mental disorder; DSM-IV

DSM-IV

"DSM-IV is a classification of mental disorders that originated for use in scientific, educational, and research configurations. " What the DSM attempts to do is have specific conditions for specific disorders, but at exactly the same time, not need the manual be used in a "cookbook" fashion. Meaning that the specific diagnostic requirements in the DSM are meant to serve as suggestions concurrently with professional medical judgment. As we all know, each disorder included in the DSM has a set of diagnostic requirements that signify what symptoms must be present in order to meet the requirements for a diagnosis. Conversely, there are some disorders where there are symptoms that must not be there in order for an individual to be eligible for the diagnosis. A strong point of this particular set-up of the DSM manual makes finding the disorder and its own diagnostic conditions easier because of its conciseness. The usage of the DSM diagnostic criteria to diagnose has been shown to increase diagnostic reliability.

As noted above, the DSM-IV is a manual that helps put together mental disorders. A significant strength is the fact healthcare specialists such as medical doctors, psychologist, psychiatrists, yet others put together their resources and knowledge to create a common manual (Well in america anyways). Also, the DSM is used for appropriate coding for billing and insurance purposes which, for some psychologists, is crucial in order to receive reimbursement for treatment. DSM IV allows analysts anywhere to gather together a group of patients who meet the described criteria for the disorder, try different treatments, and compare the results. The prognosis is general. Thus, a given percentage of patients with cultural phobia might be helped by placebo, and when a greater quantity will be helped by paroxetine, or gabapentin, or cognitive behavioral therapy, or whatever the procedure in the research design might be, then these treatments can be specified effective if statistical significance is come to. "Evidence founded treatment" appeals to the FDA and, moreover, seemingly attracts good sense. Empirical data is usually far more valuable than ideas and controversy that can't be backed up by way of a test of the facts. In recent years "evidence based medicine" has become a rallying cause. Pressures are exerted for it to become the typical of care. The Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM) is the standard classification of mental disorders employed by mental health professionals in the United States. It is intended to be applicable in a wide array of contexts and employed by clinicians and analysts of many different orientations (e. g. , biological, psychodynamic, cognitive, behavioral, social, family/systems). DSM-IV has been created for use across adjustments, inpatient, outpatient, incomplete hospital, consultation-liaison, medical clinic, private practice, and key treatment, and with community populations and by psychiatrists, psychologists, sociable employees, nurses, occupational and rehabilitation therapists, counselors, and other health and mental medical researchers. Additionally it is a necessary tool for collecting and communicating accurate general population health statistics. The DSM contains three major components: the diagnostic classification, the diagnostic requirements models, and the descriptive words.

They have again overlooked the chance to note that although terms such as neurosis, hysteria and neurasthenia are not disorders in the DSM system, they are simply widely used throughout the rest of the world; none of these three terms is given an entrance in the overall index to the quantity. This is an especially unfortunate omission with regard to neurasthenia, since it means that the promise about taking notice of recent research can't be taken very very seriously. ? One of the weaknesses of the DSM system has always been the frequently available option of like the social ramifications of disorders in the standards by which the same disorders are diagnosed.

The DSM-IV is a categorical classification system. The categories are prototypes, and a patient with an in depth approximation to the prototype is said to have that disorder. DSM-IV state governments, "there is no assumption each category of mental disorder is a completely discrete entity with absolute boundaries. . . " but isolated, low-grade and noncriterion (unlisted for confirmed disorder) symptoms aren't given importance. [18] Qualifiers are occasionally used, for example light, moderate or severe types of a problem. For practically half the disorders, symptoms must be sufficient to cause "clinically significant problems or impairment in social, occupational, or other important areas of functioning", although DSM-IV-TR removed the problems criterion from tic disorders and many of the paraphilias. Each category of disorder has a numeric code extracted from the ICD coding system, used for health service (including insurance) administrative purposes.

Despite caveats in the launch to the DSM, it has long been argued that its system of classification makes unjustified categorical distinctions between disorders, and uses arbitrary cut-offs between normal and unnatural. A 2009 psychiatric review noted that attempts to show natural limitations between related DSM syndromes, or between a DSM symptoms and normality, have failed. [4] Some argue that rather than categorical approach, a fully dimensional, spectrum or complaint-oriented approach would better represent the evidence. [38][39][40][41]

In addition, it is argued that the current approach based on exceeding a threshold of symptoms will not adequately look at the context in which a person is living, and what extent there exists interior disorder of a person versus a internal response to adverse situations. [42][43] The DSM does add a step ("Axis IV") for outlining "Psychosocial and environmental factors adding to the disorder" once someone is diagnosed with that one disorder.

Because a person's degree of impairment is often not correlated with warning sign counts, and can stem from various individual and social factors, the DSM's standard of distress or disability could produce false positives. [44] On the other hand, individuals who don't meet indication counts may nevertheless experience equivalent distress or impairment in their life.

Despite questions about arbitrary cut-offs, yes/no decisions often need to be made (e. g. whether a person will be provided a treatment) and the others of remedies is focused on categories, so it is thought unlikely that any formal nationwide or international classification will choose a fully dimensional format. [4]

Reference


Also We Can Offer!

Other services that we offer

If you don’t see the necessary subject, paper type, or topic in our list of available services and examples, don’t worry! We have a number of other academic disciplines to suit the needs of anyone who visits this website looking for help.

How to ...

We made your life easier with putting together a big number of articles and guidelines on how to plan and write different types of assignments (Essay, Research Paper, Dissertation etc)