This essay will provide you with an overview of contract law, contract legislation cases and how contract legislations is used today. There are also examples of agreement law cases and some free law article examples. If you wish to see more types of rules essays, then visit our free essays section.
What is Agreement Law?
The legislation of deal is a set of rules governing the partnership, content and validity of the agreement between several folks (individuals, companies or other institution) regarding the sale of goods, provision of services or exchange of pursuits or ownership. While this is a wide definition it does not cover the entire ambit of situations where contract legislations will apply. The reason for this is due to the vast number of examples where contracts can come up in everyday routine.
Contract regulation has been more formally thought as a promises or set of promises which the law will enforce. Another definition and a somewhat rivalling view, is a contract can be an agreement giving go up to obligations which can be enforced or acknowledged by law. Either description confirms the participation of the law by using enforcement, suggesting that should there be an infraction or breach of the terms of the contract then your aggrieved get together may seek recourse via the Courts. As is observed above, a contract can happen is a plethora of cases; from buying a loaf of breads in the corner shop, to the sales of a house. It really is unsurprising therefore that certainty is needed before the Courts will intervene to enforce any agreement. The law of deal has confirmed the essential foundations of any deal, irrespective of its difficulty and substance, which it must contain to make the contract enforceable in legislations.
There must be an offer and this must be accepted to make an arrangement. While this would in the beginning seem to be self explanatory, it is important to distinguish between what regulations says sums to a valid offer. An offer can be made orally, on paper or by way of conduct. Regardless regarding the types of the offer, it's the willingness or goal of the individual making the offer (the offeree) which is of importance, and that is clearly subjective. If a person says that I wish to sell this orange for 1. 00 but mistakenly advertises it for 1p, and that provide is accepted, a valid agreement will be upheld. Simply because there was a mistake in the offer, it generally does not invalidate the contract. There is an intention to market on the part of the offeree. It's important to distinguish at this time however between an offer and an "invitation to take care of".
Struggling with your agreement law article(s)?
Did you know that we can assist you with your deal law essay and any other laws essays?
- An exact, 100% original response to your article question
- From a qualified, graduate rules writer
- Delivered confidentially by email, in 3 time - 10 days and nights (you choose)
Stop battling and receive the help you need from the UK's preferred learner support company, right now.
Learn more about our essay writing service.
Parties may enter preliminary discussions or pre-emptive talks before getting into a contract. The issues they cover won't necessarily form part of the contract and are considered to be invites to treat. A vintage example of this is actually the produce on screen at Supermarkets and on shelves. The price highlighted amounts to an invitation to take care of only. The offer does not materialize before goods are taken to the checkout and the purchase price confirmed. At that time the customer can accept the products and pay the total amount, thereby completing the business deal and formalizing the deal. An identical situation is evidenced in auction rooms, where the offer is manufactured when bids are put forward by possible purchasers and approval after the auctioneers hammer falls.
Just as important in agreement laws as the offer, is the legality of the approval. This must be an unqualified expression of assent to the terms associated with an offer. An acknowledgement of offer wouldn't normally amount to approval, nor would a statement of intent. There must be an obvious unequivocal communication of acceptance of the offer on the conditions put forward by the offeree. Any try to amend the conditions of the offer would amount to a counter-top offer. This would then position the parties back again to square one and the offer would be open for acceptance with the offeree becoming the offeror.
The need for contract rules here may well not be clear initially. Contract legislation not only governs what happens when the agreement breaks down, but it addittionally establishes the actual conditions of the contract are, in case of a dispute. As the contract may be self explanatory in what the parties plan i. e. you pay 50 and I'll give you this washer, there are of course terms regarding the time of repayment, delivery, condition of the goods etc that need to be established. The main terms are of course the quality of the goods and the method of payment. Certain pieces of legislation will import terms into the contract without any acknowledgement or agreement between the functions that they will be so included. An example of this is actually the Sale of Goods Action 1979 which means that in sales to consumers by anyone throughout an enterprise, that the products are of satisfactory quality, fit for his or her purpose and correspond to their description. Deal law helps to protect the customer without his knowledge. The saying usually exhibited at checkouts regarding sales and offers, "This will not impact your statutory rights" identifies such implied terms.
