Cognative behavioral therapy and homework assignments

Practitioners encourage clients to complete between session duties to help apply behavioural or cognitive, beneficially into their everyday lives. Home work tasks are completed out of session and frequently require your client to complete a set of cognitive distortions and track record their dysfunctional thoughts. This permits clients to point out their thought patterns, feelings and physiological sensations (Kazantzis & Daniel, 2009). Home work assignments supply the client with the opportunity to attain beliefs and reduce negative thought habits and to further provide therapists with aim and detailed records (Beck, Hurry, Shaw & Emery, 1979). As a prime component of cognitive- behavioural remedy (CBT; Beck, et al. 1979; Ellis, 1962) it allows for clients to activate in research activities, accumulate new information, establish new therapeutic skills and incorporate these increased actions from therapy to situations in which their problems happen (Neimeyer, Kazantzis, Kassler, Baker, & Fletcher, 2008). Indeed, research has established that homework during the course of CBT is favorably associated with reduced symptom severeness and restorative benefits (Beck, et al. 1979; Kazantzis, Deane, & Ronan, 2000; Scheel, Hansen, & Razzhavaikina, 2004). This reason is most steady with the conceptual sizes of CBT, as between session-assignments generally give attention to and try to task negative thinking (Addis & Jacobson, in press). Several studies also show support of the combination of homework with CBT compared to without homework (Bryant, Simons, Thase, 1999; Neimeyer & Feixas, 1990). Research (Kazantzis & Dattilio, in press) found that 62% of clients who received home work in CBT proved improvement, instead of 38% who didn't get research, indicating its contribution to CBT. Moreover, relative to the Hullian learning theory (Kazantzis & L'Abate, 2007) the addition of homework projects is suggested to be beneficial for clients as they offer composition and clarity to the commonly unstructured and uncertain process of remedy. Despite, the popular use of research assignments and support for the causal relationship between homework and treatment result, there is bound data that prevails on the specific influences of tasks in psychotherapy.

Previous studies investigating CBT and home work have focussed on the positive relationship between homework result and therapeutic homework adherence or conformity (Addis & Jacobson, in press; Scheel, et al, 2004; Westra, Doizois, & Marcus, 2007). Homework conformity is the magnitude to that your consumer implements the advised homework, displaying their degree of commitment and engagement in the psychotherapeutic process. Individual homework compliance has an insight in to the scope that the client's behaviour between classes aligns with the research assignment previously discussed. Moreover, Burns & Spangler, 2000 discovered that there's a linear romantic relationship between research and result, where clients who complete a high quantity of home work and have an increased level of participation in the task, show more improvement. There are a number of factors that have shown to produce client conformity including, problem severeness, delivery methods by therapists, consumer characteristics and the assessment of conformity (Scheel, et al, 2004). Practitioners (Kazantzis, Deane and Ronan, 2004) have found that when using independent observer ratings of therapist competence and their correctness with homework tasks, therapist views of the research tasks correlated with client competence. However therapists play an important role in creating the customers experience of the homework process, influencing their level of homework compliance. A report by, Hoelscher, Lichstein, & Rosenthal, 1984, found out the trend for therapists to represent insufficient measurements of compliance. For example, therapists interpreted and overestimated clients as more compliant if indeed they obtained more lucrative outcomes and on average overestimated homework conformity on 91% of occasions. Therefore, even though there has been empirical support for the positive marriage between homework and conformity, it is difficult to measure conformity as it is counterproductive. This emphasises the value of investigating other influential factors.

