Psychology and Education: Synopsis of Research

Psychology and Education

Qualitative Research in Psychology

Qualitative research has turned into a common trend in the present day day mindset. The field is experiencing new directions, for instance, there's been much standardization of the various qualitative techniques. Along with the creation of new recommendations, a clearer understanding of qualitative research will be achieved while elaborating the consequences that it has on the mindset.

Research hypothesis

The researcher is targeted on discussing the continuing future of qualitative research in neuro-scientific psychology. He looks for showing various benefits of the current benefits that have accrued due to presenting had more advancements in the field. Further, he relates the current development with the continuing future of psychology with an aim of exhibiting the positive influences despite there being assorted misconceptions about the same.

Throughout the study work, the researcher expected to find out whether there exist qualitative methodological strategies that may be relied upon to help proper emotional research. Further, he expected to discover if the category which has qualitative methods in group B necessary or could it mislead the complete approach. Furthermore, he wanted to really know what data was, and when it time was ripe to displace such conditions like qualitative or data with other better conditions that could perhaps suit the existing psychological research techniques. Also, the researcher experienced hoped to look for the amount to which mainstream mindset has been utilized with a bias using its primary concentration being on a person separately. He was worried about identifying the rift that is accessible between qualitative research and the way in which where regular research work is conducted used. Finally, he is determined to determine the scope to that your past styles of standardization and inflationary request of 'qualitative methods' influenced McDonaldization of research. His goals were predicated on racking your brains on the actual future of the qualitative research in psychology.

To effectively test the hypothesis, the researcher conducts a rigorous re-examination of various works done by various experts as well as organizations as a means of pulling results that can then be applied to forecast what is to be expected in the foreseeable future of qualitative research in neuro-scientific psychology. First of all, he conducts a thorough study of the new innovations that have been realized by qualitative research. He further switches into the theoretical facet of it by examining different ideas that seek to displace research. To perform an all-sided approach to the study, he conducts a short study of the risks that qualitative research will probably have on the development of psychology.

On the basis of the various resources that the researcher applied for his work, a majority of the results show that, unlike other research techniques and methodologies that have been used in the previous history, the qualitative research method has a much better charm and applicability in the field of psychology. Various research workers have since denounced the majority of the original methods and are vouching for the use of the qualitative strategies, more in mindset. This is seen with the progressive progress that has managed to get the preferred research method for many researchers worldwide. On the problem of Theorism, the researcher detects it necessary to introduce the theoretical aspect of research in the qualitative method so that it remains inventive, allowing for more realm to be achieved, particularly in neuro-scientific psychology.

Ideally, the implication of these results is the fact that qualitative research sticks out one of the better research techniques that can be applied in mindset. Nonetheless, more alterations should be made to factor in the theoretical aspects that enable for the inventive section, with the target being mainly on the field of mindset.

In the research work, there were different sources which were useful to get any substantive and important results. A lot of the psychology experts view qualitative research in mindset as the best technique as far as comprehensive research can be involved. However, it fails to contain other aspects including the theoretical methods to analyze. For others, they consider the traditional ideologies as already outdated with reduced features to the field of research. Not surprisingly group's support, there exists other radical experts who view the qualitative approach as bare with limited use in just as much as research in mindset is concerned.

They will form the basis of evolving the processes of research-related techniques while factoring in the suggestions by the research workers that will improve research in psychology. Further, their main target was to regulate how applicable qualitative techniques can be employed in the foreseeable future research in mindset. The main limitation, however, is the actual fact that qualitative research techniques neglect to consider the theoretical bit of any research process, which can prevent any successful research in mindset.


Any response action is brought about by some activity that requires instant decision-making. However, not absolutely all decisions can be recognized to be providing the best results during action. Most are the changing times when people are likely to have more than one decisions for a particular action. However, finding the right decision for the circumstance at hand may be problematic. Therefore, it is likely that a person may forego a much better decision and choose an inferior course of action. Overall, both instances are possible; a decision to adopt the greater complete decision can be taken, or else we can decide to select the inferior plan of action.


In this review, therefore, the principal concentration will be on a distinctive approach to the condition of akrasia in the sense that having two judgments during action, we can decide to respond on the superior one if not we can opt for the less superior one if we follow our thoughts at the time of action.

Therefore, the researcher looks for to ascertain if the decisions that people make when responding to a given reason behind action, can be attributed to the thoughts, beliefs and choices that we possess at the moment.

