Concepts of Symbolic Interactionism

Aspects of the modern culture of Britain, including the Education and Religion may be explained by using the sociological perspectives, functionalism and symbolic interactionism. These perspectives offer contrasting insights into the inner-workings of modern culture and are useful in wanting to understand these areas of sociable life, utilizing both macrosociology; the analysis of widespread communal techniques and microsociology; the analysis of society at a social level.

Symbolic Interactionism is a interpersonal emotional theory devised from the work of Charles Horton Cooley and George Herbert Mead that studies how individuals action within contemporary society (Symbolic Interactionism, no time). The idea of the theory is that individuals act towards different situations established upon this is that the situation holds to them, from physical things such as trees to institutions including the government, known as symbols. As Symbolic Interactionism is a microsociological theory, the perspective focuses on how the meaning of these symbols to a individual is derived from the interpersonal, sociable interaction in population. Then through an interpretative process after experience, the meanings a person holds towards icons will change (Blumer, 1986). There are several examples where individuals find communal so this means through symbolic connections, one being that without symbolic connections many people would not smoke; however so this means is designed through the multimedia or peer categories and folks rationalise that albeit the consequences smoking keep, smoking is advisable.

Another social mental health idea of Symbolic Interactionism is Charles Horton Cooley's looking-glass do it yourself (1902), which explores how personal information is developed. Charles' concept areas an individual's identity develops out of interpersonal interactions, and the conception of others. This leads individuals in culture to form themselves around other's perspectives and ideas of themselves. The looking-glass do it yourself has three main components; first of all imagining how exactly we may actually others, second imagining the judgement from others of that appearance and thirdly growing our personal information through these judgements (Rousseau, 2002).

Functionalism on the other hands is a macrosociological theory which originated from the works of emile Durkheim, Functionalism is also known as a "consensus perspective" theory as the point of view does not deal with the issue of social discord but rather at looks at the ideal in society. Durkheim's view on the functionalist point of view talks about the macro-level of cultural structure, the communal institutions, as to clarify how these donate to the stability of modern culture; the core companies being: family, federal government, economy, media, education and religious beliefs. To a functionalist these social institutions are designed to fill the needs of contemporary society, thus shaping contemporary society, creating steadiness (Crossman, 2016). The functionalist point of view argues that establishments only are present to serve a job in how contemporary society functions, if the role is no longer needed the institution wouldn't normally be needed either in case new needs come up in society, organizations will be created to address these jobs.

As handled upon, Symbolic Interactionism is a micro-sociological theory looking at the interpersonal level of population and Functionalism is a macro-sociological theory which talks about modern culture on the structural level. The difference between your perspectives is vast due to this difference. Using religion as an example emile Durkheim argued that religion encouraged people of society to follow the public norms which Functionalist theorists perceive as bringing about stability through establishment (Emile Durkheim - the sociology of religious beliefs, no day). However as Symbolic Interactionism focuses on the micro level of society, instead of looking at religion as a institution and how it causes visitors to adhere to interpersonal norms, Interactionism talks about the symbolic interpretation behind religion. A symbolic interactionist would observe the meanings people attach to such things as religious symbols, just like a combination or a mosque, to observe how they affect individual behaviour in culture (Symbolic Interactionism, no night out). However there are similarities between these perspectives, despite the differences as to what level of modern culture the perspectives focus on, both theories are similar in that they group individuals along, be it through social class for functionalism and through icons for interactionism.

Education in Britain has altered drastically since the 20th century. The Education Act was launched in 1944 which guaranteed education for free, for each child in England and Wales. This action also divided the colleges into what's the norm today, principal education and extra education. Through the entire 20th Century, education in britain was a complete contrast to education in modern-day society, corporal consequence was trusted; whereas today the education system has different methods of punishment and students have rights which prevent corporal abuse such as caning. Education in modern-day britain has advanced to be including gender and those with special educational needs as through the 20th century women and special needs were discriminated against and thought to be unintelligent. Education in modern day britain has also integrated the utilization of technology, with the vast majority of students having access to smartphones and so on within college (Reporters, 2014)l. Education is at the forefront of present day culture with 33% of students gaining a qualification in 2000 in contrast to 3. 4% of students in 1950. (Bolton, no night out)

