Gordon Allport was an influential figure in the shaping of the fields of mindset and social psychology. He had wide-ranging pursuits in eidetic imagery, faith, interpersonal attitudes, rumor and radio, but his most influential review was his research of the Psychology of Personality Characteristics. Throughout the span of this paper, issues will be his biography, his works such as his mindset of religion and prejudice, and forces that affect our tendencies, as well as common characteristics of behavior. Also included is a critical evaluation of his theory, and my own reaction to his work.
Gordon W. Allport, born November 11, 1987, was an American psychologist whose works are significantly less often cited than other popular figures (www. newworldencyclopedia. org). A favorite work of his was Style and Expansion in Personality and THE TYPE of Prejudice. He observed efforts at understanding real human learning as inadequate if the analysis had not been completed about them in question. He also declined the Freudian psychoanalytic methodology believing that it was relying too much on the effects of the past without giving sufficient attention to issues of the current context. He regarded that universal laws and regulations together could never inform the whole tale of the variety and uniqueness of specific human beings, which is why he always thought and believed to compare specific studies. However, he strove to find general personality traits that may be combined in various ways to determine the uniqueness of every specific (www. stolaf. edu).
Among his theories of personality, he gets the psychology of religion and prejudice. In his publication, The Individual and His Religious beliefs (1950), Allport illustrated how
Gordon Allport 3
people may use religion in different ways. He makes a variation between a "mature" spiritual orientation and an "immature" spiritual orientation. People that have mature
religious orientation would have a procedure for faith that is dynamic, open-minded,
and in a position to maintain links between inconsistencies. Alternatively, a person with immature spiritual orientation would be self-serving and generally would embody the negative stereotypes that individuals have about religion. These dimensions were measured on the Religious Orientation range of Allport and Ross (www. newworldencyclopedia. org). Around the mindset of prejudice, Allport devised a range which he referred to as Allport's Level of Prejudice and Discrimination. This scale is measured from 1-5, that are level 1. Anitlocution, level 2. Avoidance, range 3. Discrimination, range 4. Physical Episode, and size 5. Extermination. Range 1, antilocution, will be a majority group, making fun of your chosen minority group. The items said would be about negative stereotypes, images, which are most often times, seen as harmless by almost all group. This stage is not harmful, but it opens doors for more serious kinds of prejudice. Scale 2, avoidance, is when people in a minority group are actively avoided by participants of a majority group, such as segregation before the Civil Rights movement, where African People in america and Caucasians cannot eat in the same places, or African People in america had to sit behind the bus or give their seats up to a Caucasian person. No immediate damage may be designed, but harm is done through avoidance and isolation. Range 3, discrimination, minority communities are discriminated against by denyging them opportunities and services. Behaviors have the precise goal of harming the minority group by protecting against them from achieving goals, education, or careers. Range 4, physical harm, almost all group vandalizes the
Gordon Allport 4
minority group material possessions. They burn property and perform violent episodes on individuals or communities. An example of this would be graffiti on someone's personal owed or losing crosses of the Ku Klux Klan. Size 5, extermination, where in fact the bulk group seeks extermination of the minority group through forms of genocide, similar to the Holocaust of Adolf Hitler (www. newworldencyclopedia. org).
Infusing a humanist element into his work, Allport strove to comprehend the human home as a person who got certain attitudes, even prejudices about situations and people, predicated on both their interior personality and their earlier encounters. Gordon Allport was main psychologists to give attention to the analysis of the personality, and it is often referred to as one of the fathers of personality psychology. He realized that there surely is a fundamental contradiction between your medical and intuitive views of humans. He
referred to these as the homothetic and idiographic standpoints. The homothetic will try to arrive at general laws and regulations that apply to all mankind, and his procedures derive from accurate measurements of behavior. The idiographic view, on the other hand, perceives each particular person as a unique whole and depends largely on intuitive understanding. Allport presumed both should be mixed (www. stolaf. edu).