Past research conducted by Kazantzis, Deane and Ronan, (2004) found that when researching the methods of research and compliance, customer self-report was the most frequent source of research conformity data, as it was utilised in 28% among 32 studies. This infrequency of comparing several types of data contributes to inconsistency of results of among studies (Kazantzis et al. 2004, Abramowitz Franklin, Zoellner & DiBernardo, 2002) as it could not make certain that clients will assess themselves reliably as they could be affected by self-enhancement desires. This stresses the value of integrating both client and therapist perspectives when learning homework conformity, proposing the Project Compliance Rating Size (ACRS) and the Home work Rating Level (HRS) as valid assessments. The ACRS is a single item rating scale and was devised to determine the amount of homework conformity and solely actions the quantity of homework conformity, not the grade of the completed assignment. Where as the HRS separates conformity into two specific components and addresses both measurements of quality and quantity (Kazantzis, Deane, & Ronan, 2005). It really is a self survey questionnaire (12 questions) and methods client conformity with homework assignments by focusing on customer, clinician, and task characteristics. Although the items have been found (Kazantzis, Bjornholdt, Munro, Dobson, Merrick, Fletcher, Jones, Wayne, 2006) to create good internal steadiness and increased persistence over sequences, the inter-item correlations found most items to show variability as time passes and be put through social-desirability bias, that is; the trend for clients to respond to their clinicians in a socially advisable manner. For that reason a revised version (HRS-II), was devised to boost on the HRS by: reversing the wording of items which measure clients assessments of these non to sectioned conclusion of the home work task to increase consistency. This enables for the improvement of the scaling system by utilising biases to highlight regions of difficulty experienced by your client with their conclusion of homework duties. This assessment device addresses aspects which concern homework completion somewhat than compliance, evaluating the theoretically significant determinants of homework completion, values (progress matched with remedy goals), implications (pleasure, mastery and improvement) and engagement (quality, quantity, difficulty and obstacles).

When assessing research projects and the beneficial capabilities to CBT, dependence is positioned on the validity and trustworthiness of assessment musical instruments. This emphasises why the HRS was revised and refinements were designed to the theoretical methods of dimension to increase stability and validity of rankings. The modified instrument's rationale stimulates participation of clients in treatment and coupled with compliance of home work assignments plays a part in further change. An examination of Cognitive Remedy Scale (CTS) highlights the necessity for psychometric investigation. The CTS-R, was made to boost on the CTS by: abolishing overlapping between items and ensuring that items more referred to more clearly. The observer-rated level (11 items) and extra research has proved that the CTS-R has high inner regularity and sufficient inter-rater stability and high degrees of validity have been found recommending improved scores of competence (Blackburn et al. , 2001; Haddock, 2001; Vallis, Shaw & Dobson, 1986). The little way to obtain studies looking into the psychometric properties of the HRS-II, ends in little room for psychometric evaluation. However, (Kazantzis, N. , Bjornholdt, A. , Munro, M. , Dobson, K. S. , Merrick, P. L. , Fletcher, R. B. , Jones, D. , Wayne, Y. H. , 2006) completed pilot studies which reported on the psychometric properties of the HRS-II measuring the co-ordinance between client and therapist scores and the stability of impartial observer scores. The evaluation found the HRS-II to provide high trustworthiness and validity. Inside uniformity of the level was found to be high with overall coefficient alpha's of. 87, and. 84 for consumer and therapist scores respectively. Additionally a higher Inter-class correlation coefficient of impartial observer steps (. 82) given little variation among rater ratings, recommending for high inter rater trustworthiness. Lastly, there is a high relationship evident amidst the results of factors accounting for good factorial validity. Indeed, as indie observers in this analysis were trained therapists it needs to be kept in mind that commonly impartial observers rankings might go through the 'halo impact' that is; the inclination for raters to draw the therapist high on all categories if they consider those to be of good quality and the opposite is found to also occur (Young & Beck, 1980). Further factors which can influence observer scores are, contrast effects, similarity and discretion with first impression accuracy, therefore psychometric properties of scales should be considered when analyzing future studies to try to take into account biases.

Selective attention, confrontation with interference and the principles of working storage and inhibition are influential factors of activity performance, affecting just how one would react to relevant information whist wanting to disregard irrelevant information. The Stroop process (Stroop, 1935) measures one's idea of selective attention and inhibition control. Past research (MacLeod, 1991) used this task and instructed members to name the print color of any coloured word. For example, respond ''blue'' when subjected to the term green which is printed out in blue. This task entails participants to demonstrate inhibition control rather than read the coloured phrase. This proves to be a hard exercise as reading is commonly an automatic process, resulting in a tendency to read the word somewhat than name the print out colour. Therefore the analysis of congruent and incongruent session content resembles that of a stroop-like impact.

