Gentrification And THE CONSEQUENCES On Urban Development Sociology Essay

Today, the metropolitan development is susceptible to the growing impact of gentrification. At this time, it will probably be worth mentioning the actual fact that the procedure of gentrification emerges under the impact of multiple factors, including monetary and cultural ones and the procedure of globalization, which activate regular changes in metropolitan development. At the same time, the procedure of urban development causes socioeconomic and demographic changes, provoked by the gentrification. However, possible ramifications of gentrification remain under-researched and the issue on whether gentrification brings about positive or negative effects persists. Nevertheless, changes in the development of locations are significant and make policy creators either to support or to slow down the procedure of gentrification. However, any try out of policy designers to regulate the procedure of gentrification and, therefore, metropolitan development confronts the challenge of the disturbance of state along the way of local financial development. In such a situation, policy makers should understand plainly whether gentrification has positive or unwanted effects and whether benefits of gentrification outweigh its down sides. Actually, the support of gentrification is essential only on the condition of the positive effect on the urban development but, in actuality, the risk of widening spaces between different communal classes, namely between your rich and the poor, may broaden that may lead to the exclusion of the indegent and their marginalization. Therefore, the procedure of gentrification needs to be studied in details but plan makers should take into consideration the fact that gentrification has a considerable impact on the social, economical and demographic development of modern urban areas.

THE Substance OF GENTRIFICATION

Definition of gentrification

Gentrification is a comparatively new craze, although specialists (De Courcy Hinds, 1987) send the foundation of gentrification to the middle-20th century and the post-World Battle II period, when extensive changes in areas inhabited by associates of lower- and working course had started out. In this respect, it is possible to refer to the experience of Brooklyn, NY

On November 22, 1966, a small group of city construction staff arrived at the part of Express and Nevins Avenue in Brooklyn with purchases to raze an left behind brownstone. Having recently gained possession of the dilapidated four-story building through non-payment of taxes, the city acquired become worried that the clear townhouse was a gathering place for homeless men and medication users and decided to demolish it (Osman, 2011, 1).

However, it is merely by the later 20th century, the tendency to gentrification acquired become strong and today this is one of the most significant tendencies in the urban development.

At this aspect, specialists (McKenzie, 2006) define gentrification as the procedure of switch of the center class population in low income and working class communities. As a rule, the native society of low-income and working school communities is steadily replaced by staff of the upper-class and pros, who settle in the region, whereas the show of the indigenous population decreases substantially. The wealthier society moves to low-income and working class communities, settles their and starts developing local neighborhoods. In that situation, the local population of the communities must move to other areas and negotiate there.

Nevertheless, the process of gentrification is still under-researched and needs further studies because this technique is quite complicated and relatively new. That is why researchers try to explore the process of gentrification in the context of metropolitan development (Sassen, 1995). In such a way, it is possible to understand its results on metropolitan development. However, before studying ramifications of gentrification on metropolitan development, it is necessary to dwell after basic causes of gentrification. Factors behind gentrification can help to understand the fact of this process and its own results in a long-run point of view.

Economic factors behind gentrification

On analyzing factors behind gentrification, specialists (Brandes Gratz, 1989) point out economic concerns among the significant reasons of gentrification. To place it more exactly, the economic development of large metropolitan areas contributes to the fast improvement and development of the population along with the expansion of needs and requirements of the populace concerning residential areas, conveniences and environment. In that situation, younger generation of specialists and staff of the center category often prefers to go to low-income and working category areas, where they are able purchasing a long term lodging at a comparatively good deal and, thus, start living separately from other parents, buying their own lodging. The option of lodging and its own relatively good deal attracts staff of the middle class, who look for freedom and affordable lodging.

In addition, many specialists are driven to low-income and working category areas by their professional concerns. For instance, if experts work in the city, they feel more comfortable, when they live close to their work that allows them to save lots of travel time as well as money. In that situation, economical concerns become prior to representatives of the middle class and specialists, mainly teenagers, who move to low-income and working category neighborhoods from traditional areas of their living.

