Organizational Performance Of Higher Educational Corporations In Pakistan Management Essay

In today's competitive world organizational performance is becoming extremely important for sustainability. Globalization has taken in comprehensive competition between organizations, coupled with budgetary constraints and growing cost of operations. The higher realization of people towards organizational performance has added new sizing to the environment. Budgetary constraints are more pronounced in public sector organizations where in fact the resource generation is bound and heavy reliance is on the government to provide for the costs. In conjunction with these constraints, there exists enhanced focus on organizational governance.

These sizes have led to increased general population accountability across the world. In the past, business organizations were those people concentrating on the performance and success. Not-for earnings organizations especially general public sector organizations were excluded from it as it was thought that the governments are in charge of preserving and providing the assistance to general public through such organizations.

In recent years, the idea of new general population management is among the most cornerstone of federal policies and open public sector institutions are expected to follow good governance, transparency, accountability and personal sustainability through efficient and effective performance. In growing countries like Pakistan, with source of information constraints, the need for good performance in educational corporations has become extremely crucial for their sustainability.

Another important development that is witnessed by higher education in Pakistan is the mushrooming of private sector higher educational institutes. These institutes have earned their money generated through private donations or through industry linkages. These institutes are in a position to attract certified and skilled recruiting and employ them to attain competitive advantages, which unfortunately the general public sector institutes have been unable to do so up to now. These private sector institutes also have brought with them the performance focused culture which again regrettably is absent in the public sector institutes.

It is clear that the bigger education environment has modified considerably during the last couple of years and with an increase of business like attitude prevailing in the sector; a new style of authority is popular. The competencies which were once characteristics of the business enterprise world are actually becoming important prerequisites for educational market leaders as well (Boyett, 1997).

In Pakistan the overall regulatory body for advanced schooling is the bigger Education Commission rate (HEC) established in 2002. The establishment of payment came due to the years of underinvestment in the field and also the realization that advanced schooling is needed to fuel the financial progress in the competitive globalized world. The overall activity of the percentage is to ensure quality, and improve advanced schooling and research in the united states. Keeping to its mandate commission rate has considered various revolutionary steps of making certain the higher educational institutes in Pakistan stick to the product quality and show performance within the budgetary provisions. The strategic seeks of the commission rate are supported by well-integrated cross-cutting topics for developing Leadership, Governance and Management, boosting Quality Analysis and Accreditation and Physical and Technological Infrastructure Development.

(www. hec. gov. pk/abouthec/pages/welcome. aspx retrieved on 18th November, 2009).


For days gone by fifteen years there has been mushroom development of colleges both in the general public and private industries in Pakistan. At present there are 132 colleges operating in Pakistan with sub-campuses at various locations. In Rawalpindi and Islamabad alone there are twenty one (21) universities. Out of these 21, seventeen (17) participate in general population sector and five (5) belong to private sector. This physique does not include the campuses of varied private sector colleges chartered by provincial assemblies. (http://www. hec. gov. pk/ourinstitutes/pages/default. aspx retrieved on 20th January, 2010).

For the present study four universities were decided on. Out of these four, two belonged to open public sector namely Fatima Jinnah Women University Rawalpindi and International Islamic University or college Islamabad and both private sector colleges included SZABIST- Iqra University (Islamabad campuses). The selection of these four colleges was done on the basis of convenience and the research workers were associated with these colleges in one capacity or the other.


The high development of colleges in Pakistan has compelled the general public sector universities to change their strategies relative to the framework distributed by the bigger Education Payment. The focus of the colleges is to be competitive for the budget as well as the human resources and also provide graduates that are abreast of changes worldwide and become competitive at the national and international levels. Given the scenario it becomes imperative for both general public as well as private sector higher educational institutes to possess command that adapts to the changing educational environment and needs and pieces vision that help boost the performance and performance of these organizations.

The focus of this study is to investigate the potency of Higher Education Corporations in Pakistan and empirically test their performance. The present research is important from Pakistani point of view as Higher Education Commission is currently emphasizing on quality and has launched an excellent Assurance program for all your universities. In this respect the study will focus on the impact of culture that prevails in our colleges and its relationship with the organizational performance.

The outcome of the study will facilitate the bigger education institutions to recognize their weaknesses and initiate appropriate response ways of achieve competitiveness.


To assess the management style as used by higher educational institutes.

To evaluate the impact of management style on organizational performance.


Following are the delimitations of today's study.

