Compare and contrast the theories

Part I

1. Compare and contrast the theories and basic treatment types of Albert Ellis and Aaron T. Beck. Add a debate of the framework, theoretical/philosophical positions, therapist activity, needs on the client, and empirical support.

Albert Ellis's basic treatment model is logical emotive behavior therapy (REBT). The theoretical basis of Ellis's model is that folks routinely handle life issues by reconstructing their values, affect, and actions in version to the challenge (Ellis, 2000). While this psychological process seems such as a positive way to conform when it comes to an issue, many individuals inevitably build poor values and act in a repeated and maladaptive manner. Interpretation, that not only does the problem still exist in a single way or another, but that the tendencies, or even more specifically the schematic agenda, created by this poor cognitive process only increases a schema that is improperly built. In this regard, the future result of another problem will be dealt with poorly yet again due to too little introspection of days gone by consequences or perhaps simply scheduled to too little individual skills.

Additionally, REBT considers that a lot of individuals bring about problems for themselves by creating personal imperatives (Ellis, 2000). These personal imperatives involve internal statements which include: I will perform well to gain others' approval, my entire life should be trouble-free and exciting, and everyone should treat me well (Ellis, 2005). This way, when these prospects (needs) aren't achieved, individuals create their own affective misery. In response to this, therapists using REBT are expected to employ a more directive manner than when utilizing a psychodynamic methodology, for example. Clients are shown how to acknowledge and then dispute within themselves their irrational beliefs. Furthermore, therapists not only give the clients unconditional popularity, but the therapist must gives themself Unconditional Self-Acceptance (aka USA) (Ellis, 2005).

Beck's Cognitive therapy rests on the principle of collaborative empiricism (Hollon & Beck, 2000). Cognitive therapy theorizes that clients have automatic thoughts and these thoughts are incorrect beliefs, therefore, they create maladaptive actions (Wenzel, Dark brown, & Beck, 2009). A cognitive therapist would show their clients how to believe more like a scientist by displaying them that their beliefs are not actually facts. Meaning, client would acquire data using their company issues, their actions, and their effects, and pseudo-empirically test their possibly irrational values. Within this technique, the hope would be that the programmed thoughts will be attended to and corrected.

Though, Beck's Cognitive therapy is somewhat unique of Ellis's Rational Emotive-Behavior Therapy (REBT). While they both have their basis in the procedures of cognition and how those thoughts stimulate behavior, you can claim that REBT uses the influence of logic reasoning to change the client's schema (Hollon & Beck, 2000). Also, Beck's Cognitive remedy differs from REBT since there is an emphasis in the assessment of values in-vivo from an empirical viewpoint. In either kind of cognitive-based remedy, there are a big amount of empirical data that supports how effective CBT is. In fact, there are studies that suggest CBT works more effectively than medication for unhappiness (McGinn, 2000).

2. The "First Influx" was behavior therapy. The "Second Wave" was Cognitive and cognitive-behavioral therapy. The "Third Wave" includes the works of Hayes and Linehan. Is the "Third Wave" a influx, a tsunami, or simply a soothing lapping at the shore? How are these "waves" different?

The first influx, Behavior therapy, is situated upon the ideas of classical conditioning and operant conditioning produced by B. F. Skinner and Ivan Pavlov. Behavior-based therapy considers the behavior's antecedent and effect, then viewing how the consequence is refined to impact the occurrence and the repetition of the same tendencies (Skinner, 1969). The second wave consists of the addition of the cognitive model. This model is situated how interpretations or misinterpretations are created and exactly how they eventually relate with the individual's affective encounters and the tendencies that is manifested. (Wenzel, Dark brown, & Beck, 2009). The mixture of behavioral and cognitive aspects in this wave is the utilization of reinforcers that are directly related to personal experiences. So this means, that the exposure of thoughts, reinforcers, and conducts to your client will help in the realization of negative thought patterns with regards to their situation. Thus, in the real essence of CBT, they'll be in a position to scrutinize themselves, the world, and the future. The hope is the fact that the client will work, with the therapist, towards beneficial life changes.

The third wave is its wave. This wave of Cognitive remedy was developed as a consequence of the restructuring procedure for the second influx of Cognitive Remedy. As detailed by Linehan & Dimeff (2001), Dialectic Behavioral Therapy (DBT) was made because of the "failures" of standard Cognitive and/or Behavioral remedy. It's advocated that too much emphasis was put on change the of specific which resulted in an invalidation of the client; an invalidation of the power of the client to achieve success when they have, in their notion, failed a lot already. Therefore, a sizable conceptual part of DBT is skills training of "emotion regulation, interpersonal efficiency, mindfulness, and stress tolerance" (Linehan & Dimeff, 2001, p. 1). DBT purposefully considers not only the change that needs to arise cognitively, but also the in the moment affect of your client.

