Around the Philippines itself, picture searching through garbage, junks, rivers filled with waste material, rubbish and trash; imagine looking through dumps, or burrows across the avenues, looking for food to satisfy unending hunger. Make an effort to see the tragedy 'Dangling Habagat' has dealt on some parts or moreover on some poverty-living people in the Philippines? Shop around you, shop around the earth you you live, many people faces the same situation as mentioned; being hungry, thirst, unemployment - all because of poverty. What could have caused a situation like this that occurs? Simple. Insufficient education, illness, and discrimination play a key role in leading to poverty. Those triggers can come with an immense impact on countries, continents, and additionally the Philippines itself.
Defining the idea in my own view, functionalist/functionalism is very famous and by much one of the best-known sociological perspective used for understanding the realization of the population where we live at present. Fundamentally, functionalism affirms that almost everything; irrelevant, extraneous or distinct as it may seem, is vital to the entire utility - simply speaking, almost all things in the contemporary society has a purpose; more or less a certain and possible function; that every person toils as you to help maintain the society to function in a enjoyable and harmonious manner, or furthermore abduct an equilibrium point of view.
The Functionalist view or Functionalism was set up by Emile Durkheim, a great French Sociologist in the 18th-19th century and was expounded by great American sociologist, Talcott Parsons in the same century.
Searching through the net itself, you wouldn't have the ability to search for probable perspectives that easily on Durkheim's approach to the current social issue confronted today by Filipinos, poverty. Why? Literally because poverty wasn't something that he expounded on among social issues present today, unlike views on gender, contest or probably deviance, Durkheim could treat his perspectives on such. Try to see, was Durkheim in a position to write mere functionalist views in the Philippines itself? Was he in a position to exhibit his ideas on how a functionalist perspective on poverty should be in vicinities such as Manila, Quezon City, Cebu as well as others? No, because Durkheim writes his view all together, and not by certain country represents. Well I guess choosing the topic itself was a complete risk, but attempting to deal with this issue helps us explore on new perspectives, new views and probably to explore beyond what we know at the moment; what this issue really attempts to impose is for all of us to check out what Durkheim do with functionalism, or merely the functionalist point of view - the particular certain point of view connotes and includes - and try to explore beyond from that point of view, what Durkheim, as a noticeably excellent functionalist sociologist, would consider regarding poverty in the Philippines.
Functionalists see everything in society as creating a function or probably a purpose. Just like parts of the body, hands function to touch or carry things, ft function to walk or run around, or ears function to hear everyday tones. Poverty is no exemption, if it is an element of the world, it must have a probable function, however the question is, the facts? Poverty, corresponding to Functionalists encompasses two main functions.
Motivates us to work harder than what we are probably doing sooner or later, let us say procrastination. If people would like to earn and achieve success, people should then know to manage everything and are hard as they probably could. Working with sweat is way better than dealing with poverty, [ sabi nga ng mga Pilipino "kapag may tiyaga, may nilaga diba?"], and believe it or not; poverty remains a continuous reminder to everyone, why? Who recognizes, maybe poverty is just right in front of you without knowing.
Another function that poverty creates is the process of offering a factor of enjoyment, delight and probably that feeling we've always sought. [Some people lose, while some individuals gain. ] As personnel, or for me personally as college or university students who aspire great opportunities; we all need to be able to assess how well we have been doing, how well we are getting, and also getting the affordable sense that "all of this hard work is worth it".
Putting yourself in some serious mentality, harmonious thinking would help you understand the whole point of view of poverty itself. It'll probably need some critical thinking or furthermore deep research - but it's all well the worth. Basically, the question it desires us to understand is: How does poverty happen and what goal does poverty serve from a functionalist perspective?
In my own view, just how I realized things - from a functionalist point of view, poverty allows for the establishment of job professions or just careers itself - there Filipinos who focus on providing services to people who are in poverty - like Filipinos working at the Departments and Governments, or Philippine NGO's focusing on dispossessed and poverty-living individuals. From the idea itself, we're able to see that minus the existence of poverty itself and poverty-living individuals, those who focus and provide them would probably live with opportunities or only live under the world of unemployment.
Poverty as well, through diagnosis, drives one's self-esteem. When those who are in middle income(kumikita), lower-middle class(sapat), and top class(mayayaman) are being down and out, they can scrutinize people surviving in poverty - people trying around corners, trying to make ends convene when the ends come nowhere near to one another - and can feel better about themselves. In helping the indegent Filipinos to avoid anguish and despair, poverty attempts to end up like sort of medication for the culture - ensuring social functions of these who are advanced on the economic stratification scale.
Another thing is, as I've mentioned previously, poverty does motivate Filipinos to work harder than ever. When certain people stumble on the fact that they are already troubled either economically/economically, they experience levels of poverty and discover such sense of sorrow, or in other words they don't assess to take pleasure from such status; they see others existing in slums and filth, going swimming through the floods the Filipinos have confronted in a variety of locations who aspire for 'better', therefore, people who "has" then works harder, examine harder - increasing the production to ensure that they stay out of poverty.
Poverty is markedly all-encompassing, and is an extremely complex issue in the Philippines. Look around you, look around the Philippines; beggars among streets, among stairs, among roads, among garbages, among filths and so on, well this is how we determine poverty. Finding from a functionalist point of view in the Philippines, we can say that equilibrium could not happen in the country itself. Why? Key points to consider, functionalist point of view depends on the existence of purposes, only a function; for the Philippines to function we must have different personas in the world; rich people would be abundant while poor people would be poor, definitely the easiest way to explain such. In other words, we need to have poverty, we need to have poor Filipinos for us to have wealthy ones. If we've no poverty, there can be no rich people. Makes sense? No poor people, no wealthy people. Then how do we establish, or just how do we sort out people according to their means of living, gaining and probably producing. To cover it up, poverty must always be an essential area of the segmented division we live living in as a whole, the Philippines.
Social issues will always be complicated, moreover many-sided in ways. But pertaining to this, the response to poverty will always be an intricate, complex to recognize - but in my overview, viewing such perspectives learned, complicated it may appear - but it is, most surely, one well-worth tackling, one well-worth learning and one well-worth addressing.
(Theory of Population, 2005).
Retrieved from http://gse. buffalo. edu/fas/bromley/classes/foundations/readings/theories. htm
Retrieved from http://cssr. berkeley. edu/bassc/public/CompletePovertyReport082306. pdf
Also We Can Offer!
- Argumentative essay
- Best college essays
- Buy custom essays online
- Buy essay online
- Cheap essay
- Cheap essay writing service
- Cheap writing service
- College essay
- College essay introduction
- College essay writing service
- Compare and contrast essay
- Custom essay
- Custom essay writing service
- Custom essays writing services
- Death penalty essay
- Do my essay
- Essay about love
- Essay about yourself
- Essay help
- Essay writing help
- Essay writing service reviews
- Essays online
- Fast food essay
- George orwell essays
- Human rights essay
- Narrative essay
- Pay to write essay
- Personal essay for college
- Personal narrative essay
- Persuasive writing
- Write my essay
- Write my essay for me cheap
- Writing a scholarship essay