane until next dynasty, the Pahlavi (192-1979). Naser Al Din Shah and his first best minister, Amir Kabir got a significant role in establishment of european modernization.

He [Naser al Din Shah] curbed the secular vitality of the clergy, introduced telegraph and postal services, built streets, opened up the first university offering education along Traditional western lines, and launched Iran's first newspapers. He was the first Iranian to be photographed and was a patron of photography who acquired himself photographed hundreds of times.

Before Naser Al Din Shah, his progenitor Fath Ali Shah (1797-1834) dispatched a diplomat and few students to European countries. Mirza Abu'l asan Khan Ilchi, was first diplomatic envoy to Great britain in 1809 because the 1600s. When he moved into at England cannot believe that much of advanced methods of technology and liberal activities. In that time he seen the huge different between both countries such as establishments, culture and arts. He wrote a journal under the name of ayrat-name-ye sofara (The Book of wonder), in 'which he marveled at the amenities of modern western life'. It had been not only his consider but also Naser Al Din Shah dropped in the same stream during traveled to European countries.

In England Mirza Abu'l-asan started to learn British and became able to converse in it. His progress is shown by two characters written to the anonymous British lord which were published each day Superstar of 29 May 1810. The characters give a fascinating insight into the mind of Mirza Abu'l-asan and his ideas on English society Apart from a number of official characters, ayrat-name-ye sofara is the only real work written by Mirza Abu'l-asan The reserve is written in the usual florid design of the time and illustrates many of the situations. . . Five portraits of Mirza Abu'l-asan were decorated during his Western journey.

Although by such as contact with west, can be found the political idea between intellectuals and elite in critic of the king's electric power which was described before as shadow of God on the earth. Independence, parliament and election were new words; which slowly and gradually spread its explanation behind the modernization process by the Shah.

'In the old age of his guideline, however, he [Naser al Din Shah] steadfastly refused to deal with the growing stresses for reforms. He also awarded some concessionary privileges to foreigners in return for large repayments that gone into his own wallets. In 1872, popular pressure required him to withdraw one concession affecting permission to create such complexes as railways and irrigation works throughout Iran. In 1890 he made a much greater problem in granting a 50-time concession on the purchase, sales, and processing of all tobacco in the country, which led to a nationwide boycott of tobacco and the withdrawal of the concession. '

Apart the observing progressive style life in Europe also Iranian traveller, consider on theatrical subject matter. Mirza Abul Hassan's reserve offer impressive observations on the modern performance civilizations of London. He presents complex conversations of opera and ballet at the King's Theatre and a performance of King Lear at Covent Garden.

'During his stay static in Britain, Mirza Abu'l-asan was asked to many plays and operas. After joining the opera of Sidagero al the King's Theater in December 1809, he remarked: Dancers and sweet-voiced singers appeared one following the other to entertain us, operating and dance like Greeks and Russians and Turks. ' He found satisfying the well-disciplined crowed at the theatre. 'It is amazing that although 5000 people may gather in the movie theater, they don't make a noisy sound. On that night a historical ballet entitled Pietro II Grand by Signor Rossi was performed. '

Before Mirza Abu'l-asan also the traveler Mirza Abu Taleb Khan Isfahani who mentioned before, during 4 years in 1799-1803 traveled to Europe and Asia. He considers on theatre subject matter in his book 'Safar Name Talebi';

'Mirza Abu Talib viewed the trip to playhouses as "sensual work" (Mashghalte-Nafs) and had written a detailed information of your playhouse in Dublin, describing the arrangement of the stage, chairs, spectacles, and spectator. He even drew a detailed blueprint of the playhouse. He was often supported to play- properties by Neglect Garden, whom he described as a "fanatic in religion and used to the patterns of old London, '

In addition Students who sent to Europe by Iranian kings, in exchange expanded the western idea in own country. Many of them charmed at new culture so they tried out to improve Iran's face as development country.

'Mirza Saleh Shirazi, was one of the first students to be delivered to London, published admiringly of his coordinator country, demonstrating the methods of new trends occurring in Britain. Like many after him, he returned to Persia to learn a pioneering role in producing european ideas and creating modern institutions like a paper in Persia.