Concurrently with DBT, Acceptance and Commitment Remedy (ACT) was created by Steven Hayes as a emotional intervention that also uses mindfulness but has a spotlight on personal popularity (Hayes, 2009). Hayes coins a term called emotional flexibility, in where a person is able to fully connect to themselves in spite of the changing situations and personal spirits. With this overall flexibility in mind, the 3rd wave CBT and the mindfulness strategy is different from traditional second wave CBT due to highly energetic procedure that is expected from the therapist towards the client. Maybe too simply put, 2nd wave CBT focuses highly on» cognition while DBT concentrates more on tendencies and skills (or lack of). Therefore, the central aspect of the new third influx CBT is assisting clients review and recognize their thoughts to be able to improve the maladaptive computerized reactions they are using to cope. CBT is not just 'how your cognitions benefit your patterns', but an effort to understand the sophisticated interconnection of schemas that produce reactions in every areas of performing including: have an impact on, physiology, and patterns (Claessens, 2010).

3. From your own reading and research what would be the main points of contract and difference between: 1) CBT, 2) psychodynamic therapy, and 3) family systems therapy.

While psychodynamic therapy and family systems remedy agree that human being development is largely determined by significant interpersonal associations, and that understanding is vital to treatment, CBT places better emphasis on the affected person. The main target of CBT is put only on the person in therapy, their schemas, automatic thoughts, and cognitive distortions (Freeman & Eig, n. d. ). Conversely, psychodynamic theory revolves around emotions and patterns being dependant on connections with others. Transference plays an integral role in understanding present habits of behavior which originated in previous attachment-based interactions (Leichsenring, Hiller, Weissberg, & Leibing, 2006). Psychodynamic psychotherapy is designed to identify difficult relationships from days gone by and to supply the consumer with a safe, restorative relationship, as well as assisting them build additional positive interactions. While family systems remedy also works within the framework of attachment-based associations, the emphasis is on the relational dynamics taking place in as soon as. Family and lovers therapists work with all influenced people, together and separately, in order to address intrapersonal and interpersonal dysfunction (Liddle, 2010).

CBT and psychodynamic remedy both address the client's core values, though how these values were shaped is definitely not crucial to CBT structured treatment. Family systems puts the give attention to developing positive interactions between members of the family. Meanwhile, interactions in family systems therapy are already founded and occurring in the present (Liddle, 2010). Psychodynamic therapy focuses on dangerous relationships of days gone by and understanding them, however, not always focusing on building positive connections in the foreseeable future.

While both CBT and Psychodynamic procedure attempt to reduce psychopathological symptoms and grief, a very central difference between CBT and psychodynamic therapy is that psychodynamic therapy tries to determine at why you are feeling or behave the way you do. Specifically, psychodynamic therapy concentrates on trying to uncover the deep and frequently unconscious motivations for feelings and habit whereas CBT will not necessarily consider this a priority - you can't see what's before you when you're overlooking your shoulder (Freeman, 1993, 2011). Used, CBT attempts to lessen the client's fighting as fast as possible training their brain to displace maladaptive thought habits, perceptions, and do with helpful ones to be able to modify habit and impact.

Part II

1. How is composition found in CBT? What's the purpose of structuring the classes? What techniques would be used to achieve the composition for the remedy as well as for the sessions?

Structure in therapy can have several meanings. Composition could suggest the format of the remedy all together, whether it might be very quick, short-term, or long-term. Composition could mean the surroundings of where therapy takes place, such just as a clinic or in an exclusive office. However, the most relevant and essential meaning of composition within CBT is the framework of the procedure. 45-50 minutes a week is not really a great amount of time, so the framework of CBT used should be designed to be as efficient as is feasible. Each treatment should be a significant exchange between therapist and client. The therapist's and client's collaborative goals should always be center level, but the set agenda needs to take precedence. As Freeman, Pretzer, Fleming, & Simon (1990) records, spending a few minutes each session is an asset to the healing milieu and it is possibly the most effective technique in developing a environment of development rather than digression.