To check the organizational efficiency only four dimensions have been focused upon. These measurements pertain to goal setting, cohesion within the organization, productivity of the organization and communication. There are many variables that contain been cited in the books, but only the above four sizes have been preferred. The primary reason being that performance is the notion of the employees and these four dimensions check the perceptions.

The present analysis focuses upon education sector only and this to raised education institutes. Four institutes were preferred for the study; therefore, we can not generalize the results.

There are various factors that have an impact on the impact of control style on organizational efficiency. In the present research only the command style has been taken and all other moderating parameters have been excluded. If those moderating factors are included the results could be different.

For efficiency only employees have been determined. If we include various level leaders the results could vary because they are the ones involved in strategic planning of any organization.


There have been numerous studies on the influence leadership has on Organizational performance. The exact role of how management influences organizational performance is till in controversy as the proceeding paragraphs will demonstrate. Before proceeding further it is vital to establish what really management means.

According to Robbins (2005, p. 332) authority is the ability to influence an organization towards the achievement of goals. However, Kotter (1990) argues that authority is approximately change which is done through setting up the direction of that change, which is the essential ingredient of leadership. Gibson (2005) features that effective control is essential in attaining organizational targets and to be effective leaders' subordinates should not maintain discrepant views about them.

In a report conducted by Richard E. Boyatzis and Franco Ratti (2009) on executives and professionals of Italian cooperatives and multinational company used competencies specifically emotional intelligence; public intellect and cognitive intelligence competencies for efficiency. The study found that effective executives possessed more initiative while effective managers were more planning focused in the emotional intelligence competencies. Similarly, effective executives obtained higher in networking, self-confidence, persuasiveness and oral communication while effective professionals relied more greatly on empathy and group management. Inside the cognitive brains sphere executives proved more systems considering and pattern identification strategy while middle managers use more conceptual methodology.

The research of Boyatzis and Ratti (2009) has used the competencies to judge the potency of the leaders both at the very top level and at the center levels. Their study is confined and then a small sample thus the results can not be generalized. Second, the sample consists of middle management and top management it would be interesting to study the supervisory levels as the low management also provides control to subordinates. The test can be risen to include various business for generalization purposes.

In their conceptual review Goran Svensson and Greg Timber (2005) highlights that the effectiveness of authority in organizational performance ranges as time passes and also with context. Organizational performance is the results of conscious leadership. The authors are suffering from a model that is based on three components of leadership effectiveness that is well-timed; contextual and serendipitous versus skilful authority effectiveness. The analysis is conceptual in dynamics and thus is limited. The model proposed must be analyzed across contexts to validate the propositions put forward by the authors.

Victor J. Garc±a-Morales, Fernando Mat±as-Reche and Nuria Hurtado-Torres (2008) researched the impact of transformational management on organizational innovation and performance. The analysis was conducted on pharmaceutical companies and for this purpose an example of 164 companies was picked. The results of the study indicate that there surely is a positive marriage between transformational authority and organizational performance. The results also point out that transformational authority is essential for technology which is required for technologically advanced organizations. The study is limited in range as the respondents were the CEOs of the companies. Therefore, the results can't be generalized. Second of all, the test can be widened to add other sectors and not only the technological businesses.

Regarding organizational determination which is recognized as a mediator of the associations of leadership patterns with job satisfaction and performance in non-western country, Darwish A. Yousef in 2000 completed an exploratory study that comprised of 30 randomly picked major organizations in four major districts of UAE. Authority behavior, organizational determination, and job performance were assessed using different scales (i. e; Organizational determination questionnaire, management questionnaire) and it was find out that level of performance, determination and satisfaction of these are high who understand their superiors as participative, implementing or consultative leaders.

Steven H. Appelbaum, Danielle Hebert and Sylvie Leroux (1999) conferred the study study on empowerment and analyzed the sizes of power, organizational characteristics for empowerment (vision, teamwork, discipline and control, support and security), subconscious dimensions (choice, competence, meaningfulness, improvement and trust), and organizational culture and structural factors (role ambiguity, course of control, sociopolitical support, usage of information and resources, participative and non-participative climates). They concluded that a complex and multifaceted ongoing process is encompassed by empowerment and organizational culture in this process plays an important role via organizational mission, vision and objectives. So far as leadership role in facilitating empowerment can be involved, participative or consultative management style was considered favorable as when employees are participated and consulted in organizational development techniques by the leaders they can be intrinsically and extrinsically encouraged.