This kind of connection with european countries, made passions elite, and teach people imitating of american method in all kind of modern culture and culture levels. The radicals' idea also rose throughout that time. Akhond zadeh the first playwright in western style possessed radical progressive ideas in various cases. He composed the proposal in 1863, which defend, of changing Persian alphabet into Latin alphabet. He claimed this can help to neglect superstitions and traditional qualifications then at the earliest opportunity methodology the modernity. His idea never accepted by rulers but he asked a fresh alphabet to persist on his way. Those documents show, those Iranian who travelled to European countries were interest in theatre as intensifying aspect. However, it had not been possible to grow them love of theater into general population. Thus new theater got limited perform for court and aristocrats young families. The Shah was the major supporter of this movie theater style. He explain his observation the theatre in England in his journal;

After eating evening meal, sunlight was still up, and we went to the theater. There were many people in the roads. When we arrived at the theatre, we ascended many steps, approved through the lobby, and sat in the pack in front of the area where they performed works. It is a sizable theatre, one of the constructions of the Emperor Nicholas. It includes six levels, and in each level, there were women and men. There was a huge chandelier clinging from the middle of the movie theater. . . . The curtain proceeded to go up and a strange world appeared.

When Naser Al Din shah go back from Europe, made a decision to change, so import western techniques and Ideas. He was alluring of traditional western arts, especially photograph and theater. As mentioned in Iran's chapter then he bought a Western style theatrical hall in 1852 but until 1873 not used. New theater brought in to Iran through of judge for king's entertainment. Armenians also attempted imitation of western theatre but it might not have an impact on the Muslim world, which was the major community, and ignore such as activities.

There had not been only judge sponsored Modem Movie theater in Tehran, for the Armenian community also continued using its theatrical activities. At night of Feb 21, 1887, lots of Iranian officials, almost all of them mounted on foreign embassies as well as a variety of Armenian retailers and craftsmen and other people attended a theatrical performance at the Armenian school.

In Iran, new theater from access, the first performance in Dar al Fonun it got more than 30 years until become a dynamic broadcast in public. In following during Mashrooteh the idea had switch and new theatre fall down into society and tried to get approaches among general population activities.

In other hands, India got different situation during time of appearance of traditional western theatre. England expanded his colony in the united states by established authorities implemented of business purpose. Western systems such as papers and print out machines imported by Englishman. American system education that set up became the chance to get acquainted with traditional western for Indian who resided in higher casts.

British, created the British legal and justice system, sorted out a formidable civil service, provided modern armed service training and corporation to a basically medieval army, re-organized the antiquated duty system which acquired persisted since Emperor Akbar (circa 1600), set-up an export and transfer system largely for their own profit but never the less as a basis for future trade, built one of the world's greatest water irrigation system in Pakistani Punjab, created a rail and highway network to assist in transport but also to give food to the growing transfer/export trade, expanded the old education system to add universities and colleges of higher learning and unveiled the traditional western dress code in India.

India experimented the whole modernization changes under electric power of colonization. They haven't any choice to accept or refuse of this kind of development. These development drove under pressure of foreigners who has no idea but only thought themselves benefits. England prepares those trends for its advantage because without developed India, they cannot exploit more of the colony treasures. Englishmen became symbol of american and expansionist thus whatever was belonged to them could not accept as Indian quality. It is simple to imagination Indian folks of that point how much love for freedom' what was the same in Iran. However here is big different between meaning of the term 'liberty' in Iran and India. The Bengali's desire to be free shown behind the modern theater which could trace from beginning until indolence.

In endeavoring to subvert political theater, the history of Bengali theatre has been distorted. Its historical context has not only been remaining un-discussed but also disregarded, to the detriment of re-interpretation of your theatre history. We have seen historical treatise being written where Rabindranath Tagore's efforts have been immediately linked to Sisir Kumar Bhaduri's and then has been followed to Shombhu Mitra and Bohurupee.

