Descartes Fifth Meditation Living Of God Beliefs Essay

In Descartes Fifth Meditation he speaks about the lifetime of God and why he feels that they can prove the living of God. He talks about God being the ideal being and also shows that he can verify Gods lifestyle with the fact that God gave him this notion that he is out there since there is no possible way that he could have come up with this idea himself. Both these explanations that are given by Descartes I really believe aren't very solid or sound arguments for the lifestyle of God. In this particular paper I am going to argue against the idea that you cannot confirm Gods living with Descartes explanations of why he thinks you can.

Descartes discussion for the existence of God is quite widespread in his Fifth Meditation. On this Meditation Descartes explains how God is the "most perfect being" by stating that if he truly is ideal he lacks little or nothing. Therefore, if this God lacks little or nothing he cannot lack presence, so he must exist. As Descartes state governments, "Hence it is merely as much of a contradiction to think of God (that is, a supremely perfect being) missing life (that is, lacking a excellence), as it is to think of a mountain with out a valley" (Descartes 203). He compares God to a pile and his lifestyle to a valley. He's simply proclaiming that expressing God will not exist is like saying a pile does not have a valley. Since you cannot say a pile doesn't have a valley, how will you say that God will not exist? He is saying that these two things, a pile and a valley are inseparable, just like God and his lifestyle are inseparable.

Descartes also shows that it is not his thought which makes God exist, however the idea that the God is present that can determine his thinking. "It isn't that my thought helps it be so, or imposes any necessity on any thing; on the contrary, it is the necessity of the thing itself, namely the existence of God, which determines my thinking in this respect" (Descartes 203). He cannot produce the idea that God exits. Descartes has this notion that God prevails because God comes with an existence and allows him to acquire this notion of him existing. So that it must be true that God is present if this "most perfect being" has given him the capability to produce such a thought.

There are however some contradictions you may run into when facing Descartes discussion for the lifetime of God. "For my thought will not impose any requirement on things; and just as I might think about a winged horse even though no horses has wings, therefore i may be able to attach life to God even though no God is accessible" (Descartes 203). Here he is saying that you can imagine whatever you want, but that will make it so. Just as you are free to think of a equine with wings, even though such a creature will not is present, you are free to think of a God of existing even though any such thing might not exactly be true.

Another contradiction you might come across is just what will a "most perfect being" entitle? If we as humans are so imperfect how could we produce such an idea of a "most perfect being"? Descartes would suggest that we cannot, that God has given us this idea of what perfection is. Regardless of whether God had given us the idea of a "most perfect being" how can it be easy for us to identify the qualities of just what a "most perfect being" entitles if we are so imperfect ourselves. It might also be possible that if we did recognize the capabilities of just what a "most perfect being" entitles, who's to state that different people wouldn't normally have difference ideas of what "perfect" means to them. There may be a million various things, which a million different people believe to be the features of a "most perfect being". So for example if two different people associate different descriptions of what a "most perfect being" is, are they talking about the same God that they believe exists or would it all come down to 1 ultimate God?

The discussion for Gods life that Descartes places forth appears to have a few weaknesses and can even be argued against in multiple ways. I believe that Descartes will not bring a sufficient argument to the stand about the lifetime of God. His arguments can be broken down and contradicted in the few techniques I have explained throughout my paper. This is an argument that has obviously gone on for a long time and will continue being a major question throughout life. It really is something I do not believe that will every evidently be fixed, but will be talked about. Overall, I do not think that Descartes thinking and explanations of why the presence of God is real are extremely valid. I've clearly only somewhat began to break down Descartes pondering and it might be quite possible to get into even more depth about why his arguments aren't very solid arguments in my opinion.

Also We Can Offer!

Other services that we offer

If you don’t see the necessary subject, paper type, or topic in our list of available services and examples, don’t worry! We have a number of other academic disciplines to suit the needs of anyone who visits this website looking for help.

How to ...

We made your life easier with putting together a big number of articles and guidelines on how to plan and write different types of assignments (Essay, Research Paper, Dissertation etc)