Competencies for effective command in higher education had been explored by Marion Spendlove lately in 2007 to learn the role of educational market leaders (Pro-Vice Chancellors or Principals of colleges and the competencies necessary for the effective command in higher education. For this function, ten UK university Pro Vice chancellors were interviewed. The results indicate that for effective authority competencies like credibility, experience, people skills were more important. It had been also suggested by the results that these organizations didn't possessed any organizational technique for developing command skills. The study is limited in opportunity as the sample size is merely ten and second the analysis is qualitative in mother nature and based on interviews so biases can be there. To generalize the results of the analysis it's important to improve the sample size.

Alma Harris (2008) studied the distributed command to highlight the positive romantic relationship between distributed leadership and organizational results so different patterns of distributed leadership impact the organizational results. Furthermore, it was also discovered that certain configurations of leadership offer greater prospect of organizational change and development. The analysis also confirmed that artificial barriers to organizational learning can be eroded by sent out management implications. This review can be criticized for not being tested empirically and hence the value and contribution of the analysis would be doubled.

Trudy C. DiLiello and Jeffery D. Houghton (2006) carried out a study on maximizing organizational leadership convenience of the future for the development and display of conceptual model of self-leadership, innovation, creativeness and organizational support. The model also recommended that individuals with strong self-leadership will consider themselves to have more innovation and creativeness potential than those with weak self-leadership. Additionally the former ones will be more more likely to practice innovation and creative imagination when they perceive strong support from the work environment than the those who perceive weak support from the work place. The carried out study have been found conceptual without the empirical screening.

Zhang (1994) studied the leadership qualities of educational institutes in Singapore. The analysis was based on interviews of 200 minds of departments of universities. The results suggest that effective principals are the ones having characteristics and attributes of responsible, adaptable, authoritative, competitive, considerate, stubborn, and reality focused. Zhang's analysis is important in highlighting the traits of effective principals who will be the leaders with their organizations but lacks empirical evidence. The study is based on interviews and thus the results can be biased. Therefore, the results can't be generalized for the training sector so.

In a theoretical analysis of cultural management Trice and Beyer (1991) figured innovative leadership arises in times of perceived crisis where as maintenance command is from secure times. They identified nine cultural management elements from the literature namely personal attributes, perceived situation, perspective and objective, follower attribution, leader tendencies, performance, administrative action, use of ethnic forms and use of custom. The study concludes that ethnic leadership can become more effective if market leaders use and highlight cultural varieties to find alternatives of problems. The analysis is important from ethnical leadership perspective as well as for smaller organizations where market leaders are often accessible to employees. The results can be empirically examined for both smaller and bigger organizations.

Don Adams & David T. Gamage (2008) analyzed the leadership performance in large Vocational Education and Training (VET) institutions in Australia. Teachers and head teachers were selected for this analysis and it was found through results that significant dissimilarities were there between your self perceived authority success of the professors and the top professors. Moreover, results proved that the gender, duration of services as the mind teachers, services length at a post, and educational willpower area did not affect brain teacher's leadership effectiveness significantly. However, factors of workload, insufficient support and training, and the difference between the head professors and the top-management impacts head teacher authority momentously. Command for eye-sight, change, self-confidence, ethics, team philosophies, drive of others, coaching, people management, social skills, information management, specialized currency and organizational knowledge, quality learning surroundings, decision-making and problem fixing and business were the task areas of management which were analyzed in the study. Additionally, the results implied that head teachers were far better in team philosophies, self-confidence and self consciousness, instruction and mentoring, perspective and motivating others and t these were less effective running a business, technical currency, organizational knowledge, quality learning environments and interpersonal skills. Alternatively, the educators were found far better in technical currency and organizational knowledge, decision making and problem fixing, business and coaching and were found less effective in change, self confidence, motivating others and team philosophies. The advised leadership attributes surfaced in the analysis were of the transformational command and are necessary to be complemented by the effective management in business.

In the organizational culture and transformational leadership as predictors of business device performance study, Athena Xenikou & Maria Simosi (2006) examined the partnership between transformational management and organizational ethnical orientations and the joint effect of transformational command and organizational culture on the business device performance. Two ethnical orientations were concentrated in the study which were humanistic orientation (includes human relations motion at workplace) and achievement orientation (includes assumptions, prices and methods on task firm, goal setting techniques, organizational goals, experimentations and emphasis placed on being effective) and were referred to as the predictors of the organizational effectiveness. Employees of an large Greece financial group were the respondents and the results showed that the success and adaptive cultural orientations experienced a positive immediate impact on the business enterprise performance and transformational command and humanistic orientation experienced an indirect positive effect on the performance through achievements. The analysis is limited for partial establishment of the relation between requirements and predictors.