Although freedom could achieved when the Uk who were the key junction of western world to India, forgotten the united states and maintained them idea for themselves only. Abundant traditions was the gravity point for Indian which finally The Quite Movement could follow and led India to the indolence. The powerful of the ideas could obvious in the first choice of movements Gandhi's life;

He found the villages as the main of the real India and marketed self-sufficiency; he didn't support the industrialization programs of his disciple Jawaharlal Nehru. He lived modestly in a self-sufficient home community and used the original Indian dhoti and shawl, woven with yarn he previously hand spun on the charkha. His political foe Winston Churchill ridiculed him as a "half-naked fakir".

In Iran as reviewed in previous discussion, freedom was an brought in quality which ruined power of ruler who was thought as shadow of God in throughout the annals. It had been passible only in following the traditional western ideas and aspects in all levels such as politic, which decrease the king's ability and create parliament, culture, research, education, etc. Iranian top notch people had virtually no time for understood and critics of the wests intensifying aspects, then modified into Iranian cultural ideals as will discuss latter. Although there have been fights between spiritual- traditional ideas and improvement ideas, which some time changed way of democracy. Thus, Iranian in general accepted the freedom which could be passing merely through the western's thought. Because traditional thought experienced supported the ruler therefore manners which inverse also king was the faith supporter. Thus fall into traditional thought could not solve problems rather than brought liberty. The helping of kingdom by faith is clear after Mashrooteh when Reza shah who defeated the Qajar dynasty and wished proven a republic federal government.

Reza Shah (Reign 1925-1941) created the foundation of a fresh Iran where people would participate in constructing the future of their homeland. He now called for establishment of any Republic, and his educative system started a massive advertising campaign for a Republic. However, the idea of a Republic was fiercely opposed by the powerful clergymen and the feudal landlords.

In other palm, India under colonization experienced the heavy presser of colonial guideline on its shoulder. Around development was in progress, then freedom vanished behind those activities. Thus classification of freedom' not be following the european development but be stand on own foot and tradition. Indian enemy had not been own king, these were foreigners who expropriated them land. Definitely this psychologically distance, helps Indians to critic, decided and then selecting those elements from of western aspects which, is necessary for themselves.

2- Playwright

This review not occurred in Iran. Dramatic literature imported in Iran along with modern theater. This american aspect acquired no equal similarity in Iranian books. Modern theater was completely different of traditional theater, in form and style. The part as European defined was a new aspect in Iranian theater. In the traditional theatre, improvisation was an important element for actors, which, they could proof them potential by knowledge of atmosphere of the time of performance. Toumar, the Taziye's script was merely a assortment of verse dialogs. Level was completely split from literature. Actors were absolve to perform expression as they thought. Reading of western Plays, enthusiastic Iranian writer to imitated traditional western writers then tried out on own skill. These activates brought on to exist a new position for a writer, the 'playwright' which, had not been described before in Iranian theatrical terms. Playwright became an independence position of copy writer who was absolve to mix other literature aspects such as storyline, literature, history, verse, and then put together the text that called the play. At the time of can be found the first Iranian play in 1859, Akhundzadeh who posted some 'Tamsilat' or comedies developed on the types of MoliЁre and Shakespeare, concerns the play as moral education for community. This judgment was important at the manners of supporters like Mirza Aqa Tabrizi who published the first modern secular works in Persian in 1870. That they had exchanging letter collectively that disclosed about, Akhundzadeh published

. . . the goal of the artwork of crisis is the refinement of the character of the people and the edification of the viewers and listeners. . . . Today, these varieties of writings are not useful for the nation [It means following past style writing]. Today, the writings that are useful for the country and agreeable to the flavour of the readers are the play and the novel I am hoping you will spend much time to the noble skill. . . and that you will make great improvement and will become a guide to your compatriots, those who discuss your language, and your co-religionists in this art.

In this letter Akhundzadeh wants clarify the benefits and manner of playwriting that was not are present before in the country. The Mirza Aqa Tabrizi's takes on never staged at his time. There is no information about his contemporaries who may follow and wrote the play after him. However before constitutional revolution all of the sudden modern theatre came out in public areas with extreme passions. Playwriting was a situation which allowed freelance writers to try them skill. They tried out to exhibitive among conservatives that theater is necessary for a world. Against of critic spiritual and traditional though, they provide known reasons for morality education that is one of the top parts of the civilization which done by theater. Though there was no more this kind of play at that time in Persian, thus version was a way to convert European text messages into Persian value that was understandable for destination culture. Thus Persian playwriting could convert the european elements into Persian takes on and bring until decades latter. Because of lacks of research and practice in this field playwrights cannot build the modern day issues on american style.