The researcher likely to know if the judgments that we make can be related to various factors that are likely to effect the decision-making process at the time of action. In the light of this can individual differences in conditions of choices and beliefs impact the talk about of the mind that will further cause the selection of different best judgments or selecting the less complete judgment? Ideally, an individual could make biased judgmental choices in different contexts depending on what they think is right. An individual may opt choosing a less complete action, even in the presence of a more complete one.

To test the hypothesis, the researcher used a consultative discourse that involved some questions and feedbacks from which the researcher drew almost all of the conclusions from. Further, he has examined the details provided by the conversation to arrive at most his decisions.


On the bill of the many circumstances and situational conditions that an individual may come in contact with, acting akratically can, therefore, be attributed to lots of factors. These can include; possessing varied values and personal preferences for different situations, choosing a best view on the basis of the whole self throughout the action, doing what we perceive to be the best or unlike what we might want to be the best at the moment of action, and being irrational while behaving unlike what we believe that.

The implication is the fact most of the activities by individuals derive from a state of your brain that can profoundly be influenced by a range of factors that are, as well, determined by other conditions including the beliefs and personal preferences that an specific possesses towards various situations and activities.

Results summary

The researcher observes that different people are likely to make different judgments on different programs of actions. It is likely that those who possess similar beliefs and preferences may have closely related judgments that will vary from those of another type of band of individuals.

Of much importance is the way majority of the folks work in these ways; their judgments being affected by many factors. Akrasia may be irrational, but there are exceptional instances in which it could have significant implications. Firstly, many individuals are improbable to exercise free judgmental skills at the moment of taking an action. Diverse best judgments will arise because of the diverse desires and tastes that will have a significant influence on the manner in which we think and action, different from the most common standpoint. Second, peer judgmental features weigh down a person's thinking capacity and generally, she or he will take a choice contrary to the best. Thirdly, though a person may be rational for acting in a way below their will, there are chances that their actions may be related to the decisions they make. Finally, though a person functions rationally, and without blame for the judgmental decisions that they make, there are higher chances that they could not be logical in their interpretation of the akratic activities.

In psychology, these findings are essential as they permit the learners get a clearer knowledge of the reason why for various actions by different individuals, by being in a position to understand the circumstances that are likely to trigger such reactions.

Psychological Science

The request of knowledge in psychology can signify change in the manner by which clinical genomic counseling is done. As a development in psychology, there are higher potential customers that the complete field may experience arbitrary improvements resulting in better patient care and attention. The researcher looks for to determine the most efficient method of providing useful communication to the family and the patients so that they can get an understanding and later make acoustics decisions regarding healthcare.

Research hypothesis

The researcher's main concern is about how effective the genomic sequencing technologies are proving applicable to enhancing medical care given that the experience of sequencing information is confronted with many complexities. This can be divided into a series of questions that the researcher feels ought to be the central point of emphasis. They include: the perseverance of the factors that have an impact on the informational requirements of the patients that may be necessary for comprehending on the particular genomic results are and their implications; how to supply the genomic sequencing information; the reactions from the patients and their own families.

In the span of conducting the research work, the researcher expected to know of the factors that have the greatest effects on the patient's informational requirements for there to be a clear understanding of the results as well as their implications. Also, he expected to know the way in which where the results reach patients and family. Finally, he was more concerned about the response of the patients and their own families towards genomic information. His expectations were predicated on the effectiveness of the new technologies of genomic sequencing that may be considered to far better in administering clinical care.

To test the hypothesis, the researcher employed prior research work from various analysts in the field of clinical treatment that uses genomic systems. Furthermore, he has applied various works carried out using both qualitative and quantitative techniques of research. Further, the study areas are diverse, applying different methodologies and case analysis that enable the study to protect a wider collection of the hypothesis questions.


Researcher's results necessitate more genetic counseling. Firstly, he notes that there are some steady factors which exist, and they're likely to be influential into the informational needs of the patients with regards to getting understanding of genomic sequencing results. Some of these factors may include the activities in an individual view, culture, limited genetics experts, and limited training for the specialists which exist. Secondly, transferring over genomic information has been problematic for long. Various systems of connecting the info have proved insufficient and to some degree non-applicable. Because of this, the researcher provides alternatives that he thinks can improve this case. For instance, he records that more research ought to be conducted to so that to streamline the whole system. Communication platforms have to be changed and devote conformity with the current informational requirements.

Finally, he notices the lifestyle of uncertainties mainly due to the nature of hazards that are involved, and the complicated healthcare information which may prove difficult for the patients to comprehend. In addition, he says that the patients' conditions may help in higher degrees of uncertainty to the amount of not differentiating illness-related occurrences. These results imply that psychological technology can play a significant role in transferring information regarding genomic sequencing. However, the process is confronted by lots of factors and, therefore, the greatest process is to enhance the systems by which the communication will need place.

