A Comparison of Person Centred and Existential Therapies

Although person centred and existential treatments are both humanistic in their techniques both these solutions have many differences as well as similarities in the utilization of the remedy towards their clients. Yalom agrees with Rogers for the reason that it's the therapeutic romantic relationship that heals. However Yalom helps his clients from a philosophical stance in dealing with their problems. Furthermore that's where existentialism varies from Rogers's person centred therapy Jones, R. (2006). This article will compare and contrast person centred and existential restorative approaches to therapy.

Whereas the individual centred approach regards the average person as the specialist on their own experience (Mulhauser, G. 2010). On the other hand the existential way views your client as having continual change and transformations throughout their experiences. However the person centred way provides three core conditions that your client finds useful to help them in their progress and therapeutic change they are matching to Rogers as cited in Jones, R. (2006), the first is unconditional positive regard where Roger respect as the trust the therapist sets in the clients potential to constructive change. Furthermore Roger assumed that as well as this trust placed in your client; that the therapists likewise have their own have difficulty for the reason that the therapist must be mindful of the client's capability to realize constructive self-direction if that esteem is part of their personality. This then makes a crucial feature of Rogers healing approach and the partnership where the client is appreciated, and well known as a worthy person (Jones, R. 2006). Empathic understanding is the next core condition Rogers as cited in Jones, R. (2006) advises it is just a empathic understanding the therapist shows in understanding and recognizing the client's viewpoint. Furthermore in understanding the clients' thoughts as well as their emotions the therapist shows understanding additionally, it may shows the client point view is important and accepted. But when Roger talks about the 3rd condition congruence he's saying that your client does not need to "do you know what the therapist is absolutely like" (Mulhauser, G. 2010) however the therapist must be in touch using their feelings whilst still have awareness of these feelings which the therapist can talk if appropriate (Rogers, 1962: 417) as cited in Jones, R. (2006). Which will not signify the therapist will come out with every feeling but must also stay away from turning it from person centred to therapist centred; with therapists writing their feelings this is seen as conditioning the relationship between your therapist and consumer by being portrayed truly. Furthermore these three conditions are what Rogers had confidence for the reason that the client was able to use to develop their own identification, which resulted in the client connection with therapeutic change.

Existential remedy on the other hand according to Mulhauser, G. (2010) is approximately "facilitating the client's own face and, to work alongside them in the job of discovering and understanding their beliefs, assumptions and ideals". The therapist can be involved mostly with your client (Mulhauser, G. 2010). The same can be said of person centred approach is virtually identical by working with the customers own activities to help them explore and understand their prices, assumptions, and ideals. Furthermore this is where both solutions have similarities in that both types of solutions try not to impose their own bias or judgements during therapy or on your client (Mulhauser, G. 2010); this then helps your client to" figure out and expand on the perspective", the main objective in helping the client to exist well. The clients own assessments of their own experiences and corresponding to Mulhauser, G. (2010) "attributions of value may be replaced by creations partially or even completely due to the pressures sensed from other folks". Which Mulhauser, G. (2010) says that the "individual displaces personal judgements and meanings with those of others". This may cause Psychological disturbances which can occur when the individuals self-concept clashes using their other experiences. Furthermore matching to Mulhuser, G. (2010) the existential methodology shows the same similarities with the customers capacity in making "well- informed selections about their own life and the frame of mind towards it", this however highlights the necessity for the therapist to" remain in control of their own private and professional assumptions". He also continues on to suggest that whereas the existential procedure is totally symmetric in presenting emphasis to self-awareness. In contrast the individual centred approach is considered asymmetric in the client self-awareness (Mulhauser, G. 2010). Furthermore he shows that the existential idea works along like the person centred procedure in that the" two of us, me and you", are accountable for the arriving to grips with the vagaries of life, signifying, and even loss of life" that's where the therapist should focus on the client and not themselves. Mulhauser, G. (2010) also says the same about the individual centred approach in that the "two of us, me and you" are involved in different achievements, here the therapist reassures the client they are there for them and to acknowledge your client with unconditioned positive regard and to show congruently to them and not themselves (Mulhauser, G. 2010). On the other hand the existential methodology wants to comprehend what this means to be human and what conflicts people face.

Death for instance is one of the first existential issues to be addressed in that being conscious of death and the predictability of fatality as well as a lot of people desperate to be useless life and loss of life is a continuous source of stress and anxiety whether it be neurotic, normal or existential. Furthermore when you here the word death terror therefore a more drive of fatality than the nervousness of death. Nevertheless the fear of loss of life can be either conscious or unconscious from preceding experiences when growing up as children are preoccupied with fatality these thoughts of stress can be repressed to form a defence to handle this conceivable threats of terror. However this is where psychopathology has failed in its makes an attempt to transcend fatality Jones, R. (2006).

The second conflict is how people deal with freedom and how this causes both stress and dread credited to when people are segregated from others can increase our sense of control in presuming accountability in that they become accountable for their own lives and their activities and this is excatly why we give up our independence by joining organizations you can avoid isolation.

On the other side isolation can cause anxiety and folks have always got a deep need for belonging and they want authorization of others. Also shown in flexibility above people join groups but in doing this may in overtly take on the identification of the group they have joined up with therefore trading their freedom to belong with others, as well as this; isolation can remind the individual of how vulnerable they can be and their also there morality even though each person has to expire sometime however when we isolate ourselves it can result in, choices that could even lead on to death. This type of solitary life may become a consequence that not only identifies prisons but also the house whereby as a child you are delivered to your room, as well to be ignored this is used to bring unruly children and individuals into brand (Jones, R. 2006).

In conclusion you can see that both these treatments have both similarities and dissimilarities. Whereas existentialism focuses on freedom of choice in what sort of person's life is shaped it also shows us how the client is in charge to their life for self-awareness. Along with the uniqueness of each individual and exactly how it designs their own personality; this begins from being truly a child; also this type of therapy targets the present in that the therapist shows and struggle the client that they are accountable for their selections in life. So by existentialism offering this freedom of choice to your client the same can be said of the individual centred methodology as it also give the consumer more responsibility in their own treatment and the therapist will steer the client towards self-awareness by permitting the client dwelling address certain denied emotions using this method the therapist leads the client to a way of resolving these issues, as exactly like existentialism person centred also focuses on the here and today. Both of these strategies don't consider on past events in dealing with the client and simply go through the here and today.

Also We Can Offer!

Other services that we offer

If you don’t see the necessary subject, paper type, or topic in our list of available services and examples, don’t worry! We have a number of other academic disciplines to suit the needs of anyone who visits this website looking for help.

How to ...

We made your life easier with putting together a big number of articles and guidelines on how to plan and write different types of assignments (Essay, Research Paper, Dissertation etc)