Both perspectives attempt to explain this aspect of public life in modern day britain in contrasting ways, the Functionalist perspective focuses on the the functions performed by the education system. A functionalist may claim that Education creates Public Solidarity. Public Solidarity is when individuals feel as though they are built-into something bigger than themselves. Durkheim's belief when it comes to education was that the system is built after the common beliefs of people in world, Durkheim believed the system to be always a product of collective thought alternatively than specific thought, therefore making the training system a manifestation of the collective conscious which adapts over time as society's ideals change, uniting modern culture with shared prices, which is known as value consensus (Hoenisch, 1996). Talcott Parsons (1961), an american functionalist which widened upon Durkheim's writings in the 1950's and 1960's, indicated his view on the education system can be related to contemporary britain as being useful to give a trained labour force as, this pays to to modern day britain scheduled to it being truly a advanced industrial current economic climate, which requires a complex section of labour in order to sustain (Make meals, 2008). Talcott Parsons (1961) also argued that the education system is the bridge between family and society all together for students, finding your way through their role in later life after their original primary socialisation; which is where individuals learn and develop throughout their young years (Agnihotri, 2008). Parsons (1961) thought that in the family, as the parents understand the initial abilities of their child, the parents will assess the kid to a particular set of expectations they attended to expect, this is known as particularistic specifications. However due to the education system, children learn that beyond the family individuals are judged by universalistic benchmarks, which is where rules and laws apply to all people, whatever the character of the individual, education educates this. From a functionalist point of view, education in modern-day britain is used to assign functions to the people in society by using examinations and qualifications. Education also presents meritocracy, which is a equality of opportunity; every university student has an opportunity to be successful (Thompson, 2015).

An interactionist's perspective however will focus on studies on interpersonal interaction within the institution, such as with the classroom, in the lunch break hall and on the playground. Studies also show that instructors' belief of students make a difference the training environment, A study carried out by Robert Rosenthal (1968) and Lenore Jacobson (1968) targets several students within a school year, in the beginning of the school year the educators' where told which students' where wise and which where unintelligent. The study showed by the end of the entire year that the students which the teachers' had been up to date where "intelligent" performed better throughout the year than the students deemed "unintelligent", although students where labelled to the instructors' randomly. A Interactionist will look at how because of the professors' having that knowledge inadvertently triggered them to praise the "intelligent" students' more regularly, and spend additional time with them. Interactionist's will also look at how Social Connections contributes to gender-role socialization, studies also show that teachers praise males more often (Jones & Dindia, 2004)

Functionalism pays to in understanding how the education system is more work concentrated in contemporary world with increasing vocational classes. The perspective we can see how roles are allocated in culture and how the education system brings around a value consensus in world. It is also useful in understanding how society demonstrates to children the actual universalistic requirements are. However Functionalism tends to look at the macro elements of the education system somewhat than at the social level where functionalism can be criticized due to overlooking negatives such as bullying. It can be criticised because of the fact the Marxist perspective argues education is not meritocratic due to the fact private classes only profit the wealthy. Symbolic Interactionism on the other side pays to in understanding the interpersonal relationships between functions like the teacher and the pupil, allowing researchers to comprehend how individuals behavior form culture through observations and gathering qualitative data, focusing on how population come to learn gender roles and the way the labelling theory works as shown in the study aforementioned; students being given more praise makes the university student believe they can be intelligent and for that reason tries to fit that label, which is known in sociology as the self-fulfilling prophecy. According to Manis and Meltzer (1978) Symbolic Interactionism also helps it be difficult to understand on a broad level the training system in modern day society anticipated to being limited by only micro-social set ups and that the perspective neglects mental conduct, focusing only on rational behaviour.

Bolton, P. (no date) Commons Briefing papers SN04252. House of Commons.

Also We Can Offer!

Other services that we offer

If you don’t see the necessary subject, paper type, or topic in our list of available services and examples, don’t worry! We have a number of other academic disciplines to suit the needs of anyone who visits this website looking for help.

How to ...

We made your life easier with putting together a big number of articles and guidelines on how to plan and write different types of assignments (Essay, Research Paper, Dissertation etc)