Can Feelings COME WITH AN Rational Basis Viewpoint Essay

Emotions are part of our everyday life, every instant in our life we are feeling an feelings, whether its delight, sadness, fear, anger, wonder, or disgust. Thoughts are expressed in 3 ways: 1. Emotions as an obstacle to knowledge, 2. Feelings as a source of knowledge and, 3. Intuition. Our thoughts are very powerful and do have a logical basis. "Emotional brains" is not an oxymoron because with thoughts we wouldn't have any intelligence. I trust what Robert Solomon stated. He's completely correct by professing that virtually all sense belief, and reasoning, must require emotion.

Emotions are a fundamental element of us so when strong enough they will often distort the three different ways of knowing. Our belief of things can be shaded by strong feelings, and there is doubtless some fact in sayings like 'love is blind' and 'dread has many eye'. ( vehicle de Lagemaat pg. 151). This 'mental coloring' makes us alert to aspects of actuality to the exclusion of others. For instance when we love a person we think they may be perfect and also have no flaws as to when you loathe them you see only their faults. Our emotions can also negatively influence our reasoning creating never to have open thoughts. A person with powerful emotions will probably use more emotive vocabulary. Our thoughts also serve as a way to obtain knowledge; it is difficult to exist without feeling. Our emotions help us reason through things. For instance if you look down a cliff you understand not to hop because you are worried and your dread can help you reason to not hop because you will pass away. So with what was mentioned recently we can conclude our emotions do have a rational basis because they help reason through things that go on during our everyday lives. Reason and feeling although are usually thought of as opposite things they may be more on the continuum of some sort. More often than not we're someplace along the center of the continuum with this thoughts and feeling going swimming our mind. For example if we are doing numerical problems we will use less of our own thoughts and steer more to the other area of the continuum. One other way to think of reason and sentiment is to think about our feelings being pretty much logical. (van de lagemaat pg. 156). The main problem with the earlier mentioned idea is the fact sometimes our feelings are irrational such as fear and disgust. Although we realize that it's safer to journey in a plane than to drive in a car most of us are terrified to can get on planes. The very last way feeling is a way of knowing is through intuition. The word intuition is normally associated with the aha minute of perception when you suddenly see the treatment for a difficulty without going right through any conscious process of reasoning. (van de lagemaat pg. 158) A couple of three types of intuition; central intuitions, subject-specific intuitions, and communal intuitions. Central intuitions are our most fundamental intuitions about life, the world and everything. For although reason and perception are usually thought to give us knowledge they in the end rely upon intuition. Regarding to center intuitions, the laws of logic will be the starting point for all our reasoning, but we can not prove them in terms of any more fundamental laws. If asked to justify them, most people would say that they are intuitively clear. (van de lagemaat pg. 158). For perception, it is an important way to obtain knowledge, but we can not make certain on the data of our own senses alon that life is not really a dream. Yet we have an overwhelmingly strong intuition that the wish hypothesis is false and that what we are experiencing is reality. A sensible way to describe why our knowledge is intuitive is by playing the 'why?' game. If you were to ask a pal to declare something that she is aware of and then ask her why she thinks that this holds true and then ask her again why she is convinced that what she described holds true eventually she will say that it's intuitively clear. We cant take these intuitions for granted but we can not just reject them either. For subject specific intuition we sometimes appeal to intuition to justify our knowledge remarks in various regions of knowledge. There's a wealth of information to suggest that our uneducated intuitions in subjects as logic, mathematics, physics, biology, background, economics and ethics' are in best confused with worst false. As for sociable intuitions we tend to be over positive about our very own intuitions. ( truck de lagemaat pg 162). For instance men always think they know everything rather than need help in anything, we think we can fix anything and that we know getting anywhere. The reason behind this is our satisfaction so we intuitively believe that what we should think is right.

As for emotional intelligence it is unquestionably no oxymoron sometimes taking into account what was discussed earlier. With our feelings we acquire much knowledge. Although sometimes we have a tendency to put our take great pride in before everything else and stop ourselves from acquiring any knowledge. Our intelligence of the world helps change our emotions. We realize that a cliff is large and that jumping from levels hurts so our dread kicks in preventing us from ever before attempting to jump off a cliff unless one day we find out that little or nothing harmful comes from jumping off a cliff.

When Robert Solomon says that emotions are "systems of judgments" and this "practically all of our encounters is to some extent 'affective', and even our most dispassionate judgments can be properly comprehended only within some bigger emotional context" he essentially claims that sense notion, and reasoning, must involve emotion. I agree with this affirmation because everything that we do has a mental reaction. For example if someone dies you'll feel unfortunate, if you get the lottery you will be happy, if you visit a scary movie you will have fear. Quite simply all incoming sensory understanding will offer an emotional reaction. As for reason as stated before reason and feeling are carefully related and are on the same continuum. A persons reasoning and emotions are close along but can vary greatly depending on the task you do.

To sum up what was previously mentioned, emotions as a way of knowing is discussed in 3 ways: 1 as an obstacle to knowledge, 2 as a source of knowledge and, 3 as intuition. Thoughts and reason are usually regarded as opposing causes when in simple fact they go along. Sentiment and reason are on a single continuum. Without emotions we can not reason and with reason we can stop emotions. It might be confusing but for example without fear how can we reason that jumping off a cliff is bad. One more thing is that with enough reason we can prevent feeling or come to our senses for example after we watch a terrifying movie we may be frightened but with reason we can stop ourselves and conclude that it's impossible for what took place in the movie to happen in real life. Emotional intellect is no oxymoron because with brains with have emotions. Finally what Robert Solomon mentioned makes sense because without feeling how can we interpret that which you perceive or how could we reason?

Work cited

Van de Lagemaat, Richard. Theory of knowledge: for the ib diploma. Cambridge, New

York: Cambridge university or college Press, 2005.

Also We Can Offer!

Other services that we offer

If you don’t see the necessary subject, paper type, or topic in our list of available services and examples, don’t worry! We have a number of other academic disciplines to suit the needs of anyone who visits this website looking for help.

How to ...

We made your life easier with putting together a big number of articles and guidelines on how to plan and write different types of assignments (Essay, Research Paper, Dissertation etc)