Is Offender Behavior Innate or Shaped?

Keywords: criminality character v nurture, interpersonal learning theory crime

The 'character vs. nurture' debate is one of the oldest issues pertaining to psychologists and the degree to which both factor affects personality can be an enigma that remains unresolved to this date. Many questions have been brought up and one such question is: 'Is criminal behavior is innate or could it be molded by the environment' which paper will try to toss some light on this issue.

Crime and violence have been around in the world since the time of Abel and Cane and people have been intrigued as to what makes a person turn out to be a 'bad seed' and behave in violent ways and do unspeakable acts. Such people, previously known as 'psychopaths', do not feel normal emotions, willingly break rules, don't get socialized, and lack morality and a individuals connection. However, labeling such people as scammers creates the situation of stereotyping and might lead to misjudgment of the reason which can frequently be psychological. Psychopathy is now called the 'Antisocial personality disorder' (APD) attributed to people who show 'a pervasive pattern of disregard for, and violation of, the protection under the law of others'. Such people usually have a brief history of APD since years as a child and aren't designed by environmental factors as they grow older.

A great deal of family, twin and adoption studies have been conducted to find the basis for the type vs. nurture debate in criminal habit. To calculate the result of genes or environment antisocial tendencies, a few family studies have been completed. A Dutch family was found to truly have a mutation in the structure of the MAOa gene, which causes low degrees of 5-hydroxyindole-3-acetic acid solution (5-HIAA) in cerebrospinal liquid, resulting in impulsive and hostile habit in the men of the family. This analysis showed the effect of genes on unlawful habit, however, such studies lack a whole lot of credibility as it isn't possible to isolate either genes or environment to study the effect on behavior and the results can't be replicated.

Twin studies compare monozygotic (MZ) and dizygotic (DZ) twins and a hereditary influence can be assumed if criminal tendencies is more in accord in MZ twins than in DZ twins. Some studies have been conducted on MZ and DZ twins reared apart and some show the effect of heritability while others have negated it. Such studies, however, can lack validity and the ability to filter out genetic or environmental affect.

Adoption studies are of vital importance as mother nature and nurture influences have been separated as children are reared aside from their labor and birth parents. Research demonstrated that followed children born to offenders demonstrated better antisocial and legal tendencies. However, one research revealed that children created to parents convicted of property crimes were more susceptible to be violent themselves than those of people convicted of violent offences, an interesting end result indeed. Similarities of the children with hereditary parents are hereditary affects while similarities with the implemented parents are environmental influences. However, adoption studies can be complicated by factors like the difference in the socioeconomic position of the labor and birth and adoptive parents.

Cadoret, Cain and Crowe conducted adoption studies in Iowa by choosing a number of samples from different psychopathological disorders. The dependant variable was the number of adolescent antisocial habits used, the genetic parameters were antisocial and alcoholic track record as most biological mothers possessed antisocial personalities and were convicted for a few crime, and the environmental variables were the unfavorable adoptive-home conditions and the age at which the child was adopted. Sex factor was also considered. The results have been talked about in the final outcome.

Biologically, it has been discovered that neurochemicals, such as monoamine oxidase (MAO), epinephrine, norepinephrine, serotonin, and dopamine are accountable for antisocial action. Low levels of MAO are shown to be related to antisocial patterns, impulsivity and hostility and are also related to norepinephrine, epinephrine, and dopamine, which are all related to the personality factor of psychosis. Dopamine is linked to emotionally driven and predatory hostility and is associated with the Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) which is associated with violent crimes regarding to one research. Another neurochemical, serotonin, has been found to try out a vital role in depression, anxiousness, bipolar disorder, carry out disorder (Compact disk), impulsivity and hostility. Such results can be used to validate the claim that genes play a substantial role in deciding characteristics that can result in antisocial tendencies. However, it is argued by some that a well defined causation is not proved as it is not entirely certain if the reduced levels of such chemicals lead to a violent response or if violence leads to the low levels.

Disorders - such as ADHD, Oppositional Defiance Disorder (ODD) and Compact disc - which can bring about violent adult behavior, are usually found to exist since childhood. ADHD is hyperactivity and the inability to focus which contributes to antisocial behavior therefore children cannot reveal upon and study from previous errors. Children with ODD are argumentative, irritable and noncompliant. They become worse as time passes, indulging in resting, cheating, vandalism and aggressiveness. As ADHD or ODD get worse, they are often apt to be diagnosed with Disc which really is a violation of norms. Each one of these disorders can result in the antisocial personality disorder (APD) as such children emerge into adulthood and find the personality qualities of aggressiveness and impulsivity, two heritable traits that are associated with criminal patterns as they can forecast antisocial behavior and delinquency.