Dorthe Dojbak Haakonsson, Richard M. Burton, Borge Obel, and Jorgen Lauridsen (2008) studied that how failing to align organizational climate and authority style influences performance. Misalignments between the organizational climates were assessed as information-processing demand and the authority style was measured as the information processing capacity. The results proved that both variables are problematic for organizational performance as responded by the market leaders of different organizations. Organizational climates included the internal process local climate (disappointment, tranquil, quiet, shameful, and fatigued), rational goal weather (gloomy, distressed, anxious and furious), group local climate (relaxed, comforted and comfortable) and developmental climate (enthusiastic, excited, happy and thrilled). Market leaders were classified as managers, producers, maestro and leader. The results also showed that including management as information processing patterns, climate and authority styles should be aligned for the command style to provide considerable support for the weather so the organization can implement sound. The study was limited for using the info being collected from the tiny and mid-sized organizations and over the time, these combination sectional data cannot research the consequences of misalignments.

In 2003, Karen Boehnke, Nick Bontis, Joseph J. DiStefano and Andrea C. DiStefano carried out a study about transformational authority for the study of cross-national dissimilarities and similarities. This empirical research led to the principles that manager's command abilities takes on an important role in the success of the global current market and the major finding of the study was that the primary dimensions of authority for extraordinary performances are widespread. Different management behaviors leading towards different performance levels have been discussed in the analysis. It was discovered that transformational management behaviors (visioning, uplifting, stimulating, training, and team development) leads towards beyond goals performances. Transactional management behaviors (rewarding, and instruction) confirmed that performance level satisfies the expected degree of performance and Lassez-faire management behaviors (avoiding) provided below expectation performance results. So, the study acquired shown that transformational authority characteristics are associated with the powerful. The results also confirmed that transformational control symbolized the clear most its related behaviours. So, Organizations can produce exceptional performance through the effective transformational management. The study was limited for using a tiny number of professionals over the countries as it prevents more distinguished research and additionally the primary data collection also limited the study as researchers gathered the studies from the executives for management development course in a workshop and it contributes to the time usage process and ambiguous data as well So, it can be improved by executing the interviews from the executives.

Marguerite Schneider (2002) in the analysis of stakeholder style of organizational management explored the partnership between your radix organizations (have value chain as its relatively fluid foundation) and control analyzed based on organization-environment co-evolution framework. The changing organizations from hierarchical bureaucratic varieties to the new varieties of radix organizations have been discussed in the study and stakeholders model of organizational leadership had been developed which aided in the prediction of leader's effectiveness in organizations characterized by fuzzy organizational limitations, flattened hierarchies, and work related relationships. So that it had been mentioned that by creating and determining roles for goal attainment, leaders would continue to commence buildings. Moreover, market leaders' manners within the radix organizations would persuade the links and interactions as corporation stakeholders have a tendency to join the market leaders rather than following them. As the study was predicated on theoretical conceptual model, no empirical data had been collected and examined. So, this limited the scope of the study and needs the further empirical screening for increased contribution.

Stephen J. Tvorik and Michael H. McGivern (1997) in their review about determinants of organizational performance examined that organizational beliefs and authority factors exhibit a solid affect on performance of a business. On top of that this research promotes the performance model of organizational performance determinants which impact performance variance within the strategic management model. From analysis it could be inferred that a firm is a storehouse of skills and functions which show you the associated resources and leadership styles that progress the business to create a new perspective. The study was predicated on the theoretical examination only so that it can be limited in its characteristics for this and empirical evaluation could enhance the effectiveness of the research.

In the analysis of role of market leaders in organizational learning in mechanisms and instilling values, Micha Popper and Raanan Lipshitz (2000) mentioned the organizational learning in structural and social features. The structural features included the organizational learning mechanisms that happen to be institutionalized structural and procedural arragements and which permit the organizations to collect, assess, store, disseminate and use information systematically related to the organizational performance. The cultural facet includes the distributed values. Therefore the interview based research results discovered that the market leaders in organizational learning context position the organizational learning on the plan as a central concern, build the structural foundations necessary to mould the individual learning in the organizational understanding how to establish the training mechanisms, and create ethnical and internal conditions for effective learning. The analysis implies that leader's style improves the psychological safe practices which reduces the defensive routines and escalates the learning culture based on the problem orientation, transparency, integrity, inquiry and accountability. Also, the leaders can create organizational learning mechanisms as well as learning agendas by devoting their time, attending to and by fulfilling the employees. This would lead to the effective organizational learning and therefore it would improve the performance degree of the employees as well as group. So, market leaders are active members in the advertising of organizational learning. These findings point out a linkage between ethnical orientations and impact of leadership on drive and performance of employees.

