Piagets theory underestimated childrens cognitive abilities

Piaget presumed in cognitive development and that there are three principles included. Accommodation, which is the procedure of adapting cognitive plans (a structured or arranged way of understanding experience, this changes as you grow older) for enjoying the world. The next assimilation, is the process of interpreting experiences when we use current plans to set-up new ones. The final is equilibration. This is when you are through assimilation and accommodation to accomplish cognitive steadiness Hummel (1998)

Piaget found four periods of development from infant to adolescence

The first level of Piaget's cognitive development is the sensorimotor stage. This occurs between your age of 0-2 years. At this stage learning is based on: (Sensori) senses, (electric motor) and doing things. Matching to Piaget babies know a little about the entire world but cannot explore it how they want to. Piaget believes infants were delivered with the actual to learn everything about the planet and that the sensory system is functioning from birth. Despite the fact that they cannot do much using their head they have got many motor responses, they think using their eyes, ears, and they are able to suck and gasp. Piaget then measured object permanence. Understanding the thing remains when protected, out of vision using searching patterns. I. e. hiding toy with cloth. He found they first weary, then in the later sub stage can handle looking for it, doing this implies they have storage area of object.

According to Piaget young children start developing subject permanence. Bower (1982) found evidence to disprove Piaget's theory, and explained that they are able to do that young than explained. An experiment was done with children a few months old. They were shown objects, and then your screen was moved across in front of the thing and then transferred back to its original position. Two conditions were then produced. The first was when the display was moved back and the object was still in the same place. The next condition being that the thing had relocated when the display screen moved back. According to Piaget, small children don't retain information about things that aren't there; which means children shouldn't be surprised in the second condition. The kid did the contrary. Bower said this was because of the fact they expected it to reappear. Another analysis which agrees with Bowers finding was done by Ballargeon and DeVos on three month old children. Within this they found that the children were aware of continues lifetime of object even when out of site.

Piaget mentioned only towards the finish of sensorie engine (twenty months) that children show their organized activities to help form demonstration of the organized event. Willates (1989) then evaluated this by doing the same experiment but with youngsters (nine a few months). It had been found that many children completed their activities on the first try and was correct. They didn't need to go through 'trial and problem', meaning they are able to operate on a mental representation of the term. Piaget also claimed that deferred imitation was proof memory representation of what that they had seen at an earlier time. Meltzoff & Moore (1983) mentioned that babies can imitate cosmetic expression from beginning. This was turned out in studies done with six week old children plus they were found to be able to make the same cosmetic expression they had seen the day before. They recommended they had memory representation of the gesture in order to succeed. This shows Piaget wrong that mental representation occurs at an earlier age than he advised.

The second stage is the pre-operational stage which occurs at age groups 2-7. This is then split into two sub stages; the pre-conceptual period age 2-4 years and intuitive period 4-7 years. The pre-conceptual period consists of the upsurge in a child's terms and thinking due to the development of symbolic thoughts. There are two limits of the child's abilities at this stage; animistic and egocentric. Piaget noted that egocentrism thinking is really because the child is convinced the world is centered on them and they only give attention to their own view and think and sense the same manner as them. An example of this is shown as an experiment done by Piaget and Inhelder (1956), who found egocentrism responsible for children convinced that inanimate things have feelings, purpose and life like features. I. e. teddy had sore head. This is an example of animistic thinking example by Borke (1971). Studies done by Broke and Mossler (1976) turned out Piaget to be incorrect in this these all develop. This could be because of the fact that studies did not relate to anything that happened in everyday routine.

Piaget suggested that at the intuitive period (years 4-7), the kid thinks differently, the kid is able to do more things in a organized way, buying, classifying and quantifying, The web that even though the child can many of these things it is unable to describe why they did them. Piaget also discovered that at this time children find it hard to class inclusion process. He later found this could be due to social background.

One facet of the preoperational child was looked into by Piaget and was called conservation. This is the idea that physical characteristics of something may stay the same even though outward appearance changes, i. e. two identical glasses of drinking water, both of the same form, and amount would be regarded as the same whereas two different glasses in condition but indistinguishable in level would be studied as adapted. Just because the form of the glass has changed it doesn't mean there exists less or more water that your children found this hard to understand. They tended to focus on the situation and forgetting about the rest of the important features. Another important process is reversibility. At this time the kids think about reversing the stage which just occurred to the start. Piaget said that pre functional children cannot apply the idea process needed: payment and reversibility. This is why they may be in in a position to conserve jobs.

To sum up, Piaget claimed that pre-operational children cannot deal with certain tasks credited to lack of logical thought functions. Other research runs against this, and thinks there could be other reasons than the ones associated with reasonable processes.

According to Piaget's studies regarding the experiments with rods, pre-operational children found it hard to arrange the sticks to be able. Bryant and Trabasso found Piaget's conclusions were wrong due to the fact children found the task difficult because they were unable to bear in mind the information needed. When the analysis was redone it was found that as long as the information was sorted to their memory they completed without issues. Piaget also mentioned pre-operational children cannot understand between whole and part in school inclusion task. Some researchers remarked that the questions which were asked were unusual, i. e. 'are there more dark brown beads or more solid wood beads?' This isn't an everyday question. McGarngle and Doncudson revisited Piaget's interpretation on conservation and found the key reason why they did badly was due to the form of questioning which then inspired their answer. i. e. 'are there more counters or are they both the same?' This could confuse the child because as little or nothing has been modified. The children interpret the question in conditions of expected framework and not concentrate on the complete wording of the question.

The next level is concrete functional children whose age groups range between 7-11. Their way of thinking has changed and they develop new strategies. At this time their thinking is more flexible because they are able to give attention to several thing at the same time. Children can perform well in point of view taking tasks due to this, a limitation is the fact the kid is reliant on the thing being present when fixing problems. Tomlison Keasey (1978) mentioned conservation of numbers, weight and volume level gained in the order that Piaget stated, but he known that relative concept may develop at different times, which he didn't give reason for.

At get older 11 and old, children are actually in the formal functional stage having been through previous periods. Now they can reason hypothetically, so when they are confronted with a problem they could breakdown all the aspects which may affect the results. They don't really need to depend on concrete thinking to be able to solve problems. Also, they are better at dealing with problems, systematically. Shayer et al (1976) Piaget boasts at this time thinking is gradual, that not everyone undergoes the same periods. They do this at different times and acceleration depending on their cognitive stimuli they received, the culture. University also stimulates this stage. Some have the opportunities to learn at school. Researchers found that it isn't in fact used in on a regular basis.

To conclude

Also We Can Offer!

Other services that we offer

If you don’t see the necessary subject, paper type, or topic in our list of available services and examples, don’t worry! We have a number of other academic disciplines to suit the needs of anyone who visits this website looking for help.

How to ...

We made your life easier with putting together a big number of articles and guidelines on how to plan and write different types of assignments (Essay, Research Paper, Dissertation etc)