The offer and popularity are the visible conditions of the agreement, but perhaps even more clear is the requirement of thought. This term refers to the exchange of money for goods or services, or something else of value traded between the gatherings. It is also possibly the most complex and contentious of the requirements for a valid agreement. Without some type of consideration, the agreement is only a promise, which is unenforceable under English Law. But it is not enough that the parties get this to exchange of value, it must be "valued" consideration instead of inadequate consideration. This concept of "valued concern" refers to something that is capable of estimation in terms of financial or value. Furthermore it isn't enough that such account has taken place in the past, there has to be contemporaneous value through exchange to make a formal agreement. These technicalities have led to a raft of case law upon the issue of what amounts to account, hence the value of contract legislation to mediate any dispute.
With the arrangement between several people verified as an arrangement, made up of an offer and approval, and the exchange amount to money or something in money's well worth, there must be the requisite goal to produce legal relations. While in a commercial transfer it would show up clear that the functions to the agreement designed to create legal relationships, in a far more relaxed and casual setting there could be a question over how serious the parties were being? This will not imply that individuals i. e. consumers are free to return goods on the basis that they were never alert to the intention to produce such legalities. The Courts may bring an inference from do and common knowledge that shoppers are well aware of the binding dynamics of any contract to get goods or services. What we are discussing is the scenario where one party mistakenly believes that there surely is no formal motive, and the other get together has knowledge of that problem but fails to tell them. The Court docket will apply a target test to consider all the reality of each individual case. An instance relating a pupil barrister who accepted an offer from a Barristers Chambers was held to be a binding contract between the trainee and the complete chambers, not simply the pupil expert. The absence of specific intention for the rest of chambers was irrelevant. There was clearly objective from the do of the celebrations.
More informal contracts between co-habitants moving into a quasi-marital relationship can result in dispute, particularly upon the break up of that romantic relationship. Historically there was a question about whether a contract would form when the "stay at home mother" would find herself without recourse via matrimonial legislation. The agreement was said to relate with the offer to be maintained forever by the hubby, which was accepted, and the consideration would be foregoing the to earn a living and/or providing a home for the family. Really the only question was associated with the formal intent of fabricating legal relationships, a hurdle that many women cannot overcome. While substitute remedies in collateral exist to remedy such a circumstance, it is a useful illustration of how purpose can negate what at first instance appears to be a valid agreement. Needless to say, the most apparent way to ensure that any arrangement shows the objective of the functions is just to write it down. A affirmation of "This contract is not came into into as a formal legal agreement" may possibly suffice.
This basic overview of regulations of contract shows its importance and need to stay in touch with modern innovations. Another section will offer more completely with this matter in conditions of the opportunity of contract rules in every day lives but it is reasonable to state that the necessity for this protection is fundamental. An unknowing party can enter into a contract without having to be fully alert to the implications. The introduction of legislation like the Unfair Contract Conditions Action 1977 and the various Consumer Credit Serves have all progressed from the basic principles of contract rules and the rule of placing the celebrations on as similar a taking part in field as is feasible.
Where is Contract Rules used today?
As was mentioned above on several occasions, contract legislations permeates our day-to-day lives, and often we have no idea of its occurrence. While legally licensed individuals may be aware whenever a contract comes into existence and take note phrases such as "the client uses this at their own risk" with a wry giggle, nearly all society lives in blissful ignorance of how deeply indebted to deal law these are.
In the first occasion it would be a useful exercise to list a few of the various instances of contract law coming into play when we might not exactly expect it.
- Public Carry - every solution bought on the bus train or on the underground forms a contract. That is a deal of services and nearly all terms will be implied alternatively than share. If one was to convey the whole set of terms on the trunk of a solution regarding the obligations of the professional of the transportation to the client, it would cause a bit of paper resembling an education sheet from Ikea rather than a ticket.
It should be pointed out here that such express conditions that form part of the contract must be present at the moment it was joined into. The terms of importance will most likely be on display either around the stage where a ticket is bought, or it'll direct the client to a full list of the conditions somewhere else.
- Employment - every employee must have a deal of employment with the employer. While it is an undeniable fact that some employers have not bothered with the formality of drafting a report aiming the rights and anticipations of both celebrations, the Employment Privileges Function 1996 will infer lots of basic rights for the worker in any event. The offer and approval of going for a new job is confirmed, as is the awareness (days be employed by a times pay). The intent is not necessarily so obvious but the relationship the agreement creates leaves no room for talk concerning its formality in a legal sense.