Tsang, Denise (2007) in his study of leadership, countrywide culture and performance management in the Chinese software industry explored that success of the market sectors is from the market leaders who align the performance management with the main cultural prices of the collectivism as well as the prevailing best practices of performance management.

J. S. Pounder (2002) in his review about Open public accountability in Hong Kong higher education mentioned that higher organizations have been found under-pressure to make clear the value for money performance. The type of the scales targeted in the analysis highlighted the human being resource management issues regarding advanced schooling in Hong Kong. Organizational self-assessment have been explained utilizing the students, course evaluation and benchmarks, resources, new technology, collaboration and past reviews. These requirements could be helpful in providing an efficient framework for the organizational efficiency and represented an implicit and untested view of organizational performance to determine the performance of particular educational institution. The books review exhibited that the framework of competing values contains four types of organizational efficiency. The rivalling value body work was comprised of nine requirements or measurements of performance (productivity-efficiency, quality, cohesion, adaptability- readiness, information management-communication, progress, planning-goal setting recruiting development, and stability-control). The measurements were measured utilizing the Behaviorally Anchored Score Scale (Pubs) steps.

James S. Pounder (2009), in his research about transformational class room leadership presented a solid basis for the evaluation and advancement of the classroom command. The results of this empirical analysis conducted by using MLQ and rivalling value framework proved that the educational principles of the transformational school room leadership. It turned out reviewed that the transformational authority is measured in accordance with three leadership results including potential of the first choice to produce extra efforts for those being led by the first choice, the belief of subordinates about authority effectiveness and employee satisfaction using their leaders. The capabilities, behaviors, influenced motivation, intellectual arousal and individual account items had been mentioned with the employees in order to evaluate transformational authority in classrooms. The results of the study showed the positive relation between transformational management and leadership benefits being reviewed in the analysis. The study was limited for using the sample being restricted to the teachers and staff only and it was taken from the one School of Hong Kong.

Chun and Rainey (2005) researched the goal ambiguity and its own relation to organizational performance in forty nine federal government agencies. To study the organizational performance, identified organizational effectiveness were assessed. The variables utilized by them are managerial performance, customer support orientation, output and work quality. Both specific and organizational level controlling variables were used as the performance was conducted on individual perceptions. Tenure, pay grade, job category and managerial level were individual level controlling factors. Where as organizational level managing parameters used were organizational size, organizational era, institutional location, financial public-ness, insurance plan problem complexity, type of policy responsibility, dependence on political bargain among rivalling demand from constituencies. Multiple regression evaluation results show that the recognized organizational effectivness factors were all negatively related to goal ambiguity. The study found that the government organizations with clear goals were high performing organizations. The analysis clearly indicates that leaders have to be more directed and clear in their perspective and mission and this organizations should invest in goal clarification. In addition, it suggests that proper planning is important from employees' perception so that they have clear sign of what their firm requirements from them.

Shefei and Haddad (2001) researched the partnership between culture and performance of organizations working in Bahrain. The businesses studied belonged to bank (18) and hotel (23) industry. They used eight cultural dimensions namely planning orientation; development; action orientation; people orientation; team orientation; communication; results orientation; confrontation. Performance procedures used were profitability; expansion rate of sales/earnings; financial strength; staff moral, job satisfaction and determination; and general public image and good will. The results of the study prove that corporate and business values are positively related to performance. But this relationship is mediated through industry and environment uncertainty and size of the organizations.

The research of Shefei and Haddad though important from Middle Eastern region lacks generalizability factor. The sample taken is small and a comparative study of banking versus hotel industry has been done. The analysis results can be more effective and generalizability can be produced if the test size is to be increased and also if other areas or sectors are included in the sample.

Jo Rhodes, Richard Hung, Peter Lok, Bella Ya-Hui Lien and Chi-Min Wu (2008) studied the organizational performance with regards to knowledge management. They used both financial and non-financial procedures. For the non-financial measures they used perceptions of the employees for acquisition of patents, increasing competitive ability, and employees' productivity. The results of the study mentioned that the non-financial actions experienced higher positive coefficient value to invention than the financial actions of organizational performance. The study is important for it brings forth the new concept of knowledge copy to fore leading but at the same time the organizational factors like innovation, culture, IT, structure and design, used can change over time and then for various organizations these organizational factors can vary greatly. Also the sample size is small as only technological companies in Taiwan have been analyzed. Therefore, the results can not be generalized for a wider human population.