Other plays compiled by Iranian playwrights for modern theater were influenced by traditional Iranian theatre (taqlid) for the reason that they used drama as a medium to criticize sociable conditions and the get spread around of modern ideas. The private Baqqal-bazi dar hozur, for example, has criticism on the administrative reforms presented by the reforming Primary Minister, Mirza Hoseyn Khan Sepahsalar (187173). Apart from the title itself, the items itself also shows how dilemma of the traditional Baqqal-bazi type was used in this fashion. Iranian playwrights would continue to do it even in the twentieth century.

It seems rather than concern to improve the playwriting style and coordination between content and form; they attempted to target only on the emails of has. Thus the top elements of writing evolution were dismissed by playwrights. It was that part that ought to contacted by practice and this opportunity was happened just after coming new style theater into public.

In other hands India have an extended theatrical traditions. Sanskrit literature acquired teach important playwrights such as Bhasa and Kalidasa who became internationally known in previous century. in opposite of Iran playwriting was not a new field in India. It had been not no more than drama but also for all theatrical aspects. Natya shastra by Bharata mentioned and describe whatever theatre must forward on strong basic. Bharata describes 15 types of theatre ranging from someone to ten works. The key points for stage design are laid down in a few detail. Individual chapters deal with aspects such as cosmetic, costume, behaving, directing, etc. which accompanied by strong and important facts about Sanskrit theater

It is composed of sacred material

A specialist should see it

It should be performed by users of the priestly caste, the top rank in the hierarchy of the caste system

Its execution requires special knowledge and skill

Training is a hereditary process coming from father to child and descending directly from God

Special skills are essential to execute theatre, such as party, music, recitation and ritual knowledge

It should be performed on consecrated ground

Its purpose is to captivate as well concerning educate

The principles implemented during ages as holy orders by all different costs in India. Theatre was an important part of culture, thus when western theatre introduced in India, this custom allows Indian to received conservatively near to the western theatre. Thus theatre stood on social passion and little by little accepted like nationwide arts. Indian elements transferred to western theatre by practice by privet theatres before made an appearance in public. The change could track by following documented in catalogs.

European plays imported to India for British entertainment that residents provided for their own recreation. British, which were resolved in India for years and years, built own clubs, entertainments, and theatre that was the important Englishman behavior. They built also playhouse for traditional western style performances. Stars from England journeyed to India for while of accomplishing;

The playhouse opened under English management, and the first has performed there were in English. In a short time however, the Offer Road Theatre was named a perfect locus for Indian theatrical shows.

Those theatrical activities were specifically for English people. There have been no cultural connect between two countries. Englishman used the own patterns and Indian continuing on own customs. British people cannot penetrate into Indian community until formation a fresh Indian societal course. In 1835, Thomas Babington Macaulay, articulated the goals of English colonial imperialism most succinctly;

We should do our best to form a school who may be interpreters between us and the millions whom we govern, a school of persons Indian in bloodstream and color, but English in flavor, in views, words and intellect.

The new school people were touch with British culture as well as Indian contemporary society and studied in English academic institutions and universities.

Since the first United kingdom schools in India - run by missionaries - had been founded around 1820, the number of British-educated Indians was growingIn addition compared to that; Indians had create Hindu Colleges providing British education as well, e. g. mathematics, natural sciences and Traditional western philosophy.

In Calcutta, Hindu college or university had a major role to upbringing educated who were got familiar with British since and literature and drama. The opportunity let Indian informed people to touch the western details through the safe way, which they could, reviewed the westerns idea with much like Indian traditions. Western theatre was one of those interesting that they got close to gradually. It soon revealed the Bengali's expertise when the young Indian, Baisnav Charan Auddy played the role of Othello in 1848.