- Any purchase of goods or services - while this is handled in more detail below, the sale of goods or services is the most basic form of contract. While we may well not appreciate the scope of regulations and its impact upon a basic purchase of e. g. a new car, the conditions and conditions of sale, the various bits of legislation importing terms and the situation law stretching back again more than 100 years on similar issues all have a bearing after a customers (and suppliers) rights and obligations. It really is of course uncommon for anyone to be made aware of all the conditions around and the "small print" usually protects most things of relevance.
- Buying a house - most individuals who have become involved in the conveyancing process will remember the strain of looking forward to the solicitor to verify that they have "exchanged deals". While the ownership of a property in Great britain & Wales can only just pass by way of deed, the contract is pivotal. The deal will set out the conditions of sale, like the price, items of furniture and fittings that are being left behind and the night out of completion. After the purchase is completed and the monies paid, any concern which may be taken between your parties should be raised as a breach of deal. While in the majority of circumstances the axiom "Caveat Emptor" (buyer beware) will apply, the precise terms of the agreement must still be satisfied and depending after the severe nature of magnitude of the breach, this will dictate the appropriate cure available.
What can be seen above is the fact Contract Rules is everywhere. Through the purchase of a newspaper in the morning to the service of gas and other resources, there exists a agreement to govern most romantic relationships outside the domestic scenario. It is understandable therefore that area of legislations may be the most diverse in its impact after everyday activity, yet its ideas remain relatively straightforward. There are of course intricate issues and certain types of agreement (acquisitions and mergers, share holders contracts etc) require specific rules to govern their request, most contracts have a quality which allows them to operate without the knowledge of their living.
The most important and commonly used contracts are those relating to the purchase of goods and services. The Sale of Goods Action 1979 and Supply of Goods and Services Act 1982 are suffering from from a backdrop of Caveat Emptor, where consumers were unprotected from retailers able to peddle goods that were less than of merchantable quality. As the image of "Del Youngster" flogging various items out of your suitcase springs in your thoughts, it was actually the larger and additionally used suppliers of goods that got the brunt of this legislation. We described terms as to quality and fitness above, and a multitude of cases have removed so far as the House of Lords to ensure the protection granted under a contract is enforced. We have deals for the deal of goods whenever we do our regular shopping, buy a fresh kitchen appliance or finally get that pair of shoes. Similarly long term contract for the supply of services exist in the cords service for it, the mobile phone company or the plumber who comes into fix the leak upstairs. Nonetheless they are manufactured, the contracts that people are get together to are numerous and often we aren't specifically alert to our obligations under them, save to pay what we've agreed to.
While we've focused on consumers and specific contracts, that's not to say that we now have any fewer agreements that exist between companies, corporations, charities or even governments. Most companies will have several contracts for the assistance it obtains from others i. e. cleaning, wedding caterers, accountancy etc. You will see contracts of work with every member of staff, as well as contracts with each shareholder regarding the money they have got invested and the dividends received each period. They'll subsequently have contracts with the customers who maintain their services, or even other companies via merger or distributed services within a more substantial agreement. That is a non-exhaustive list but a good example of how contract laws not only creates the foundation for the partnership between individuals, companies etc, but also regulates their protection under the law and responsibilities and ultimately provides a solution in case of a dispute. The range of this area of legislations clearly has no limit.
Contract Law Circumstances - Examples
Carlill v. Carbolic Smoking Ball Co (1893) 1 QB 256 (CA)
This case involved the accused company who produced and publicized smoking balls as a preventative solution against influenza and the normal cold. The advertising campaign stated that they would give 100 to anyone who used the product for 3 x a day for 14 days but still contracted one of these illnesses. The accused also explained that they had positioned 1, 000 in a bank account to show their sincerity. Suffice to state that the claimant took up the challenge and after approximately eight weeks of continuous use she contracted the flu. Mrs. Carlill claimed the 100 however the defendant refused to pay; they stated that there is no contract set up on her behalf to enforce the case.
This matter progressed to the Court docket of Appeal. The defendants looked after that there was no intention to produce legal relationships and the advert amounted to only an invitation to take care of. At no level do the claimant tell them that she possessed accepted their offer. Nevertheless the Court of Charm confirmed that there is in fact a contract in effect between the functions. This example amounted to a "unilateral agreement" whereby one get together offers money in exchange for the performance of any stipulated work. Whereas normally an advert would total only an invitation to treat, the request for the performance of act made it an offer. There was no requirement of Mrs. Carlill to see the defendant that she acquired accepted it, the undertaking of the task was tantamount to acceptance.