In a conceptual study Carlos Molina and Jamie L. Callahan (2009) tried to explore the relationship of individual learning, entrepreneurship, and organizational learning with organizational performance. They offered a style of entrepreneurial learning and performance in which the constructs of environment, individual learning, intrapreneurship, and organizational learning affect organizational performance.

Vittal S. Anantatmula (2007) has tried to create a linkage between knowledge management execution and organizational performance. The analysis was completed in 21 years old countries and experts of 147 organizations participated and expressed their views. Organizational performance has been measured through non-financial actions like client satisfaction. The results of the study reveal that organizational performance may be accomplished if knowledge management practices are implemented and this can only be achieved through learning environment, staff development, effective communication tools, and knowledge showing. The study is limited in range as the members are knowledge management experts. Therefore, the generalizability of the results can not be done.

In a report on mediating aftereffect of learning and knowledge on organizational performance, Chin-Yen Lin and Tsung-Hsien Kuo (2007) developed a conceptual structural formula model to research the interactions among human reference management (HRM), organizational learning (OL), knowledge management capabilities (KMC) and organizational performance (OP). The analysis was conducted on financial training centers in Taiwan. To measure the organizational performance, they used individual resource management methods (appraisal, staffing, training and development, work movement, as well as rewards and compensation) and market performance (profit margin, sales, and customer satisfaction) of the businesses. The results indicate that human source practices have indirect effect on performance through learning and knowledge management. The results also indicate direct aftereffect of organizational learning and knowledge management procedures. The analysis though important is limited as only financial training centers of various companies in Taiwan were picked for the analysis. If wider sample from various industries is taken may be results change.

In the study of new command and school organizational effectiveness, Adam S. Pounder (2001), explored the partnership between your two (new command and university or college organizational effectiveness). However problems have been found associated with the leadership-organizational effectiveness romance. It was reviewed in the study that corresponding to new control studies, desirable command benefits could be produced by the transformational leadership. The variables recognized for transformational control in the study are drive, integrity, innovation, impression management, consideration, intellectual arousal. Organizational success has been inspected through competing principles framework, discovering productivity-efficiency; cohesion; information management-communication and planning-goal setting. The results show that transformational leadership is vital for organizational success. commitment and shared vision have recently come out to be the most significant parameters of transformational authority.

After going through the literature review it becomes clear that control has a significant marriage with organizational performance/effectiveness. The control variables discovered from the above books review comes out to be authoritative/assertiveness, responsibility, adaptability, competitive, considerate and actuality centered.

In circumstance of colleges organizational performance is hard to measure as they are not for income service sector. The performance steps found in various studies as mentioned above has mainly used financial variables which in case there is colleges is not applicable. Therefore, to measure the performance of these corporations Pounder (2001, 2002) construction has been utilized. The framework is dependant on competing prices and uses behaviorally anchored size.

James S. Pounder (2003) in his study about using transformational leadership to enhance the quality of management development training talked about and explored the theory that the quality of management development teaching can be enhanced by the execution of the transformational leadership. The variables identified for transformational leadership in the study included the idealized affect or charisma, inspirational inspiration, individual account, intellectual stimulation, integrity, innovation, and impression management. Based on the studies, a profound impact of transformational control had been on the subordinates' attempts and satisfaction. Transformational command have been related to the improved individual commitment to the group or firm. The transformational market leaders be capable of stimulate the employees to degrees of performance exceeding expectation. The study have been limited for not undertaking the empirical research.

Eran Vigoda-Gadot (2007), in his review about leadership style, organizational politics, and employees' performance study the two competing models empirically and also to scrutinize the political perceptions among general public sector employees as a possible mediator between the supervisor's control style and formal and casual aspects of employees' performance (Organizational Citizenship Behavior OCB). The analysis was completed by using the Multifactor Command Questionnaire (MLQ) and employees of public security firm in Israel were asked their responses for their market leaders. The results reported the direct relationship between leadership and performance. The deep impact of the command on the organizational performance had been mentioned in the literature. In the last and contemporary theories, both main control behaviors including transformational and transactional control had been discussed and concentrated despite of other proportions. The study have been limited for having limited test size with less work experience and the study focused entirely on the organizational politics.


Independent Varying Dependent Variable



Reality centered









Goal setting



The hypothesis developed from the above framework is as practices

H1: Transformational Command has a good effect on organizational performance

H2: Transactional Leadership has a good impact on organizational performance

H3: Laissez Faire has a negative influence on organizational performance


Type of Research

The present analysis is relational in dynamics as it is to find out the impact of control style on organizational effectiveness.