The time 1848 noticed a landmark performance at the Sans Souci. Othello was performed on 17 August. The title role was performed by an Indian for the very first time. His name was Baishnab Charan Auddy. All of those other cast was Western, as regular. The newspapers didn't know how to react to this example, but overall commented favorably on the actor's diction and training and admiringly on his courage and self confidence.

May the key reason why newspapers didn't want discussed on this subject in public areas, was the huge distance that was mentally between foreigners and Indian. Both English and Indian consider the length between each other. Finally the paper covered the news headlines;

One newspapers (Bengal Harkaru, 19 August 1848) summed up somewhat melodramatically: "Shakespeare, exiled from the united states he honors a whole lot looks for an asylum on the Calcutta planks.

Educated, elite and Babus became familiar with new theater. They read Shakespeare takes on also other american playwrights. Dwarkanath Tagore, (1794-1846) associated with Chowringhee Theater which within 1813. Sans Souci theater also was one of the famous places at the time, which founded in 1839. Dwarkanath Tagore, Motilal Sil, and Radhamadhab Banerjee were who added generously for built the theatre. Those activities were personal. Stage was under expert of English plays and Bengalis hadn't such as activity until the time of Lebedef who broken the wall. From when Lebedef performed the first Bengali theater before first public theatre in 'National Theatre', there were many attempts of these theatrical activities by Bengalis. 'Love is the very best Doctor' was the junction point between european theater and Calcutta in 27th November, 1795 again on the 21st March, 1796. A genuine entertainment theatre show up on Calcutta level;

It was a noteworthy feature about the display that everything was at Indian fashion the level, the arrangements for the seating of the audience, vocal and instrumental music, though European instrumental music had not been completely excluded. Passages from Bharat Chandra's Vidyasundar were set to music for the entertainment of the general public. All that we know of the works is that they were taken up to suit the flavor of the Indians who "preferred mimicry and drollery to plain grave stable sense, however purely portrayed" as the Russian pioneer phrased it. The translation received the benefit of revision by many "learned Pundits, " and with the help of 'Goluknat Dash, ' the linguist, stars of both sexes were recruited from the Indian portion of the individuals; it was a great innovation as this was the first time when actresses came out in women's role on the Bengali level.

Thus it came into being that though certainly he was the pioneer of the Bengali level; he had not that impact which might have been expected from such exceptional beginnings. Unfortunately there is absolutely no evidence to prove why the Theatre had only two performances, but the play was greatly popular. It appears society was prepared to accept this theatre style performance but 'due to some inexplicable and secret reasons the play didn't run for more than the two successful nights observed above, and Lebedef, strangely enough, appears to have left off of the site of the drama completely. ' After Lebedef, theater sustained through of private societies which put Bengali writers to try them talent in the new way. Students, who studies under guide of English teachers, got familiar with western dramatic books specially Shakespeare and other european playwrights' takes on in original terms.

In an other situation to Iran, India possessed a rich dramatic literature which helps Indian to get discreetly near western theater. Sanskrit literature got grate playwrights such as Sudraka, Bhasa and Kalidasa which, these backgrounds stunned audience in a Sanskrit translation into British.

There was great passion and on Dec 28, 1831, at the Beliaghata garden house of Prasanna Kumar, was staged Uttara Rama Charita [of Bhavabhuti, 8th century] translated into British by Professor Wilson who, on concluding his translation, said he would rather call it a remarkable poem. It had been staged in part along with the last function of Shakespeare's Julius Caesar; this truth deserves comment. It could have been that with all the admiration that the group noticed for Sanskrit theatre, they discovered that the knowledge of the new type experienced created in them a demand that your indigenous books.

Other theses kind of theatrical activities prolonged in private residents of wealthiest Bengalis. Jutra the traditional theatre form of Bengal was a suitable platform because of this kind. A theatre, belonging to Nabin Chandra Basu, who was simply wealthy resident of Shyambazar, was started as early as 1833. The Vidyasundar which is a charming poem of Medieval Bangla literature based on the love between Vidya and Sundar dramatized and staged in the resident;

Who dramatized it, or whether it had emerged whatsoever from the Yatra stage where Vidyasundar was a repeated theme, we have no idea; but some inventions were attempted, and these were received with eagerness by the audience. More than a thousand persons, and of different nationalities, went to the performance which lasted from 12 at night to about 7 each day.