The researcher confirms the application of psychological research as an important trend in genetic counseling. However, he notices that field hasn't had the full potential to streamline effectively all the techniques that are required to be conducted. He points out some of the areas that needs to be better so that efficiency may be accomplished. He further recommends on the necessity to improve the clinical specialists' knowledge so the passing of information and other communication requirements can be carried out better.

The field of psychology is advancing, and efficiency will be necessary for its full probable to be recognized; more research will need to be conducted to ensure that there surely is sustainability of the field all together. The results are significant since to a larger extent, they provide suggestions on what should be achieved so that the psychological process can be transformed and become better. If all the changes are applied, the whole field will get better, providing enough patient experience while boosting the smooth flow of useful scientific information.

Social Justice

The issue revolves around the moral aspect of psychology among learners of varied disciplines in schools. Its primary concentrate lies in the manner where various honest research practices receive to different categories of students while, for others, they are not given, solely based on the discipline. For this case, psychology learners rarely cover ethics-related items in their studies, while their peers in other domains have it as a total unit. For this reason, the topic's main target is on affording justice in terms of providing the required ethical knowledge to the group that can it as a whole course while eliminating the usual practices that provide to derail excellent practice in the field of psychology.


The researcher's primary concern is placed on the observation that despite ethics as an important field of psychology, it rarely matters in increasing the professionalism and reliability of an individual, rather it is just a uniform code of professional practice that may be learned through practice or as a unit at university. The implication talks about the diverse lifestyle of ethics with regards to professional disciplines. Therefore, the researcher looks for to establish the ethical effects that result from epistemological foundations that form the foundation of major disciplines in psychology.

Throughout the research work, the researcher's targets were to establish any honest implications on the basis of various worth, facts, as well as, beliefs using articles that had the evaluation. This research's basis is to recognize the ethical results.

To test the hypothesis, the researcher conducts a short analysis of every of four articles by different writers with the purpose of identifying the variations between facts and beliefs with regards to disciplinary mindset. The materials contain research regarding the ethical decision-making with regards to psychology. Further, in the articles, the writers have analyzed different APA and CPA rules, an executing that will play a substantial part into the practical examination of the hypothesis. Finally, the researcher establishes a few of the features that distinguish various ethical considerations in psychology from natural technology.

From the research conducted, the researcher's finding is the actual fact that ethics in decision-making operations is entirely not the same as the disciplinary view. It is more of a social process whose event can somewhat be related to the level of experience as well as the exposure to different mental health experts, and specialists in other psychology-related domains. Further, the codes that are given by various subconscious bodies often fail to provide a detailed definition of cultural justice. Therefore, in neuro-scientific psychology, ethical habit can probably be attributed to cultural responsibility through designing proper systems and strategies that are targeted at advancing the welfare of each person in the culture. The implication derived from these results is the fact ethical decision-making differs from the multi-disciplinary methodology of various occupations. It requires no particular insights concerning training so as to achieve an extra scale of qualification; rather it entails a free process that would depend on the exposure to experience and proper appointment.

The author identifies a number of insights covering various ethical ideologies in psychology. Most importantly, he has recognized moral decision-making as a distinctive process that considers a number of different parties. For instance, in research, different parties may be engaged. However, they are simply bound to use outdated decision-making techniques, you start with the researcher. For this reason, the ecological aspect of decision-making could be more relevant for research functions. The findings imply that the insights should be applied as a subject of enhancing the delivery of moral decision-making processes. In addition, it is important for a researcher to execute an analytical study of his research activities with the principal objective of building if classical strategies towards decision-making are being applied in his research operations.

The field of psychology keeps growing, and decent approaches to ethical decision-making should be applied in order to boost better services and specialization. Therefore, applying the researcher's insights in real-life would give a much better understanding of the requirements of the field in around psychology is concerned. In addition, spotting the benefits of honest decision-making in psychology would play a substantial role in maximizing its progress and appreciating its interconnections with various interdisciplinary factors.


The researcher failed to element in other considerations which may contest the already available idea. This would have the benefit of bringing in several thoughts and ideologies that may provide a contesting point while wanting to understand who brings out a justifiable reasoning and the sort of ideologies that they provide for the analysis to remain more compelling.

Also We Can Offer!

Other services that we offer

If you don’t see the necessary subject, paper type, or topic in our list of available services and examples, don’t worry! We have a number of other academic disciplines to suit the needs of anyone who visits this website looking for help.

How to ...

We made your life easier with putting together a big number of articles and guidelines on how to plan and write different types of assignments (Essay, Research Paper, Dissertation etc)