Social factors behind gentrification

In actuality, communal factors also play an important part in the emergence of gentrification in modern metropolitan areas that affects regularly their development. In this regard, specialists (Ley, 1995) dispute that artists, teachers and ethnical administrators are in the avant-garde of gentrification because they seek for new place of property, where they can negotiate being free of the reliance on automotive transportation and other issues rising in the suburban areas, where representatives of the center class normally live. In fact, young graduates, teachers, performers and other staff of the middle class prefer to settle closer to the town center to get access to basic conveniences, services and important city areas, including private hospitals, trade centers and other areas. In such a way, they try to maintain the lifestyle they have got used to while learning and get wider usage of basic services they want at the moment. Furthermore, gentrification raises their independence from parents and automotive transport. In such a way, representatives of the center class proceed to low-income and working category communities.

Economic globalization

At the same time, some specialists (Ley, 1986) explain that the process of gentrification is directly intertwined and is also provoked by the process of globalization. In this respect, it will probably be worth mentioning the fact that the procedure of globalization contributes to the free and fast activity of capital combined with the migration of the populace. The migration of the population and movement of capital being enhanced by the free movement of capital stimulates gentrification. Associates of the middle class purchase properties in low-income and working school communities plus they can repair and improve to complement their expectations of living. In this respect, immigrants with a relatively advanced of income can also proceed to low-income and working category community, where they can purchase houses at a comparatively good deal and repair them respectively to their standards.

At the same time, globalization plays a part in the introduction of banking and service activities which replace the original manufacturing main of the metropolitan economy. In that situation, professional working in the bank industry and specialists working in different market sectors providing services prefer to move to low-income and working school neighborhoods, where they can settle near to their work area, whereas many experts today work just at home that permit them to save time and money on transportation. At the same time, low-income and working school communities entice them due to the relatively good deal and location near the city middle and respected conveniences and services being available to representatives of the middle class living in these neighborhoods.

THE RAMIFICATIONS OF GENTRIFICATION ON URBAN DEVELOPMENT

Economic effects of gentrification

In actuality, the procedure of gentrification leads to consistent changes in metropolitan development and affects consistently the economical development of communities susceptible to the impact of gentrification. In this respect, many specialists alert that the obvious problem being that the low income part of the social collapse has been disregarded"literally and figuratively (Whats Up with Gentrification, 2007, 5). What is meant here is the simple fact that gentrification leads to the replacement of poor, working class population by reps of the center class. In such a situation, low-income individuals and staff of the working school have to move from their communities to other ones, where in fact the benchmarks of living are even less than that of their own areas inhabited by reps of the middle class. Reps of the center course, in their change, inhabit low-income and working category communities start constant changes in local neighborhoods, where they settle. These changes lead to constant raise in standards of living because they repair their properties and stimulate the introduction of commerce and different services, which are essential for the maintenance of these high criteria of living. So, representatives of the middle class invest considerable funds in the development of local communities to match them to their traditional specifications of living, that happen to be naturally consistently greater than expectations of living for low-income families and representatives of the working school.

At the same time, the rise of expectations of living, significant assets, the development of the neighborhood infrastructure, services and facilities increases substantially the price of real estate locally as well as costs of living in the community. In that situation, associates of the center category settling in low-income and working course community bring sizeable purchases but these investment funds lead to the increase of costs of living in communities making the life unaffordable for low-income and working course population.

As an outcome, the financial development of neighborhoods susceptible to the impact of gentrification changes consistently. Specialists (McKenzie, 2006) dispute that representatives of the center class moving to low-income and working category communities boost their monetary development that causes the upsurge in cover prices and overall climb of costs of living. Because of this, low-income and working school communities transform from poverty stricken areas into successful and swiftly progressing communities, where business activities emerge successfully.

At first glimpse, economic ramifications of gentrification are positive. However, specialists (Sassen, 1995) alert that such positive effects of gentrification can have extremely dangerous side-effects, especially in relation to low-income and working school. To place it more exactly, the low-income and working category population has to move from the areas, where people used to live a life before the entrance of reps of the middle class. Often they have to move away from the areas located close to the city middle and they should look for cheap lodging. However, as the procedure of gentrification emerges, they have got substantial issues with finding cheap lodging, while they cannot afford making their own houses, that used to be the prerogative of staff of the center class. Representatives of the low-income and working course cannot afford purchasing their own homes as well. In that situation, they may be doomed to reside in outskirts of large towns or other areas, where conditions of living deteriorate and become unbearable for the population. In contrast, representatives of the middle school improve conditions of living, encourage the introduction of business activities. As a result, the indegent are required to are in communities experiencing monetary stagnation, whereas the abundant and middle income prosper. The monetary disparity between classes deteriorates the financial development of low-income and working school. The disparity in economical development of various areas of cities leads to the backwardness of the parts inhabited by low-income and working class, whereas elements of metropolitan areas inhabiting by middle income prosper.