Study Participants

The following research has been conducted in higher educational institutes in Pakistan. The study is targeted around institutes of Rawalpindi and Islamabad. You can find twenty one level awarding institutes in Pakistan. Out of the 21 years old, four had been selected for today's analysis. These four institutes belong to both public and private sector.

For the study purposes, members targeted are the faculty customers and administrative staff of the institutes.

Sampling Technique

For today's study non-probability purposive sampling has been employed as the sample employees participate in education sector. Secondly, the target sample belongs to teaching and administrative positions.

Sample Selection Procedure

Four institutes out of twenty one in Rawalpindi and Islamabad have been chosen to participate in the study. These four belong to both open public as well as private sector. A sample of 200 employees was picked with the objective.

Sample Characteristics

As the test of 200 employees belonging to four colleges was chosen. Two of the universities belonged to general population sector and two of these belonged to private sector. The test belongs to both supervision as well as instructing staff. For the purpose of the study only the operational staff (both coaching & administrative) was decided on. The reason being that this tier is the most important vis a vis implementation of all policies and procedures. Therefore, these respondents are the main in analyzing the command and organizational effectiveness. Out of 200 questionnaires sent out, 139 loaded questionnaires were received with a reply rate of 69. 5 percent.

Research Instrument

For the analysis two questionnaires have been implemented. To determine the control, Multifactor Control Questionnaire (MLQ) has been used. A similar questionnaire has been employed by Vigoda-Gadot (2007), Athena and Maria (2006) and Pounder (2009).

The questionnaire comprises of nine leadership measurements namely idealized impact (tendencies), idealized influence (attributed), inspirational determination, intellectual stimulation, specific consideration, contingent reward, management by exception (active), management by exception (passive) and laissez faire management. You will find 45 items which determine these nine proportions. These items are placed on likert level from 0 (never) to 4(frequently). Out of the nine sizes, three dimensions particularly contingent compensation, management by exception (passive), and management by exception (lively) solution transactional authority style. Five dimensions namely intellectual activation, idealized influence (patterns), idealized impact (attributed), inspirational motivation and individual concern gauge the transformational authority style. One sizing laissez faire control measures dimensions laissez faire authority style. Transformational command style has 20 items, transactional command style has 12 items and laissez faire authority style has 4 items. The identical categorization has been employed by Pounder (2009). In the same way, Lowe et. al (1996), has examined the leadership through individualized consideration, intellectual stimulation, contingent praise and management by exception. Nine items from the questionnaire measure extra effort, efficiency, and satisfaction of the control styles. For the purpose of study, these nine items have been excluded from the analysis. (Pounder, 2009)

To assess the effectiveness of the business, Behaviorally Anchored Score Scale (Pubs) has been designed from Pounder (1998, 2001, 2002, 2003, and 2009). Each one of these dimensions of efficiency (cohesion, communication, productivity/efficiency, and planning/goal setting) has been ranked on likert range with 5 for very efficient to at least one 1 for extremely ineffective. The adaptation has been made on the range. Instead of using numerical value, the analysts have used likert scale for the simplicity and examination.

The dependability of the level was determined from a pilot study of 30 respondents and was found to be 0. 84. This stability value is constant with the studies conducted by Pounder (1998) and Athena and Maria (2006).

Operational Definitions

As the model is extracted from Pounder (2001), therefore, the organizational effectiveness dimensions have been used and defined as such.


Behavior that reflects the degree to which it is concerned with the quantity and cost of businesses.


Behavior that reflects the amount of its ability to which it is concerned with personnel morale, interpersonal associations, teamwork, and sense of belonging.

Information Management - Communication

Extent of capability to spread timely and appropriate information needed by its people to do their job.

Planning - Goal Setting

Behavior that demonstrates the magnitude of its capability to create goals and goals and systematically arrange for the future.


The analysis was conducted to determine the impact of command style on the organizational performance in public areas and private organizations. The Pearson correlation was applied and email address details are presented in table 1.

Table 1 Correlation between Command Style and Organizational Effectiveness

The correlations show that there is positive significant romance between transformational authority style and organizational efficiency (58. 4 percent). The negative marriage prevails between laissez faire control style and organizational efficiency (25. 1 percent). While in case of transactional authority style, there is absolutely no significant effect of the control style on organizational success (24. 4 percent).