The opportunity of translation of Sanskrit and Bengali performs to British and perform on level, made an abrupt aware comparison between such features which was not before clear. The propensity of actuality in western takes on was the particular Bengali authors want to perform on stage but Juta and Sanskrit takes on had not this type of quality. The poetic terminology of Jutra cannot help them to review of true to life on stage which was necessary to help Bengalis to comprehend the situation of himself in the modern day days. As the necessity was presser to them shoulder then the western style theatre received more penetrate to Bengali's style performance.

The demand for new methods of entertainment will need to have called forth the creative activity of the authors to conform themselves to the British form, or alternatively the european model. Many poems were called Natak [The Play] in those days, however they were so only in name. Prem Natak by Panchanan Banerji of Shyampukur, Prabodh-Chandroday Natak by Gangadhar Vidyaratna, and works like they were poems in simple fact and really should never mislead even the careless audience into thinking that these were prototypes of the modern drama.

Hara Chandra Ghosh was who forwards one step more to keep this way although nothing of his plays never came out on level and placed just on paper. His adaptation received distance from the original British paly and 'determined to put off the western original and got to an episode from the Mahabharata in the idea that its sublimity wouldn't normally fail to charm even to the westernized brain, the mind of those who received English education in university and colleges and were acquainted with overseas literary models. ' The British preface of his publication shows that the prior work, Bhanumati Chittavilas (1857) was popular and sold well.

In 1852, I publicized my vernacular crisis of the Merchant of Venice that was written at the suggestion of your (sic) European friend of native education. . . . However the avidity with which the work was received by the general reader, specifically by those whose curiosity was fired up to see the Vendor of Venice within an oriental dress, induced a notion that the work has been considered acceptable, and this if a similar look at were made, it could not prove abortive.

It was a progressive work which had also looking to corroborate his Ideas by viewers;

The subject after that i have written is of great interest, and the change which includes been carefully launched in it, being totally new, and agreeable to the approved style of the present day literati of the united states, and no aches and expenditure having been spared to render the task useful, and acceptable, I indulge in the anticipation that it will meet the approbation of the audience.

It seems his work proven by Bengalis literati people because he continuing his work by publishes another translation paly, Charumukha Chittahara, rendered into Bengali from Romeo and Juliet, and posted in 1864. He attemptedto introduce the european model through his own structure, though, as there is no evidence of his works having have you been staged, he could haven't any practical affect on the theater of the united states except in the sense of experiencing created a tastes among the visitors of his literature. After passed this course, Bengal was see of Sanskrit has which translated into Bengali and mixed with american style. Those plays perform in front of european and Indian audience at wealthy Bengali properties.

The audience was combined, many Western gentlemen were invited to see the performances, and the music group from the Fort William dished up the Vidyotsahini Theater [1855] as its orchestra. The implication of these two factors should be properly understood, for, in the in any other case eastern atmosphere, they desired to impart a fresh build; the novelty of the music and the necessity of explaining the play to the Europeans and making them interested got both their significance and must have influenced the fine art of those who had structured the show.

In following, Michael M. S Dutt (1824-1873) translated the Bengali version of Ratnavali to English. Next thing was bigger when he publicized the play Sharmishtha (1859) in Bengali as well as English version. Immediately the play became popular. He had written more has by successfully demonstrating the techniques of European dramaturgy and finally found the key point; he detected on the type of the Indian drama and made a decision to cast his work in an alternative mold. its recorded in another of the words written while involved in speaking about Krshna Kumari(1861) which has been declared to be the first historical and tragic dilemma ;

We Asiatics are of a more romantic convert of mind than our European neighbours. . . . In the fantastic European crisis, you possess the stern realities of life, lofty enthusiasm and heroism of sentiment. With us, it is all softness, all romance. We forget the World of simple fact and imagine Fairy-lands. The genius of the crisis has not yet received even a moderate amount of development in this country. Ours are remarkable poems; and even Wilson, the fantastic foreign admirer of the ancient vocabulary, has been compelled to confess this. In the Sharmishtha, I often stepped from the way of the Dramatist, for the of the mere Poet. I often forgot the real searching for the poetical. In today's play After all to determine a vigilant safeguard over myself. . . . I shall endeavour to build characters who speak as aspect suggests rather than oral cavity mere poetry.