The economic wealth activated by gentrification enhances the neighborhood infrastructure and starts new ways for the development of business activities. As a result, the riches of the center and upper-class boosts and is accumulated in the hands of staff of the middle and upper-class. On the other hand, the indegent grow poorer and cannot manage living within the location that contributes to their marginalization.

Social ramifications of gentrification

At the same time, consistent economical changes have an effect on the development of the social life of neighborhoods vulnerable to the impact of gentrification. At this time, it is worth mentioning the actual fact that the deterioration of the economic situation in urban areas and the deterioration of the positioning of low-income and working category. Representatives of the center course are also susceptible to the impact of gentrification. However, the impact of gentrification is different with regards to low-income and working category and with regards to the middle category. Economic changes affect consistently the position of both classes that by natural means contributes to regular cultural changes.

In fact, the indegent are susceptible to the negative impact of gentrification. To begin with, they have to move off their traditional residential areas to new ones, where they have got to start a new life and where conditions of living are worse compared to the areas they used to reside in. Representatives of the low-income and working course have to reside in new communities and begin a fresh life, which normally evokes lots of public problems, among which it's important to develop basic infrastructure and positive human relationships within the community.

Furthermore, as the poor have to go to a new residential area, they often have to improve their work environment because they can not always find the money for covering transport costs or the program of these work makes their work impossible. Because they change the work environment, they could face the situation of unemployment, especially because they need to move to areas with the poor business development and with stagnating economy.

In such a situation, staff of the low-income and working category can face another problem " the challenge of high criminal offense rates in areas, where they negotiate after they have to move from their areas under the impact of gentrification. In fact, being in a eager position and having no means for living, the indegent are compelled to commit offences to earn for living also to afford moving into a fresh community, where they proceed to from neighborhoods now inhabited by associates of the center class mainly. Reps of the low-income and working category slip to criminal activities that obviously increase the sociable anxiety in poverty-stricken neighborhoods, their current address.

Another public problem staff of the low course face is having less access to education. In fact, because they are taken off traditional domestic areas, where they used to have, the poor have to develop their life in new neighborhoods and areas, which are often underdeveloped. They can not afford expanding education organizations and education system in their new community independently. Their state and local authorities are not always suitable and willing to support the populace of local areas. As a result, new communities inhabiting by the poor either have insufficient capacities to provide access to education for students in these areas, or haven't any education organizations in any way. Obviously, having less usage of education will raise the social anxiety even more because without education individuals cannot get well-paid careers and good profession opportunities. Furthermore, children living in low-income neighborhoods with the advanced of offense rates are vulnerable to the impact of their unlawful environment. Therefore, the positioning of the indegent will deteriorate, whereas communal problems increase over and over again.

In addition, it is worth mentioning the actual fact that healthcare services are not available to the indegent, who have to go to new residential areas after associates of the top class have substituted them in their traditional personal areas. In fact, healthcare services aren't available as education services. Today, healthcare services are extremely expensive and the indegent cannot afford the development of healthcare organizations in their areas, whereas their state lacks funds for the provision of healthcare services to all or any people. In that situation, the poor are deprived of basic opportunities to have access to basic healthcare services.

In comparison to the indegent, representatives of the middle class can benefit from gentrification economically nevertheless they can hardly benefit from gentrification in sociable terms. What's meant here is the fact that representatives of the middle class exclude representatives of the low course from the mainstream culture and benefits from the fast economic development of their neighborhoods. Actually, in social conditions, gentrification contributes to the growing anxiety between staff of different cultural classes. To put it in simple words, staff of the middle class enhance their conditions of living, whereas the indegent become poorer and have problems with a bunch of socio-economic problems. In addition, the gap between the rich and the indegent grows wider and specialists (Sassen, 1995) forecast serious conflicts between the two classes under the impact of gentrification because the condition will aggravate and the gap between your two classes will widen.