There is a strong positive marriage between transformational control and the four dimensions of the organizational effectiveness as shown in desk 2. The results show that the dimensions of productivity-efficiency is the most prominent among all the dimensions of organizational performance which is correlated with the transformational leadership (58. 8 percent) and transformational control is related to all the other three measurements of performance (communication, planning goal setting and cohesion) almost at the same level. The results are consistent with the study of Pounder (1998). Pounder's review suggested that the info management and communication is linked to control demonstrating the consistency with the transactional control style. Similarly, planning goal setting techniques and productivity efficiency dimensions relate with transformational as well as transactional command style. Cohesion relates to the flexibility in the organization and which relates to transformational and laissez faire style.

Table 2 Transformational Command and Performance Dimensions

Table 3 Transactional Authority and Performance Dimensions

Table 3 relates the transactional leadership with four performance proportions of the organization. The results show that transactional command relates to planning goal setting negatively and negligibly as the value of relationship is very small (7. 0 percent) within the organization. The worthiness of romance between communication and transactional control is also very weakened as shown by the results (12. 7 percent). The partnership of cohesion with transactional control is a bit stronger than the communication and planning. Productivity efficiency has been found strongly correlated with the transactional control among all the measurements (41. 9 percent). The results are steady with the studies of

Table 4 Laissez faire and Performance Dimension

The Laissez-faire style has negative affect with all the four sizes of organizational success. The results show that there surely is high negative impact with planning goal setting (38. 9 percent) among all the four proportions. The relationship of other three dimensions is very poor with the laissez faire command style (efficiency = 4 percent, communication = 7 percent, and cohesion = 24. 5 percent)

Table 5 Multiple Regression

The above Stand explains the brief summary of the model applied in this research. The worthiness of R shows the fitness of the applied model on the theory in the study being done. The results revealed that the applied model fits 62. 3 percent to the idea. This also shows that there are other factors that affect the organizational efficiency other than the leadership styles. The worthiness of Durbin Watson (1. 483) is at the range and shows the multi-collinearity one of the variables which includes been found low one of the variables reviewed in this research. The worthiness of R square talks about the changes being took place in the dependent changing because of impartial factors. So, the results showed that independent variables contribute 38. 8 percent in the changes being done in the reliant variable.

The above desk shows the ANOVA information explaining the Analysis of Variance which clarifies the overall impact of impartial changing on the centered changing and also clarifies the difference in the method of the variables. The value of regression (39. 4) and the residual (62. 2) in these table shows that other than the authority styles, there are numerous factors that happen to be adding in the organizational efficiency. The email address details are again constant with the analysis of Vigoda Gadot (2007) however the study considers organizational politics as a mediating factor.

The above desk depicts the values of coefficients separately contributing towards the dependent varying i. e. , organizational success. The transactional management style is adversely related to organizational performance (19. 9 percent in negative way) and transformational control is significantly related (72. 8 percent in positive course) to the organizational performance.

The results show our hypothesis 1 has been accepted where as two other hypothesis related to transactional and laissez faire have been turned down. The literature also supports our assumptions especially related to transformational authority. While the literature review facilitates that the transactional leadership also affects organizational effectiveness however the relationship is not that strong. While laissez faire has an influence however the romantic relationship is very weak.


Following recommendations are put forth

Public sector organizations need to focus on the aspect of cohesion and information posting with their functional level employees. Until and unless it isn't done, the organizational performance cannot be attained.

The general population sector organizations need to be very clear about the control style. The perceptions of the general public sector indicate that all three authority styles are being used at various levels. The faculty perceptions' indicate that transformational and transactional control but it is not that effective, whereas administrative personnel perceive transactional control style with focus on rules and regulations.


The development of effective leadership style is a central matter for the majority of the organizations. The need for the authority can be judged by the actual fact that the new organizational paradigms like information sharing, decentralization of decision making authority and use of teams makes the management across organizational levels important. The results of the present study reveal that leadership, whether of open public sector firm or an exclusive sector organization, impacts the entire organizational success and the market leaders are the primary source of cohesion, and efficiency with in the business. Further, the bigger educational corporations are no unique of other organizations in the need to adept at taking care of simultaneously a number of organizational demands. The main element to the long-term survival of the bigger level group may be its capability to manage organizational pressures.

Also We Can Offer!

Other services that we offer

If you don’t see the necessary subject, paper type, or topic in our list of available services and examples, don’t worry! We have a number of other academic disciplines to suit the needs of anyone who visits this website looking for help.

How to ...

We made your life easier with putting together a big number of articles and guidelines on how to plan and write different types of assignments (Essay, Research Paper, Dissertation etc)