A typical structure of a program as described by Freeman, Pretzer, Fleming, & Simon (1990) includes: agenda environment, an assessment of client's current status, consideration of events of the past week, requesting feedback regarding previous session, review any home work from the prior session, a give attention to main plan issues, develop any new homework, as soon as again looking for opinions regarding current program (p. 17). Considering how the consumer and therapist envision the consultations while building a plan allows redirection of the client when the discussion runs off the expect avenue, but also reduces the likelihood that the client will feel pushed around or invalidated (Freeman, Pretzer, Fleming, & Simon, 1990). Also, a client who is defensive, intense, or always in problems may make the development of the weekly session unstable when a joint program is not placed (People, Davidson, & Tompkins 2001).

Therefore, the collaboration between customer and therapist when preparing the main plan is vital. If this teamwork does not occur, in where in fact the therapist chooses completely the topic of the program, the client might not exactly effectively grasp the meaningfulness of the treatment due to a lack of motivation because they don't feel involved. Additionally, a lack of overview of the plan with your client may also put the inexperienced therapist uncertain of where to go next in the procedure (Individuals, Davidson, & Tompkins 2001). The termination of the session shouldn't be an urgent and sudden event for your client. A therapist must bring some kind of closure in relation to goals of the treatment while allowing sufficient time to handle the stopping of therapy and any issues your client still has. (Joyce, Piper, Ogrodniczuk, & Klein (2007). Therefore, even with a chance for responses about the prior session toward the start of a session, there should be a place time for opinions about the current session by the end of the treatment. In both circumstances, this time permits a discourse of problems that may have took place, such as mistakes in communication, misunderstandings, or basic feedback from your client (Freeman, Pretzer, Fleming, & Simon, 1990).

4. How is Narcissistic Personality Disorder defined, evaluated, conceptualized, and treated? How exactly does a therapist offer with this resilient patient?

Narcissistic Personality Disorder is defined by cognitive procedures that entail selective attention of this is of occurrences and dichotomous thinking (Freeman, n. d. ). This dysfunctional internal thought arrangement is because of the postulation that the individual considers themselves as special, or simply better than others. However, from a psychodynamic point of view, the definition of the disorder changes a little. Ledermann (1982), represents the disorder as something of your opposite of an individual who considers themselves as special or has a proclivity to activate in self-worship, "it is the incapability to love oneself and hence the shortcoming to love another person. . . They are fixated on an early on defense framework which springs into being in infancy-when, for whatever reasons, there's a catastrophically bad fit between your baby and the mother, frequently compounded by the lack of an adequate father and by other inimical activities in childhood. Babies, thus deprived, grow into individuals who lack trust in other people. . . They experience their lives as futile and clear, and their emotions as being freezing or divided off" (p. 303). This psychodynamic perspective is a little extremist and clearly over-analyzed. To say that the narcissistic person is unable to love is akin to calling a person with low self-confidence a sociopath. On second thought, it has been noted a narcissistic individuals is nearly the same as a sociopath anticipated to too little empathy for others and no need to do what's right (Freeman, Pretzer, Fleming, & Simon, 1990). Regardless, one could claim that the narcissistic individual really does have problems with low esteem. That maybe they may be grasping at the straws of the world looking for someone to approve of them. The much more likely reality is that over a daily, second to second process, the narcissistic person is looking for aspects of their lives and environment that supply or fit into their own schema of how great they are. This may also entail an ignoring of any data that goes contrary to their belief composition.

Therefore, the procedure and the purpose of remedy for the narcissistic specific is not to automatically expose the cognitive flaws and the social manipulations which have occurred. Doing so would go against the foundation of the narcissistic individual's schematic framework and probably prematurely end remedy (Freeman, Pretzer, Fleming, & Simon, 1990). First, a realization of the difficulty that lies in advance must appear for the client and the therapist. There must be a detected equalization of power between the therapeutic alliance because protecting against a power struggle is normally the first rung on the ladder that must be taken. Freeman, Pretzer, Fleming, & Simon, (1990) allude to the idea that homework assignments may well not be the best methodology with these individuals because of the odds of noncompliance due to patient's belief that they are special. Instead the therapist must present the therapy to the client as something of great value to them instead of a type of humiliation (Freeman, n. d. ). A protected patient like this isn't only opposing to feedback or questioning, they view it as a fundamental extreme criticism that attacks their very lifetime. Because of their innate respond to invalidate a therapist's assertion or view, a therapist must be vibrant and keep an "absolute positive respect" towards the average person and appear to understand deeply what is stated by your client.

Also We Can Offer!

Other services that we offer

If you don’t see the necessary subject, paper type, or topic in our list of available services and examples, don’t worry! We have a number of other academic disciplines to suit the needs of anyone who visits this website looking for help.

How to ...

We made your life easier with putting together a big number of articles and guidelines on how to plan and write different types of assignments (Essay, Research Paper, Dissertation etc)