There were quarrels from the defendant that the wording of the advert was too vague for this to total a contract. There is always a need that the details of the offer are exact so as to avoid misunderstanding. While there was some range for interpretation, the Courtroom implemented a literal meaning to the advertisement, which simply declare that providing the claimant had taken the smoke cigars balls continuously and then contracted any of those illnesses she'd obtain 100. The first deposit of 1, 000 into an account was a demonstration of the defendants interpretation and determination to rely upon their product in light of this challenge. The Judge possessed no hesitation is finding in these specific circumstances that there is a contract under which the claimant was scheduled 100.
While this case demonstrates the way the law of contract protects the get together who in good conscience allows the terms submit by the offeror, it remains something of anomaly. This situation would only be enforceable where in fact the offeree was necessary to undertake a particular task, thereby eliminating the necessity for communicating popularity and transferring an invitation to treat into a formal offer. Gleam lessons for the naЇve or careless when setting difficulties and making proposals to others. A deal can arise even though the intent was to make an informal offer, but in the absence of a specific statement to that result, the conduct of the offeror may infer the requisite legal intent.
Coward v. Electric motor Insurance providers' Bureau (1963) 1 QB 259 (CA)
In this matter Mr. Coward and Mr. Cole were work acquaintances who acquired an layout regarding distributed lifts to work. Cole would drive his motorbike and Coward would drive pillion in return for a weekly amount of cash. Regrettably both were killed in a road traffic incident and the wife of Mr. Coward made a lay claim for damages from the real estate of Mr. Cole. However Cole's insurance policy didn't cover pillion people as his estate experienced no property or money to meet the common sense, Mrs. Coward pursued the Electric motor Insurance Bureau (MIB).
The MIB have an agreement whereby crashes and consequential promises would be satisfied by the federal government in circumstances where in fact the driver does not have any relevant insurance plan of insurance. However the rules covering this situation require Mr. Coward was transported for "seek the services of or prize". Consequently Mrs. Coward needed to prove that there was a contract set up between Coward and Cole for the lifts to work.
There was evidently an offer of move and this was accepted. In addition the consideration exchanged by the get-togethers was the service of transfer and the amount of money paid by Mr. Coward. However there was a question over how formal this set up was in order to total an intention to build legal relations. Once again this matter advanced to the Court of Appeal and it was made the decision that notwithstanding the standard payment of profit return for the lift up, it was not so formal as to create a contract. There have been no terms as to how long this is to previous, what would happen in default of payment or the option of carry, or anything on paper so as to at least make their objective clear.
The practice of colleagues sharing a lift to work (or "car pooling") can be an accepted and endemic practice. Parties will usually concur that one will need their car and in exchange the others will make a contribution for the petrol costs. This is usually a subject of convenience, reducing costs or even a conscious decision to reduce emissions from each independently going for a vehicle. It cannot be said however that the agreement is so formal as to form a agreement for the provision of this service. The compare is to a past example, that of open public transport. You can find no tickets, conditions or conditions of agreement and no business or profit making group is involved. There can be no obligation after people in this scenario to ensure that travel is always distributed around the party that pays. What would happen when who owns the vehicle continued holiday or there was a change change? In these circumstances an component of good sense must come into play. A lot of people will make casual agreements which range from car pooling to picking right up children from institution or even being the specified driver over a night out. Nothing of these build a deal as the objective is one of casual assistance or a shared benefit, never to create legal relations.
Olley v. Marlborough Court docket Ltd (1949) 1 K. B. 532
Mr. Olley frequented the hotel belonging to the defendant. He had not made an beforehand booking and after arrival requested an area for the night. He agreed upon the register and there was no point out at that level of other terms or conditions that may impact after his stay at the hotel. During the course of his stay Mr. Olley discovered that someone had broken into his room and taken certain property including a hair coat. It consequently became known that the accused was negligent with regards to the security within the hotel. Nevertheless, the defendant sought to rely upon an exclusion clause that was positioned in the bedroom the claimant stayed in. This explained that the hotel wouldn't normally accept responsibility for lost or taken items owned by customers.
The question was whether the exclusion clause that was displayed in the bedroom constituted a valid term of the agreement. It had been not disputed that there were all the mandatory components to for the agreement i. e. offer, approval, consideration and intention, but that was not to say that the terms the hotel searched for to rely after could actually be enforced against Mr. Olley. Once we mentioned above, conditions must be taken to the interest of the customer, consumer or party against whom they want to be enforced at this time the deal was came into into. Otherwise it would allow get-togethers free will to add other terms at a later stage, albeit if the customer had known of such a term they might have decided never to enter it in the first place.