As mentioned previously, Allport presumed the individuals personality attributes to be the main element to uniqueness and consistency of tendencies. He developed three levels of attributes, being cardinal, central, and supplementary. Cardinal is the trait that dominates and shapes a persons habit, which are rare, as most people don't possess a single item that separates them from others. An example of this would be traits that dominate an individual's expereince of living, often to the point that the person becomes known designed for these attributes, People with
Gordon Allport 5
such personalities often become so known for these traits that their brands are often synonymous with these features, such as Martin Luther King Jr. , for leading a motion of Civil Protection under the law, or Abraham Lincoln with abolishing slavery. . The second trait being the central, is an over-all characteristic found in some degree atlanta divorce attorneys person. They are the basic building blocks that shape the majority of our patterns although they aren't as overwhelming as cardinal traits. These are the overall characteristics that form the essential foundations of personality. These central traits, while not as dominating as cardinal attributes, are the major characteristics you may use to describe another person. Conditions such as wise, honest, shy and stressed would be types of this. The 3rd and previous of the three features, is the extra. It's the characteristics seen only in certain circumstances. They are the traits that are occasionally related to attitudes or choices and often seem only using situations or under specific circumstances. Examples would be getting stressed when having to face large crowds or impatient while ready in line. Many of these characteristics must be included in order to give a complete picture of real human complexity. An example of this might be the Id, Ego and Superego (McAdams, 1999).
Along with his views of personality is his notion of self-esteem. For Allport, self-esteem was a central concern for early years as a child. It is the sense of take great pride in that originates from recognition that one may do things on one's own. He hypothesized the thought of inside and external causes that influence and individual's behavior. These causes were known as Genotypes and Phenotypes. Genotypes being the internal forces that relate to how a person keeps information and uses it to interact with the external world. Phenotypes are external forces, which relate with the way an individual accepts his area and how
Gordon Allport 6
others influence their patterns. These forces create the ways in which we behave and will be the groundwork for the creation of specific qualities. These would come into play with the type verses nurture theory. Our company is taught to act a certain way, but what we learn in other surroundings and settings, offers us the life span lessons that we need to make smart decisions. Some agree that folks can be identified based after their personality features, theorists continue steadily to debate the number of basic traits that make up individual personality. While trait theory has objectivity that some personality ideas lack, it also offers weaknesses. A few of the most frequent criticisms of trait theory focus on the fact that traits tend to be poor predictors of behavior. While an individual may score high on assessments of a specific trait, he or she might not exactly always behave that way in every situation. Another problem is that characteristic theories do not dwelling address how or why specific dissimilarities in personality develop or emerge (Leahey, 1991).
Allport viewed psychology as the analysis of the healthy person. Allport's approach is that all individual is exclusive and different, and really should be approached as such and studied accordingly. All individuals can be likened, but his review of psychology goes beyond just comparison of people, and he emphasizes this in all of his works. Allport's ideas and work didn't have a great impact on later theorists or psychologists, apart from to encourage them. One main factor along with his work is that he had hardly any research to lower back up his theories ( Ben-David, 1966).
Throughout the research of Gordon Allport, his views of personality traits are those that are not unusual to what we've discovered and explored in the analysis of psychology. He mad some very valid tips on his psychology of prejudice, and one
Gordon Allport 7
might say the same for his mindset of religious beliefs. Further comprehensive views on his personality characteristic theory, would only cause the idea of the views on mother nature verses nurture. That is said because of the three traits, cardinal, central and secondary. The
cardinal behavior patterns a persons action, central is said to be the building blocks for almost all of our habit, and secondary are those characteristics that are only seen in certain circumstances, such as how we are in stressful situations. I assume that he laid a base for others to develop upon, and he has valid tips, but with exploring him and what others experienced to state, he didn't have any basis to his theories, only what he thought to be true, which makes for a shaky base in science.
Gordon Allport 8
Also We Can Offer!
- Argumentative essay
- Best college essays
- Buy custom essays online
- Buy essay online
- Cheap essay
- Cheap essay writing service
- Cheap writing service
- College essay
- College essay introduction
- College essay writing service
- Compare and contrast essay
- Custom essay
- Custom essay writing service
- Custom essays writing services
- Death penalty essay
- Do my essay
- Essay about love
- Essay about yourself
- Essay help
- Essay writing help
- Essay writing service reviews
- Essays online
- Fast food essay
- George orwell essays
- Human rights essay
- Narrative essay
- Pay to write essay
- Personal essay for college
- Personal narrative essay
- Persuasive writing
- Write my essay
- Write my essay for me cheap
- Writing a scholarship essay