Demographic effects of gentrification

Along with numerous financial and social effects of gentrification, specialists (McKenzie, 2006) identify demographic results. In this respect, it is important to place emphasis on the actual fact that the process of gentrification plays a part in consistent demographic changes. In fact, representatives of the middle class purchasing properties in the low-income and working school communities tend to have a few children. At this time, it is worth mentioning the fact that representatives of the middle class, who proceed to low-income and working course communities, are young people mainly. As a rule, they aren't having children, when they proceed to low-income and working school communities. They need substantial money to start a new life in low-income and working class communities. In that situation, reps of the center class prefer to purchase the repair of the new properties and the development of low-income and working class communities to change them into prosperous communities. In such a situation, the go up of taxes and costs of living diminishes the capacities of staff of the middle class moving into low-income and working category communities of having children. In a very long-run point of view, gentrification contributes to the ageing of the populace living in areas, where associates of the middle class have relocated to. A similar craze can be traced in low-income and working class communities because they cannot afford retaining large families. In such a situation, the risk of the demographic turmoil emerges because both representatives of the middle and lower classes have a few children. Specialists (Brandes Gratz, 1989) claim that, in a long-run perspective, the demographic problems provoked by gentrification can lead to the aging of the population. The latter may provoke the deterioration of the economic situation and provoke interpersonal problems.

ADVANTAGES AND Negatives OF GENTRIFICATION

Advantages of gentrification

Obviously, gentrification has a number of advantages. To begin with, gentrification stimulates the fast economical development of low-income and working category communities because representatives of the middle class invest considerable financial resources in the development of the areas. The investment and the development of local infrastructure increase cover prices in local areas. In that situation, the property fees increase as the wealth of the city rises. Therefore, the economical development of neighborhoods under the impact of gentrification is accelerated. The introduction of communities stimulates the development of cities at large because cities take advantage of the increased revenues obtained from taxation and accelerated economical development of would be low-income and working class communities. Associates of the center class obtain large opportunities for the further improvement with their expectations of living. Because of this, they reap the benefits of gentrification.

Disadvantages of gentrification

On the other hand, gentrification brings a number of problems and has substantial disadvantages. To begin with, Gentrification deteriorates the position of the poor, who have to move from low-income and working category communities, which are inhabited by representatives of the center class. Their economical position becomes even worse as they have to proceed to new communities. In fact, the poverty breeds poverty being expelled from low-income and working school communities by staff of the middle class.

In addition, associates of the lower class have to go to new neighborhoods, where a bunch of socioeconomic problems emerge. Among the major problems of socioeconomic problems, it will probably be worth mentioning unemployment, the lack of access of the poor to education and basic healthcare services, and other problems.

However, furthermore important about gentrification is widening the space between the wealthy and the indegent. In fact, the indegent become poorer, whereas associates of the middle class enhance their position. In such a situation, gentrification can undermine the building blocks of modern locations because it boosts unsurpassable barriers between the rich and the indegent moving into the cities but this antagonism can provoke serious cultural conflicts, including growing offense rates, which might have an effect on not only poverty stricken communities but also other areas, including areas inhabited by staff of the middle class and neighborhoods emerged in conditions of gentrification.

CONCLUSION

Thus, considering all above mentioned, it is important to place focus on the fact that gentrification is a significant controversial process. In actuality, it is clear that gentrification affects consistently the metropolitan development. However, ramifications of gentrification can be highly controversial. On the one palm, gentrification stimulates the monetary development of communities, where reps of the center class move to. However, economic benefits may be short-run, whereas, in a long-run point of view, gentrification can result in the widening difference between the wealthy and the poor in locations. The latter problem will lead to the deterioration of the public stability within places. Nevertheless, the entire impact of gentrification on urban development should be researched further.

Also We Can Offer!

Other services that we offer

If you don’t see the necessary subject, paper type, or topic in our list of available services and examples, don’t worry! We have a number of other academic disciplines to suit the needs of anyone who visits this website looking for help.

How to ...

We made your life easier with putting together a big number of articles and guidelines on how to plan and write different types of assignments (Essay, Research Paper, Dissertation etc)