Physiologically, there is an abnormality in the central nervous system of such people which will make them unable to feel psychological arousal - such as empathy, fear, guilty or anxiety - or react to the risk of punishment. This lack of physiological arousal is what differentiates a person with APD from others. In addition, people with APD also have lesser gray matter and an impaired frontal-lobe working, the area responsible for planning and impulse control, resulting in impulsivity. Brain destruction can also lead to the impairment of the frontal-lobes. It had been also once assumed that men with an extra Y chromosome were more prone to violent behavior however the argument was not proved.

Even though most of all these results show genetics to be a factor, it's important to look at the role of the surroundings, i. e. family and peers, in nurturing such action. Not absolutely all recent studies have supported the earlier results of genetic influences. It is shown that young families can effect the hyperactivity of kids with ADHD. Upbringing, communication, good care, financial status, disciplinary techniques, family composition and bonds, education, etc are a few of the factors that vary from family to family and can have a positive or a poor impact on the child. Furthermore, abused or neglected children have a fifty percent greater threat of indulging in crime. Physically abused young boys, who've a lacking gene too, have been proven to indulge in more violent crimes. Moreover, time also decides the impact of heritability or environment and kids will be inspired by their environment as they can not choose their own environment and are more likely to be molded regarding to it. Parents, however, have an option and their personality qualities can only be positively or negatively reinforced by the environment they choose to reside in.

Social learning theory also implies that children observe the behavior of those around them, such as parents and siblings and if indeed they see aggressive action around them to be a norm, they will more likely act likewise, although this is as opposed to the hereditary theory. Aggressive people usually lack in disciplinary techniques and monitoring which reinforces a child's patterns and is essential in leading to antisocial action.

Peer communities are also essential in producing antisocial tendencies. When small children behave in an antisocial manner, they will be shunned by their peers which results in the further reinforcement of such patterns as these kids are then struggling to develop peer associations. They are also forced in to the midst of other such antisocial children and are forced towards offense as they get reinforcement from other group. This is also in accord to the fact that genes influence the kind of connections humans have.

Eysenck came in the Pencil Model which is dependant on psychoticism, extraversion, and neuroticism. In his model, 'Psychoticism is associated with the traits of extreme, impersonal, impulsive, cool, antisocial, and un-empathetic. Extraversion is correlated with the attributes of sociable, exciting, effective, sensation-seeking, carefree, prominent, and assertive. Finally, neuroticism is associated with restless, frustrated, low self-esteem, irrational, moody, emotional, and tense'. He believes psychoticism is the difference between thieves and non-criminals, extraversion is a much better predictor for young people and neuroticism for more mature. It has been shown that low arousal levels in the mind, such as lack of interest, sleepiness etc, are related to criminal behavior and extravert people hunt for more simulation in high risk activities to increase their arousal. However, adding on to his model, the belief that there can be an connection between genes and the surroundings is backed by the general arousal theory of criminality which implies that there is conversation between the factors and also an interaction between your environment and genes to build such an person.

Although clinical tests have generally lacked the capability to have the ability to isolate the effects of genes or environment on the shaping of a person's personality, both factors of the type vs. nurture debate hold a lot of merit. You will discover people known as primary sociopaths who lack morals and the capability to feel responsible therefore of the genotype. Secondary sociopaths, however, are a rsulting consequence the environment they are really raised in and even though there is some degree of heritability, there is a higher environmental role. Coming to a realization, it is generally agreed after that genes do in truth have too much to do in influencing action, and factors in the environment account for what cannot be discussed by the genes. Because of this, personality is shaped by the interaction of both factors and it was discovered that a certain mixture of environmental factors with genetics essentially takes on a vital role. Inherited genes when combined with right environmental conditions can bring about a catastrophic delivery of a legal. Relating to Joseph Alper, however, research on these issues is too basic to be decisive and of much help in treating disorders. It really is however, the role of the population, for its own good and out of moral obligation, to ensure children with such personality characteristics are treated and rehabilitated, alternatively than shunned out and stigmatized.

Also We Can Offer!

Other services that we offer

If you don’t see the necessary subject, paper type, or topic in our list of available services and examples, don’t worry! We have a number of other academic disciplines to suit the needs of anyone who visits this website looking for help.

How to ...

We made your life easier with putting together a big number of articles and guidelines on how to plan and write different types of assignments (Essay, Research Paper, Dissertation etc)