The March of the Flag Summary

Keywords: the march of the flag brief summary, march of the flag

Albert Beveridge, a keen imperialist, was campaigning for the Indiana senator couch in 1898 when he supplied The March of the Flag speech. The speech, that was published later in the Indianapolis Journal, was pronounced a month after the putting your signature on of armistice. The talk targeted at promoting US imperialism both as a divine and nationwide objective that originated with Thomas Jefferson. In the speech, he used religious rhetoric and invoked God eleven times to appeal to a audience. The audience expected politicians to know the Holy Scriptures and got divine Providence as Manifest Future. He envisaged the US going for a colonial which he defined in terms of an divine quest.

Running as the get together of prosperity, economic steadiness and the precious metal standard, Republicans acquired the 1896 presidential election. William McKinley easily defeated the populist Democratic prospect William Jennings Bryan, having received enormous campaign efforts mainly from big businesses. He was to usher in a long amount of republican dominance in the county's politics. During the period, Cuba was experiencing a humanitarian turmoil and the united states intervened by attacking Spain in April 1898, quickly acquiring Cuba, the Philippines and Puerto Rico. However, in the Philippines, it took a long and brutal battle to quell mounting internal rebellion. If the speech was being delivered, the position of the new territories had not been settled. Throughout the speech, Beveridge submit the theory that the US was obligated to increase civilization to the conquered territories as a key platform for bolstering American economical strength.

The speech aimed at celebrating American win. However, behind the excitement lay a burning prefer to counter the critics of the imperialist move who Drink referred to as "they" in the conversation (paragraph 10). The critics, who constituted the fantastic proportion of the electorate, were adamantly opposed and very reluctant to embrace an idea of any imperial America. The talk starts with adulation of his country in epic terms (paragraphs 1-3). Later, he sets across the main issue behind the advertising campaign in paragraphs 4 to7: the decision to or never to pursue an imperialist insurance plan. In paragraphs 8-11, he justifies his country's pursuance of the imperialist coverage and answers objections of anti-imperialists. The objections, he says defies the notion of patriotism and celebration of America's electric power.

Beveridge's first debate was founded on the actual fact that his county's geographical position provided it political and economic power - in conditions of resources, size and location dividing "both imperial oceans. " This assertion implied that America's superiority was beyond that of all European powers. In paragraph 3, he refers to misconception of the western with regards to the unexplored land or wilderness (paragraph 3). He mentions the heroes of expansionary wars and sets forward a mythic observation of the american conquest of the 1840s (paragraph 7).

Beveridge's third discussion centres on racial superiority. He alludes to the "blood" (paragraph 2) and evokes the feeling of vitality associated as evidenced by the virility of the country's "multiplying people. " In his view, the upsurge in American human population is sue with their virility and is also not related to immigration: this illustrates the mythic methodology that America gives to its problems. Leader Roosevelt would pose as an energetic and virile man on several situations. This cult of make, ability and energy suggests a Darwinian twist in Beverigde's ideas.

He also uses spiritual arguments to progress his notion of imperialism. Reading through the speech, you can be forgiven for convinced that it is a piece of O' Sullivan's Express Destiny. Really the only variation is the fact Beveridge's religious propositions were largely indicated in a clinically inspired dialect. To his country, the elegance of God is feels as unavoidable. He later refers to "nature's legislation" in regards to the divine determinism in that way directing his argument in a pseudo technological reason of imperialism. In paragraph 5, Beveridge contributes yet another dimension to his argument-that of an historical objective of "duty". This implies a normal puritan idea of stewardship as restored by the Gospel of wealth through the Gilded Years. Stewardship aimed at civilising people and transforming them to Christianity at exactly the same time.

Along with the decision to stewardship arrived the necessity to extend democracy to those recognized to be "oppressed". Ironically, the freedom that the American liberators could bring didn't go as far as extending freedom to all or any. Beveridge phone calls it "guidelines of liberty. . . self-government. "

Beveridge's insistence on the sense of quest blankets what is a major preoccupation for his country - economical predominance. In paragraph 6, he uses the word "reward" in mention of the parable of Ability. That is a clever matrimony of religious economical rhetoric. In his view, rewards were to come in form of new riches and markets- a concept prevalent in the Gospel of prosperity that takes riches for God's blessing. This implies that the real target behind imperialism is indeed commercial supremacy. The recurrence of what "domination" and "power" in previous paragraph are indicators of this reality.

Contextually, the getting close to elections were his country's short term preoccupation. In the long run, the preoccupation was if the new territories would be annexed to America. Beveridge sought even more territories to be annexed after the Philippines. His stand was that the ideals of the North american Revolution were not contradictory to the insurance policy of annexation and the views of these surviving in the annexed territories. To him, the colonised were second-rate people who couldn't benefit from the values of North american Revolution in equivalent strategy to the People in the usa. This was a set rejection of the idea of equality (paragraph 8-10). The constitution shouldn't follow the flag- i. e. the annexed territories shouldn't enjoy the constitutional entitlements of his country's constitution.

His racist state of mind clearly involves the fore in section 10 when he represents as second-rate the people of foreign lands as "savages and alien populations". He envisaged a colonial America governing the new territories since Great britain achieved it to America. Besides, he explains that the Indians' experience offered ideas concerning the way to handle the conquered. In obviously distinctive wording of "we" versus them, he's against assimilation of those "savages" with the mainstream People in the usa (paragraph 8). His mentality correlates well get back of southerners for the blacks prior to the Civil Warfare. Finally, he defends the Philippines conquest as a rampart to the then greedy competition for territories by world forces stating that if US didn't undertake it, other forces would do so.

This article is without doubt a special event of American mythical and heroic founding. It features an explicit show of pressure and brutality: economical domination of conquered territories, virility of the American populace, racial competition and accumulation of prosperity at the expense of conquered territories. It evokes the sensation of American supremacy since its founding and the brutal materialism that continues to define American way of life down to the present. The vocabulary shows both cynicism and naivety. The militant party served to persuade the deeply cynical electorate to yank in the direction of imperial America. It is naive to the actual fact that such imperialism deeply violated the ideals of America as a nation, a fact that cannot resonate well with not only the electorate but also the leftist leaning statesmen of that time period. To best drive his point home, he insisted on syntactical habits and repetition of words to bring the audience to his point of concentrate. His recurrent use of questions and answers provided the talk a polemical quality and appeared like a dialogue with his audience. This especially made the cynical audience examine its stand with every posing of your question and providing of a suggested answer. The conversation is highly representative of a crucial and decisive instant of record in the making of American region, recording in great colour the prevalent ideology then. The conversation brought out the natural fusion of condition coverage and Biblical injunction (religious beliefs). Implicit in the conversation is the ideology that the non-white world was inferior and struggling to govern itself. It therefore needed the benevolent Us citizens' "civilizing affects".

Also We Can Offer!

Other services that we offer

If you don’t see the necessary subject, paper type, or topic in our list of available services and examples, don’t worry! We have a number of other academic disciplines to suit the needs of anyone who visits this website looking for help.

How to ...

We made your life easier with putting together a big number of articles and guidelines on how to plan and write different types of assignments (Essay, Research Paper, Dissertation etc)