Existing data facilitates the notion that non-compliance is a common problem in therapeutic classes. Common regions of concern between the client and homework compliance include, the issue they endured with the duty, doubting their own individual capability of completing the duty or portraying an opposing view about the given homework (Fehm & Mrose, 2008). Non- conformity of homework tasks has been linked to the client not participating to or showing engagement in the homework that was designated to them in past consultations. Whereas clients who openly expressed feedback and information about their home work presentation showed high home work compliance, which confirms the idea for pursuing up homework in therapy classes (Shelton & Levy, 1981). However, compliance and non-compliance is difficult to determine. For example, a client may spend an considerable duration of time attempting a homework task, but fail to complete entirety of the task, therefore compliance may not precisely depict the client's connection with competing the homework. Relative to the idea of Planned Behaviour (Ajzen, 1988) studies have found whenever a client is within agreement with the explanation, they will be more likely to complete their homework assignments as they are depicted as relevant and directive toward a positive change (Addis & Jacobson, in press). A higher importance is put on the clinician interrelated frame of mind toward the research, consisting of congruence, positive and encouraging regard accompanied by empathy. Additionally, Kazantzis, Deane, Ronan & L'Abate, (2005) discovered that when using indie observer ratings of therapist competence and their reliability with homework assignments, therapist views of the homework assignments correlated with consumer compliance. Furthermore inter-rator reliability in procedures of competence is influenced, as supervisor ratings were associated with positive CBT results but self-employed ratings who received no additional information didn't. The id of non-compliance with research can assist in the disclosure of difficult areas highlighting the client's inspiration, commitment and level of contribution in the changing process. These elements can then be used up and different and more suitable strategies can be integrated.

The administration of more information may lead to the opportunity of confirmation bias among indie observer raters. That is; interpreting data in ways that are partial to ones own existing targets, beliefs, or personal assumptions (Nickerson, 1998). Ditto & Lopez (1992) discovered that when members were demonstrated numerous accounts of new information in collection, which either reinforced or conflicted with the tentative decisions they overestimated the worthiness of supportive information and underestimated those that were conflicting. Yet there is found to be always a positive relationship between your similarities in interpersonal and trustworthiness levels and changes in frame of mind. Relative to Source credibility theory (Hovland, 1953) it has been suggested that individuals are more likely to be persuaded and resulting in an attitudinal change by way of a resource which is deemed as highly credible alternatively than mildly credible (Aronson, Turner & Carl-Smith, 1963). This theory connotes that conception of trustworthiness and the conception of know-how of the useful source as both main elements which lead to bias (Strong, 1968). For example if a person perceives the foundation as educated and highly credible or believes that they source is impartial, they can be more susceptible to change.

However, the present analysis will be working with client feedback and can involve the 3rd party parameters, four possible combinations of two attributes, research adherence (job completed vs. not completed) and research attitudes (task fascinating/ helpful vs. process not attractive/ unhelpful), followed by the assessment of a further two independent factors, Congruence and non congruence. Congruence will be defined as adherence plus positive attitudes, and non adherence plus negative behaviour. Non-congruence will be thought as adherence plus negative attitudes, and non-adherence plus positive behaviour.

The aim of the research is to examine the effects of period content and extra information on the dependability of indie observer assessments of remedy process. As between-session 'research' responsibilities are a typical component of Cognitive Behaviour Therapy, the present review will examine the factors influencing ratings of research tasks. Specifically, the analysis will analyze the Homework Rating Scale - Modified (HRS-II; Kazantzis, Deane, & Ronan, 2005).

It was hypothesised that if the treatment content relates to stability in observer ratings, then ratings of trainings with congruent content could be more reliable than non-congruent content. If usage of client and therapist data affects observer ratings, then ratings made in the absence of written responses from clients and therapists will be more reliable.


A total of 180 women and men, 18 and 65 years of age will be recruited for the analysis. All participants will be students or staff of La Trobe University, or associates of the community, who volunteer for the test. Participants will be experienced in reading, writing, and conversing in English and free of current mental illness. These inclusion standards will be layed out in advertisements and in the analysis information sheet.

There is no prior research after which to estimate the likely effect size of versions in time content or more information on the factors influencing observer ratings on the HRS. Therefore, today's analysis will recruit 180 individuals taking alpha at the convention 0. 05 level, presuming a small effect for information, and conversation between information and program content.