His modern day playwright Dinabandhu Mitra (1830-1873) published Nildarpan (1860), a real story of oppression by indigo- planters [which effectively handles the ruthless exploitation of Bengal peasants by the powerful English indigo planters in rural Bengal. ] This play was resulted of attempted from Lebedef time until that point. Bengali dramatic books finally found its way to make the Bengali play based on reflects of fact issues of modern time. This was a continuously initiatives by writers to deal with the native remarkable form. Nildarpan later performed on open public stage and became an uproarious play.

In Iran enlightened who were passions in modern theater had never considered capacity of traditional theater which may use as program for western theatre. Although at start Iranian playwright conceder of use capacity of traditional theater and write has as broadcast them announcements, however the point is they had no other choose. Because they didn't make an effort to understand structure of western has then convort it to Persian ideals. It isn't clear those theatrical activities between the first performances in Dar al Fonoun before appeared modern theatre among public. Even though some record show the prosperous aristocracies build own theater and perform the translated works but it was unusual and also solution price for folks was high. Other point is, they adopted entertainment idea in theatre passion, and thus there is not incitation to effort for playwriting.

Aziz al-Soltan even built his own theatre in 1889 and he staged a performance there on April 17, 1890. Everybody were required to buy a ticket at a cost of 4-6 Tumans per couch. The amount of money he provided to 'Ali Akbar Khan Mozayyen al-Dowleh, the royal painter (Naqqash-Bashiy, who recently had staged theatre performances for the shah. Mozayyen al-Dowleh also educated marching music to 'Aziz al-Soltan's musicians. In every the actors performed 3-4 has and also performed gymnastics for the public. What is of further appealing is the fact that Moslems now also began to respond in the modem European plays.

After Mirza agha Tabizi who had written the first Persian play the next effected person was, Morteza Gholi Khan Fekri Ershad )1868-1917). Three of Tabrizi's four plays, written in the 1870s, were at first published erroneously under the name of Mirza Malkom Khan (1833-1908) who was simply a prominent Iranian modernist, in Berlin in 1922. It not clears why Tabizi didn't disclose his name at the preface of has. His identify was detection when scholars latter acceded to the Akhoondzadeh's archive then found Tabrizi's works which was mounted on his characters.

Although Fekri Ershad's takes on are technically more advanced than those of Tabrizi, they are really focused on similar designs. In his preliminary plays people are identified like story rather than remarkable and energetic. The Language has not enough solidarity and movement which could exhibit characters functions and thoughts. Although he centered on details of sociable issues alternatively than Tabrizi, thus copy writer knows perfectly his plays personas and they're believable personas in the play.

In compare to Bengal, in Iran the playwriting hadn't evaluated by Iranian writers during time of imported western theater until ages latter when modern theatre became popular among general public. There is absolutely no constantly writing experience between Tabrizi and Ershad by other authors. Ershad begins the writing regarding technical details from where that Tabrizi starts off before. It seems there is a huge distance between both of these progressive authors which, proofs no person didn't tried to develop technical writing. Effect of traditional theater which is clear in Tabrizi works has visible also in Ershad has. It means there is no research to understand structure of western play and then designed to Iranian prices. Ershad like other theatrical people in that time got closed to theatre for use it as a crucial weapon in front of traditional ideas in politics and interpersonal levels. Indeed, Persian episode has remained primarily a vehicle of interpersonal criticism since these early efforts, although later playwrights created more sophisticated and experimental works. The study on this part shows lacks of theoretical and practice research to understand western theater capacities. It point out western theatre moved into to Iranian public stage so hurriedly by intensifying writer which this example deprived a patient research of adaptableness things of western theater into Iranian culture. Now could be time to verify the time of public theatre in Iran and Bengal.

Also We Can Offer!

Other services that we offer

If you don’t see the necessary subject, paper type, or topic in our list of available services and examples, don’t worry! We have a number of other academic disciplines to suit the needs of anyone who visits this website looking for help.