The Court chose that the deal was entered in to the moment Mr. Olley arrived at reception and agreed upon the register. That was the point when the area was offered to him and he accepted. Intent was not a concern and in account of the contract, he would get a room to stay for which the hotel would acquire payment. The actual fact that repayment would usually come following the stay was irrelevant. Therefore Mr. Olley had not been given notice of this exclusion clause until he had already entered into the contract and therefore it was unenforceable against him.
Similar examples of this problem of notice and timing of the terms of any deal can be seen where clothes are ordered and notices wanting to exclude liability are placed on the receipt. The example of public transfer above and the terms and condition associated with the travel must be stipulated at the relevant time. It should be described here however that the actual notice of the terms need not be something that is brought to someone's attention each and every time they enter a contract. If there is a course of coping or repeated business, and in a previous business deal a term was brought to the attention of the customer, then they could be presented to own been made aware of it and it becomes a term of the deal. If Mr. Olley got remained at the hotel on lots of previous situations, it could have been difficult for him to dispute that he previously no knowledge of the exclusion term. In such circumstances it is arguable that he'd have been considered to have had knowledge and the hotel may have relied upon the term within the deal.
Adams v. Lindsell (1818) 1 B. & Ald. 681
This circumstance concerns the approval associated with an offer and the importance of how that approval is communicated to the offeror. Here the accused offered to sell the claimant fleeces of wool for a certain price. They wanted that the response be made by post. This letter was misdirected by the accused so that it was not received for 3 times after it was delivered. The claimant made a decision to acknowledge the offer and responded on a single day. This is published on the 5th September but not received until the 9th September. Nevertheless the defendant decided on the 8th September that as they had not received a reply decided to sell the wool to another person. The claimant argued that a contract have been created as he previously accepted their offer.
The Court verified that the delays were completely the problem of the offeror. Had the notice been posted properly then this circumstance would in all likelihood not have arisen. Furthermore the agreement was created on the 5th September when the acceptance was published, not when it was received. As the agreement was not communicated to the offeror, it could not prevent the contract being created. To choose otherwise would be to prevent agreements being created by post completely. It would often require (in this scenario) the claimant to hold back until the accused experienced received the offer and then written to him saying that the terms were agreed and so on. This technique of popularity was thereafter known as the "postal rule".
In distinction the offer itself can only just be communicated to the offeree via the post once it has been received. Any pre-emptive discussions or discussions are likely to amount to only an invitation to take care of pending the formal offer.
While there has in a natural way been some development in this area, the most obvious issues arise with the creation of the internet and on-line shopping. The majority of people with usage of the internet have purchased something at onetime or another. The question as to the development of any agreement here's when will that contract arise? While it is not important to look at the legislation and circumstance law for the reason that particular area (which is great) what is essential is how this example of a seemingly antiquated rule can be implemented into a new and totally unforeseeable system through the medium of contract law. As the guideline itself remains relevant to postal orders via catalogues and other postal services, the advancement does not stop and await something new to take its place. The law of contract in this field requires modification and version to meet the demand of e-commerce and a population moving towards carrying out nearly all household and cultural affairs through the internet. Protection for the unwary or even experienced surfer of the web, when getting into agreements on-line is obviously an important function of modern deal law.
We have seen how contract legislation permeates every portion of our lives. From job, to conveyancing or even to social and recreational activities such as buying a glass or two in the pub, deals are created all around us. While the majority are temporary and the terms fairly easy and unobtrusive, breaches of such contracts may be enforced with all the current force of the law as with the more serious forms of deal.
The public belief of deals is often deceptive as many have never found it necessary to enforce such terms. As we reside in a capitalist population with freedom of preference, the necessity to ensure quality often negates the necessity for a consumer to enforce their protection under the law as to quality and fitness under a deal of sale. Standards are maintained by Government bodies and independent organizations i. e. BSI. The consumer rarely gets the need to enforce breaches of contract, and even if they do, merchants are so alert to the protection under the law of people that they'll allow an exchange of goods without question. It is more regularly that not (certainly in today's financial environment) that the conditions as to payment are enforced by suppliers and retailers in default of the agreement more frequently. Issues of credit are popular at this time and the deals that regulate the borrowing of money against property (hire purchase) or just under an over-all agreement (bank card) are being breached every day. This is actually the other aspect of the gold coin for contract legislations. There are conditions and conditions for both celebrations. This is actually the essence of the legal contract, the exchange of awareness without which there is nothing more than an unenforceable assurance.