Participants will be recruited via advertisements, either submitted at La Trobe University's noticeboards and via Learning Management System, or in flyers sent out via an information booth at La Trobe University's Agora. Discussion about the study may also be made possible out of this booth. La Trobe University students will have the opportunity to participate on a single day as recruitment in addition to recently organised schedules. Recruitment from the community will occur via the researcher's internet sites and by person to person. In all situations, individuals expressing interest will contain the chance to view a paper advertisement about the analysis outlining the conditions and great things about participation.

The information sheet will be produced available to those who exhibit an initial curiosity about the research. The info sheet will summarize the study and fully notify potential individuals about the type of the study. The research workers' email and contact number will be accessible on this sheet, so that those interested may have possibility to consider the analysis, and make a decision whether to contact the analysts about taking part on the info collection dates.


The Homework Rating Range- Revised (HRS II; Kazantzis, Deane, & Ronan, 2005) is a 12-item score scale which is used.

The video segments will be recorded role-plays of cognitive behaviour therapy with the primary investigator (as therapist) and an actor (as client). In each portion, the therapist and consumer will review the client's degree of engagement with the research task over the prior week in a typical duration of five minutes. The content of the sections includes standard questions about the review of research tasks, such as "how have you find the task we discussed from last time?" and "was it difficult and/ or easy for you?" These segments will be centered on the practical areas of task conclusion, and the restorative content will not be discussed at length.


Participants will be involved in one 40 minute data collection treatment. The study will be run in lecture halls enabling up to 100 individuals to participate simultaneously. Individuals will be asked to reach and be seated in the lecture hall quickly prior to the commencement of the period, relating to which sequence of video sections they are to view. Individuals will be seated in rows (randomly) that will sign their allocation to information teams. Individuals will be welcomed to the study and asked to read the info sheet, that will provide a simple rationale for 3rd party observer ratings of therapy sessions, and the type of today's study. Members will be informed their attendance in the treatment suggests consent.

The experimenter will read standardised instructions detailing the scenarios to be viewed in the video recording sections. The instructions can make clear that video tutorial segments will only be viewed once. Participants will have five minutes to examine the questionnaires. Members will then receive a brief circumstance using a PowerPoint screen, and asked to practice completion of the questionnaire from an observer's perspective. Third, practice, individuals will be invited to ask any questions to clarify the content or procedure for doing questions.

It will be explained that participants should concentrate on the video segment, and once viewed, complete the 12-item Research Rating Level - Modified (HRS-II; Kazantzis, Deane, & Ronan, 2005). After completing the first rating, participants will be presented with either (a) no more information, (b) client HRS-II score, (c) therapist HRS-II rating, or (d) customer and therapist HRS-II ratings, and offered the opportunity to change their replies. Participants will be instructed to use circles for their initial reactions, and squares for his or her second responses on the same questionnaire. After doing the first score there will be a brief 2-3 minute period of time when forms will be collected, and members will asked to remain silent. After the break, individuals will complete the second rating following the same treatment.

After all the video segments have been rated, the experimenters will remind individuals that the situations were role-play sections and not real clinical trainings. The experimenters will invite any questions or responses from the individuals. Participants will have the results of raffle via email and the winning members will be asked to gather their prize. Members will be offered the opportunity to obtain a certificate of participation.

Methods of data analysis

The ramifications of the between-groups and within-groups factors will be calculated and analysed using multivariate examination of variance (MANOVA). MANOVA will be utilized with Pillai's track as the criterion, as opposed to repeated measures analysis of variance (ANOVA) as a result of multiple measures included. The info will initially be screened in preliminary tests to eliminate era and gender effects and test any outliers or abnormal variations in the data that had not been considered. The counterbalancing process of program content will be considered effective if there is no main result for session sequence.

Also We Can Offer!

Other services that we offer

If you don’t see the necessary subject, paper type, or topic in our list of available services and examples, don’t worry! We have a number of other academic disciplines to suit the needs of anyone who visits this website looking for help.

How to ...

We made your life easier with putting together a big number of articles and guidelines on how to plan and write different types of assignments (Essay, Research Paper, Dissertation etc)