The rules of contract must change with the innovations in economics, technology and public attitudes. It is usually a subject for Parliament to intervene and legislate for new situations and introduce legislation that will govern particular human relationships and the contract that occur between them. It really is impossible however to legislate for many potential eventualities as a predicament may come up that was not foreseen, or the technology, issue or romantic relationship that it was intended to regulate may have shifted. It is then for the Courts to interpret the law so as to find the answer to any dispute. This is how contract law was in 1818 with the case of Adams v. Lindsell and exactly how it will probably continue to be for the near future. As the variety and range of contracts continue steadily to evolve and increase, the general principles that people have analyzed above remain suitable. It might be that in a long time you will see introduced something that will create a standard form of arrangement based upon the type and romantic relationship of the gatherings to it e. g. companies or businesses in the same market working between themselves but there will always be the isolated contract, or informal shake of hands that eventually creates a deal and the enforceable conditions it grants to people party to it.
Contract Law Essay Examples
- Contract Legislation Essays - Example 1: Contract Law Essay - In order for the customer and XYZ to be destined by standard terms and conditions there must be a couple of criterion filled. These conditions should be treated as exclusion clauses because they are the extreme conditions to be enforced. For these standard conditions and conditions to be enforced there needs to be a valid agreement, which means that four requirements have to be satisfied. A valid contract must have the following elements; offer; popularity; consideration; capacity; and purpose. These are within this deal when XYZ offers his work and the client accepts verbally or on paper. Addititionally there is intention because there is an understanding that XYZ will arrive to work on a certain day and the client can pay a certain cost, which is evidence of consideration as the client reaches a disadvantage. This is a valid agreement, nevertheless the next area to explore is if the exclusion clause and standard conditions apply because the customer has never worked with XYZ and at the verbal contract point does not suggest what his typical conditions and conditions are. Read more. . .
- Contract Legislation Essays - Example 2: Contract Rules Essay - To be able to establish what the type of the ultimate contract is, between the hotel and A, it is first essential to find the 'offer' and 'acceptance'; the constituent parts of any agreement. An offer has been presented to be always a affirmation which objectively (I. e. to a reasonable observer) signifies that the person making the 'offer' is prepared to written agreement on the terms specified in that offer (Gibson v Manchester City Council). It could at first perception, show up that the hotel's website and advert for the accommodation at the specified price was an offer. This, however, is false, as it has been held by the courts that advertisements are usually 'invitations to treat' alternatively than offers, as the advert usually lacks the other essential ingredient of a agreement; an intent to be legally bound (Partridge v Crittenden). This principle is set up in order to safeguard the marketer from incurring liability in deal to everyone who is willing to purchase the goods (in cases like this, the holiday), at the advertised price. An 'invitation to treat' can be an invitation to the other party to negotiate the terms of your potential deal. A responds to the invitation by causing his initial email enquiry, which can in the same way be classed as an invitation to treat, or simply simply an enquiry. Read more. . .
- Contract Legislation Essays - Example 3: Contract Rules Essay - Customer B may be able to count on undue effect, the main case being Country wide Westminster Lender v Morgan where it was held the claimant should never suffer from express disadvantage. Undue affect simply means unfair pressure on a celebration when building a contract. The shop may claim there was no special relationship between the get-togethers, in which case it is for customer B to establish this (Williams v Bayley). Following decision in Lloyds Bank v Bundy, the question may be whether there is 'inequality of bargaining strength' the shop acted as an agency for the HP financers. Read more. . .
Also We Can Offer!
- Argumentative essay
- Best college essays
- Buy custom essays online
- Buy essay online
- Cheap essay
- Cheap essay writing service
- Cheap writing service
- College essay
- College essay introduction
- College essay writing service
- Compare and contrast essay
- Custom essay
- Custom essay writing service
- Custom essays writing services
- Death penalty essay
- Do my essay
- Essay about love
- Essay about yourself
- Essay help
- Essay writing help
- Essay writing service reviews
- Essays online
- Fast food essay
- George orwell essays
- Human rights essay
- Narrative essay
- Pay to write essay
- Personal essay for college
- Personal narrative essay
- Persuasive writing
- Write my essay
- Write my essay for me cheap
- Writing a scholarship essay